Correlation of reduced temporal muscle thickness and systemic muscle loss in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients.

PURPOSE: Reduced temporal muscle thickness (TMT) has recently been postulated as a prognostic imaging marker and an objective tool to assess patients frailty in glioblastoma. Our aim is to investigate the correlation of TMT and systemic muscle loss to confirm that TMT is an adequate surrogate marker of sarcopenia in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. METHODS: TMT was assessed on preoperative MR-images and skeletal muscle area (SMA) was assessed at the third lumbar vertebra on preoperative abdominal CT-scans. Previous published TMT sex-specific cut-off values were used to classify patients as 'patient at risk of sarcopenia' or 'patient with normal muscle status'. Correlation between TMT and SMA was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Sixteen percent of the 245 included patients were identified as at risk of sarcopenia. The mean SMA of glioblastoma patients at risk of sarcopenia (124.3 cm2, SD 30.8 cm2) was significantly lower than the mean SMA of patients with normal muscle status (146.3 cm2, SD 31.1 cm2, P < .001). We found a moderate association between TMT and SMA in the patients with normal muscle status (Spearman's rho 0.521, P < .001), and a strong association in the patients at risk of sarcopenia (Spearman's rho 0.678, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the use of TMT as a surrogate marker of total body skeletal muscle mass in glioblastoma, especially in frail patients at risk of sarcopenia. TMT can be used to identify patients with muscle loss early in the disease process, which enables the implementation of adequate intervention strategies.

Temporal muscle thickness as an independent prognostic imaging marker in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients: A validation study.

Background: Previous studies have recognized temporal muscle thickness (TMT) as a prognostic marker in glioblastoma, but clinical implementation is hampered due to studies' heterogeneity and lack of established cutoff values. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of recent proposed sex-specific TMT cutoff values in a real-world population of genotyped primary glioblastoma patients. Methods: We measured TMT in preoperative MR images of 328 patients. Sex-specific TMT cutoff values were used to divide patients into "at risk of sarcopenia" or "normal muscle status". Kaplan-Meier analyses and stepwise multivariate Cox-Regression analyses were used to assess the association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The association with occurrence of complications and discontinuation of glioblastoma treatment was investigated using odds ratios (OR). Results: Patients at risk of sarcopenia had a significantly higher risk of progression and death than patients with normal muscle status, which remained significant in the multivariate analyses (OS HR = 1.437; 95%CI: 1.046-1.973; P = .025 and PFS HR = 1.453; 95%CI: 1.037-2.036; P = .030). Patients at risk of sarcopenia also had a significantly higher risk of early discontinuation of treatment (OR = 2.45; 95%CI: 1.011-5.952; P = .042) and a significantly lower chance of receiving second-line treatment (OR = 0.23; 95%CI: 0.09-0.60; P = .001). There was no association with the occurrence of complications. Conclusions: Our study confirms external validity of the use of proposed sex-specific TMT cutoff values as an independent prognostic marker in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. This simple, noninvasive marker could improve patient counseling and aid in treatment decision processes or trial stratification.