Protective ileostomy creation after anterior resection of the rectum: Shared decision-making or still subjective?

AIM: The choice of whether to perform protective ileostomy (PI) after anterior resection (AR) is mainly guided by risk factors (RFs) responsible for the development of anastomotic leakage (AL). However, clear guidelines about PI creation are still lacking in the literature and this is often decided according to the surgeon's preferences, experiences or feelings. This qualitative study aims to investigate, by an open-ended question survey, the individual surgeon's decision-making process regarding PI creation after elective AR. METHOD: Fifty four colorectal surgeons took part in an electronic survey to answer the questions and describe what usually led their decision to perform PI. A content analysis was used to code the answers. To classify answers, five dichotomous categories (In favour/Against PI, Listed/Unlisted RFs, Typical/Atypical, Emotions/Non-emotions, Personal experience/No personal experience) have been developed. RESULTS: Overall, 76% of surgeons were in favour of PI creation and 88% considered listed RFs in the question of whether to perform PI. Atypical answers were reported in 10% of cases. Emotions and personal experience influenced surgeons' decision-making process in 22% and 49% of cases, respectively. The most frequently considered RFs were the distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge (96%), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (88%), a positive intraoperative leak test (65%), blood loss (37%) and immunosuppression therapy (35%). CONCLUSION: The indications to perform PI following rectal cancer surgery lack standardization and evidence-based guidelines are required to inform practice. Until then, expert opinion can be helpful to assist the decision-making process in patients who have undergone AR for adenocarcinoma.

Prognostic significance of lymph node count in high-risk node-negative colon carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: the prognostic value of the number of lymph nodes isolated (< 12 versus ≥ 12) in the surgical specimen continues to be controversial. In this study, the impact of isolating fewer or more than 12 lymph nodes in stage II colon cancer with a high-risk biologic phenotype was analyzed, such as the presence of perineural invasion. METHODS: all cases of stage II disease (T3-4N0M0) with perineural invasion (PNI+) were retrospectively identified from a prospective database of patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer. The cohort was divided into two groups depending on the number of lymph nodes isolated (< 12 vs ≥ 12). Apart from clinical and surgical data, the patterns of recurrence, overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at five and ten years were analyzed. RESULTS: sixty patients met the inclusion criteria, 31.7 % had < 12 lymph nodes isolated and 68.3 % had more than 12 isolated. There were no clinical or surgical differences between the two groups. OS at five and ten years was significantly lower in the patients with < 12 lymph nodes isolated (84.2 %, 62.7 % vs 94.6 % and 91.6 %, p = 0.01). DFS at five and ten years was 51 % vs 86.5 %, respectively (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: the number of lymph nodes isolated (with a cutoff of 12) in stage II colon cancer with PNI+ has prognostic value and should therefore be borne in mind when planning adjuvant chemotherapy.

Prognostic significance of lymph node count in high-risk node-negative colon carcinoma

BACKGROUND: the prognostic value of the number of lymph nodes isolated (< 12 versus ≥ 12) in the surgical specimen continues to be controversial. In this study, the impact of isolating fewer or more than 12 lymph nodes in stage II colon cancer with a high-risk biologic phenotype was analyzed, such as the presence of perineural invasion. METHODS: all cases of stage II disease (T3-4N0M0) with perineural invasion (PNI+) were retrospectively identified from a prospective database of patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer. The cohort was divided into two groups depending on the number of lymph nodes isolated (< 12 vs ≥ 12). Apart from clinical and surgical data, the patterns of recurrence, overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at five and ten years were analyzed. RESULTS: sixty patients met the inclusion criteria, 31.7 % had < 12 lymph nodes isolated and 68.3 % had more than 12 isolated. There were no clinical or surgical differences between the two groups. OS at five and ten years was significantly lower in the patients with < 12 lymph nodes isolated (84.2 %, 62.7 % vs 94.6 % and 91.6 %, p = 0.01). DFS at five and ten years was 51 % vs 86.5 %, respectively (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: the number of lymph nodes isolated (with a cutoff of 12) in stage II colon cancer with PNI+ has prognostic value and should therefore be borne in mind when planning adjuvant chemotherapy

No disponible

Infarto hemorrágico suprarrenal bilateral como causa infrecuente de dolor abdominal agudo durante el postoperatorio inmediato de la cirugía de colon / Bilateral adrenal hemorrhagic infarction as a rare cause of acute abdominal pain in the immediate postoperative period of colonic surgery

No disponible

[Central pancreatectomy in benign tumors of the neck of the pancreas]. / Pancreatectomía central en tumores benignos del cuello del páncreas.

The surgical treatment of benign tumors of the neck of the pancreas usually consists of enucleation or formal pancreatectomy. Central pancreatectomy has been put forward because it has fewer major complications and can preserve endocrine and exocrine function. Between January 1999 and march 2003, three patients with benign tumors of the neck of the pancreas underwent central pancreatectomy. all patients underwent computed tomography scans, intraoperative ultrasound and frozen-section analysis. pathologic examination showed two mucinous cystadenomas and one serous cystadenoma. after a mean follow-up of 34 months, none of the patients has shown major complications or local recurrence, or has developed diabetes. In conclusion, central pancreatectomy is a useful technique for selected benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors of the neck of the pancreas.

Estudio de casos y controles entre anastomosis intra y extracorpórea en pacientes intervenidos de hemicolectomía derecha laparoscópica / A case-control study of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in patients subjected to right laparoscopic hemicolectomy

IntroducciónEn la actualidad no existe suficiente evidencia científica sobre cuál es la mejor técnica para realizar la anastomosis -intracorpórea (IC) o extracorpórea (EC)- en la hemicolectomía derecha laparoscópica. El objetivo del presente estudio es determinar si existen diferencias al comparar ambas técnicas.Material y métodosSe realiza un estudio sobre una serie prospectiva de pacientes intervenidos en nuestro Centro mediante hemicolectomía derecha laparoscópica. Se comparan las variables preoperatorias, intraoperatorias y relacionadas con complicaciones recogidas en función del tipo de anastomosis.ResultadosDesde junio de 2004 hasta junio de 2010 se intervinieron 60 pacientes (35 IC; 25 EC). No existieron diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos en cuanto a características basales preoperatorias ni comorbilidades asociadas. La mediana de tiempo operatorio fue de 212 minutos (142-305min), sin diferencias significativas entre ambas técnicas. El número de ganglios extraídos resultó mayor en el grupo IC (21 versus 14; p=0,03). Tanto el inicio de la tolerancia oral como la primera deposición resultaron significativamente más precoces en el grupo IC. La tasa de complicaciones postoperatorias fue similar para ambos grupos (14% IC; 16% EC; p=0,89). Tres pacientes presentaron dehiscencia de anastomosis en las IC. La tasa de mortalidad fue del 2,8% (un paciente en cada grupo).ConclusiónLa anastomosis intracorpórea frente a la extracorpórea en la hemicolectomía derecha laparoscópica permite obtener un mayor número de ganglios resecados y un inicio más precoz de la tolerancia oral y del tránsito intestinal (AU)

IntroductionThere is still insufficient scientific evidence on which is the best technique to perform the anastomosis -intracorporeal (IC) or extracorporeal (EC)- in right laparoscopic hemicolectomy. The objective of the present study is to determine whether there are differences to compare in both techniques.Material and methodsA study was performed on a prospective patient series subjected to right laparoscopic hemicolectomy in our Hospital. The preoperative and the postoperative variables associated with complications recorded depending on the type of anastomosis.ResultsA total of 60 patients were intervened form June 2004 to June 2010 (35 IC; 25 EC). There were no significant differences between both groups as regards baseline preoperative characteristics or associated comorbidities. The median operation time was 212minutes (142-305min), with no significant difference between both techniques. The number of lymph nodes removed was higher in the IC group (21 versus 14; p=0.03). The beginning of oral tolerance and the first bowel movement were significantly earlier in the IC group. The complications rate was similar for both groups (14% IC; 16% EC; p=0.89). Three patients in the IC group had anastomosis dehiscence. The mortality rate was 2.8% (one patient in each group).ConclusionIntracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right laparoscopic hemicolectomy can obtain a higher number of resected lymph nodes and an earlier oral tolerance and intestinal transit (AU)

Pancreatectomía central en tumores benignos del cuello del páncreas / Central pancreatectomy in benign tumors of the neckof the pancreas

El tratamiento quirúrgico de los tumores benignos del cuello del páncreas ha sido clásicamente la enucleación o la pancreatectomía estándar. La pancreatectomía central se ha propuesto por su menor tasa de complicaciones y por la posibilidad de preservar la función endocrina y exocrina. Entre enero de 1999 y marzo de 2003 se realizaron en nuestro centro 3 pancreatectomías centrales por patología benigna en el cuello del páncreas. En todos los casos se realizó tomografía computarizada, ecografía intraoperatoria y estudio anatomopatológico. El examen de las piezas quirúrgicas mostró 2 cistoadenomas mucinosos y 1 cistoadenoma seroso. Ninguno de los pacientes presentó complicaciones quirúrgicas mayores, recurrencia local de la enfermedad o diabetes, con un seguimiento medio de 34 meses. Podemos decir, por tanto, que la pancreatectomía central es una técnica útil para un grupo seleccionado de pacientes con lesiones benignas en el cuello del páncreas o de bajo grado de malignidad (AU)

The surgical treatment of benign tumors of the neck of the pancreas usually consists of enucleation or formal pancreatectomy. Central pancreatectomy has been put forward because it has fewer major complications and can preserve endocrine and exocrine function. Between January 1999 and march 2003, three patients with benign tumors of the neck of the pancreas underwent central pancreatectomy. all patients underwent computed tomography scans, intraoperative ultrasound and frozen-section analysis. pathologic examination showed two mucinous cystadenomas and one serous cystadenoma. after a mean follow-up of 34 months, none of the patients has shown major complications or local recurrence, or has developed diabetes. In conclusion, central pancreatectomy is a useful technique for selected benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors of the neck of the pancreas (AU)