Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of cytoreductive surgery in the management of progressive glioblastoma in adults.

QUESTION: In patients with previously diagnosed glioblastoma who are suspected of experiencing progression, does repeat cytoreductive surgery improve progression free survival or overall survival compared to alternative interventions? TARGET POPULATION: These recommendations apply to adults with previously diagnosed glioblastoma who are suspected of experiencing progression of the neoplastic process and are amenable to surgical resection. RECOMMENDATION: Level II: Repeat cytoreductive surgery is recommended in progressive glioblastoma patients to improve overall survival.

Minimally Invasive Lateral Transorbital Approach for Clipping of Right Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

The lateral transorbital approach is a minimally invasive approach that was first described for accessing the cavernous sinus.1 Although other minimally invasive approaches have been broadly applied to aneurysm surgery,2 the use of transorbital keyholes for this is still quite rare.3,4 We present a 72-year-old man with an incidentally discovered 5-mm middle cerebral artery aneurysm. Despite a low rupture risk,5 the patient himself opted for treatment, and because of the complex shape of the aneurysm, he chose surgical clipping as the treatment of choice. Two unique aspects of the patient's anatomy brought forth transorbital approach for consideration. He had a wide fissure, which opened to the orbital wall, and a giant frontal sinus made its avoidance difficult with any anterolateral transcranial approach. The lateral transorbital approach was started with a transpalpebral incision.4,6,7 Both wings of the sphenoid bone were drilled until the frontal and temporal dura was exposed. Opening this through the orbit gained direct access to the large Sylvian fissure. Two specific challenges were specific to this opening: the aneurysm dome pointed straight at the surgeon, and the M1 segment, needed for proximal control, was directly behind the aneurysm. Despite these, the aneurysm was successfully eliminated through the transorbital approach with no residual or normal branch compromise. Given the specific anatomical provisions, the lateral transorbital approach was an effective and safety alternative to the pterional approach for middle cerebral artery aneurysms. No Institutional Review Board approval was sought or necessary as the patient provided consent for the procedure, publication of his image, and this submission.

Minimally Invasive Bilateral Duo-Keyhole Approach for Giant Falcine Meningioma: 2 Dimensional Operative Video.

One of the key concepts behind minimally invasive keyhole cranial surgery is that as the operative corridor deepens, it also widens. The corridor should therefore be designed parallel to the long-axis of the tumor to optimize visualization.1 These ideas were applied in a duo-keyhole operation for a falcine meningioma. The patient is a 79-year-old woman diagnosed with a large falcine meningioma compressing both frontal lobes. Her tumor was oriented with the long-axis, perpendicular to the superior sagittal sinus, and has bulbous extensions on both sides of the falx. Incisions on the falx, anterior and posterior to the tumor, in addition to a cut between it and the undersurface of the superior sagittal sinus, would render it practically devascularized and "free-floating.2" One keyhole was insufficient, but one anterior and another posterior to the tumor would make the falcine cuts feasible. The operation was performed with the above scheme and the posterior keyhole to the left and anterior one to the right of midline to facilitate surface vascular detachment on both sides. The patient recovered well and was discharged home after 4 days. This procedure highlights that flexible application of the principles of minimally invasive keyhole. Neurosurgery can tailor-make an operation to precisely fit the unique features of a patient and the tumor. The procedure was performed under the ethical guidelines of our hospital. No Institutional Review Board consent was required or sought because the patient gave specific consent to the procedure and publication of her image.

Impact of extent of resection and adjuvant therapy in diffuse gliomas of the spine.

BACKGROUND CONTENT: Diffuse gliomas of the spine (DGS)-consisting of intradural intramedullary glioblastoma, astrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma-are exceedingly rare tumors that account for about 2% of primary spinal cord tumors. Much is unknown about their optimal treatment regimen due to a relative lack of clinical outcome data. PURPOSE: To provide an updated analysis on treatment and outcomes in DGS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Observational cohort study using The National Cancer Database (NCDB), a multicenter prospectively collected oncology outcomes database. A systematic literature review was also performed to compare the resulting data to previous series. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with histologically confirmed DGS from 2004 to 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES: Long-term overall survival and short-term 30/90-day postsurgical mortality, 30-day readmission, and prolonged hospital length of stay. METHODS: Impact of extent of resection and adjuvant therapy on overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze covariables and their prognostic impact on short-term surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 747 cases that met inclusion criteria, there were 439 astrocytomas, 14 oligodendrogliomas, and 208 glioblastomas. Sixty percent (n=442) of patients received radiation, and 45% (n=324) received chemotherapy. Tumor histology significantly impacted survival; glioblastoma had the poorest survival (median survival time [MS]: 12.3 months), followed by astrocytoma (MS: 70.8 months) and oligodendroglioma (MS: 71.6 months) (p<.001). Gross total resection (GTR) independently conferred a survival benefit in patients with glioblastoma (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.194, p<0.001) and other WHO grade four tumors (HR: 0.223, p=.003). Adjuvant chemotherapy also improved survival in patients with glioblastoma (HR: 0.244, p=.007) and WHO grade four tumors (HR: 0.252, p<.001). Systematic literature review identified 14 prior studies with a combined DGS mortality rate of 1.3%, which is lower than the 4% real-world outcomes calculated from the NCDB. This difference may be explained by selection biases in previously published literature in which only centers with favorable outcomes publish their results. CONCLUSIONS: There remains a paucity of data regarding treatment paradigms and outcomes for DGS. Our analysis, the largest to date, demonstrates that GTR and adjuvant therapy independently improve survival for certain high-grade subgroups of DGS. This best-available data informs optimal management for such patients.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Management of Progressive Glioblastoma in Adults: Update of the 2014 Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine best practice recommendation to review guidelines every 5 years is followed by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Guidelines Committee. The aim of this work was to provide an updated literature review and evidence-based recommendations on the topic of diagnosis and treatment of patients with progressive glioblastoma (pGBM). OBJECTIVE: To review the literature published since the last guidelines on pGBM dated 2014, with literature search ending in June 2012. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for the period July 1, 2012, to March 31, 2019, using search terms and search strategies to identify pertinent abstracts. These were then screened using published exclusion/inclusion criteria to identify full-text review articles. Evidence tables were constructed using data derived from full-text reviews and recommendations made from the evidence derived. RESULTS: From the total 8786 abstracts identified by the search, 237 full-text articles met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in this update. Two new level II recommendations derived from this work. For the diagnosis of patients with GBM, the use of diffusion-weighted images is recommended to be included in the magnetic resonance images with and without contrast used for surveillance to detect pGBM. For the treatment of patients with pGBM, repeat cytoreductive surgery is recommended to improve overall survival. An additional 21 level III recommendations were provided. CONCLUSION: Recent published literature provides new recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of pGBM. The Central Nervous System Guidelines Committee will continue to pursue timely updates to further improve the care of patients with diagnosis.https://www.cns.org/guidelines/browse-guidelines-detail/guidelines-management-of-progressive-glioblastoma.

Comparison of One-day Combined versus Staged Anterior and Posterior Cervical Decompression, Fixation, and Fusion.

AIM: To compare the perioperative outcomes between single-day combined or separate-day staged surgeries for cervical spinal stenosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on consecutive patients admitted at a single institution between July 2015 and April 2019, who underwent either single-day combined or separate-day staged surgeries during the same hospitalization period. Demographics, comorbidities, hospital length of stay, and perioperative complications were compared between the patient groups. RESULTS: Eighty patients (combined surgery: n=68, staged surgery: n=12) were included. Dysphagia was the most commonly reported postoperative complication in 44/80 patients (55%). There were no significant differences in the baseline demographics between the two groups. The staged surgery group had significantly longer total time in the operating room (7.2 vs. 8.5 hours, p=0.002), longer duration of general anesthesia (6.7 vs. 7.6 hours, p=0.006), and higher incidence of postoperative delirium (12.1% vs. 50% p=0.005) than the combined surgery group. The mean hospital length of stay was similar in the two groups (combined surgery: 7.5 days vs. staged surgery: 15.1 days, p=0.09). CONCLUSION: Staged anterior and posterior cervical decompressions, stabilizations, and fusions are associated with longer total time in the operating room, longer duration of general anesthesia, and higher incidence of postoperative delirium than combined surgeries.