RESUMEN
BACKGROUND : Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is a novel treatment for esophageal perforations. This study aimed to describe initial experience with EVT of esophageal perforations due to iatrogenic cause, Boerhaave syndrome, or other perforations not related to prior upper gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS : Data from patients treated with EVT for esophageal perforation at five hospitals in three European countries, between January 2018 and October 2021, were retrospectively collected. The primary end point was successful defect closure by EVT, with or without the use of other endoscopic treatment modalities. Secondary end points included mortality and adverse events. RESULTS : 27 patients were included (median age 71 years). The success rate was 89â% (24/27, 95â%CI 77-100). EVT failed in three patients: two deceased during EVT (septic embolic stroke, pulmonary embolism) and one underwent esophagectomy due to a persisting defect. Two adverse events occurred: one iatrogenic defect expansion during sponge exchange and one hemorrhage during sponge removal. Median treatment duration was 12 days (interquartile range [IQR] 6-16) with 1 sponge exchange (IQR 1-3). CONCLUSION : EVT is a promising organ-preserving treatment for esophageal perforations, with a success rate of 89â%. More experience with the technique and indications will likely improve success rates.
Asunto(s)
Perforación del Esófago , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Humanos , Anciano , Perforación del Esófago/etiología , Perforación del Esófago/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Fuga Anastomótica/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recently, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) was introduced as treatment for anastomotic leakage after upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the initial experience with EVT for anastomotic leakage after upper GI surgery in a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Patients treated with EVT for anastomotic leakage after upper GI surgery were included retrospectively (January 2018-June 2021) and prospectively (June 2021-October 2021). The primary end point was the EVT success rate. Secondary end points included mortality and adverse events. RESULTS: 38 patients were included (31 men; mean age 66 years): 27 had undergone an esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction and 11 a total gastrectomy with esophagojejunal anastomosis. EVT was successful in 28 patients (74â%, 95â%CI 57â%-87â%). In 10 patients, EVT failed: deceased owing to radiation pneumonitis (nâ=â1), EVT-associated complications (nâ=â2), and defect closure not achieved (nâ=â7). Mean duration of successful EVT was 33 days, with a median of six EVT-related endoscopies. Median hospital stay was 45 days. CONCLUSION: This initial experience with EVT for anastomotic leakage after upper GI surgery demonstrated a success rate of 74â%. EVT is a promising therapy that could prevent further major surgery. More experience with the technique and its indications will likely improve success rates in the future.
Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Esofagectomía/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transmural defects in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, such as anastomotic leakage and oesophageal perforations, are associated with significant morbidity and mortality risks. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is an efficient and safe treatment option for these patients. With the growing use of EVT in the upper GI tract, it is important to share expertise on the topic. AIM: This review explores the emerging role of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) as treatment for transmural defects in the upper GI tract. An overview of the mechanism and procedures, outcomes in current literature and challenges of implementation and application are discussed. CONCLUSION: EVT exhibits great efficacy and safety for the treatment of transmural defects in the upper GI tract. Current use of EVT is mostly experience-based, emphasizing the importance of sharing expertise and performing research to unlock its full potential.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/instrumentación , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Fuga Anastomótica/terapia , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Perforación del Esófago/terapia , Perforación del Esófago/etiología , Perforación del Esófago/cirugía , Vacio , Tracto Gastrointestinal Superior/cirugía , Tracto Gastrointestinal Superior/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Video 1Successful endoscopic management of a large esophageal defect due to Boerhaave syndrome with endoscopic vacuum therapy using EsoSponge and VACStent.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has gained a greater role in management of transmural defects in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, including anastomotic leakage and esophageal perforation (e.g. Boerhaave syndrome and iatrogenic causes). The vacuum-stent is a new treatment modality, combining the benefits of EVT and an intraluminal stent. Patients and methods: This prospective case series describes the first ten cases of a transmural defect in the upper GI tract treated with a vacuum-stent in a tertiary referral center. All patients signed informed consent for prospective registration of relevant data on treatment and outcomes in a specially designed database. Outcome parameters were successful closure of the defect, number of endoscopies, duration of treatment and adverse events. Results: In total, ten patients treated with a vacuum-stent were included. Eight patients had anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection, of whom six were treated with vacuum-sponge and vacuum-stent, and two with vacuum-stent only. One patient had Boerhaave syndrome, treated with vacuum-sponge and vacuum-stent, and one had an iatrogenic perforation during pneumodilation for achalasia, treated with vacuum-stent only. Success rate was 100%, requiring a median of 5 (IQR 3-12) EVT-related endoscopies with a treatment course of median 18 (IQR 12-59) days. One patient developed an esophageal stricture, but no other vacuum-stent related adverse events were observed. Conclusion: The vacuum-stent, which combines benefits of EVT and an intraluminal stent, shows great feasibility and efficacy in treatment of transmural defects in the upper GI tract. Future studies should point out whether this device can prevent major (re-)surgery in these patients.