Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Midwifery ; 29(4): 284-93, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23079870

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: childbearing women and their midwives differ in their diagnoses of the onset of labour. The symptoms women use to describe the onset of labour are associated with the process of labour. Perinatal factors and women's attitudes may be associated with the administration of epidural analgesia. Our study aimed to assess the correlation between women's perception of the onset of labour and the frequency and timing of epidural analgesia during labour. DESIGN: prospective cohort study. SETTING: 41 maternity units in Lower Saxony, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 549 nulliparae (as defined in the "Methods" section) and 490 multiparae giving birth between April and October 2005. Women were included after 34 completed weeks of gestation with a singleton in vertex presentation and planned vaginal birth. MEASUREMENTS: the association between women's symptoms at the onset of labour and the administration of epidural analgesia - frequency, timing in relation to onset of labour and cervical dilatation - was assessed. The analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meiers estimation, logistic regression and Cox regression. FINDINGS: a total of 174 nulliparae and 49 multiparae received epidural analgesia during labour. Nulliparae received it at a median time of 5.47hrs (range: 0.25-51.17hrs) after onset of labour, at a median cervical dilatation of 3.3cm (range: 1.0-10.0cm). In multiparae, epidural analgesia was applied at a median time of 3.79hrs (range: 0.42-28.55hrs) after onset of labour; the median cervical dilatation was 3.0cm (range: 1.0-8.0cm). Women who were admitted with advanced cervical dilatation received epidural analgesia less often. Women who defined their onset of labour earlier than it was diagnosed by their midwives received epidural analgesia earlier. Gastrointestinal symptoms and irregular pain at the onset of labour were associated with later administration of epidural analgesia. Induction of labour was associated with a reduced interval from the onset of labour to epidural analgesia. KEY CONCLUSIONS: women's self-diagnosis of the onset of labour and their perception of their labour duration when meeting their midwives has some impact on their admission to the labour ward and the timing of epidural analgesia. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: consideration of women's own perceptions and expectations regarding the onset and process of labour is necessary for individual care during labour.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural , Analgesia Obstétrica , Inicio del Trabajo de Parto , Partería , Percepción/fisiología , Adulto , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Epidural/psicología , Analgesia Epidural/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/psicología , Analgesia Obstétrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Inicio del Trabajo de Parto/fisiología , Inicio del Trabajo de Parto/psicología , Dolor de Parto/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de Parto/psicología , Partería/métodos , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Paridad , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA