Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 29(3): e13198, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31825156

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early palliative care team consultation has been shown to reduce costs of hospital care. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between palliative care team (PCT) consultation and the content and costs of hospital care in patients with advanced cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted in 12 Dutch hospitals. Patients with advanced cancer and an estimated life expectancy of less than 1 year were included. We compared hospital care during 3 months of follow-up for patients with and without PCT involvement. Propensity score matching was used to estimate the effect of PCTs on costs of hospital care. Additionally, gamma regression models were estimated to assess predictors of hospital costs. RESULTS: We included 535 patients of whom 126 received PCT consultation. Patients with PCT had a worse life expectancy (life expectancy <3 months: 62% vs. 31%, p < .01) and performance status (p < .01, e.g., WHO status higher than 2:54% vs. 28%) and more often had no more options for anti-tumour therapy (57% vs. 30%, p < .01). Hospital length of stay, use of most diagnostic procedures, medication and other therapeutic interventions were similar. The total mean hospital costs were €8,393 for patients with and €8,631 for patients without PCT consultation. Analyses using propensity scores to control for observed confounding showed no significant difference in hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: PCT consultation for patients with cancer in Dutch hospitals often occurs late in the patients' disease trajectories, which might explain why we found no effect of PCT consultation on costs of hospital care. Earlier consultation could be beneficial to patients and reduce costs of care.


Asunto(s)
Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos/economía , Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Nutrición Enteral/economía , Nutrición Enteral/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estado Funcional , Hospitales para Enfermos Terminales , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Esperanza de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/economía , Países Bajos , Alta del Paciente , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración Artificial/economía , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia
2.
Oncol Res Treat ; 43(9): 405-413, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32580199

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Experimental studies have shown that palliative care team (PCT) involvement can improve quality of life (QoL) and symptom burden of patients with advanced cancer. It is unclear to what extent this effect is sustained in daily practice of hospital care. OBJECTIVE: This observational study aims to investigate the effect of PCT consultation on QoL and symptom burden of hospitalized patients with advanced cancer in daily practice. METHODS: After admission to 1 of 9 participating hospitals, patients with advanced cancer for whom the attending physician answered "no" to the Surprise Question were invited to complete a questionnaire, including the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL, at 6 points in time, until 3 months after admission. Outcomes were compared between patients who received PCT consultation and patients who did not, taking into account differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients consented to participate, of whom 32 received PCT consultation. Of these patients, 108 were able to complete a questionnaire at day 14, of whom 19 after receiving PCT consultation. After adjusting for baseline differences, EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL scores for pain, appetite, and emotional functioning at day 14 were more favorable for patients who received a PCT consultation. CONCLUSION: PCT consultation decreased patients' symptom burden and tends to have a positive effect on QoL of hospitalized patients with advanced cancer, even if the PCT is consulted late in the patient's disease trajectory.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Derivación y Consulta , Anciano , Apetito , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Países Bajos , Dolor/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA