The proportion of potential candidates for focal therapy in localized prostate cancer in a real-life cohort and their final pathologic results.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of patients who would have been eligible for focal therapy (FT) in a population of patients who underwent prostatectomies; additionally, to assess the risk of having underestimated disease on the surgical specimen by using consensus selection criteria. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed data from 446 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2016 and 2018. Patients suitable for FT had unifocal significant prostate cancer on MRI, as well as on pathological data from targeted and systematic biopsies. Inclusion criteria were defined by the 2014 consensus conference, PSA<15ng/mL, tumor stage T1c-T2a and Gleason score 3+3 or 3+4 on biopsies. Disease was considered to be underestimated on postoperative data in the presence of extraprostatic invasion, a high Gleason score (≥4+4) and significant multifocality defined by secondary foci of Gleason 6 (3+3)>5mm or Gleason 7 (3+4). RESULTS: In our cohort of 446 patients, 97 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 27 patients (27.8%) were eligible for focal therapy. Among the eligible patients, 4 patients (14.8%) had pT3, and no patient had significant multifocality or a Gleason score of 8 (4+4) on the surgical specimen. CONCLUSION: In the era of pre-biopsy MRI, there could be a significant proportion of patients who could benefit from focal therapy among patients currently undergoing radical prostatectomy. The 2014 consensus conference eligibility criteria could effectively predict the presence of extraprostatic invasion and safely select patients for FT.

Sepsis secondary to a misplaced urinary catheter into the ureter.

Misplacement of a urinary catheter in the ureter is a rare phenomenon. The described cases occurred in patients with neurogenic bladder. We describe an unusual case of 58 years old female where the Foley catheter was unintentionally placed in the left ureter. The patient developed sepsis due to complete obstruction of the left ureter treated with antibiotic therapy after repositioning the catheter.

[Prostatic urethral lift using Urolift® system for benign prostatic hyperplasia: 7years experience]. / Pose d'implants Urolift® intra-prostatique pour hyperplasie bénigne de la prostate : résultats après 7 ans d'expérience.

INTRODUCTION: Urolift® system is a mini-invasive technique, proposed as an alternative treatment for classic surgery of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Our objective was to report the results of Urolift® system in our center after 7years experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Urolift® implants were proposed between February 2012 and March 2019 for patients presenting symptomatic BPH in our center, as an alternative for classic surgery. The efficacy was evaluated with questionnaires about lower urinary tract symptoms (IPSS) and its impact on quality of life (IPSS-QdV). Tolerance was evaluated with questionnaires about erectile (IIEF5) and ejaculatory function (MSHQ-EjD) and complication rate. Survival without additional treatment was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Forty patients were treated during this period, with a median follow-up of 32months [12-67]. Three months after the procedure, IPSS and IPSS-QdV were significantly improved (respectively 8 [4-11] vs 20 [17-24]; P<0.0001 and 2 [1-2] vs 5 [4-6]; P<0.0001). MSHQ-EjD and IIEF5 were not modified (respectively 13 [11-14] vs 12 [9-13]; P=0.69 and 21 [18-23] vs 21 [18-23]; P=0.13). Two patients (5%) experienced a urinary retention and needed a bladder catheter. No complication with a Clavien-Dindo score>2 were reported. Survival without additional treatment at 5years was 63%. CONCLUSION: Urolift® implants improved significantly the lower urinary tract symptoms in our population, with a good tolerance profile. More than 60% of the patients did not need an additional treatment after 5years of follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical activity within academic urological departments in Paris]. / Impact de la pandémie de COVID-19 sur l'activité chirurgicale au sein des services d'urologie de l'Assistance Publique ­ Hôpitaux de Paris.

INTRODUCTION: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in France, all non-emergency surgical activity has been cancelled since March 12, 2020. In order to anticipate the reinstatement of delayed interventions, surgical activity reduction analysis is essential. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reduction of urological surgery in adult during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to 2019. MATERIAL: The data regarding urological procedures realized in the 8 academic urological departments of Parisians centres (AP-HP) were compared over two similar periods (14-29 March 2019 and 12-27 March 2020) using the centralized surgical planning software shared by these centres. Procedure title, type of surgery and outpatient ratio were collected. The interventions were sorted into 16 major families of urological interventions. RESULTS: Overall, a 55% decrease was observed concerning urological procedures over the same period between 2019 and 2020 (995 and 444 procedures respectively). Oncology activity and emergencies decreased by 31% and 44%. The number of kidney transplantations decreased from 39 to 3 (-92%). Functional, andrological and genital surgical procedures were the most impacted among the non-oncological procedures (-85%, -81% and -71%, respectively). Approximatively, 1033 hours of surgery have been delayed during this 16-day period. CONCLUSION: Lockdown and postponement of non-urgent scheduled urological procedures decisions has led to a drastic decrease in surgical activity in AP-HP. Isolated kidney transplantation has been stopped (national statement). Urologists must anticipate for lockdown exit in order to catch-up delayed surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Study of the intra-prostatic arterial anatomy and implications for arterial embolization of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

INTRODUCTION: Prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) is an experimental therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Its feasibility is based on the knowledge of the pelvic arterial anatomy, and more specifically the prostate. The aim of this study was to describe the prostatic arterial supply: origins, distribution and variability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively, with two radiologists, 40 arteriographies of patients who underwent PAE in our center. With these observations of 80 hemipelvics, we described the number of prostatic arteries, their origins, their distributions and eventually their anastomoses with other pelvic arteries. RESULTS: There was one prostatic artery in 70% of the cases. It came from a common trunk for the prostate and the bladder in 55% of the cases, from the obturator artery in 17.5% of the cases, from the pudendal artery in 25% of the cases, from the intern iliac artery in 1% of the cases, and from the superior gluteal artery in 1% of the cases. The prostatic artery splitted in two branches (medial and lateral), with no anastomoses in 37% of the cases. Anastomoses with penile and rectal arteries were observed in 29% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: For our 40 patients, we observed many variations of arterial prostatic anatomy. We proposed a classification in order to increase security and efficacy of PAE, and it should be validated with more patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

[Optical coherence tomography of bladder resection specimen]. / Tomographie par densité optique des pièces de résection des tumeurs de vessie.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of bladder urothelial tumors is based on bladder resection and histological analysis of the specimen. The time to obtain the results of the histological analysis increases the treatment delay. Furthermore, the lack of muscle on the specimen forces the surgeon to practice on other procedure. Full field optical coherence tomography (FFOCT) is a recent imaging technique to analyze tissue. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of FFOCT to detect muscle and tumor in bladder resection specimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed with the FFOCT technique bladder resection specimen of 24 consecutives patients. Three readers did the blind analyze of the images, looking for the presence of muscle and tumor on each specimen. Their results were compared with histological analysis to calculate diagnostic accuracy for each reader. RESULTS: Mean sensibilities for the detection of muscle and tumor were respectively 75% and 81%. Mean specificities for the detection of muscle and tumor were respectively 78.3% and 55.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the FFOCT is feasible to analyze bladder resection specimen. Sensibilities and specificities calculated are encouraging for the detection of muscle and tumor. The accuracy of this detection and early-staging tool should be validated by larger studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Urinary incontinence after HOLEP: Incidence, evolution and predictive factors]. / Incontinence urinaire après énucléation endoscopique de la prostate au laser Holmium : fréquence, évolution, et facteurs prédictifs de survenue.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the early morbidity after HOLEP, the urinary incontinence in particular, and specify its different types, evolution, and predictive factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational, analytical, retrospective, monocentric study including all patients undergoing surgery for benign prostatic hypertrophy (HBP) by HoLEP between November 2015 and January 2017. The data were collected pre-, per- and postoperatively. The follow-up was for 6 months. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy one patients were included. 23 patients (14.6%) had a complication according to Clavien-Dindo classification [4]: 19 (83%) Clavien 2, 1 (4%) Clavien 3b et 3 (13%) Clavien 4. At one month of the surgery, 64 (42.7%) patients had urinary incontinence of which 55 (86.1%) presented pure stress urinary incontinence. 18 (32.7%) were still incontinent at 6 months of the surgery. The delivered amount of energy during the surgery and the preoperative IIEF5 score were statistically significantly associated with the occurrence rate of stress urinary incontinence. There was no correlation between the surgeon's learning curve and the occurrence of incontinence. CONCLUSION: The occurrence rate of urinary incontinence post HoLEP might be related to the adopted surgical technique ; It is crucial to keep the patient well informed of the risk of this complication postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Multidisciplinary and systematic preoperatory-assessment in geriatric urologic oncology surgery: Feasibility and results]. / Évaluation pluridisciplinaire préopératoire systématique en chirurgie cancérologique urologique gériatrique : faisabilité et résultats.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of cancer increases with age, especially for urological cancers. The frailty of the elderly persons may expose them to more postoperative complications resulting in prolonged hospitalization, increased morbidity or even increased mortality, and delayed or impossible return to normal life. In such cases, the benefit of surgery and therefore its realization can be questioned. PATIENTS AND METHOD: This article reports the experience of a pre-operative risk assessment in a population of elderly patients treated for urologic cancer. This retrospective study aims to report the feasibility and the main results of this systematic preoperative multi-professional evaluation. RESULTS: Between April 2016 and February 2017, 31 elderly patients were evaluated. The evaluation revealed: moderate to severe malnutrition in 59 % of cases, a patient judged from a geriatric point of view fit, intermediate or fragile in respectively 25 %, 35 % and 40 % of cases. This evaluation led to propose a modification of an element of care for 66 % of patients and to propose therapeutic abstention for only 3 patients. CONCLUSION: An evaluation whose purpose is to adapt to the physiological age of patients and their overall state of health, surgical treatment and postoperative management is feasible and seems to help unmask elements of fragility usually not detected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Are the UroLift(®) implants an alternative for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia? Short-term results and predictive factors of failure]. / La pose d'implants intra-prostatiques UroLift(®) est-elle une alternative chez les patients ayant une hyperplasie bénigne de la prostate ? Résultats initiaux et facteurs prédictifs d'échec.

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of UroLift(®) implants after a 2-year experience in the technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The procedure was proposed between February 2012 and April 2014 in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, as an alternative to standard endoscopic ablation techniques. Evaluation of BPH related symptoms relied on the IPSS and IPSS-QoL self-questionnaires, as well as on maximum uroflow (Qmax). Evaluation of erectile and ejaculatory functions relied on the IIEF5 and MSHQ-EjD self-questionnaires, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were treated during this period. Median age was 66 years [53-78]. Median prostate volume was 38mL [20-80]. Preoperative IPSS and IPSS-QoL were 20 [9-29] and 5 [3-6], respectively. No severe adverse event was observed postoperatively. Median follow-up was 14 [5-31] months. At the end of follow-up, 19 (83%) patients reported sustained symptomatic improvement without any additional treatment. Median IPSS and IPSS-QoL were improved significantly (11 [1-27] and 2 [0-6], P<0.0001), with however no significant improvement in Qmax. Four patients needed additional treatment during the first postoperative year. Among them, 3 had a prostate volume>60mL. No patient reported retrograde ejaculation or worsened erectile function. CONCLUSIONS: UroLift(®) implants allowed symptomatic improvement in more than 80% of the patients after 1-year follow-up. A high prostate volume may potentially be predictive of symptomatic failure. LEVEL OF PROOF: 5.

[Management of low-risk prostate cancer]. / Prise en charge des tumeurs de la prostate à faible risque évolutif.

INTRODUCTION: The widespread use of prostate cancer screening has led to a stage migration resulting in an increase in the diagnosis of low-risk disease, which currently accounts for 40-50% of diagnosed forms. New therapeutic strategies have been developed in order to minimize the risk of overtreatment. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature over the past 20 years was performed using the Medline database. The literature selection was based on evidence and practical considerations. RESULTS: Low-risk tumors are conventionally defined by the d'Amico classification. The use of multiparametric MRI helps to better characterize these tumors. The contribution of molecular biology remains to be determined in clinical practice. Novel therapeutic options for low-risk disease are currently being evaluated. CONCLUSION: The new therapeutic strategies are evolving. They seek to reduce overtreatment without compromising oncological success.

[Imagery of treated prostate cancer]. / Imagerie post-thérapeutique du cancer de la prostate.

INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis, localization of recurrence in the management of prostate cancer patients with increasing concentrations of tumor serum markers is crucial for treatment planning of the patients. The present review describes the role of prostate MRI and (18) Fcholine PET/computed tomography (CT) in tumor detection and extent, when there is a suspicion of residual or recurrent disease after treatment of prostate cancer. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching in the PUB MED/MEDLINE database searching for articles in French or English published between the last 12years. RESULTS: In patient with a clinical suspicion of recurrence after treatment for prostate cancer, imaging can be used to distinguish between local recurrence and metastatic disease. (11)C-choline PET/CT and pelvic multiparametric MR imaging (mp MRI) are complementary in this indication. In this paper, the current status of imaging techniques used for the staging of patients with suspected locally recurrent or metastatic disease in patients treated for prostate cancer were reviewed. CONCLUSION: Mp MRI of the prostate may be valuable imaging modality for the detection and localization of local recurrence. C-choline PET/CT offers an advantage in detecting metastatic disease to lymph node and bone.

[Prostate cancer surgical margin: review by the CCAFU (Oncology Committee of the French Association of Urology)]. / Les marges chirurgicales dans le cancer de la prostate. CCAFU revue de la littérature.

OBJECTIVE: Literature showed the impact of surgical margin status on prognosis after radical prostatectomy (mostly on biochemical survival). Margin status is an easy self-evaluation of surgical practice to assess. The aim of this paper was to define what a positive surgical margin (PSM) is and how to prevent the occurrence, to precise the impact on survival and how to treat. METHOD: A literature analysis with Pubmed has been performed to 2012, furthermore conclusions of the main congresses with selection committee and review publication have also been studied. RESULTS: PSM is defined as "tumor cells touching the ink on the specimen edge". The most frequent reported incidence is between 15 to 20%. Margin status remains one of the major criteria to determine the need of adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery. Quality of life is not or only lightly modified by radiotherapy with the current techniques. Adjuvant radiotherapy improves biological survival but is synonymous with overtreatment in many times. Salvage radiotherapy has to be quickly performed after Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) relapse (PSA<1 ng/mL even<0.5 ng/mL). CONCLUSION: This literature review did not allow to suggest superiority of one surgical technique over another. In the same way, the kind of dissection i.e. bladder neck or neurovascular bundle preservation does no clearly modify PSM rate. However, it seems logical to "customize" dissection according to prostate cancer characteristics (D'Amico criteria for instance) guided with multiparametric MRI. Intrafascial dissection has to be applied only to low risk. Lastly, the debate between adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy is always ongoing.

Sarcopenia and body mass index predict sunitinib-induced early dose-limiting toxicities in renal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Little is known on factors predicting sunitinib toxicity. Recently, the condition of low muscle mass, named sarcopenia, was identified as a significant predictor of toxicity in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients treated with sorafenib. We investigated whether sarcopenia could predict early dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurrence in mRCC patients treated with sunitinib. METHODS: Consecutive mRCC patients treated with sunitinib were retrospectively reviewed. A DLT was defined as any toxicity leading to dose reduction or treatment discontinuation. Body composition was evaluated using CT scan obtained within 1 month before treatment initiation. RESULTS: Among 61 patients eligible for analysis, 52.5% were sarcopenic and 32.8% had both sarcopenia and a body mass index (BMI)<25 kg m(-2). Eighteen patients (29.5%) experienced a DLT during the first cycle. Sarcopenic patients with a BMI<25 kg m(-2) experienced more DLTs (P=0.01; odds ratio=4.1; 95% CI: (1.3-13.3)), more cumulative grade 2 or 3 toxicities (P=0.008), more grade 3 toxicities (P=0.04) and more acute vascular toxicities (P=0.009). CONCLUSION: Patients with sarcopenia and a BMI<25 kg m(-2) experienced significantly more DLTs during the first cycle of treatment.

[Pronostic value of ureteral location of upper tract urinary carcinoma]. / Impact pronostique de la localisation urétérale dans les tumeurs de la voie excrétrice supérieure.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the ureteral location of the upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1998 and December 2007, 161 patients with UTUC were operated in our center. Tumors were located on renal pelvis in 51% of cases, on the ureter in 34% of cases and in both locations in 15% of cases. Nephroureterectomy was performed in 79.5% of cases (128/161) whereas a conservative treatment was performed in 20.5% of cases (33/161). RESULTS: In our series, 29.8% of patients had primary bladder cancer and 14.3% had synchronous bladder tumor. At a median follow-up of 42.5 months, 38.6% of patients developed bladder recurrence and 4.8% developed controlateral upper tract tumor. In multivariate analysis, ureteral location and existence of synchronous bladder tumor were independent prognostic factors of bladder recurrence (P=0.009 and P=0.025, respectively). Multivariate analysis retained T-stage and ureteral location as independent prognostic factors in both overall and disease-free survival (P=0.002 and P=0.0008 respectively for ureteral location). CONCLUSION: Ureteral location was an independent prognostic factor of bladder recurrence and was associated with a poorer prognosis.

[Prognostic factors of upper tract urothelial carcinoma]. / Facteurs pronostiques des tumeurs de la voie excrétrice urinaire supérieure.

INTRODUCTION: Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease. Thus, little evidence-based data are available to guide clinical decision-making. The aim of the study was to provide an overview of the currently available prognostic factors for UTUC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed databases to identify original articles regarding prognostic factors in patients with UTUC. RESULTS: We divided the prognostic factors for UTUC in four different categories: clinical factors, preoperative characteristics, intraoperative/surgical factors and postoperative/pathologic factors. Prognostic factors described in order of importance are: tumor stage and grade, lymph node involvement, a concomitant cis, age at the diagnostic, lymphovascular invasion, tumor architecture and necrosis, tumor location and multifocality, gender. The impact of obesity, smoking and other comorbidities (ECOG, ASA) on outcomes has been recently reported but needs to be validated. The endoscopic approach of distal ureter management during radical nephroureterectomy has been shown to be at higher risk of bladder recurrence. CONCLUSION: The incorporation of such prognosticators into clinical prediction models might help to guide decision-making with regard to timing of surveillance, type of treatment, performance of lymphadenectomy, and consideration of neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapies.

[Prostate brachytherapy: indications and outcomes]. / Curiethérapie exclusive du cancer de la prostate par implants permanents : indications et résultats. Revue du CC-AFU.

INTRODUCTION: To summarize the indications and outcomes of low dose-rate prostate brachytherapy with permanent implants. METHODS: Bibliographic database PubMed was searched with prostate cancer and brachytherapy as keywords from 1995 to 2012. RESULTS: The main indication of prostate brachytherapy is the favorable group, but it could be proposed to patients with an intermediate prognostic group if the PSA is ≤ 15 ng/mL or if the Gleason score is 7 (3+4), under cover of a prostate MRI without any extra-capsular extension. Oncologic results are similar to those of surgery or external beam irradiation (EBRT), with a 10-yr biochemical control rate approaching 90%. Urinary toxicity is common during the year following the implant, mainly irritative symptoms; 5 to 15% of patients experienced acute urinary retention. A prostate volume higher than 50 cc or an initial high international prostatic symptom score (IPSS) are predictive of toxicity and are recognized as relative contraindications of the technique. Sexual activity is maintained in 60% of patients. CONCLUSION: Brachytherapy must be proposed as a validated option beside active surveillance, surgery and EBRT.

[CCAFU Recommendations 2013: Prostate cancer]. / Recommandations en onco-urologie 2013 du CCAFU : Cancer de la prostate.

INTRODUCTION: The sub Comittee prostate of the CCAFU established guidelines for diagnostic, treatment, evaluation and standart of care of prostate cancer. METHODS: Guidelines 2010 were updated based on systematic literature search performed by the sub-Comittee in Medline and PubMed databases to evaluate references, levels of evidence and grade of recommandation. RESULTS: Pathological examination of the tissue specimens was defined specifically for Gleason score according to ISP 2005 recommandations. Prostate and pelvis RMN became the reference in terms of radiological exam. Individual and early diagnosis of prostate cancer was defined and role of PSA was precised. Active surveillance became one of the standart of care of low-risk tumors, radical prostatectomy remained one of the options for all risk group tumors, length of hormonotherapy in association with radiotherapy was precised according to the risk group. Side effects of hormonotherapy treament needed specific supervision ; hormonotherapy had no indication in case of non metastatic tumors and intermittent hormonotherapy in metastatic tumors. New hormonal drugs in pre and post chemotherapy and bone target drugs opened new therapeutics pathways. CONCLUSION: From 2010 to 2013, standarts of care of prostate cancer were modified because of results of prospective studies and new therapeutics. They allowed precise treatments for each specific clinical situation. In the future, multidisciplinary treatments for high risk tumors, time of adjuvant treatment and sequencies of new hormonal treatment had to be defined.

Value of multiparametric MRI in the work-up of prostate cancer.

The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer evaluation is controversial and likely underestimated. Technological advances over the past 5 years have demonstrated that multiparametric MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, can evaluate the actual tumor burden of a newly diagnosed prostate cancer more accurately than sextant biopsy protocols. Tumor risk, defined by the D'Amico criteria, hence can be re-evaluated by multiparametric MRI. As a result, there is increasing evidence that MRI before repeat or even initial biopsy can accurately select patients who require immediate biopsies and those in whom biopsy could be deferred. Also, a relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), calculated from DWI, and Gleason score was found. Thus, MRI before biopsy helps to detect high-grade tumors to target biopsies within areas of low ADC values. To achieve good targeting accuracy, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-MRI image registration is necessary. Three-dimensional deformable registration is sufficiently accurate to match TRUS and MRI volumes with a topographic precision of 1 mm. Real-time MRI-guided biopsy is another technique under evaluation. Both approaches will allow for increasing acceptance of focal therapies, should these techniques be validated in the future.

[Intra-prostatic UroLift(®) implants for benign prostatic hyperplasia: preliminary results of the four first cases performed in France]. / Pose d'implants UroLift(®) intra-prostatiques pour hyperplasie bénigne de la prostate : résultats préliminaires des quatre premiers cas réalisés en France.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility, tolerance and short-term efficacy of intra-prostatic UroLift(®) implants in four patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Four patients with symptomatic BPH, already treated with alpha-blockers, were consecutively treated with intra-prostatic UroLift(®) implants under general anaesthesia. A bladder catheter was placed postoperatively. Alpha-blocker therapy was withdrawn 7 days postoperatively. The clinical and morphological characteristics of the patients were noted. Low urinary tract (IPSS) and sexual symptoms (IIEF5, MSHQ-EjD), maximum urinary flow rate and post voiding residual volume were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 month. RESULTS: Median age was of 69 [52-74] years old and median prostatic volume of 50 cm(3) [40-80]. Median procedure time was of 11 minutes [6-15]. Intra- and postoperative outcomes were uneventful. At 1 month, the mean IPSS and IPSS-QOL improvement were of 46 % and 58 %, respectively. One patient reported no improvement in his urinary and sexual symptoms. In the other three patients, the maximum urinary flow rate was improved, the post voiding residual improved in two patients and similar in one. No alteration in erection or ejaculation functions was reported. CONCLUSIONS: In our initial experience, intra-prostatic UroLift(®) implant procedure seemed feasible, efficacious for LUTS and well tolerated, especially concerning sexual outcomes. Further study of the UroLift(®) implant in France is currently being planned.

[pT3N0 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy as sole treatment: Oncological results and predictive factors of recurrence]. / Cancer de la prostate de stade pT3N0 traité par prostatectomie radicale en monothérapie : résultats carcinologiques et facteurs prédictifs de récidive.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate biological free survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) as sole treatment, and to analyse predictive factors of recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We retrospectively studied patients treated between 1996 and 2006 for a pT3N0 prostate cancer with RP without any adjuvant treatment. The main endpoint was PSA relapse, defined as two successive elevations of PSA>0.2 ng/mL. An association between PSA free survival and PSA, Gleason score, pathological stage and surgical margins status was statistically assessed. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were included. Median preoperative PSA was of 10 ng/mL. Pathological stage was pT3b in 30% of the cases and surgical margins showed cancer involvement in 63% of the cases. Gleason score was ≥3+4 in 74% of the cases. Postoperative PSA was undetectable in 121 (82%) patients. Median follow up following RP was of 5 years. The 5-year-PSA free survival was of 48%. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative and postoperative PSA, as well as Gleason score were predictors of PSA relapse (P<0.05). In patients with undetectable postoperative PSA, 5-year-PSA free survival was of 56%. Seminal vesicle involvement and Gleason score ≥3+4 were the only independent predictors of PSA relapse. CONCLUSIONS: After RP for pT3N0 prostate cancer, the only predictive factors of recurrence were postoperative PSA and Gleason score. In case of undetectable postoperative PSA, surveillance seems acceptable if Gleason score is <3+4 and in the absence of seminal vesicle involvement.