RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The catastrophic fail of a container holding a pressure-liquified gas can generate a boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion (BLEVE) with a subsequent blast wave, flying fragments, and fire or toxic gas release. CASE REPORT: This report describes the management of a mass casualty disaster related to a BLEVE in an urban area due to a highway accident involving a tanker carrying liquified petroleum gas and a truck transporting chemical solvents. The event resulted in 158 casualties that were triaged, stabilized, and transported into the "hub" and "spoke" hospitals of the regional trauma network within 3 h and 22 min from the event by the Emergency Medical Services. The logistic complications related to the partial collapse of the highway bridge on an underlying urban road and the relative solutions adopted, as well as the application and advantages of the use of the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) algorithm in the field and the criteria adopted for the distribution of patients within the trauma network, are discussed, along with the potential pitfalls observed. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: BLEVE events are rare but can be complex in both logistical management and clinical presentation of the lesions related to the event. The START algorithm is a valuable tool for rapid triage in mass casualty incidents.
Asunto(s)
Planificación en Desastres , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa , Explosiones , Humanos , TriajeRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: A reduction of the hospitalization and reperfusion treatments was reported during COVID-19 pandemic. However, high variability in results emerged, potentially due to logistic paradigms adopted. Here, we analyze stroke code admissions, hospitalizations, and stroke belt performance for ischemic stroke patients in the metropolitan Bologna region, comparing temporal trends between 2019 and 2020 to define the impact of COVID-19 on the stroke network. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included all people admitted at the Bologna Metropolitan Stroke Center in timeframes 1 March 2019-30 April 2019 (cohort-2019) and 1 March 2020-30 April 2020 (cohort-2020). Diagnosis, treatment strategy, and timing were compared between the two cohorts to define temporal trends. RESULTS: Overall, 283 patients were admitted to the Stroke Center, with no differences in demographic factors between cohort-2019 and cohort-2020. In cohort-2020, transient ischemic attack (TIA) was significantly less prevalent than 2019 (6.9% vs 14.4%, p = .04). Among 216 ischemic stroke patients, moderate-to-severe stroke was more represented in cohort-2020 (17.8% vs 6.2%, p = .027). Similar proportions of patients underwent reperfusion (45.9% in 2019 vs 53.4% in 2020), although a slight increase in combined treatment was detected (14.4% vs 25.4%, p = .05). Door-to-scan timing was significantly prolonged in 2020 compared with 2019 (28.4 ± 12.6 vs 36.7 ± 14.6, p = .03), although overall timing from stroke to treatment was preserved. CONCLUSION: During COVID-19 pandemic, TIA and minor stroke consistently reduced compared to the same timeframe in 2019. Longer stroke-to-call and door-to-scan times, attributable to change in citizen behavior and screening at hospital arrival, did not impact on stroke-to-treatment time. Mothership model might have minimized the effects of the pandemic on the stroke care organization.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Neurología/tendencias , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tiempo de Tratamiento/tendenciasRESUMEN
Cardiac arrest (CA) is the third cause of death in Europe. This paper highlights the various treatments for the prevention and early management of CA and provides an overview of available evidence on the CA center concept. The experience of Maggiore Hospital of Bologna, Italy over the last 11 years is also outlined along with the treatments applied to patients with CA and their impact on improving outcomes. The new concept of the "Systems Saving Lives" approach is presented as a potential way for implementing Italian healthcare systems involved in the management of CA patients. Finally, the future perspective of implementation of CA centers in Italy is also described encouraging the healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of CA patients to consider a multidisciplinary approach (including a cardiologist, emergency physician, neurologist, physiatrist, radiologist, and intensivist).
Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco , Europa (Continente) , Predicción , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Hospitales , Humanos , ItaliaRESUMEN
Background: The return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest (RACA) score was developed as a tool to predict ROSC probability (pROSC) based on easily available information and it could be useful to compare the performances of different EMS agencies or the effects of eventual interventions.We performed an external validation of the RACA score in a cohort of out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients managed by the EMS of the metropolitan city of Bologna, Italy. Methods: We analyzed data from 2,310 OHCA events prospectively collected between January 2009 and June 2021. Discrimination was assessed with the area under the ROC curve (AUROC), while the calibration belts were used for the comparison of observed versus expected ROSC rates. The AUROCs from our cohort and other validation cohorts were compared using a studentized range test. Results: The AUROC for the study population was 0.691, comparable to that described by previous validation studies. Despite an acceptable overall calibration, we found a poor calibration for asystole and low pROSC ranges in PEA and shockable rhythms. The model showed a good calibration for patients aged over 80, while no differences in performance were found when evaluating events before and after the implementation of 2015 ERC guidelines. Conclusions: Despite AUROC values being similar in different validation studies for RACA score, we suggest separating the different rhythms when assessing ROSC probability with the RACA score, especially for asystole.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The decision to initiate or continue advanced life support (ALS) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) could be difficult due to the lack of information and contextual elements, especially in non-shockable rhythms. This study aims to explore factors associated with clinicians' decision to initiate or continue ALS and the conditions associated with higher variability in asystolic patients. METHODS: This retrospective observational study enrolled 2653 asystolic patients on whom either ALS was attempted or not by the emergency medical services (EMS) physician. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to find the factors associated with the decision to access ALS. A subgroup analysis was performed on patients with a predicted probability of ALS between 35% and 65%. The single physician's behaviour was compared to that predicted by the model taking into account the entire agency. RESULTS: Age, location of event, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and EMS-witnessed event were independent factors influencing physicians' choices about ALS. Non-medical OHCA, younger patients, less experienced physicians, presence of breath activity at the emergency call and a longer time for ALS arrival were more frequent among cases with an expected higher variability in behaviours with ALS. Significant variability was detected between physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Significant inter-physician variability in access to ALS could be present within the same EMS, especially among less experienced physicians, non-medical OHCA and in presence of signs of life during emergency call. This arbitrariness has been observed and should be properly addressed by EMS team members as it raises ethical issues regarding the disparity in treatment.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Médicos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Humanos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: The dispatch of Advanced Life Support (ALS) teams in Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is still a hardly studied aspect of prehospital emergency logistics. In 2015, the dispatch algorithm of Emilia Est Emergency Operation Centre (EE-EOC) was implemented and the dispatch of ALS teams was changed from primary to secondary based on triage of dispatched vehicles for high-priority interventions when teams with Immediate Life Support (ILS) skills were dispatched. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effects on the appropriateness of ALS teams' intervention and their employment time, and to compare sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm implementation. DESIGN: This was a retrospective before-after observational study. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Primary dispatches managed by EE-EOC involving ambulances and/or ALS teams were included. Two groups were created on the basis of the years of intervention (2013-2014 versus 2017-2018). INTERVENTION: A switch from primary to secondary dispatch of ALS teams in case of high-priority dispatches managed by ILS teams was implemented. OUTCOMES: Appropriateness of ALS team intervention, total task time of ALS vehicles, and sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm were reviewed. RESULTS: The study included 242,501 emergency calls that generated 56,567 red code dispatches. The new algorithm significantly increased global sensitivity and specificity of the system in terms of recognition of potential need of ALS intervention and the specificity of primary ALS dispatch. The appropriateness of ALS intervention was significantly increased; total tasking time per day for ALS and the number of critical dispatches without ALS available were reduced. CONCLUSION: The revision of the dispatch criteria and the extension of the two-tiered dispatch for ALS teams significantly increased the appropriateness of ALS intervention and reduced both the global tasking time and the number of high-priority dispatches without ALS teams available.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Triaje , Ambulancias , Estudios Controlados Antes y Después , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) is an assessment scale of in-hospital patients' conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess the appropriateness of a potential off-label use of NEWS by the emergency medical system (EMS) to facilitate the identification of critical patients and to trigger appropriate care in the pre-hospital setting. METHODS: A single centre, longitudinal, prospective study was carried out between July and August 2020 in the EMS service of Bologna. Home patients with age ≥ 18 years old were included in the study. The exclusion criterion was the impossibility to collect all the parameters needed to measure NEWS. RESULTS: A total of 654 patients were enrolled in the study. The recorded NEWS values increased along with the severity of dispatch priority code, the EMS return code, the emergency department triage code, and with patients' age (r = 0.135; p = 0.001). The aggregated value of NEWS was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization (OR = 1.30 (1.17; 1.34); p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that the use of NEWS in the urgent and emergency care services can help patient assessment while not affecting EMS crew operation and might assist decision making in terms of severity-code assignment and resources utilization.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/epidemiología , Pandemias , Anciano , COVID-19/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/etiología , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendenciasAsunto(s)
Deterioro Clínico , Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Puntuación de Alerta Temprana , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , China , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neumonía Viral , Características de la Residencia , SARS-CoV-2Asunto(s)
Coronavirus , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Humanos , Italia , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
AIMS: Treatment delay is a powerful predictor of survival in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. We investigated the effectiveness of pre-hospital triage with direct referral to PCI, alongside more conventional referral strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 2003 to December 2007, 1,619 STEMI patients were referred for primary PCI at our cathlab through two main triage groups: i.e., 1) following pre-hospital triage (n=524), 2) via more conventional triages (n=1,095) represented by the S. Orsola-Malpighi hospital emergency department triage (hub hospital) and local hospital triage. Pre-hospital diagnosis was associated with a 76 minute reduction in pain-to-balloon time (143 [107-216] vs. 219 [149-343], p=0.001) allowing mechanical revascularisation within 90 minutes from the first medical contact in the vast majority of the patients (>80%). Clinically, pre-hospital triage showed no significant reductions in terms of adjusted long-term mortality (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.61-1.08; p=0.16) in the overall population. However, significant adjusted survival benefits were observed in high-risk groups (i.e., cardiogenic shock, TIMI risk score >30, diabetes mellitus). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that pre-hospital diagnosis allows for significant reductions in primary PCI treatment delays and suggests the hypothesis that this referral strategy might provide long-term survival benefits especially in high-risk patients.