RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein is a potential prognostic biomarker of the efficacy of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although several ongoing trials are evaluating the level of expression of ERCC1, no consensus has been reached regarding a method for evaluation. METHODS: We used the 8F1 antibody to measure the level of expression of ERCC1 protein by means of immunohistochemical analysis in a validation set of samples obtained from 494 patients in two independent phase 3 trials (the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group JBR.10 and the Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9633 trial from the Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation Biology project). We compared the results of repeated staining of the entire original set of samples obtained from 589 patients in the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Biology study, which had led to the initial correlation between the absence of ERCC1 expression and platinum response, with our previous results in the same tumors. We mapped the epitope recognized by 16 commercially available ERCC1 antibodies and investigated the capacity of the different ERCC1 isoforms to repair platinum-induced DNA damage. RESULTS: We were unable to validate the predictive effect of immunostaining for ERCC1 protein. The discordance in the results of staining for ERCC1 suggested a change in the performance of the 8F1 antibody since 2006. We found that none of the 16 antibodies could distinguish among the four ERCC1 protein isoforms, whereas only one isoform produced a protein that had full capacities for nucleotide excision repair and cisplatin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Immunohistochemical analysis with the use of currently available ERCC1 antibodies did not specifically detect the unique functional ERCC1 isoform. As a result, its usefulness in guiding therapeutic decision making is limited. (Funded by Eli Lilly and others.).
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Reparación del ADN , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/metabolismo , Endonucleasas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , ADN de Neoplasias , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/inmunología , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Endonucleasas/genética , Endonucleasas/inmunología , Mapeo Epitopo , Epítopos , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Isoformas de Proteínas/genética , Isoformas de Proteínas/metabolismoRESUMEN
Cisplatin (cis-diaminedichloroplatin (II), CDDP) is part of the standard therapy for a number of solid tumors including Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). The initial response observed is in most cases only transient and tumors quickly become refractory to the drug. Tumor cell resistance to CDDP relies on multiple mechanisms, some of which still remain unknown. In search for such mechanisms, we examined the impact of CDDP on mRNA translation in a sensitive and in a matched resistant NSCLC cell line. We identified a set of genes whose mRNAs are differentially translated in CDDP resistant vs. sensitive cells. The translation of the mRNA encoding the Ubiquitin-Specific Peptidase 1 (USP1), a Ubiquitin peptidase with important function in multiple DNA repair pathways, is inhibited by CDDP exposure in the sensitive cells, but not in the resistant cells. This lack of down-regulation of USP1 expression at the translational level plays a primary role in CDDP resistance since inhibition of USP1 expression or activity by siRNA or the small molecule inhibitor ML323, respectively is sufficient to re-sensitize resistant cells to CDDP. We involved the USP1 mRNA translation as a major mechanism of CDDP resistance in NSCLC cells and suggest that USP1 could be evaluated as a candidate predictive marker and as a therapeutic target to overcome CDDP resistance. More generally, our results indicate that analysis of gene expression at the level of mRNA translation is a useful approach to identify new determinants of CDDP resistance.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Cisplatino/farmacología , Reparación del ADN , Células Epiteliales/metabolismo , ARN Mensajero/genética , Proteasas Ubiquitina-Específicas/genética , Línea Celular Tumoral , Daño del ADN , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Células Epiteliales/efectos de los fármacos , Células Epiteliales/patología , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Inhibidores de Proteasas/farmacología , Biosíntesis de Proteínas , ARN Mensajero/antagonistas & inhibidores , ARN Mensajero/metabolismo , ARN Interferente Pequeño/genética , ARN Interferente Pequeño/metabolismo , Mucosa Respiratoria/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Respiratoria/metabolismo , Mucosa Respiratoria/patología , Transducción de Señal , Proteasas Ubiquitina-Específicas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteasas Ubiquitina-Específicas/metabolismoRESUMEN
ERCC1 (excision repair cross-complementation group 1) plays essential roles in the removal of DNA intrastrand crosslinks by nucleotide excision repair, and that of DNA interstrand crosslinks by the Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway and homology-directed repair processes (HDR). The function of ERCC1 thus impacts on the DNA damage response (DDR), particularly in anticancer therapy when DNA damaging agents are employed. ERCC1 expression has been proposed as a predictive biomarker of the response to platinum-based therapy. However, the assessment of ERCC1 expression in clinical samples is complicated by the existence of 4 functionally distinct protein isoforms, which differently impact on DDR. Here, we explored the functional competence of each ERCC1 protein isoform and obtained evidence that the 202 isoform is the sole one endowed with ERCC1 activity in DNA repair pathways. The ERCC1 isoform 202 interacts with RPA, XPA, and XPF, and XPF stability requires expression of the ERCC1 202 isoform (but none of the 3 others). ERCC1-deficient non-small cell lung cancer cells show abnormal mitosis, a phenotype reminiscent of the FA phenotype that can be rescued by isoform 202 only. Finally, we could not observe any dominant-negative interaction between ERCC1 isoforms. These data suggest that the selective assessment of the ERCC1 isoform 202 in clinical samples should accurately reflect the DDR-related activity of the gene and hence constitute a useful biomarker for customizing anticancer therapies.