[Patients' experience of neoplasia care by their general practitioner. Qualitative study of case histories]. / Vécu de patients dans la prise en soin d'une néoplasie par leur médecin généraliste. Étude qualitative de narrations de cas.

BACKGROUND: Little research has been done on the follow-up of patients in the active phase of treatment in primary care. This study aimed to build up a corpus of authentic clinical situations and carry out an inductive analysis of the data. METHOD: Research in two stages: case study and qualitative analysis of verbatims. The authors conducted individual interviews using an interview guide. The questions targeted their experiences, focusing on their relationship with their general practitioner. RESULTS: Six themes were identified. The announcement of the diagnosis was a key moment. Patients emphasised their general practitioner's responsiveness and coordination, and stressed his involvement. They consulted him regularly during the active phase of treatment, and asked for information. They felt confident. The need to facilitate access to the general practitioner was noted, particularly in the event of a real or perceived emergency. DISCUSSION: The increase in the prevalence and incidence of cancer means that general practitioners need to be heavily involved. The authorities are advocating a strengthening of the general practitioner's "pivotal role", without clearly defining it. A perceived lack of skills may be an obstacle to general practitioner involvement. Training in cancer during the 3rd cycle of general medical studies is inadequate. By compiling and analysing a corpus of cases, it would be possible to redefine the training objectives and list the skills required to manage cancer patients.

[Thromboembolic disease and cancer: Attitude and practice of general practitioners. A qualitative study]. / Maladie thromboembolique et cancer : attitude et pratique de médecins de soins primaires en France. Une étude qualitative.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer is a major public health problem in France. Idiopathic venous thromboembolic disease may be one of the modes of discovery. Few studies have been performed on this subject in primary care. The general practitioner plays a key role in the diagnosis for which a more codified approach seems desirable. The aim was to study how general practitioners conceive the search for cancer in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolic disease in primary care. METHOD: A qualitative study, inspired by the grounded theory approach, was carried out using semi-structured interviews with 12 established general practitioners. It was conducted from May to July 2022. The interview guide was developed based on data from the literature. RESULTS: Idiopathic venous thromboembolic disease as a mode of cancer discovery in primary care was a well-known topic among general practitioners but remained a difficult exercise in practice. Our study revealed similarities in their practices: a complete anamnesis, clinical examination, verification of screening tests, and finally a TAP scan. They emphasized the importance of collaboration with angiologists and asked for a more codified management. DISCUSSION: The question of etiology of cancer remains unanswered. General practioners would like to be made aware of a common, codified attitude. This raises the question of the applicability of the recommendations. The aim is to avoid misdiagnosing a cancer or delaying a diagnosis, while at the same time, not unnecessarily exposing certain patients to excessive investigations when these are not needed. So, it is time to think about better dissemination of recommendations, tools to help GPs easily finding what they need among the multitude of existing recommendations and tools, to establish better collaboration between general practice and hospital medicine, and between general practice and specialist medicine in order to improve cancer diagnosis as early as possible.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Primary Care: Perspective of Application in France and Narrative Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection affects 30% to 40% of people in industrialized countries. AIM: This study aimed to synthesize knowledge on the diagnostic and therapeutic management of Hp infection in general practice in people under 40 years of age. METHOD: A narrative review of the literature with an inductive content analysis of the articles was performed. RESULTS: The extracted data (22 articles out of 106 included after screening of 965 articles) determined three areas of analysis: indications for screening, methods of screening and diagnosis by non-invasive tests, and treatment modalities. DISCUSSION: Targeted, easily performed screening with noninvasive tests is recommended for patients younger than 45 years of age with no family history of gastric cancer and symptoms of dyspepsia without warning signs. Given their proximity to the general population and their coverage of the territory, general practitioners are ideally positioned. Treatment modalities are well-codified and feasible in primary care. Simplifying the recommendations available to them would optimize the identification of patients at risk and the management of Hp infection. Informing, educating, involving, supporting, and promoting the control of Hp infection in primary care will be future goals. Further research is needed in primary care to evaluate the impact of new procedures on Hp control.