Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
2.
Pregnancy Hypertens ; 37: 101135, 2024 Jun 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936015

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To improve timely treatment and follow-up of birthing individuals with severe hypertension. STUDY DESIGN: A quality improvement (QI) initiative was implemented at an academic tertiary care center in the United States of America for individuals with obstetric hypertensive emergencies. Statistical process control charts were utilized to track process measures and interventions tested through plan-do-study-act cycles. Measures were disaggregated by race and ethnicity to identify and improve disparities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment of hypertensive events within 60 min, receipt of blood pressure (BP) device at discharge and completed postpartum follow-up BP check within 7 days of discharge. RESULTS: All process measures showed statistically significant improvements. The primary process measure, timely treatment of hypertensive emergencies, improved from 29 % to 76 %. Receipt of BP device improved from 37 % to 91 % and follow-up BP checks from 58 % to 81 %. No racial or ethnic disparities were noted at baseline or after interventions. Readmission rates within 6 weeks of delivery increased from 2.3 % to 6.1 % for the cohort with no severe morbidity or mortality events after discharge. Strategies associated with improvement included project launch with establishment of the "why," telehealth, simulation, a video display of quality metrics on the birthing unit, promoting BP cuff access, and automated orders. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive QI initiative provides novel improvement strategies for the management of individuals with severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for the timely treatment of severe BP, attainment of home BP devices, and follow-up after discharge. Quality improvement methodology is practical and essential for achieving guideline-concordant care.

3.
J Ultrasound Med ; 32(9): 1607-13, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23980222

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the genetic sonogram in Down syndrome screening for women who have received the stepwise sequential test. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included women with singleton pregnancies who underwent stepwise sequential (first-trimester combined and second-trimester serum) screening and then had a genetic sonogram between March 2005 and January 2010. Stepwise sequential Down syndrome risks were multiplied by either a positive or negative likelihood ratio based on the second-trimester sonographic findings to determine the final Down syndrome risk. A final Down syndrome risk of 1:270 or higher was considered screen positive. RESULTS: A total of 6286 women fulfilled our criteria, including 17 with Down syndrome-affected fetuses. After stepwise sequential testing, the Down syndrome detection rate was 88.2% (15 of 17), and after the genetic sonogram, there was a non-significant reduction in detection to 82.4% (14 of 17; P > .05). For the 6269 unaffected pregnancies, the genetic sonogram converted 58 screen-negative results (1%) to positive and 183 screen-positive results (3.1%) to negative. The net effect was a change in the false-positive rate from 6.2% (390 of 6269) after stepwise sequential screening to 4.2% (266 of 6269) after the genetic sonogram. CONCLUSIONS: The genetic sonogram should be applied cautiously for women who have received prior prenatal screening tests. Women with screen-positive results need to be counseled that a negative sonographic result can be falsely reassuring. Conversely, for women with screen-negative results who have a risk close to the cutoff, a sonographic examination could assist in the decision of whether to accept or reject amniocentesis.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Down/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Connecticut/epidemiología , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/epidemiología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 201(1): 97.e1-5, 2009 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19467637

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine changes in screening and performance of invasive diagnostic procedures for Down syndrome between 2001 and 2007. STUDY DESIGN: The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine members completed a survey in 2007 regarding screening tests and diagnostic procedures for Down syndrome. With the use of descriptive statistics, the chi(2) test, and the Student t test, responses from 2007 were compared with responses from a similar 2001 survey. RESULTS: Performance of first-trimester screening more than doubled from 2001-2007 (43.1% in 2001, 97.3% in 2007; P < .0001). Between 2001 and 2007, the use of the quad screen increased 10-fold (8.5% in 2001, 85.6% in 2007; P < .0001). There was an estimated 20% decrease in invasive diagnostic procedures that were performed in risk-positive women (53.7% in 2001, 34.2% in 2007; P < .0001). In 2007, the average fetal loss rates that were quoted by maternal-fetal medicine specialists after chorionic villous sampling was 1:160 and after an amniocentesis was 1:493. CONCLUSION: Down syndrome screening evolved from 2001-2007, with an increasing emphasis on first-trimester screening. With more efficacious screening, the number of invasive procedures has declined.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Diagnóstico Prenatal/tendencias , Adulto , Amniocentesis/tendencias , Certificación/estadística & datos numéricos , Muestra de la Vellosidad Coriónica/tendencias , Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Obstetricia/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Estados Unidos
5.
AJP Rep ; 9(2): e147-e152, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31041119

RESUMEN

HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets) is a serious pregnancy complication that can cause significant maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There are several conditions that may occur in pregnancy that may imitate the laboratory findings and clinical presentation of HELLP syndrome. Babesiosis is a parasitic imitator of HELLP syndrome that can be spread by the tick, transfusions, or congenitally. Recognition and treatment of this condition is important to optimize maternal and fetal outcomes.

6.
J Clin Med ; 3(2): 480-90, 2014 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26237386

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether maternal serum pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), total ß human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels and nuchal translucency (NT) measurements differ in women with pre-gestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) compared to non-diabetic controls and to assess whether correction factors are needed for diabetic women in calculation of aneuploidy risks. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective study of all women who underwent first trimester aneuploidy screening (11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks) from 2005 to 2011. The primary study outcome was the difference in PAPP-A, ß-hCG and NT multiples of median between women with PGDM and non-diabetic women. RESULTS: Of 6741 eligible patients, 103 patients with PGDM were using insulin and 4 patients were using oral hypoglycemic agents; the latter were excluded due to small number. There was 12% reduction of median PAPP-A (p = 0.001) and 18% reduction of median hCG (p = 0.006) in women with PGDM receiving insulin. There was no difference in NT. CONCLUSIONS: In women with PGDM receiving insulin, PAPP-A and ß-hCG levels are significantly lower compared to non-diabetic women. This suggests that when calculating risks for aneuploidy, correction factors should be considered to adjust PAPP-A and ß-hCG concentrations to those seen in non-diabetic women.

7.
Clin Lab Med ; 33(2): 343-56, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23702122

RESUMEN

This article reviews anticoagulant medications used for obstetric patients who have acute thrombosis or who require anticoagulant therapy for other indications. Medication options, dosing and monitoring, side effects, and complications are reviewed. Antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum management of therapy is discussed, as well as breastfeeding options.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Complicaciones Hematológicas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/administración & dosificación , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Embarazo
8.
Chest ; 141(2 Suppl): e691S-e736S, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22315276

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy is challenging because of the potential for both fetal and maternal complications. This guideline focuses on the management of VTE and thrombophilia as well as the use of antithrombotic agents during pregnancy. METHODS: The methods of this guideline follow the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement. RESULTS: We recommend low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention and treatment of VTE in pregnant women instead of unfractionated heparin (Grade 1B). For pregnant women with acute VTE, we suggest that anticoagulants be continued for at least 6 weeks postpartum (for a minimum duration of therapy of 3 months) compared with shorter durations of treatment (Grade 2C). For women who fulfill the laboratory criteria for antiphospholipid antibody (APLA) syndrome and meet the clinical APLA criteria based on a history of three or more pregnancy losses, we recommend antepartum administration of prophylactic or intermediate-dose unfractionated heparin or prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin combined with low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg/d) over no treatment (Grade 1B). For women with inherited thrombophilia and a history of pregnancy complications, we suggest not to use antithrombotic prophylaxis (Grade 2C). For women with two or more miscarriages but without APLA or thrombophilia, we recommend against antithrombotic prophylaxis (Grade 1B). CONCLUSIONS: Most recommendations in this guideline are based on observational studies and extrapolation from other populations. There is an urgent need for appropriately designed studies in this population.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/prevención & control , Sociedades Médicas , Trombofilia/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Aborto Espontáneo/sangre , Aborto Espontáneo/prevención & control , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/sangre , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/complicaciones , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/tratamiento farmacológico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Heparina/efectos adversos , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/efectos adversos , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Prevención Secundaria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA