The regulator's perspective: How should new therapies and follow-on products for MS be clinically evaluated in the future?

BACKGROUND: Although there is still no cure for multiple sclerosis (MS), the introduction of several innovative drugs with modes of action different from that of the existing drug arsenal and the progress in monitoring disease progression by imaging and using biomarkers are currently causing a knowledge surge. This provides opportunities for improving patient disease management. New therapies are also under development and pose challenges to the regulatory bodies regarding the optimal design of clinical trials with more patient-focused clinical endpoints. Moreover, with the upcoming patent expiry of some of the key first-line MS treatments in Europe, regulatory bodies will also face the challenge of recommending marketing authorisation for generic and abridged versions based on appropriate requirements for demonstrating equality/similarity to the innovator's product. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article is to improve the understanding of the relevant guidance documents of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) on clinical investigation of medicinal products and to highlight the issues that the agency will need to clarify regarding follow-on products of first-line MS treatments. CONCLUSION: Today, it is clear that close collaboration between patients, healthcare professionals, regulatory bodies and industry is crucial for developing new safe and effective drugs, which satisfy the needs of MS patients.

Biosimilars: from technical to pharmacoeconomic considerations. 30th Rencontres Nationales de Pharmacologie et Recherche clinique pour l'Innovation et l'Evaluation des Technologies de Santé. Tables rondes.

A biosimilar is a biological medicinal product claimed to be similar to a reference biological medicinal product. Its development plan includes studies comparing it with the reference product in order to confirm its similarity in terms of quality, preclinical safety, clinical efficacy, and clinical safety, including immunogenicity. Biosimilars differ from generics both in their molecular complexity and in the specific requirements that apply to them. Since patents on many biological medicinal products will expire within the next 5 years in major therapeutic areas such as oncology, rheumatology and gastroenterology and as those products are so costly to the French national health insurance system, the availability of biosimilars would have a considerable economic impact. The round table has issued a number of recommendations intended to ensure that the upcoming arrival of biosimilars on the market is a success, in which prescribing physicians would have a central role in informing and reassuring patients, an efficient monitoring of the patients treated with biologicals would be set up and time to market for biosimilars would be speeded up.

Biosimilars: from Technical to Pharmacoeconomic Considerations.

A biosimilar is a biological medicinal product claimed to be similar to a reference biological medicinal product. Its development plan includes studies comparing it with the reference product in order to confirm its similarity in terms of quality, preclinical safety, clinical efficacy, and clinical safety, including immunogenicity. Biosimilars differ from generics both in their molecular complexity and in the specific requirements that apply to them. Since patents on many biological medicinal products will expire within the next 5 years in major therapeutic areas such as oncology, rheumatology and gastroenterology and as those products are so costly to the French national health insurance system, the availability of biosimilars would have a considerable economic impact. The round table has issued a number of recommendations intended to ensure that the upcoming arrival of biosimilars on the market is a success, in which prescribing physicians would have a central role in informing and reassuring patients, an efficient monitoring of the patients treated with biologicals would be set up and time to market for biosimilars would be speeded up.

[How to optimize biopharmaceutical treatment safety?]. / Comment sécuriser les traitements par les biomédicaments?

Biopharmaceuticals represent a growing share of drug innovation. These complex biological products are derived from recombinant DNA biotechnology and are defined by their manufacturing process. Copies of these products, called biosimilars, are not identical to their princeps products and complicate the treatment choice. Minimal changes at any stage of the biopharmaceutical manufacturing process may affect safety and/or efficacy. Cases illustrating the issues surrounding the optimization of biopharmaceutical safety and efficacy include:--the biological activity and immunogenicity of erythropoietins, which depend on the expression cell system and isoform,--glucocerebrosidases with non identical structures have the same bioactivity,--interchangeability of botulinum toxins,--pharmacokinetics of insulin analogs,--protein immunogenicity. The development and interchangeability of biopharmaceuticals must be addressed on a case-by-case basis. The European authorities propose guidelines for the development and registration of biological products, with a specific approach for biosimilars. Biopharmaceutical use requires close patient monitoring and product traceability.

Simple liquid chromatography method for the quantification of irinotecan and SN38 in sheep plasma: application to in vivo pharmacokinetics after pulmonary artery chemoembolization using drug eluting beads.

A rapid and simple liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection (LC-FD) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification of irinotecan (CPT11) and SN38 in sheep plasma. Camptothecin (CPT) was used as the internal standard. A single step protein precipitation with acetonitrile was used for sample preparation. The separation was achieved using a 5 microm C18 column (250 mm x 4.5 mm, 5 microm) with a mobile phase composed of 36 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate dehydrate and 4 mM sodium 1 heptane sulfonate-acetonitrile (72:28), the pH of the mobile phase was adjusted to 3. The flow rate was 1.45 mL/min and the fluorescence detection was operated at 355/515 nm (excitation/emission wavelengths). The run time was 13 min. The method was validated with respect to selectivity, extraction recovery, linearity, intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy, limit of quantification and stability. The method has a limit of quantification of 5 ng/mL for both CPT11 and SN38. The assay was linear over concentrations ranging from 5 to 5000 ng/mL and to 240 ng/mL for CPT11 and SN38, respectively. This method was used successfully to perform plasma pharmacokinetic studies of CPT11 after pulmonary artery embolization (PACE) in a sheep model. It was also validated for CPT11 and SN38 analysis in sheep lymph and human plasma.