Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 141
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Urol ; 211(3): 392-399, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38150383

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Black men face a higher incidence of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) compared with non-Black men. While the 4Kscore is a widely utilized commercial test for PCa risk assessment, it does not currently account for racial differences. The aim of this study is to describe and validate a prespecified race coefficient for the 4Kscore with the goal of improving the accuracy of this test for Black men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from 85 Black men from the initial US prospective validation study, a race coefficient of 0.6 on the log-odds scale was prespecified. We calculated discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the 4Kscore with and without this coefficient for Black race in our primary analysis cohort of 205 Black men undergoing biopsy for PCa in a Veterans Affairs (VA) institution. We performed a sensitivity analysis using a combined cohort from the US prospective validation and the VA studies. RESULTS: The mean probability of high-grade PCa from the 4Kscore in the primary cohort increased from 25% to 37% with race coefficient addition. Incorporating the race coefficient improved 4Kscore's calibration in Black men, with consequent improvements in clinical utility based on decision curve analysis. Model discrimination was maintained (AUC 0.825 vs 0.828, P = .14) in the combined cohort of Black and non-Black men from the US prospective and VA studies and the calibration remained largely unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating a prespecified coefficient for Black race improved calibration and clinical utility of the 4Kscore among Black men and should be added to the 4Kscore.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Calibración , Medición de Riesgo , Estudios Prospectivos , Biopsia , Antígeno Prostático Específico
2.
NMR Biomed ; 37(3): e5069, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37990759

RESUMEN

Quantitative T2-weighted MRI (T2W) interpretation is impeded by the variability of acquisition-related features, such as field strength, coil type, signal amplification, and pulse sequence parameters. The main purpose of this work is to develop an automated method for prostate T2W intensity normalization. The procedure includes the following: (i) a deep learning-based network utilizing MASK R-CNN for automatic segmentation of three reference tissues: gluteus maximus muscle, femur, and bladder; (ii) fitting a spline function between average intensities in these structures and reference values; and (iii) using the function to transform all T2W intensities. The T2W distributions in the prostate cancer regions of interest (ROIs) and normal appearing prostate tissue (NAT) were compared before and after normalization using Student's t-test. The ROIs' T2W associations with the Gleason Score (GS), Decipher genomic score, and a three-tier prostate cancer risk were evaluated with Spearman's correlation coefficient (rS ). T2W differences in indolent and aggressive prostate cancer lesions were also assessed. The MASK R-CNN was trained with manual contours from 32 patients. The normalization procedure was applied to an independent MRI dataset from 83 patients. T2W differences between ROIs and NAT significantly increased after normalization. T2W intensities in 231 biopsy ROIs were significantly negatively correlated with GS (rS = -0.21, p = 0.001), Decipher (rS = -0.193, p = 0.003), and three-tier risk (rS = -0.235, p < 0.001). The average T2W intensities in the aggressive ROIs were significantly lower than in the indolent ROIs after normalization. In conclusion, the automated triple-reference tissue normalization method significantly improved the discrimination between prostate cancer and normal prostate tissue. In addition, the normalized T2W intensities of cancer exhibited a significant association with tumor aggressiveness. By improving the quantitative utilization of the T2W in the assessment of prostate cancer on MRI, the new normalization method represents an important advance over clinical protocols that do not include sequences for the measurement of T2 relaxation times.


Asunto(s)
Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Biopsia
3.
Cancer ; 128(18): 3287-3296, 2022 09 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35819253

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 lesions do not contain clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa; grade group ≥2). This study was aimed at identifying clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived risk fac- tors that predict CSPCa in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions. METHODS: This study analyzed the detection of CSPCa in men who underwent MRI-targeted biopsy for PI-RADS 3 lesions. Multivariable logistic regression models with goodness-of-fit testing were used to identify variables associated with CSPCa. Receiver operating curves and decision curve analyses were used to estimate the clinical utility of a predictive model. RESULTS: Of the 1784 men reviewed, 1537 were included in the training cohort, and 247 were included in the validation cohort. The 309 men with CSPCa (17.3%) were older, had a higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, and had a greater likelihood of an anteriorly located lesion than men without CSPCa (p < .01). Multivariable analysis revealed that PSA density (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.85; p < .01), age (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07; p < .01), and a biopsy-naive status (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.38-2.44) were independently associated with CSPCa. A prior negative biopsy was negatively associated (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.50; p < .01). The application of the model to the validation cohort resulted in an area under the curve of 0.78. A predicted risk threshold of 12% could have prevented 25% of biopsies while detecting almost 95% of CSPCas with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 34%. CONCLUSIONS: For PI-RADS 3 lesions, an elevated PSA density, older age, and a biopsy-naive status were associated with CSPCa, whereas a prior negative biopsy was negatively associated. A predictive model could prevent PI-RADS 3 biopsies while missing few CSPCas. LAY SUMMARY: Among men with an equivocal lesion (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3) on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), those who are older, those who have a higher prostate-specific antigen density, and those who have never had a biopsy before are at higher risk for having clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) on subsequent biopsy. However, men with at least one negative biopsy have a lower risk of CSPCa. A new predictive model can greatly reduce the need to biopsy equivocal lesions noted on mpMRI while missing only a few cases of CSPCa.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Biopsia , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
World J Urol ; 40(1): 27-34, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33590277

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Over the last decade, we have seen the emergence of tissue-based genomic prognostic markers that can be used for decision-making regarding the need for treatment. This review provides an up-to-date summary of the relevant literature surrounding these markers with a discussion of the relevant strength and limitations. METHODS: We performed a literature search of tissue-based genomic prognostic markers and selected those that were currently available for clinical use. We selected the following markers for further review: Decipher (Decipher Bioscience), Polaris (Myriad), Genome Prostate Score (Oncotype Dx), and Promark. We selected the initial validation study for each marker along with other validation studies in independent cohorts. Furthermore, we selected available clinical utility studies or studies combining multi parametric MRI. RESULTS: In this article, we provide an in-depth review of four commercially available biomarkers and discuss the current literature surrounding these markers, including the benefits and limitations of their use. We found that each of these markers has evidence supporting their role as an independent predictor of relevant prostate cancer endpoints, which can be helpful for clinical decision-making. However, issues related to heterogeneity and a lack of prospective randomized studies supporting their utility are limitations. Evidence appears to suggest that MRI and genomic risk assessment maybe complementary. CONCLUSION: Although these markers can help in improved risk stratification of patients eligible for AS, more prospective studies with head to head comparison between markers are needed to elucidate the true potential of these markers in AS.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Neoplasias de la Próstata/inducido químicamente , Espera Vigilante/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia
5.
World J Urol ; 40(8): 2017-2023, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35689106

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Radical prostatectomy (RP) outcomes in Hispanic men with prostate cancer are not well-described. Prior studies showed varying results regarding the rate of upgrading and upstaging, and these studies included limited pathologic data and lack of central pathology review. We characterized the rate of upgrading, adverse pathology, and oncologic outcomes in Hispanics after prostatectomy using a large institutional database. METHODS: We included Hispanic white (HW), non-Hispanic white (NHW), and black men who underwent (RP) between 2010 and 2021 at a single institution. We recorded differences in grade group between biopsy and prostatectomy and performed multivariable analyses for odds of upgrading and adverse pathologic findings. The primary outcome was rate of upgrading in HWs. Using a sub-cohort with follow-up data, we assessed race/ethnicity and upgrading as a predictor of biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival. RESULTS: Our cohort included 1877 men: 36.7% were NHW, 40.6% were HW, and 22.7% were black. Rates of upgrading were not different between NHW, NHW, and black men at 34.0, 33.8, and 37.3%, respectively (p = 0.4). In the multivariable analysis for upgrading, significant predictors for upgrading were older age (p = 0.002), higher PSA (p < 0.001), and lower prostate weight (p = 0.02), but race/ethnicity did not predict upgrading. In patients with available follow-up (1083, 58%), upgrading predicted worse BCR-free survival (HR 2.17, CI 1.46-3.22, p < 0.0001) but race/ethnicity did not. CONCLUSIONS: HW men undergoing RP had similar rates of upgrading and adverse pathologic outcomes as NHW men. Race/ethnicity does not independently predict upgrading or worse oncologic outcomes after RP.


Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Biopsia , Humanos , Masculino , Clasificación del Tumor , Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología
6.
Prostate ; 81(12): 866-873, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34184782

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increasing percentages of Gleason pattern 4 (GP4%) in radical prostatectomy (RP) correlate with an increased likelihood of nonorgan-confined disease and earlier biochemical recurrence (BCR). However, there are no detailed RP studies assessing the impact of GP4% and corresponding tumor volume (TV) on extraprostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle (SV) invasion (SV+), and positive surgical margin (SM) status (SM+). METHODS: In 1301 consecutive RPs, we analyzed each tumor nodule (TN) for TV, Grade Group (GG), presence of focal versus nonfocal EPE, SV+ , and SM+. Using GG1 (GP4% = 0) TNs as a reference, we recorded GP4% for all GG2 or GG3 TNs. We performed a multivariable analysis (MVA) using a mixed effects logistic regression that tested significant variables for risk of EPE, SV+, and SM+, as well as a multinomial logistic regression model that tested significant variables for risks of nonorgan-confined disease (pT2+, pT3a, and pT3b) versus organ-confined disease (pT2). RESULTS: We identified 3231 discrete TNs ranging from 1 to 7 (median: 2.5) per RP. These included GG1 (n = 2115), GG2 (n = 818), GG3 (n = 274), and GG4 (n = 24) TNs. Increasing GP4% weakly paralleled increasing TV (tau = 0.07, p < .001). In MVA, increasing GP4% and TV predicted a greater likelihood of EPE (odds ratio [OR]: 1.03 and 4.41), SV+ (OR: 1.03 and 3.83), and SM+ (1.01, p = .01 and 2.83), all p < .001. Our multinomial logistic regression model demonstrated an association between GP4% and the risk of EPE (i.e., pT3a and pT3b disease), as well as an association between TV and risk of upstaging (all p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Both GP4% and TV are independent predictors of adverse pathological stage and margin status at RP. However, the risks for adverse outcomes associated with GP4% are marginal, while those for TV are strong. The prognostic significance of GP4% on BCR-free survival has not been studied controlling for TV and other adverse RP findings. Whether adverse pathological stage and margin status associated with larger TV could decrease BCR-free survival to a greater extent than increasing RP GP4% remains to be studied.


Asunto(s)
Márgenes de Escisión , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Carga Tumoral/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prostatectomía/tendencias
7.
J Urol ; 206(1): 22-28, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33617331

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the optimal cystoscopic interval for intermediate risk, nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with intermediate risk, nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (2010-2017) was performed and 3 hypothetical models of surveillance intensity were applied: model 1: high (3 months), model 2: moderate (6 months) and model 3: low intensity (12 months) over a 2-year period. We compared timing of actual detection of recurrence and progression to proposed cystoscopy timing between each model. We calculated number of avoidable cystoscopies and associated costs. RESULTS: Of 107 patients with median followup of 37 months, 66/107 (77.6%) developed recurrence and 12/107(14.1%) had progression. Relative to model 1, there were 33 (50%) delayed detection of recurrences in model 2 and 41 (62%) in model 3. There was a 1.7-month mean delay in detection of recurrence for model 1 vs 3.2, and a 7.6-month delay for models 2 and 3 (p <0.001 model 1 vs 2; p <0.001 model 2 vs 3). Relative to model 1, there were 8 (67%) and 9 (75%) delayed detection of progression events in model 2 and 3. There were no progression-related bladder cancer deaths or radical cystectomies due to delayed detection. Mean number of avoidable cystoscopies was higher in model 1 (2) vs model 2 (1) and 3 (0). Model 1 had the highest aggregate cost of surveillance ($46,262.52). CONCLUSIONS: High intensity (3-month) surveillance intervals provide faster detection of recurrences but with increased cost and more avoidable cystoscopies without clear oncologic benefit. Moderate intensity (6-month) intervals in intermediate risk, nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer allows timely detection without oncologic compromise and is less costly with fewer cystoscopies.


Asunto(s)
Cistoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Espera Vigilante/estadística & datos numéricos , Espera Vigilante/normas , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo
8.
J Urol ; 205(5): 1344-1351, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33356482

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Genomic prognostic signatures are used on prostate biopsy tissue for cancer risk assessment, but tumor heterogeneity and multifocality may be an issue. We evaluated the variability in genomic risk assessment from different biopsy cores within the prostate using 3 prognostic signatures (Decipher, CCP, GPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men in this study came from 2 prospective prostate cancer trials of patients undergoing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with genomic profiling of positive biopsy cores. We explored the relationship among tumor grade, magnetic resonance imaging risk and genomic risk for each signature. We evaluated the variability in genomic risk assessment between different biopsy cores and assessed how often magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy or the current standard of care (profiling the core with the highest grade) resulted in the highest genomic risk level. RESULTS: In all, 224 positive biopsy cores from 78 men with prostate cancer were profiled. For each signature, higher biopsy grade (p <0.001) and magnetic resonance imaging risk level (p <0.001) were associated with higher genomic scores. Genomic scores from different biopsy cores varied with risk categories changing by 21% to 62% depending on which core or signature was used. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy and profiling the core with the highest grade resulted in the highest genomic risk level in 72% to 84% and 75% to 87% of cases, respectively, depending on the signature used. CONCLUSIONS: There is variation in genomic risk assessment from different biopsy cores regardless of the signature used. Magnetic resonance imaging directed biopsy or profiling the highest grade core resulted in the highest genomic risk level in most cases.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Genómica , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Medición de Riesgo/métodos
9.
J Urol ; 204(3): 483-489, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32167866

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We report short-term outcomes of focal high intensity focused ultrasound use for primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-center prospectively collected data on patients with prostate cancer who underwent primary focal high intensity focused ultrasound from January 2016 to July 2018 were included. All patients underwent a 12-core biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy depending on the presence of targetable lesions. Any Grade Group was allowed, however only patients with localized disease were included. The primary outcome was oncologic control, defined as negative followup in-field biopsy of treated cancer. Prostate specific antigen, Sexual Health Inventory for Men, International Prostate Symptom Score and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite domain scores were assessed 3-monthly till 12 months. Biopsy was performed at 6 or 12 months for high or low/intermediate risk cancer, respectively. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with minimum followup of 12 months were included in the study. The majority of patients (67%) had cancer Grade Group 2 or greater. Fifteen patients (28.8%) underwent complete transurethral prostate resection/holmium laser enucleation of prostate procedure for debulking large prostates to avoid postoperative urinary retention. Among 30 (58%) patients who underwent followup biopsies, 25 (83%) had negative in-field biopsy results and 4 (13%) had de-novo positive out-of-field biopsy. Only 5 major complications (all grade III) in 4 patients were noted. Urinary symptoms returned to near baseline questionnaire scores within 3-6 months. Sexual function returned to baseline at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Focal high intensity focused ultrasound is a safe and effective treatment for patients with localized clinically significant prostate cancer with acceptable short-term oncologic and functional outcomes. The complications are minimal and patient selection is essential. Short-term oncologic outcomes are promising but longer followup is required to establish long-term oncologic outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Ultrasonido Enfocado Transrectal de Alta Intensidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
10.
J Urol ; 203(3): 505-511, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31609178

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We applied nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer AUA (American Urological Association)/SUO (Society of Urologic Oncology) guidelines for risk stratification and analyzed predictors of recurrence and progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 398 patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer treated between 2001 and 2017. Descriptive statistics were used to compare AUA/SUO risk groups. Predictors of recurrence and progression were determined by multivariable regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis was done, a Cox proportional hazards regression model was created and time dependent AUCs were calculated to determine progression-free and recurrence-free survival by risk group. RESULTS: Median followup was 37 months (95% CI 35-42). Of the patients 92% underwent bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction and 46% received at least 1 course of maintenance treatment. Of the patients 11.5% were at low, 32.5% were at intermediate and 55.8% were at high risk. In patients at low, intermediate and high risk the 5-year progression-free survival rate was 93%, 74% and 54%, and the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 43%, 33% and 23%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis was done to stratify high grade Ta 3 cm or less tumor recurrence-free and progression-free survival in the intermediate vs the high risk group. Relative to low risk, classification as intermediate and as high risk was an independent predictor of progression (HR 9.7, 95% CI 2.23-42.0, p <0.01, and HR 36, 95% CI 8.16-159, p <0.001, respectively). Recurrence was more likely in patients at high risk than in those at low risk (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.11-3.71, p=0.022). For recurrence and progression the 1-year AUC was 0.60 (95% CI 0.546-0.656) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.622-0.732), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The AUA/SUO nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer risk classification system appropriately stratifies patients based on the likelihood of recurrence and progression. It should be used at diagnosis to counsel patients and guide therapy.


Asunto(s)
Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacuna BCG/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia
11.
J Urol ; 204(3): 450-459, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32271690

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We evaluated health related quality of life following robotic and open radical cystectomy as a treatment for bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Randomized Open versus Robotic Cystectomy (RAZOR) trial population we assessed health related quality of life by using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Vanderbilt Cystectomy Index and the Short Form 8 Health Survey (SF-8) at baseline, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The primary objective was to assess the impact of surgical approach on health related quality of life. As an exploratory analysis we assessed the impact of urinary diversion type on health related quality of life. RESULTS: Analyses were performed in subsets of the per-protocol population of 302 patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean scores by surgical approach at any time point for any FACT-Vanderbilt Cystectomy Index subscale or composite score (p >0.05). The emotional well-being score increased over time in both surgical arms. Patients in the open arm showed significantly better SF-8 sores in the physical and mental summary scores at 6 months compared to baseline (p <0.05). Continent diversion (versus noncontinent) was associated with worse FACT-bladder-cystectomy score at 3 (p <0.01) but not at 6 months, and the SF-8 physical component was better in continent-diversion patients at 6 months (p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests lack of significant differences in the health related quality of life in robotic and open cystectomies. As robotic procedures become more widespread it is important to discuss this finding during counseling.


Asunto(s)
Cistectomía/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
13.
Curr Opin Urol ; 29(6): 593-597, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31436568

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide a comprehensive review of the available biomarkers for the detection and active surveillance of prostate cancer and simplify decision-making while choosing between them. RECENT FINDINGS: The limitations of PSA and mpMRI and the invasive nature of prostate biopsy has led to a constant search for serum and urinary biomarkers for both the detection and monitoring during active surveillance of prostate cancer. 4K, PHI and PCA3 have been validated in prospective clinical trials for initial detection of prostate cancer and recent evidence points to potential differentiation between indolent and aggressive cancer. However, the usage in monitoring tumor dynamics is debatable because of lack of conclusive evidence. The answer to the existing problems lies in high-quality studies to establish definitive evidence and also to help choose between the plethora of biomarkers available today. SUMMARY: Despite the advancements in innovation and usage of biomarkers in prostate cancer, there exists tremendous potential in improving them to fulfil the unmet need that exists today. Studies to establish conclusive evidence and integration with imaging can tremendously aid diagnosis and monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Neoplasias/sangre , Antígenos de Neoplasias/orina , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Biomarcadores de Tumor/orina , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Espera Vigilante , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/orina
14.
Can J Urol ; 26(3): 9763-9768, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31180306

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To assess the secondary sequence rule in The Prostate Imaging Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 by comparing the detection of Grade group 1+ (GG1+) and 2+ (GG2+) cancers in PI-RADS 3, an upgraded PI-RADS 4, and true (non-upgraded) PI-RADS 4 targets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed a total of 589 lesions scored as PI-RADS 3 or 4 obtained from 434 men who underwent mpMRI-US fusion biopsy from September 2015 to November 2017 for evaluation of GG1+ and GG2+ prostate cancer. PI-RADS 4 lesions were differentiated into those that were 'upgraded' to PI-RADS 4 based on the secondary sequence and those that were 'true' PI-RADS 4 based on the dominant sequence. RESULTS: The odds of detecting a GG2+ cancer was significantly higher for an upgraded 4 (peripheral zone (PZ): OR 5.06, 95%CI 2.04-12.54, p < 0.001, transitional zone (TZ): OR 3.08, 95%CI 1.04-9.08, p = 0.042) and true 4 (PZ: OR 5.82, 95%CI 3.10-10.94, p < 0.0001, TZ: OR 2.43, 95%CI 1.14-5.18, p = 0.022) lesions compared to PI-RADS 3 lesions. Additionally, we found no difference in the odds of detecting a GG2+ prostate cancer between a true PI-RADS 4 (OR 1.15, 95%CI 0.49-2.71 p = 0.746) and upgraded 4 (referent) in the PZ. Similar non-significance was noted between true 4 (OR 0.79, 95%CI 0.26-2.38 p = 0.674) and upgraded 4 lesions in the TZ for detection of GG2+ cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Upgraded PI-RADS 4 and true 4 targets have a higher odds of detecting GG1+ and GG2+ compared to PI-RADS 3 in the PZ and TZ. Our findings validate the revised scoring system for PI-RADS.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Clasificación del Tumor/métodos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Sistemas de Información Radiológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/clasificación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
15.
J Urol ; 199(6): 1459-1463, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29223389

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The 4Kscore® test accurately detects aggressive prostate cancer and reduces unnecessary biopsies. However, its performance in African American men has been unknown. We assessed test performance in a cohort of men with a large African American representation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men referred for prostate biopsy at 8 Veterans Affairs medical centers were prospectively enrolled in the study. All men underwent phlebotomy for 4Kscore test assessment prior to prostate biopsy. The primary outcome was the detection of Grade Group 2 or higher cancer on biopsy. We assessed the discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness of 4Kscore to predict Grade Group 2 or higher prostate cancer and compared it to a base model consisting of age, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. Additionally, we compared test performance in African American and nonAfrican American men. RESULTS: Of the 366 enrolled men 205 (56%) were African American and 131 (36%) had Grade Group 2 or higher prostate cancer. The 4Kscore test showed better discrimination (AUC 0.81 vs 0.74, p <0.01) and higher clinical usefulness on decision curve analysis than the base model. Test prediction closely approximated the observed risk of Grade Group 2 or higher prostate cancer. There was no difference in test performance in African American and nonAfrican American men (0.80 vs 0.84, p = 0.32), The test outperformed the base model in each group. CONCLUSIONS: The 4Kscore test accurately predicts aggressive prostate cancer for biopsy decision making in African American and nonAfrican American men.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/sangre , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Biopsia , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Hospitales de Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Selección de Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
16.
J Urol ; 199(6): 1488-1493, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29307684

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The accumulation of data through a prospective, multicenter coordinated registry network is a practical way to gather real world evidence on the performance of novel prostate ablation technologies. Urological oncologists, targeted biopsy experts, industry representatives and representatives of the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) convened to discuss the role, feasibility and important data elements of a coordinated registry network to assess new and existing prostate ablation technologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multiround Delphi consensus approach was performed which included the opinion of 15 expert urologists, representatives of the FDA and leadership from high intensity focused ultrasound device manufacturers. Stakeholders provided input in 3 consecutive rounds with conference calls following each round to obtain consensus on remaining items. Participants agreed that these elements initially developed for high intensity focused ultrasound are compatible with other prostate ablation technologies. Coordinated registry network elements were reviewed and supplemented with data elements from the FDA common study metrics. RESULTS: The working group reached consensus on capturing specific patient demographics, treatment details, oncologic outcomes, functional outcomes and complications. Validated health related quality of life questionnaires were selected to capture patient reported outcomes, including the IIEF-5 (International Index of Erectile Function-5), the I-PSS (International Prostate Symptom Score), the EPIC-26 (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26) and the MSHQ-EjD (Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction). Group consensus was to obtain followup multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and prostate biopsy approximately 12 months after ablation with additional imaging or biopsy performed as clinically indicated. CONCLUSIONS: A national prostate ablation coordinated registry network brings forth vital practice pattern and outcomes data for this emerging treatment paradigm in the United States. Our multiple stakeholder consensus identifies critical elements to evaluate new and existing energy modalities and devices.


Asunto(s)
Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Sistema de Registros , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/estadística & datos numéricos , Biopsia/normas , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/normas , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/normas , Masculino , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/normas , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Calidad de Vida , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/normas , Estados Unidos
17.
BJU Int ; 121(5): 745-751, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29281848

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare survival outcome between chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with MIBC (≥cT2, N0, M0) in the National Cancer Database (2004-2013). CRT was defined as a radiation dose of ≥40 Gy and chemotherapy within 90 days of radiation. Descriptive statistics were used to compare groups. RC and CRT patients were propensity matched. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine predictors of survival. RESULTS: In all, 8 379 (6 606 RC and 1 773 CRT) patients met the inclusion criteria and 1 683 patients in each group were propensity matched. On multivariable extended Cox analysis, significant predictors of decreased OS were age, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity score of 1, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity score of 2, stage cT3-4, and urothelial histology. CRT was associated with decreased mortality at year 1 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.96; P = 0.01), but at 2 years (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.6; P < 0.001) and 3 years onward (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8; P < 0.001) CRT was associated with increased mortality. The 5-year OS was greater for RC than for CRT (38% vs 30%, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Initially after treatment for MIBC the risk of mortality is lower with CRT compared to RC. However, at ≥2 years after treatment the mortality risk favours RC. Patients who are suitable surgical candidates, with a low risk of morbidity, may be better served by RC.


Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia , Cistectomía , Neoplasias de los Músculos/mortalidad , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Puntaje de Propensión , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidad , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia/mortalidad , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Cistectomía/mortalidad , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de los Músculos/patología , Neoplasias de los Músculos/radioterapia , Neoplasias de los Músculos/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía
18.
BJU Int ; 121(5): 758-763, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29281853

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a survival difference for African-American men (AAM) versus Caucasian American men (CM) with penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC), particularly in locally advanced and metastatic cases where disease mortality is highest. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the Florida Cancer Data System, we identified men with pSCC from 2005 to 2013. We compared age, follow-up, stage, race, and treatment type between AAM and CM. We performed Kaplan-Meier analysis for overall survival (OS) between AAM and CM for all stages, and for those with locally advanced and metastatic disease. A multivariable model was developed to determine significant predictors of OS. RESULTS: In all, 653 men (94 AAM and 559 CM) had pSCC and 198 (30%) had locally advanced and/or metastatic disease. A higher proportion of AAM had locally advanced and/or metastatic disease compared to CM (38 [40%] vs 160 [29%], P = 0.03). The median (interquartile range) follow-up for the entire cohort was 12.6 (5.4-32.0) months. For all stages, AAM had a significantly lower median OS compared to CM (26 vs 36 months, P = 0.03). For locally advanced and metastatic disease, there was a consistent trend toward disparity in median OS between AAM and CM (17 vs 22 months, P = 0.06). After adjusting for age, stage, grade, and treatment type, AAM with pSCC had a greater likelihood of death compared to CM (hazard ratio 1.64, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: AAM have worse OS compared to CM with pSCC and this may partly be due to advanced stage at presentation. Treatment disparity may also contribute to lessened survival in AAM, but we were unable to demonstrate a significant difference in treatment utilisation between the groups.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Neoplasias del Pene/patología , Población Blanca , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Neoplasias del Pene/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Pene/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
19.
World J Urol ; 36(3): 393-399, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29230495

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of urinary diversion type following radical cystectomy (RC) on readmission and short-term mortality rates. METHODS: Patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer in the National Cancer Data Base were grouped based on the type of urinary diversion performed: non-continent [ileal conduit (IC)] or two continent techniques [continent pouch (CP) and orthotopic neobladder (NB)]. We used propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression models to compare 30-day readmission and 30- and 90-day mortality between the different types of urinary diversion. RESULTS: Among 11,933 patients who underwent RC, we identified 10,197 (85.5%) IC, 1044 (8.7%) CP, and 692 (5.8%) NB. Patients who received IC were significantly older and had more comorbidities (p < 0.0001). Continent diversions were more likely to be performed at an academic center (p < 0.0001). Surgery performed at a non-academic center was an independent predictor of 30-day readmission (OR 1.19, p = 0.010) and 30-day mortality (OR 1.27, p = 0.043). Patients undergoing NB had an increased likelihood of being readmitted (OR 1.41, p = 0.010). There was no significant difference in short-term mortality between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing NB had marginally increased rates of readmission compared to IC. Surgery performed at a non-academic center was associated with higher readmission and 30-day mortality. Similar short-term mortality rates were observed among the different types of urinary diversion.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Cistectomía/métodos , Mortalidad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Derivación Urinaria/métodos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Puntaje de Propensión , Estados Unidos , Reservorios Urinarios Continentes , Adulto Joven
20.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 29(1): 78-84.e1, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29150394

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of prostate artery embolization (PAE) in urinary catheter-dependent patients with large prostate volumes and high comorbidity scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center review was conducted of 30 patients with urinary retention at time of PAE from November 2014 through February 2017. Mean (range) age was 73.1 years (48-94 y), age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index was 4.5 (0-10), duration of urinary retention was 63.4 days (2-224 d), International Prostate Symptom Score quality-of-life (IPSS-QOL) was 5.3 (3-6), and prostate volume was 167.3 cm3 (55-557 cm3). These parameters were collected at 3, 6, and 12 months after PAE. Trials of voiding were performed approximately 2 weeks after PAE and, if failed, every 2 weeks thereafter. Adverse events were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: At a mean (range) of 18.2 days (1-72 d), 26 (86.7%) patients were no longer reliant on catheters. Follow-up was obtained in all patients eligible at 3 and 6 months and 17 of 20 (85.0%) patients eligible at 1 year. Mean (range) IPSS-QOL improved significantly to 1.2 (0-5), 0.7 (0-4), and 0.6 (0-4) at 3, 6, and 12 months (all P < .001). Mean (range) prostate volume decreased significantly to 115.9 cm3 (27-248 cm3) at 3 months (P < .001). Two patients experienced grade II urosepsis complications, which were successfully treated with intravenous antibiotics. All other complications were self-limited grade I complications. CONCLUSIONS: PAE represents a safe and effective option for management of patients with urinary retention, especially patients with large prostates who are not ideal surgical candidates.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Próstata/irrigación sanguínea , Próstata/patología , Cateterismo Urinario , Retención Urinaria/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Retención Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA