Safety and tolerability of intravenous immunoglobulin infusion in Down syndrome regression disorder.

Three large multi-center studies have identified the clinical utility of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in the treatment of Down syndrome regression disorder (DSRD). Yet the tolerability of infusions in individuals with DS and the safety of IVIg remains unknown in this population. This study sought to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IVIg in individuals with DSRD compared to a real-world cohort of individuals with pediatric onset neuroimmunologic disorders. A single-center, retrospective chart review evaluating clinically documented infusion reactions was performed for individuals meeting international consensus criteria for DSRD and having IVIg infusions between 2019 and 2023. Infusion reactions were evaluated for severity and need for alterations in infusion plan. This cohort was compared against an age and sex matched cohort of children with neuroimmunologic conditions who had also received IVIg infusions. In total, 127 individuals with DSRD and 186 individuals with other neuroimmunologic disorders were enrolled. There was no difference in the overall rate of adverse reactions (AEs) between the DSRD and general neuroimmunology cohorts (p = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.80-2.00), but cardiac-related AEs specifically were more common among the DSRD group (p = 0.02, 95% CI: 1.23-17.54). When AEs did occur, there was no difference in frequency of pharmacologic intervention (p = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.34-1.13) or discontinuation of therapy (p = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.06-7.44). There was a higher incidence of lab abnormalities on IVIG among the general neuroimmunology cohort (p = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.24-0.94) compared to the DSRD cohort. Transaminitis was the most common laboratory abnormality in the DSRD group. In a large cohort of individuals with DSRD, there were no significant differences in the safety and tolerability of IVIg compared to a cohort of children and young adults with neuroimmunologic conditions.

The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Clinical Core.

The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Clinical Core is responsible for coordination of all clinical activities at the ADNI sites, including project management, regulatory oversight, and site management and monitoring, as well as the collection of all clinical data and management of all study data. The Clinical Core is also charged with determining the clinical classifications and criteria for enrollment in evolving AD trials and enabling the ongoing characterization of the cross-sectional features and longitudinal trajectories of the ADNI cohorts with application of these findings to optimal clinical trial designs. More than 2400 individuals have been enrolled in the cohorts since the inception of ADNI, facilitating refinement of our understanding of the AD trajectory and allowing academic and industry investigators to model therapeutic trials across the disease spectrum from the presymptomatic stage through dementia. HIGHLIGHTS: Since 2004, the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Clinical Core has overseen the enrollment of > 2400 participants with mild cognitive impairment, mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, and normal cognition. The longitudinal dataset has elucidated the full cognitive and clinical trajectory of AD from its presymptomatic stage through the onset of dementia. The ADNI data have supported the design of most major trials in the field.

Assessing amyloid PET positivity and cognitive function in Down syndrome to guide clinical trials targeting amyloid.

INTRODUCTION: Trisomy 21, or Down syndrome (DS), predisposes individuals to early-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD). While monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting amyloid are approved for older AD patients, their efficacy in DS remains unexplored. This study examines amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) positivity (A+), memory function, and clinical status across ages in DS to guide mAb trial designs. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from the Alzheimer Biomarker Consortium-Down Syndrome (ABC-DS) was analyzed. PET amyloid beta in Centiloids classified amyloid status using various cutoffs. Episodic memory was assessed using the modified Cued Recall Test, and clinical status was determined through consensus processes. RESULTS: Four hundred nine DS adults (mean age = 44.83 years) were evaluated. A+ rates increased with age, with mean amyloid load rising significantly. Memory decline and cognitive impairment are also correlated with age. DISCUSSION: These findings emphasize the necessity of tailoring mAb trials for DS, considering age-related AD characteristics. HIGHLIGHTS: There is rapid increase in prevalence of amyloid beta (Aß) positron emission tomography (PET) positivity in Down syndrome (DS) after the age of 40 years. Aß PET positivity thresholds have significant impact on prevalence rates in DS. There is a significant lag between Aß PET positivity and clinical symptom onset in DS.

Revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer's disease: Alzheimer's Association Workgroup.

The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association convened three separate work groups in 2011 and single work groups in 2012 and 2018 to create recommendations for the diagnosis and characterization of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The present document updates the 2018 research framework in response to several recent developments. Defining diseases biologically, rather than based on syndromic presentation, has long been standard in many areas of medicine (e.g., oncology), and is becoming a unifying concept common to all neurodegenerative diseases, not just AD. The present document is consistent with this principle. Our intent is to present objective criteria for diagnosis and staging AD, incorporating recent advances in biomarkers, to serve as a bridge between research and clinical care. These criteria are not intended to provide step-by-step clinical practice guidelines for clinical workflow or specific treatment protocols, but rather serve as general principles to inform diagnosis and staging of AD that reflect current science. HIGHLIGHTS: We define Alzheimer's disease (AD) to be a biological process that begins with the appearance of AD neuropathologic change (ADNPC) while people are asymptomatic. Progression of the neuropathologic burden leads to the later appearance and progression of clinical symptoms. Early-changing Core 1 biomarkers (amyloid positron emission tomography [PET], approved cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and accurate plasma biomarkers [especially phosphorylated tau 217]) map onto either the amyloid beta or AD tauopathy pathway; however, these reflect the presence of ADNPC more generally (i.e., both neuritic plaques and tangles). An abnormal Core 1 biomarker result is sufficient to establish a diagnosis of AD and to inform clinical decision making throughout the disease continuum. Later-changing Core 2 biomarkers (biofluid and tau PET) can provide prognostic information, and when abnormal, will increase confidence that AD is contributing to symptoms. An integrated biological and clinical staging scheme is described that accommodates the fact that common copathologies, cognitive reserve, and resistance may modify relationships between clinical and biological AD stages.

From understanding to action: Exploring molecular connections of Down syndrome to Alzheimer's disease for targeted therapeutic approach.

Down syndrome (DS) is caused by a third copy of chromosome 21. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative condition characterized by the deposition of amyloid-beta (Aß) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the brain. Both disorders have elevated Aß, tau, dysregulated immune response, and inflammation. In people with DS, Hsa21 genes like APP and DYRK1A are overexpressed, causing an accumulation of amyloid and neurofibrillary tangles, and potentially contributing to an increased risk of AD. As a result, people with DS are a key demographic for research into AD therapeutics and prevention. The molecular links between DS and AD shed insights into the underlying causes of both diseases and highlight potential therapeutic targets. Also, using biomarkers for early diagnosis and treatment monitoring is an active area of research, and genetic screening for high-risk individuals may enable earlier intervention. Finally, the fundamental mechanistic parallels between DS and AD emphasize the necessity for continued research into effective treatments and prevention measures for DS patients at risk for AD. Genetic screening with customized therapy approaches may help the DS population in current clinical studies and future biomarkers.

Neuroimaging abnormalities associated with immunotherapy responsiveness in Down syndrome regression disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of neuroimaging abnormalities in individuals with Down syndrome regression disorder (DSRD) and evaluate if neuroimaging abnormalities were predictive of therapeutic responses. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective, case-control study which reviewed neuroimaging studies of individuals with DSRD and compared them to a control cohort of individuals with Down syndrome (DS) alone was performed. Individuals aged 10-30 years and meeting international consensus criteria for DSRD were included. The presence of T1, T2/FLAIR, and SWI signal abnormalities was reviewed. Response rates to various therapies, including immunotherapy, were evaluated in the presence of neuroimaging abnormalities. RESULTS: In total, 74 individuals (35%) had either T2/FLAIR and/or SWI signal abnormality compared to 14 individuals (12%) without DSRD (p < 0.001, 95%CI: 2.18-7.63). T2/FLAIR signal abnormalities were not appreciated more frequently in individuals with DSRD (14%, 30/210) than in the control cohort (9%, 11/119) (p = 0.18, OR: 1.63, 95%CI: 0.79-3.40). SWI signal abnormalities were appreciated at a higher frequency in individuals with DSRD (24%, 51/210) compared to the control cohort (4%, 5/119) (p < 0.001, OR: 7.31, 95%CI: 2.83-18.90). T2/FLAIR signal abnormalities were localized to the frontal (40%, 12/30) and parietal lobes (37%, 11/30). SWI signal abnormalities were predominantly in the bilateral basal ganglia (94%, 49/52). Individuals with DSRD and the presence of T2/FLAIR and/or SWI signal abnormalities were much more likely to respond to immunotherapy (p < 0.001, OR: 8.42. 95%CI: 3.78-18.76) and less likely to respond to benzodiazepines (p = 0.01, OR: 0.45, 95%CI: 0.25-0.83), antipsychotics (p < 0.001, OR: 0.28, 95%CI: 0.11-0.55), or electroconvulsive therapy (p < 0.001, OR: 0.12; 95%CI: 0.02-0.78) compared to individuals without these neuroimaging abnormalities. INTERPRETATION: This study indicates that in individuals diagnosed with DSRD, T2/FLAIR, and SWI signal abnormalities are more common than previously thought and predict response to immunotherapy.

De novo variants in immune regulatory genes in Down syndrome regression disorder.

BACKGROUND: Down Syndrome Regression Disorder (DSRD) is a rare and poorly understood disorder of the central nervous system, characterized by acute or subacute neuropsychiatric symptoms in previously healthy individuals with Down syndrome (DS). Many patients exhibit immunotherapy-responsiveness, indicative of immune dysregulation as a potential underlying etiology. While hypotheses are emerging regarding the role of interferon signaling in DSRD and other autoimmune conditions associated with DS, it is unclear why a small subset of individuals with DS develop DSRD. The aim of this study was to investigate genes of immune regulation in persons with DSRD. METHODS: This study included individuals with DSRD aged 10-30 years with trio exome sequencing performed during the diagnostic work up. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis (Chi-square and Fisher's exact test) were used to describe and compare the characteristics of individuals with and without variants. RESULTS: Forty-one individuals with DSRD had trio exome sequencing results. Eight (20%) had heterozygous de novo variants of immune regulatory genes, with four variants being pathogenic or likely pathogenic (UNC13D, XIAP, RNASEH2A, and DNASE1L3). All genes harboring pathogenic variants were associated with interferon type-1 inflammatory response. Individuals harboring variants were more likely to have a preceding trigger (p = 0.03, 95% CI 1.21-97.06), rapid clinical decline in less than 1 month (p = 0.01, 95% CI 1.67-52.06), and MRI abnormalities (p < 0.001, 95% CI 4.89-527.71). DISCUSSION: A distinct subset of individuals with DSRD exhibited pathogenic variants in immune regulation genes associated with interferon-mediated inflammatory response, coinciding with previously established links between these genes and interferonopathies such as Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome. Our observations suggest that these variants might potentially contribute to the development of DSRD in individuals with DS.

Comparison of tau spread in people with Down syndrome versus autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: In people with genetic forms of Alzheimer's disease, such as in Down syndrome and autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease, pathological changes specific to Alzheimer's disease (ie, accumulation of amyloid and tau) occur in the brain at a young age, when comorbidities related to ageing are not present. Studies including these cohorts could, therefore, improve our understanding of the early pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease and be useful when designing preventive interventions targeted at disease pathology or when planning clinical trials. We compared the magnitude, spatial extent, and temporal ordering of tau spread in people with Down syndrome and autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, we included participants (aged ≥25 years) from two cohort studies. First, we collected data from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network studies (DIAN-OBS and DIAN-TU), which include carriers of autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease genetic mutations and non-carrier familial controls recruited in Australia, Europe, and the USA between 2008 and 2022. Second, we collected data from the Alzheimer Biomarkers Consortium-Down Syndrome study, which includes people with Down syndrome and sibling controls recruited from the UK and USA between 2015 and 2021. Controls from the two studies were combined into a single group of familial controls. All participants had completed structural MRI and tau PET (18F-flortaucipir) imaging. We applied Gaussian mixture modelling to identify regions of high tau PET burden and regions with the earliest changes in tau binding for each cohort separately. We estimated regional tau PET burden as a function of cortical amyloid burden for both cohorts. Finally, we compared the temporal pattern of tau PET burden relative to that of amyloid. FINDINGS: We included 137 people with Down syndrome (mean age 38·5 years [SD 8·2], 74 [54%] male, and 63 [46%] female), 49 individuals with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease (mean age 43·9 years [11·2], 22 [45%] male, and 27 [55%] female), and 85 familial controls, pooled from across both studies (mean age 41·5 years [12·1], 28 [33%] male, and 57 [67%] female), who satisfied the PET quality-control procedure for tau-PET imaging processing. 134 (98%) people with Down syndrome, 44 (90%) with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease, and 77 (91%) controls also completed an amyloid PET scan within 3 years of tau PET imaging. Spatially, tau PET burden was observed most frequently in subcortical and medial temporal regions in people with Down syndrome, and within the medial temporal lobe in people with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease. Across the brain, people with Down syndrome had greater concentrations of tau for a given level of amyloid compared with people with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease. Temporally, increases in tau were more strongly associated with increases in amyloid for people with Down syndrome compared with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease. INTERPRETATION: Although the general progression of amyloid followed by tau is similar for people Down syndrome and people with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease, we found subtle differences in the spatial distribution, timing, and magnitude of the tau burden between these two cohorts. These differences might have important implications; differences in the temporal pattern of tau accumulation might influence the timing of drug administration in clinical trials, whereas differences in the spatial pattern and magnitude of tau burden might affect disease progression. FUNDING: None.