The clinical and radiological cerebrovascular abnormalities associated with renovascular hypertension in children: a systematic review.

Renovascular disease is an important secondary cause of hypertension in childhood. In this cohort, many may have undiagnosed cerebrovascular disease, and some children present acutely with cerebrovascular complications. However, these associations are yet to be defined in the literature.A systematic review of clinical and radiological abnormalities associated with renovascular hypertension in the global pediatric (< 18 years) population. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched, from database inception to 26 January 2021. Primary articles were unrestricted by study design and geographical location but were limited to those published in English.A total of 303 individuals (median age: 7.6 years [range 10 days-17.9 years]; M:F, 174:129) from 34 studies were included, across 13 countries. Twenty-seven individual cases were published for children with coexisting renovascular hypertension and cerebrovascular disease. Most children had bilateral renal artery stenosis, secondary to fibromuscular dysplasia and had coexisting occlusive cerebrovascular disease. The majority presented with neurological symptoms, and cerebral complication ranged from asymptomatic cerebrovascular stenosis to acute stroke and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. The location or underlying etiology of the renovascular disease did not predict the location or extent of the cerebrovascular disease. The evidence from the cohort studies was limited, as none specifically established a cohort of children with coexisting disease. Furthermore, the conclusions drawn were subjected to considerable bias from the treating clinicians.A prospective cohort of children with renovascular hypertension and cerebrovascular complications should be established so the long-term prognosis and impact of treatment may be better understood.

Twelve tips for medical students to enhance clinical skills learning during disrupted placements.

Disruption to healthcare settings can present a significant challenge to traditional, face-to-face models of learning in medical education. Reductions in undergraduate medical students' clinical exposure, whether due to periods of increased healthcare demand, localised service changes or infectious disease outbreaks, are likely to result in fewer opportunities to develop key clinical and practical skills. Proficiency in these skills is often essential to progression and future practice, creating a broad incentive for students to develop techniques to maintain and refine their clinical skills during disrupted placements. These tips, based on our experiences as senior medical students, are intended to help students on disrupted placements to engage in reflective practice, discover ways to facilitate further opportunities for clinical skills learning, and to make the most of clinical skills learning opportunities that they do receive.

Assessing the utility of virtual OSCE sessions as an educational tool: a national pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are a common form of assessment used across medical schools in the UK to assess clinical competence and practical skills and are traditionally held in an in-person format. In the past, medical students have often prepared for such exams through in-person peer-assisted learning (PAL), however, due to the recent Covid-19 pandemic, many in-person teaching sessions transitioned to online-based formats. There is currently a paucity of research on the utility of virtual PAL OSCE sessions and thus, we carried out a national pilot study to determine the feasibility of virtual OSCE teaching via feedback from participants and examiners. METHODS: A total of 85 students from 19 UK-based medical schools with eight students based internationally attended the series of online OSCE workshops delivered via Zoom®. All students and examiners completed a feedback questionnaire at the end of each session regarding parameters, which included questions on pre-and post-workshop confidence in three OSCE domains: history-taking, communication and data interpretation. A Likert scale using 5 Likert items was used to self-report confidence, and the results were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test after assessing for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. RESULTS: Results from student feedback showed an increase in confidence for all three OSCE domains after each event (p < 0.001) with 69.4% agreeing or strongly agreeing that online OSCE sessions could sufficiently prepare them for in-person exams. Questionnaire feedback revealed that 97.6% of students and 86.7% of examiners agreed that virtual OSCE teaching would be useful for preparing for in-person OSCE examinations after the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Most participants in the virtual OSCE sessions reported an improvement in their confidence in history-taking, communication and data interpretation skills. Of the participants and examiners that had also experienced in-person OSCE examinations, the majority also reported that they found virtual OSCE sessions to be as engaging and as interactive as in-person teaching. This study has demonstrated that virtual OSCE workshops are a feasible option with the potential to be beneficial beyond the pandemic. However, more studies are required to assess the overall impact on student learning and to determine the value of virtual OSCE workshops on exam performance.

Mental health of women and children experiencing family violence in conflict settings: a mixed methods systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Armed conflict has significant impacts on individuals and families living in conflict-affected settings globally. Scholars working to prevent violence within families have hypothesised that experiencing armed conflict leads to an increase in family violence and mental health problems. In this review, we assessed the prevalence of family violence in conflict settings, its association with the mental health of survivors, moderating factors, and the importance of gender relations. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed quantitative and qualitative studies that assessed the prevalence of family violence and the association between family violence and mental health problems, within conflict settings (PROSPERO reference CRD42018114443). RESULTS: We identified 2605 records, from which 174 full text articles were screened. Twenty-nine studies that reported family violence during or up to 10 years after conflict were eligible for inclusion. Twenty one studies were quantitative, measuring prevalence and association between family violence and mental health problems. The studies were generally of high quality and all reported high prevalence of violence. The prevalence of violence against women was mostly in the range of 30-40%, the highest reported prevalence of physical abuse being 78.9% in Bosnia and Herzegovina. For violence against children, over three-quarters had ever experienced violence, the highest prevalence being 95.6% in Sri Lanka. Associations were found with a number of mental health problems, particularly post-traumatic stress disorder. The risk varied in different locations. Eight qualitative studies showed how men's experience of conflict, including financial stresses, contributes to their perpetration of family violence. CONCLUSIONS: Family violence was common in conflict settings and was associated with mental health outcomes, but the studies were too heterogenous to determine whether prevalence or risk was greater than in non-conflict settings. The review highlights an urgent need for more robust data on perpetrators, forms of family violence, and mental health outcomes in conflict-affected settings in order to help understand the magnitude of the problem and identify potential solutions to address it.

Probability-based algorithm using ultrasound and additional tests for suspected GCA in a fast-track clinic.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical presentations of giant cell arteritis (GCA) are protean, and it is vital to make a secure diagnosis and exclude mimics for urgent referrals with suspected GCA. The main objective was to develop a joined-up, end-to-end, fast-track confirmatory/exclusionary, algorithmic process based on a probability score triage to drive subsequent investigations with ultrasound (US) and any appropriate additional tests as required. METHODS: The algorithm was initiated by stratifying patients to low-risk category (LRC), intermediate-risk category (IRC) and high-risk category (HRC). Retrospective data was extracted from case records. The Southend pretest probability score (PTPS) overall showed a median score of 9 and a 75th percentile score of 12. We, therefore, classified LRC as PTPS <9, IRC 9-12 and HRC >12. GCA diagnosis was made by a combination of clinical, US, and laboratory findings. The algorithm was assessed in all referrals seen in 2018-2019 to test the diagnostic performance of US overall and in individual categories. RESULTS: Of 354 referrals, 89 had GCA with cases categorised as LRC (151), IRC (137) and HRC (66). 250 had US, whereas 104 did not (score <7, and/or high probability of alternative diagnoses). In HRC, US showed sensitivity 94%, specificity 85%, accuracy 92% and GCA prevalence 80%. In LRC, US showed sensitivity undefined (0/0), specificity 98%, accuracy 98% and GCA prevalence 0%. In IRC, US showed sensitivity 100%, specificity 97%, accuracy 98% and GCA prevalence 26%. In the total population, US showed sensitivity 97%, specificity 97% and accuracy 97%. Prevalence of GCA overall was 25%. CONCLUSIONS: The Southend PTPS successfully stratifies fast-track clinic referrals and excludes mimics. The algorithm interprets US in context, clarifies a diagnostic approach and identifies uncertainty, need for re-evaluation and alternative tests. Test performance of US is significantly enhanced with PTPS.