Caudal resection of the upper lateral cartilages and its measured effect on tip rotation.

BACKGROUND: Commonly used maneuvers for upward tip rotation include cephalic trim of the lateral alar cartilages, caudal resection of the septum, and shortening of the upper lateral cartilages (ULCs). Few techniques for surgical manipulation of the ULCs are found in the literature, and none accurately describe the measured effect of the caudal resection on tip rotation. The purpose of this study is to predict the change in upward rotation of the nasal tip for a measured incremental resection of the ULCs. METHODS: Ten fresh cadaveric noses were dissected with the aid of loupe magnification via an open rhinoplasty approach. The ULCs were sectioned in 20% increments, and measurements of the nasolabial angle (NLA) were recorded with the use of a goniometer. True lateral photographs were obtained for the photographic analysis of the specimens. RESULTS: The average length of the ULC was 16.8 ± 1.6 mm. Serial reduction of the ULC length by 4 sequential 20% increments resulted in a mean NLA change of 3.6, 2.7, 2.1, and 1.9 degrees, respectively. The average incremental change in NLA for the 4 resections was 2.6 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal resection of the ULC has a measurable effect on the upward rotation of the nasal tip. A 20% resection correlates with an average change in the NLA of 2.6 degrees. Because caudal resection of the ULC is a powerful tool in the armamentarium of the rhinoplasty surgeon that can cause narrowing of the internal nasal valve and hallowing of the lower nasal sidewalls, it should be used with caution in a selected group of patients when attempting to elevate the "droopy" tip.

Single incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS): a novel technique.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is an emerging bariatric procedure that typically necessitates five to seven small skin incisions to place five to seven trocars. The senior author (Saber) has developed a single umbilical incision approach to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. METHODS: Seven patients underwent single access transumbilical laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between March 2008 and July 2008. The same surgeon performed all surgical interventions. The umbilicus was the sole point of entry for all patients, and the same operative technique and perioperative protocol were used in all patients. RESULTS: A total of seven single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies were performed. The procedure was successfully performed in all patients. Mean operating time was 125 min. None of the patients required conversion to an open procedure. There were no mortalities or postoperative complications noted during the mean follow-up period of 3.4 months. CONCLUSION: Single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is safe, technically feasible, and reproducible.

Laparoscopic spigelian hernia repair: the scroll technique.

Spigelian hernia is a rare clinical entity. It has a subtle clinical presentation with vague abdominal pain that may warrant laparoscopy. Even though laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is increasingly popular, laparoscopic repair of spigelian hernia has not been adequately studied. Eight patients who underwent laparoscopic spigelian hernia repair are presented herein, along with a description of our simple technique for mesh placement. In addition, literature review of laparoscopic repair of spigelian hernia is also presented. Our case series included six females and two males; two patients presented acutely whereas the others presented with chronic pain. Laparoscopic repair was successfully performed in all of our patients with a mean operative time of 92.5 minutes. There were no postoperative complications or recurrence with a mean follow up of 36 months. Our scroll technique for laparoscopic repair is simple and feasible. It minimizes intracorporeal mesh manipulation, facilitates mesh fixation to the anterior abdominal wall, and maintains a precise orientation of the mesh in relation to the defect.

Early experience with lidocaine patch for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

INTRODUCTION: Reduced postoperative pain is one of the many factors that have driven the growing emphasis on the role of laparoscopic surgery for surgical management. Several studies have documented the advantages of the laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias compared to the open ventral herniorraphy. However, the laparoscopic approach may be associated with more postoperative pain initially. In this preliminary study, we present data from our early experience with the use of a lidocaine patch for pain control in the immediate postoperative period following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVH). METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic ventral herniorraphy (LVH) and were selected randomly and placed into one of two groups. In one group, we placed a lidocaine patch (LP) (Lidoderm, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chadds Ford, PA) on the anterior abdominal wall corresponding to the placement site of the underlying mesh in fifteen patients (Group A). In the second group, we did not place a LP on the abdominal wall of fifteen consecutive patients (Group B). We assessed all patients according to their demographic data, Body Mass Index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, the size of the abdominal wall defect (AWD), area of mesh (size) used, operative time, length of hospital stay (LOA), morbidity, and the individual patient's pain score at discharge, two weeks and two months postoperatively. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with respect to demographics, BMI, ASA, AWD, size of mesh, LOS and morbidity. Group A had a statistically significant reduction in their postoperative pain score at discharge when compared to Group B (3.13+/-1.68 and 4.8+/-1.42, respectively, p value=0.0067). CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, the use of a lidocaine patch in the management of postoperative pain following laparoscopic ventral herniorraphy is a safe and promising modality to consider in the management of postoperative pain control.

Simplified laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: the scroll technique.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair can be technically challenging. We herein present a simplified technique of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. METHODS: This technique entails fixation of the rolled mesh to the anterior abdominal wall before unfolding it, each side of the mesh is unfolded and fixed individually using transfascial sutures and tacks. RESULTS: This technique was used in 3 patients; The average time for mesh placement was about 30 minutes. The mean length of stay was 2 days. Apart from 1 patient who developed a transient postoperative seroma, there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: This technique of mesh placement minimizes intracorporeal mesh manipulation, facilitates fixation of the mesh to the anterior abdominal wall, and provides adequate coverage to the hernia defect while hosting the colostomy without restriction.

Occult ventral hernia defects: a common finding during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: In many incidences, laparoscopic exploration reveals occult ventral hernia defects that were not detected on physical examination. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency of occult ventral hernia defects detected during laparoscopy. METHODS: Prospectively collected data on 146 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were reviewed. The numbers of ventral defects found on preoperative physical examination were compared with those found during the laparoscopic procedure. RESULTS: Out of 146 laparoscopic ventral hernia repair patients, 70 patients (48%) were found to have occult defects that were not detected on preoperative abdominal examination. Among all the possible variables, only the type of hernia was found to have a significant difference. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the patients with a ventral hernia have clinically occult hernia defects that can be recognized laparoscopically. This indicates the importance of careful inspection of the anterior abdominal wall during the surgical procedure.