Sirolimus therapy in liver transplant patients: an initial experience at a single center.

Sirolimus (SRL) is an mTOR inhibitor that has been shown, in contrast to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), to inhibit cancers in experimental models. Since February 2005, we introduced SRL in liver transplant patients in group a, in whom the primary disease was hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), alcoholic or autoimmune liver cirrhosis, and group b, HCC-negative patients who developed posttransplantation cancers de novo. Of 18 patients in group a, 11 received SRL ab initio (subgroup a1), starting for 10 patients at 66.1+/-29.2 days after surgical healing and after 10 days in 1 case; the remaining 7 patients (subgroup a2) received SRL at 31.2+/-24.2 months. Three patients in group b, included 1 with Kaposi's sarcoma, 1 with bladder cancer, and 1 with thyroid cancer. In this group, SRL was introduced at 80.8+/-40.4 months. In all patients but one, who received a single 5 mg loading dose, SRL was started at 2 mg/d and adjusted to 6 to 8 ng/mL blood levels. CNI drugs, present as primary therapy, were gradually tapered to low levels and eventually stopped. The following observations were drawn from this initial experience: (1) 4/21 (19.0%) patients had to discontinue SRL because of early and late side effects: thrombocytopenia (n=2) and headache with leukopenia and leg edema associated with knee joint arthralgia (n=2); (2) 14 patients (11 in group a and 3 in group b) are still on SRL monotherapy; (3) 1 HCC recurrence and 1 de novo pancreatic adenocarcinoma were observed at 14 and 16 months, respectively (at the time of transplantation, both patients were beyond the MIlan HCC criteria), and (4) 1 patient, from subgroup a1, died after 99 days due to pneumonitis and possible relation to SRL lung toxicity. In conclusion, SRL appeared to be an effective immunosuppressant that could be used as monotherapy in liver transplant patients. Any conclusion on SRL anticancer effects can only come from randomized large studies after long follow-up.

Preliminary results of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma among allocation organ policy strategies, neoadjuvant treatments, and intention-to-treat analysis.

We retrospectively evaluated the impact of our strategy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to an intention-to-treat analysis and drop-out probability. We evaluated only patients within the Milan criteria. We analyzed the outcomes of neoadjuvant strategies for HCC, organ allocation policy, and systematic application of strategies to increase the deceased donor pool as the current tendency to expand transplantability criteria for those patients. Kaplan-Meier survival probability rates at 1, 3, and 5 years according to an intention-to-treat analysis were 87.02%, 74.53%, and 65.93% for transplanted patients (n=108), and 50%, 14.29%, and 14.29% for the excluded or waiting list group (n=13), respectively (P< .0001). Drop-out risk at 3, 6, and 12 months was 2.40%, 8.59%, and 16.54%, respectively. During the same period, the mortality probability rates at 3, 6, and 12 months among patients without HCC awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) were 3.60%, 9.50%, and 18.34%, respectively. Drop-out rate was lower among patients treated before OLT (P< .0001). On the basis of the neoadjuvant treatment results to reduce drop-out risk, we suggest avoiding the high priority for the HCC cohort, particularly within the first 6 months from entrance on the waiting list, because this approach can reduce the chances of patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) alone.

Medical report type in liver transplantation as a quality system document: new prospects for computerization.

The usage of a computerized system to organize data and ease the activity procedures of liver transplantation is useful in clinical transplantation. Preliminary cognitive research on systems of clinical transplantation database concerning medical reports was performed to verify their development level. The survey highlighted that, so far, there has been no experimentation that can be applied to a medical report type devoted to liver transplantation. Regulations in force substantially point out that the medical report ought to contain all items that have to be taken into account in handling the patient from pretransplantation to follow-up. The Department of Transplantation of Genoa chose its medical report model for liver transplantation. The medical report model included the following items: personal data; case history; diagnosis; initial examination for prelisting; fitness for transplantation; assistance context; clinical data including subjective, objective, and instrumental parameters; pharmacological therapies; informed consent, evaluation of fitness; nursing data; counseling and clinical evaluations according to protocols and guidelines of the national transplantation centers. If the computing is well trained, it is supposed to help maintain a whole data view provided it is supplied information in an adequate way. Immediate clinical procedural advantages and useful scientific observations may be obtained from a high-quality database. In fact, all functions have to be applied to specific clinical, administrative needs to be remotely shared and conveniently integrated with each other to make the liver transplantation medical report an easy and handy instrument for inputting and handling data. It must be a precise, complete instrument that may be accessible in real time from any site connected with the intranet network, be unchangeable, and be protected to ensure certification and forensic medicine value.

Split liver transplantation in Italy.

The role of split liver transplantation has been well established. The limitation to this technique is the number of potential recipients for a left lateral segment graft. The optimal use of the donor pool is to split the liver to provide 2 grafts suitable for adults obtaining right or left lobe. We explored the potential increase in the number of liver grafts gained from systematically using the technique of splitting on national basis. The crucial factor appeared to be creation of guidelines for the use of optimal livers to optimize organ allocation while minimizing pretransplantation mortality and maximizing post-orthotopic liver transplantation outcome.

Potential predictive value of the MELD score for short-term mortality after liver transplantation.

In the last years, a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) was suggested as a disease severity score for patients with end-stage liver disease awaiting liver transplantation. In the early 2002, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) has proposed to replace the current status 2A, 2B, and 3 by a modified version of the original MELD score based upon patient risk for 3-month mortality on the waiting list. In this study UNOS status and MELD score were evaluated retrospectively for postoperative 3-month mortality in patients who underwent liver transplantation from 2000 to 2001. Liver recipients were stratified for UNOS status 2A, 2B, and 3, and the corresponding MELD score was calculated for each patient. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for both conventional UNOS status and MELD score by fitting patient deaths within 3 months after liver transplantation. The MELD score revealed a better prediction rate for 3-month mortality after the first LT than conventional UNOS status, although no statistical significance was evident by ROC curve comparison. This preliminary study seems to suggest a potentially better predictive rate for the MELD score than conventional UNOS status concerning short-term mortality after liver transplantation.