Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Behav Pharmacol ; 26(3): 304-14, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25485642

RESUMEN

Cannabinoid and opioid agonists can display overlapping behavioral effects and the combination of these agonists is known to produce enhanced antinociception in several rodent models of acute and chronic pain. The present study investigated the antinociceptive effects of the nonpsychoactive cannabinoid, cannabidiol (CBD) and the µ-opioid agonist morphine, both alone and in combination, using three behavioral models in mice, to test the hypothesis that combinations of morphine and CBD would produce synergistic effects. The effects of morphine, CBD, and morphine/CBD combinations were assessed in the following assays: (a) acetic acid-stimulated stretching; (b) acetic acid-decreased operant responding for palatable food; and (c) hot plate thermal nociception. Morphine alone produced antinociceptive effects in all three models of acute nociception, whereas CBD alone produced antinociception only in the acetic acid-stimulated stretching assay. The nature of the interactions between morphine and CBD combinations were assessed quantitatively based on the principle of dose equivalence. Combinations of CBD and morphine produced synergistic effects in reversing acetic acid-stimulated stretching behavior, but subadditive effects in the hot plate thermal nociceptive assay and the acetic acid-decreased operant responding for palatable food assay. These results suggest that distinct mechanisms of action underlie the interactions between CBD and morphine in the three different behavioral assays and that the choice of appropriate combination therapies for the treatment of acute pain conditions may depend on the underlying pain type and stimulus modality.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Cannabidiol/farmacología , Morfina/farmacología , Ácido Acético/farmacología , Dolor Agudo/fisiopatología , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Animales , Conducta Animal/efectos de los fármacos , Cannabidiol/administración & dosificación , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Morfina/administración & dosificación
2.
Blood ; 120(3): 671-7, 2012 Jul 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22674803

RESUMEN

Coagulation factor XI (FXI) plays an important part in both venous and arterial thrombosis, rendering FXIa a potential target for the development of antithrombotic therapy. The kunitz protease inhibitor (KPI) domain of protease nexin-2 (PN2) is a potent, highly specific inhibitor of FXIa, suggesting its possible role in the inhibition of FXI-dependent thrombosis in vivo. Therefore, we examined the effect of PN2KPI on thrombosis in the murine carotid artery and the middle cerebral artery. Intravenous administration of PN2KPI prolonged the clotting time of both human and murine plasma, and PN2KPI inhibited FXIa activity in both human and murine plasma in vitro. The intravenous administration of PN2KPI into WT mice dramatically decreased the progress of FeCl(3)-induced thrombus formation in the carotid artery. After a similar initial rate of thrombus formation with and without PN2KPI treatment, the propagation of thrombus formation after 10 minutes and the amount of thrombus formed were significantly decreased in mice treated with PN2KPI injection compared with untreated mice. In the middle cerebral artery occlusion model, the volume and fraction of ischemic brain tissue were significantly decreased in PN2KPI-treated compared with untreated mice. Thus, inhibition of FXIa by PN2KPI is a promising approach to antithrombotic therapy.


Asunto(s)
Precursor de Proteína beta-Amiloide/farmacología , Trombosis de las Arterias Carótidas/sangre , Trombosis de las Arterias Carótidas/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor XIa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Media/sangre , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Media/tratamiento farmacológico , Precursor de Proteína beta-Amiloide/química , Precursor de Proteína beta-Amiloide/genética , Animales , Anticoagulantes/farmacología , Tiempo de Sangría , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Coagulación Sanguínea/fisiología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Diseño de Fármacos , Factor XIa/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Estructura Terciaria de Proteína/fisiología , Proteínas Recombinantes/química , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacología
3.
Front Pharmacol ; 13: 803331, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35529434

RESUMEN

Acutely, non-selective cannabinoid (CB) agonists have been shown to increase morphine antinociceptive effects, and we and others have also demonstrated that non-selective CB agonists attenuate morphine antinociceptive tolerance. Activation of cannabinoid CB2 receptors reverses allodynia and hyperalgesia in models of chronic pain, and co-administration of morphine with CB2 receptor selective agonists has been shown to be synergistic. CB2 receptor activation has also been shown to reduce morphine-induced hyperalgesia in rodents, an effect attributed to CB2 receptor modulation of inflammation. In the present set of experiments, we tested both the acute and chronic interactions between morphine and the CB2 receptor selective agonist O-1966 treatments on antinociception and antinociceptive tolerance in C57Bl6 mice. Co-administration of morphine and O-1966 was tested under three dosing regimens: simultaneous administration, morphine pre-treated with O-1966, and O-1966 pre-treated with morphine. The effects of O-1966 on mu-opioid receptor binding were determined using [3H]DAMGO and [35S]GTPγS binding assays, and these interactions were further examined by FRET analysis linked to flow cytometry. Results yielded surprising evidence of interactions between the CB2 receptor selective agonist O-1966 and morphine that were dependent upon the order of administration. When O-1966 was administered prior to or simultaneous with morphine, morphine antinociception was attenuated and antinociceptive tolerance was exacerbated. When O-1966 was administered following morphine, morphine antinociception was not affected and antinociceptive tolerance was attenuated. The [35S]GTPγS results suggest that O-1966 interrupts functional activity of morphine at the mu-opioid receptor, leading to decreased potency of morphine to produce acute thermal antinociceptive effects and potentiation of morphine antinociceptive tolerance. However, O-1966 administered after morphine blocked morphine hyperalgesia and led to an attenuation of morphine tolerance, perhaps due to well-documented anti-inflammatory effects of CB2 receptor agonism.

4.
Life Sci ; 195: 1-5, 2018 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29288767

RESUMEN

AIMS: We tested the hypothesis that CB1/CB2 receptor double knockout would produce significant increases in infarct size and volume and significant worsening in clinical score, using two mouse models, one of permanent ischemia and one of ischemia/reperfusion. MAIN METHODS: Focal cerebral infarcts were created using either photo induced permanent injury or transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. Infarct volume and motor function were evaluated in cannabinoid receptor 1/cannabinoid receptor 2 double knockout mice. KEY FINDINGS: The results surprisingly revealed that CB1/CB2 double knockout mice showed improved outcomes, with the most improvements in the mouse model of permanent ischemia. SIGNIFICANCE: Although the number of individuals suffering from stroke in the United States and worldwide will continue to grow, therapeutic intervention for treatment following stroke remains frustratingly limited. Both the cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R) and the cannabinoid 2 receptor (CB2R) have been studied in relationship to stroke. Deletion of the CB2R has been shown to worsen outcome, while selective CB2R agonists have been demonstrated to be neuroprotective following stroke. Although initial studies of CB1R knockout mice demonstrated increased injury following stroke, indicating that activation of the CB1R was neuroprotective, later studies of selective antagonists of the CB1R also demonstrated a protective effect. Surprisingly the double knockout animals had improved outcome. Since the phenotype of the double knockout is not dramatically changed, significant changes in the contribution of other homeostatic pathways in compensation for the loss of these two important receptors may explain these apparently contradictory results.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/genética , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatología , Receptor Cannabinoide CB1/genética , Receptor Cannabinoide CB2/genética , Animales , Encéfalo/patología , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Infarto Cerebral/etiología , Infarto Cerebral/genética , Infarto Cerebral/patología , Circulación Cerebrovascular/genética , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Media , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Noqueados , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/uso terapéutico , Receptor Cannabinoide CB1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptor Cannabinoide CB2/antagonistas & inhibidores , Accidente Cerebrovascular/genética , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA