A sense of life: computational and experimental investigations with models of biochemical and evolutionary processes.

We collaborate in a research program aimed at creating a rigorous framework, experimental infrastructure, and computational environment for understanding, experimenting with, manipulating, and modifying a diverse set of fundamental biological processes at multiple scales and spatio-temporal modes. The novelty of our research is based on an approach that (i) requires coevolution of experimental science and theoretical techniques and (ii) exploits a certain universality in biology guided by a parsimonious model of evolutionary mechanisms operating at the genomic level and manifesting at the proteomic, transcriptomic, phylogenic, and other higher levels. Our current program in "systems biology" endeavors to marry large-scale biological experiments with the tools to ponder and reason about large, complex, and subtle natural systems. To achieve this ambitious goal, ideas and concepts are combined from many different fields: biological experimentation, applied mathematical modeling, computational reasoning schemes, and large-scale numerical and symbolic simulations. From a biological viewpoint, the basic issues are many: (i) understanding common and shared structural motifs among biological processes; (ii) modeling biological noise due to interactions among a small number of key molecules or loss of synchrony; (iii) explaining the robustness of these systems in spite of such noise; and (iv) cataloging multistatic behavior and adaptation exhibited by many biological processes.

Shrinkage-based similarity metric for cluster analysis of microarray data.

The current standard correlation coefficient used in the analysis of microarray data was introduced by M. B. Eisen, P. T. Spellman, P. O. Brown, and D. Botstein [(1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14863-14868]. Its formulation is rather arbitrary. We give a mathematically rigorous correlation coefficient of two data vectors based on James-Stein shrinkage estimators. We use the assumptions described by Eisen et al., also using the fact that the data can be treated as transformed into normal distributions. While Eisen et al. use zero as an estimator for the expression vector mean mu, we start with the assumption that for each gene, mu is itself a zero-mean normal random variable [with a priori distribution N(0,tau 2)], and use Bayesian analysis to obtain a posteriori distribution of mu in terms of the data. The shrunk estimator for mu differs from the mean of the data vectors and ultimately leads to a statistically robust estimator for correlation coefficients. To evaluate the effectiveness of shrinkage, we conducted in silico experiments and also compared similarity metrics on a biological example by using the data set from Eisen et al. For the latter, we classified genes involved in the regulation of yeast cell-cycle functions by computing clusters based on various definitions of correlation coefficients and contrasting them against clusters based on the activators known in the literature. The estimated false positives and false negatives from this study indicate that using the shrinkage metric improves the accuracy of the analysis.