The use of magnetic sensors to monitor moderate deep inspiration breath hold during breast irradiation with dynamic MLC compensators.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To reduce the dose to the heart during left breast irradiation, a moderate deep breath hold technique (MDIBH) was introduced. Originally, verification of the MDIBH was performed with portal images acquired in movie loop during the treatment delivery. However, this verification method is not compatible with the use of dynamic MLC compensation, recently introduced because of its often superior dose distribution. Magnetic sensors were evaluated as an additional/alternative method to monitor the breath hold. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a first phase, the reproducibility of MDIBH for breast patients was evaluated by investigating for 19 patients the set-up errors derived from portal images in cine loop acquisition during MDIBH. In a second phase, for 10 patients, the breathing curves recorded by magnetic sensors were used to monitor beam-on and beam-off while portal images were simultaneously recorded in movie loop. In a third phase, breast patients treated with dynamic MLC compensation were trained for MDIBH and monitored with magnetic sensors. RESULTS: The interfraction reproducibility of MDIBH for the initial 19 patients was recorded: the mean set-up error, the systematic and the random deviations are all smaller than 4mm in the anterior-posterior direction and in the cranio-caudal direction and smaller than 2 degrees along the rotation axis. Magnetic sensors provided a reproducible breathing curve: while the mean amplitude recorded for 10 patients varied substantially between patients, the individual standard deviation of the amplitude for each session was smaller than 3mm. For these 10 patients, the intrafraction set-up variation between the first portal image of two consecutive breath holds and the intra-breath hold set-up variation between the first and last portal image of each breath hold is smaller than 2mm in the anterior-posterior direction, smaller than 3mm in the cranio-caudal direction and smaller than 1.5 degrees along the rotation axis. CONCLUSION: Using magnetic sensors to record the breathing curve of left breast patients in MDIBH, a verification method was developed, suitable for combining MDIBH with dynamic MLC compensation.

Initial clinical experience with moderate deep-inspiration breath hold using an active breathing control device in the treatment of patients with left-sided breast cancer using external beam radiation therapy.

INTRODUCTION: We present our initial clinical experience using moderate deep-inspiration breath hold (mDIBH) with an active breathing control (ABC) device to reduce heart dose in the treatment of patients with early-stage, left-sided breast cancer using external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) limited to the whole breast. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February and August 2002, 5 patients with Stages I/II left-sided breast cancer received EBRT limited to the whole breast using an ABC device. After standard virtual simulation, patients with >2% of the heart receiving >30 Gy in free breathing were selected. All patients underwent a training session with the ABC apparatus to determine their ability to comfortably maintain mDIBH at 75% of the maximum inspiration capacity. Three patients received 45 Gy to the whole breast in 25 fractions, and 2 patients received 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. For each of the medial and lateral tangential beams, radiation was delivered during 2 or 3 breath hold durations that ranged from 18 to 26 s. "Step-and-shoot" intensity modulation was employed to achieve uniform dose distribution. Open beam segments were purposely delivered over 2 breath hold sessions and captured on electronic portal images to allow intra- and interfraction setup error analysis. All electronic portal images of the tangential beams were analyzed off-line using an in-house treatment verification tool to assess the anteroposterior, craniocaudal, and rotational uncertainties. Corrections were applied if necessary. RESULTS: A comparison of treatment plans performed on breath-hold and free-breathing CTs showed that ABC treatments achieved a mean absolute reduction of 3.6% in heart volume receiving 30 Gy (heart V(30)) and 1.5% in the heart normal tissue complication probability. A total of 134 ABC treatment sessions were performed in the 5 patients. The average number of breath holds required per beam direction was 2.5 (4-6 per treatment) with a median duration of 22 s per breath hold (range: 10-26 s). Patients tolerated mDIBH well. The median treatment time was 18.2 min (range: 13-32 min), which was progressively shortened with increasing experience. A total of 509 portal images were analyzed. Combining measurements for all patients, the interfraction setup errors (1 SD) in the lateral and craniocaudal directions and in rotation were 2.4 mm, 3.2 mm, and 1 degrees, respectively, for the medial beam and 2.3 mm, 3.1 mm, and 1 degrees, respectively, for the lateral beam. For all patients, the intrafraction setup errors were about 1 mm and always less than 2 mm (1 SD). CONCLUSION: Reduction in heart V(30) can be achieved in patients with left-sided breast cancer using mDIBH assisted with an ABC device. With increasing experience, ABC treatments were streamlined and could be performed within a 15-min treatment slot. Our results suggest that mDIBH using an ABC device may provide one of the most promising methods of improving the efficacy of EBRT in patients with left-sided breast cancer, particularly when wide tangential beams are employed. Breast cancer; Breath hold; Radiation therapy; Intensity modulated radiation therapy

Significant reductions in heart and lung doses using deep inspiration breath hold with active breathing control and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients treated with locoregional breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the heart and lung sparing effects of moderate deep inspiration breath hold (mDIBH) achieved using an active breathing control (ABC) device, compared with free breathing (FB) during treatment with deep tangents fields (DT) for locoregional (LR) irradiation of breast cancer patients, including the internal mammary (IM) nodes (IMNs). To compare the DT-mDIBH technique to other standard techniques and to evaluate the dosimetric effect of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients (9 left-sided and 6 right-sided lesions) with Stages 0-III breast cancer underwent standard FB and ABC computed tomographic (CT) scans in the treatment position. A dosimetric planning study was performed. In FB, the 9 left-sided patients were planned with a 5-field technique where electron fields covering the IM region were matched to shallow tangents using wedges (South West Oncology Group [SWOG] protocol S9927 technique A). This method was compared with a 3-field DT technique covering the breast and the IMNs (SWOG S9927 technique B). Compensation with IMRT was then compared with wedges for each technique. For the 15 total patients, dosimetric planning using DT with IMRT was then reoptimized on the mDIBH CT data set for comparison. Dose-volume histograms for the clinical target volume (CTV) (including the IMNs), planning target volume (PTV), ipsilateral and contralateral breast, and organs at risk (OAR) were analyzed. In addition, normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for lung and heart, mean lung doses, and the number of monitor units (MUs) for a 1.8 Gy fraction were compared. RESULTS: For the 9 left-sided patients, the mean percentage of heart receiving more than 30 Gy (heart V30) was lower with the 5-field wedged technique than with the DT wedged technique (6.8% and 19.1%, respectively, p < 0.004). For the DT technique, the replacement of wedges with IMRT slightly diminished the mean heart V30 to 16.3% (p < 0.51). The introduction of mDIBH to the DT-IMRT technique reduced the heart V30 by 81% to a mean of 3.1% (p < 0.0004). Compared with 5-field IMRT, DT-IMRT with mDIBH reduced the heart V30 for 6 of the 9 patients, entirely avoiding heart irradiation in 2 of these 6 patients. For DT-IMRT, mDIBH reduced the mean lung dose and NTCP to levels obtained with the 5-field IMRT technique. For the 15 patients planned with DT-IMRT in FB, the use of mDIBH reduced the mean percentage of both lungs receiving more than 20 Gy from 20.4% to 15.2% (p < 0.00007). With DT-IMRT, more than 5% of the contralateral breast received more than 10 Gy for 6 of the 9 left-sided patients in FB, 3 of those 9 patients in mDIBH, and only 1 of those 9 patients planned with 5 fields. The mean % of the PTV receiving more than 55 Gy (110% of the prescribed dose) was 36.4% for 5-field wedges, 33.4% for 5-field IMRT, 28.7% for DT-wedges, 12.5% for DT-IMRT, and 18.4% for DT-IMRT mDIBH. The CTV remained covered by the 95% isodose in all the DT plans but one (99.1% of the volume covered). DT-wedges required more MUs than DT-IMRT (mean of 645 and 416, respectively, p < 0.00004). CONCLUSION: mDIBH significantly reduces heart and lung doses when DT are used for LR breast irradiation including the IMNs. Compared with shallow tangents matched with electrons, DT with mDIBH reduces the heart dose (in most patients) and results in comparable lung toxicity parameters, but may increase the dose to the contralateral breast. IMRT improves dose homogeneity, slightly reduces the dose to the heart, and diminishes the number of MUs required.

Three-dimensional evaluation of intra- and interfraction immobilization of lung and chest wall using active breathing control: a reproducibility study with breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: A CT-based three-dimensional (3D) method was used to analyze the intra- and interfraction reproducibility of lung immobilization during moderate deep inspiration breath hold (mDIBH), defined as 75% of the maximal inspiration using an active breathing control (ABC) apparatus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The ABC apparatus was used to immobilize the breathing motion with a computer-controlled valve. Immobilization of the lungs in breast cancer patients was used as a model to evaluate the reproducibility of mDIBH using the ABC apparatus. CT scans were acquired twice at mDIBH in the same session for 30 breast cancer patients. Twenty-three of them were immobilized with an alpha-cradle, of which 14 had a repeat scan at mDIBH 1-4 weeks later. Twelve of those patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the left breast at mDIBH to displace the heart from the beam. The remaining patients were treated at free breathing, with either intensity-modulated irradiation to the whole breast or conformal partial breast irradiation. To remove the component of setup error, mDIBH scans were registered with respect to the vertebrae. The lungs and carina were auto-contoured to form 3D surfaces for each data set. The closest distance-to-agreement (DTA) for each point between the 3D surfaces of the corresponding CT scans was displayed on a 3D surface map. For analysis, each lung was divided along its inferior to superior extent into six regions, from the basal 10%, the next four consecutive 20% sections in height, to the last apical 10%. Likewise, the carina was divided into regions of the trachea and bifurcation. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the DTA for each of these regions was computed. RESULTS: With the patient positioned in an alpha-cradle, the mean +/- SD intrafraction DTA was 1.5 +/- 1.4 mm for the left lung and 1.0 +/- 1.4 mm for the right lung. The corresponding values without the use of an alpha-cradle were significantly greater, with 1.9 +/- 2.1 mm and 2.2 +/- 2.2 mm for the left and right lung, respectively (p <0.005 for the SD of the left lung and p <0.0003 for the SD of the right lung). The interfraction DTA for the left and right lungs was 1.4 +/- 1.7 mm and 1.4 +/- 1.6 mm, respectively. The regional analysis demonstrated better immobilization for the upper two-thirds of the chest wall compared with that for the lung base. The DTA values obtained for the tracheal bifurcation were 0.9 +/- 0.8 mm for intrafraction and 1.4 +/- 1.0 mm for interfraction. CONCLUSION: The ABC device can be used to reduce respiratory motion at mDIBH in breast cancer patients or those patients who can perform the maneuver. This device demonstrated excellent intra- and interfraction reproducibility of chest wall and carina immobilization, especially when combined with alpha-cradle immobilization. Internal margins for suspended breathing can be extrapolated from these data for various anatomic regions within the lung and chest wall.

Impact of breathing motion on whole breast radiotherapy: a dosimetric analysis using active breathing control.

PURPOSE: The active breathing control (ABC) apparatus was used to quantify the effect of breathing motion on whole breast radiotherapy (RT) with standard wedges and intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients with early-stage breast cancer underwent routine free-breathing (FB) CT simulations for whole breast RT. An ABC apparatus was used to obtain two additional CT scans with the breath held at the end of normal inhalation and normal exhalation. The FB scan was used to develop both a standard treatment plan using wedged coplanar tangents and an IMRT plan using multiple static multileaf collimator segments. To simulate breathing, each plan was copied and applied to the normal inhalation and normal exhalation CT scans. RESULTS: The medial field border (defined by a radiopaque catheter) for the normal inhalation and normal exhalation scans moved an average of 0.6 cm anteriorly and 0.3 cm posteriorly compared with the FB position, respectively. The corresponding movement of the lateral field border was an average of 0.4 cm anteriorly and 0.2 cm posteriorly compared with the FB position. For both the wedged and the IMRT techniques, the dose delivered to breast tissue, biopsy cavity, and ipsilateral lung was similar for each of the three CT scan positions. However, the internal mammary node dose varied significantly with breathing. CONCLUSIONS: The dose delivered to breast using standard wedges or step-and-shoot IMRT is relatively insensitive to the effects of breast motion during normal breathing. However, an appreciable portion of the internal mammary nodes are irradiated during normal inhalation, contributing to the uncertainty in the analysis of the efficacy of internal mammary nodal RT in breast treatment.