Contrast-enhanced US in Renal Transplant Complications: Overview and Imaging Features.

Renal transplant is the first-line treatment of end-stage renal disease. The increasing number of transplants performed every year has led to a larger population of transplant patients. Complications may arise during the perioperative and postoperative periods, and imaging plays a key role in this scenario. Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) is a safe tool that adds additional value to US. Contrast agents are usually administered intravenously, but urinary tract anatomy and complications such as stenosis or leak can be studied using intracavitary administration of contrast agents. Assessment of the graft and iliac vessels with CEUS is particularly helpful in identifying vascular and parenchymal complications, such as arterial or venous thrombosis and stenosis, acute tubular injury, or cortical necrosis, which can lead to graft loss. Furthermore, infectious and malignant graft involvement can be accurately studied with CEUS, which can help in detection of renal abscesses and in the differentiation between benign and malignant disease. CEUS is also useful in interventional procedures, helping to guide percutaneous aspiration of collections with better delimitation of the graft boundaries and to guide renal graft biopsies by avoiding avascular areas. Potential postprocedural vascular complications, such as pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, or active bleeding, are identified with CEUS. In addition, newer quantification tools such as CEUS perfusion are promising, but further studies are needed to approve its use for clinical purposes. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Early kinetics of donor-derived cell-free DNA after transplantation predicts renal graft recovery and long-term function.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) upon transplantation is one of the most impactful events that the kidney graft suffers during its life. Its clinical manifestation in the recipient, delayed graft function (DGF), has serious prognostic consequences. However, the different definitions of DGF are subject to physicians' choices and centers' policies, and a more objective tool to quantify IRI is needed. Here, we propose the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) for this scope. METHODS: ddcfDNA was assessed in 61 kidney transplant recipients of either living or deceased donors at 24 h, and 7, 14 and 30 days after transplantation using the AlloSeq cfDNA Kit (CareDx, San Francisco, CA, USA). Patients were followed-up for 6 months and 7-year graft survival was estimated through the complete and functional iBox tool. RESULTS: Twenty-four-hour ddcfDNA was associated with functional DGF [7.20% (2.35%-15.50%) in patients with functional DGF versus 2.70% (1.55%-4.05%) in patients without it, P = .023] and 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (r = -0.311, P = .023). At Day 7 after transplantation, ddcfDNA was associated with dialysis duration in DGF patients (r = 0.612, P = .005) and worse 7-year iBox-estimated graft survival probability (ß -0.42, P = .001) at multivariable analysis. Patients with early normalization of ddcfDNA (<0.5% at 1 week) had improved functional iBox-estimated probability of graft survival (79.5 ± 16.8%) in comparison with patients with 7-day ddcfDNA ≥0.5% (67.7 ± 24.1%) (P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: ddcfDNA early kinetics after transplantation reflect recovery from IRI and are associated with short-, medium- and long-term graft outcome. This may provide a more objective estimate of IRI severity in comparison with the clinical-based definitions of DGF.

Impact of robotic-assisted kidney transplantation on post-transplant infections: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the differences in the incidence, epidemiology, clinical characteristics and risk factors of infections in living donor kidney transplant recipients using robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) and open approach. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study from January 2016 to December 2019. For the risk factor analysis, a matched case-control study (1:1 ratio) was performed (robotic vs open). Control subjects were matched for living donor and time of transplantation. The data included de novo immunosuppressive regimen, delayed graft function, urological complications, acute allograft rejection and incidence, clinical features, microbiological findings and outcomes of infections. RESULTS: Ninety-four RAKT and 84 controls were included. There were no differences between groups in terms of age, gender, BMI, median days of hospitalization, immunosuppressive regimen, need for surgical urologic procedures post-transplantation, presence of urinary leak or acute allograft rejection. Thirty-five percent of all recipients analyzed presented an infection, mostly asymptomatic bacteriuria (49%), symptomatic urinary tract infection (31%) and surgical site infection (10%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequent isolated microorganism in 67%, followed by E. coli (20%), Enterococcus faecalis (17%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (10%). Eight percent of the microorganisms were multidrug resistant. The open kidney transplantation group presented more infections compared to RAKT (43 vs 27%, p = 0.04). After multivariate analysis, need for surgical urologic procedure post-transplantation (OR 6.2, 95% CI 1.1-35), BMI ≥ 30 (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.5-9) and acute allograft rejection (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.2-8.5) were associated with infection, whereas RAKT (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-0.9) and the use of JJ catheter (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.72) were protective factors. CONCLUSIONS: Infection is a frequent event in patients receiving a living donor kidney transplant. Acute allograft rejection, need for surgical urologic procedure post-transplantation and BMI were associated with infection, whereas robotic surgery was a protective factor in living donor kidney transplantation.

Extracorporeal Photopheresis Improves Graft Survival in a Full-Mismatch Rat Model of Kidney Transplantation.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an immunomodulatory therapy based on the infusion of autologous cellular products exposed to ultraviolet light (UV) in the presence of a photosensitizer. The study evaluates the ECP efficacy as induction therapy in a full-mismatch kidney transplant rat model. Dark Agouti to Lewis (DA-L) kidney transplant model has been established. ECP product was obtained from Lewis rat recipients after DA kidney graft transplantation (LewDA). Leukocytes of those LewDA rats were exposed to 8-methoxy psoralen, and illuminated with UV-A. The ECP doses assessed were 10 × 106 and 100 × 106 cells/time point. Lewis recipients received seven ECP infusions. DA-L model was characterized by the appearance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and kidney function deterioration from day three after kidney transplant. The dysfunction progressed rapidly until graft loss (6.1 ± 0.5 days). Tacrolimus at 0.25 mg/kg prolonged rat survival until 11.4 ± 0.7 days (p = 0.0004). In this context, the application of leukocytes from LewDA sensitized rats accelerated the rejection (8.7 ± 0.45, p = 0.0012), whereas ECP product at high dose extended kidney graft survival until 26.3 ± 7.3 days, reducing class I and II DSA in surviving rats. ECP treatment increases kidney graft survival in full-mismatch rat model of acute rejection and is a suitable immunomodulatory therapy to be explored in kidney transplantation.

Preemptive simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation has survival benefit to patients.

Several organ allocation protocols give priority to wait-listed simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) transplant recipients to mitigate the higher cardiovascular risk of patients with diabetes mellitus on dialysis. The available information regarding the impact of preemptive simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation on recipient and graft outcomes is nonetheless controversial. To help resolve this, we explored the influence of preemptive simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplants on patient and graft survival through a retrospective analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database, encompassing 9690 simultaneous transplant recipients between 2000 and 2017. Statistical analysis was performed applying a propensity score analysis to minimize bias. Of these patients, 1796 (19%) were transplanted preemptively. At ten years, recipient survival was significantly superior in the preemptive group when compared to the non-preemptive group (78.9% vs 71.8%). Dialysis at simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation was an independent significant risk for patient survival (hazard ratio 1.66 [95% confidence interval 1.32-2.09]), especially if the dialysis duration was 12 months or longer. Preemptive transplantation was also associated with significant superior kidney graft survival compared to those on dialysis (death-censored: 84.3% vs 75.4%, respectively; estimated half-life of 38.57 [38.33 -38.81] vs 22.35 [22.17 - 22.53] years, respectively). No differences were observed between both groups neither for pancreas graft survival nor for post-transplant surgical complications. Thus, our results sustain the relevance of early referral for pancreas transplantation and the importance of pancreas allocation priority in reducing patient mortality after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation.

A comprehensive assessment of long-term SARS-CoV-2-specific adaptive immune memory in convalescent COVID-19 Solid Organ Transplant recipients.

Long-term adaptive immune memory has been reported among immunocompetent individuals up to eight months following SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, limited data is available in convalescent patients with a solid organ transplant. To investigate this, we performed a thorough evaluation of adaptive immune memory at different compartments (serological, memory B cells and cytokine [IFN-γ, IL-2, IFN-γ/IL12 and IL-21] producing T cells) specific to SARS-CoV-2 by ELISA and FluoroSpot-based assays in 102 convalescent patients (53 with a solid organ transplants (38 kidney, 5 liver, 5 lung and 5 heart transplant) and 49 immunocompetent controls) with different clinical COVID-19 severity (severe, mild and asymptomatic) beyond six months after infection. While similar detectable memory responses at different immune compartments were detected between those with a solid organ transplant and immunocompetent individuals, these responses were predominantly driven by distinct COVID-19 clinical severities (97.6%, 80.5% and 42.1%, all significantly different, were seropositive; 84% vs 75% vs 35.7%, all significantly different, showed IgG-producing memory B cells and 82.5%, 86.9% and 31.6%, displayed IFN-γ producing T cells; in severe, mild and asymptomatic convalescent patients, respectively). Notably, patients with a solid organ transplant with longer time after transplantation did more likely show detectable long-lasting immune memory, regardless of COVID-19 severity. Thus, our study shows that patients with a solid organ transplant are capable of maintaining long-lasting peripheral immune memory after COVID-19 infection; mainly determined by the degree of infection severity.

Outcomes after 20 years of experience in minimally invasive living-donor nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The transperitoneal laparoscopic approach is considered the gold standard technique for living kidney donation. Other accepted laparoscopic techniques include the retroperitoneal approach, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)-assisted, laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), with excellent results in the donor and graft. Many studies have compared these techniques with open ones. Our objective is to describe our experience and results in minimally invasive living-donor nephrectomies (MILDN): laparoscopic, NOTES-assisted, and LESS since their introduction in March 2002. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of donors undergoing MILDN between March 2002 and March 2020. RESULTS: A total of 714 MILDNs were performed at our centre. All were completed, except for one, because of recipient death. The conventional laparoscopic approach was used in 541 cases (75.88%), NOTES in 116 (16.9%), LESS in 55 (7.7%), and one mini open (0.14%). Two-thirds of the donors were females (478 cases). The mean donor age was 52.87 years (SD 10.93). Six donors (0.8%) were diagnosed beforehand with a small renal mass, which was removed before transplantation in bench surgery. The right kidney was removed in 17.8% of cases. Warm ischaemia time was higher in the NOTES and LESS groups. We had eight conversions. The global intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were 6.8% and 4.9%, respectively. None of the donors developed renal disease during follow-up (mean 3.68 years). Five-year recipient and graft survival rates were 98.8% and 96.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MILDN techniques are safe for donors and grafts, with low complication.

Immune Profiling of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells at Pancreas Acute Rejection Episodes in Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Recipients.

Profiling of circulating immune cells provides valuable insight to the pathophysiology of acute rejection in organ transplantation. Herein we characterized the peripheral blood mononuclear cells in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients. We conducted a retrospective analysis in a biopsy-matched cohort (n = 67) and compared patients with biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR; 41%) to those without rejection (No-AR). We observed that CD3+ T cells, both CD8+ and CD4+, as well as CD19+ B cells were increased in patients with BPAR, particularly in biopsies performed in the early post-transplant period (<3 months). During this period immune subsets presented a good discriminative ability (CD4+ AUC 0.79; CD8+ AUC 0.80; B cells AUC 0.86; p < 0.05) and outperformed lipase (AUC 0.62; p = 0.12) for the diagnosis of acute rejection. We further evaluated whether this could be explained by differences in frequencies prior to transplantation. Patients presenting with early post-transplant rejection (<3 months) had a significant increase in T-cell frequencies pre-transplant, both CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells (p < 0.01), which were associated with a significant inferior rejection-free graft survival. T cell frequencies in peripheral blood correlated with pancreas acute rejection episodes, and variations prior to transplantation were associated with pancreas early acute rejection.

Overcoming limits: First ABO incompatible living donor paired kidney transplant in an hypersensitized pediatric recipient in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: HLA sensitization is a growing problem in children awaiting kidney transplantation. In some cases, finding an immunologically compatible donor entails contemplating the option of an ABO incompatible transplant or paired transplant. METHODS: Patient with genetic nephrotic syndrome and progressive chronic kidney disease, with a previous thrombosis of a first kidney transplant, resulting hypersensitized and remaining for a long-time on hemodialysis. Despite a desensitization strategy, family members were incompatible and deceased donation options must be ruled out due to the presentation of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). After 4 years, the possibility arises to perform a kidney paired transplant with a 62-year-old woman with an incompatible blood group. Although the current cytotoxicity- and cell-based crossmatches were negative, history of DSA were recorded. RESULTS: An intensive ABO and HLA desensitization protocol was performed in order to combat the isohemagglutinin antibodies and on the memory-HLA, based on rituximab, apheresis sessions, and immunoglobulins. Despite the donor being older in terms of pediatric transplantation, the donor-recipient weight difference, and immunological risk, the transplant was completed successfully. Maintenance of titration of up to 1/2 was confirmed after 3 weeks post-transplant (IgM and IgG). Kidney biopsy at 2 weeks and 6 months without signs of rejection. The patient is currently 12 months post-transplant and has not presented any signs of transplant rejection and has proper renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney paired transplantation is an excellent solution for hypersensitized children, and ABO incompatibility can be considered to increase their options to find a good donor, without thereby obtaining worse results.

Kidney Transplantation in Monoclonal Immunoglobulin Deposition Disease: A Report of 6 Cases.

Monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD) usually leads to kidney failure. Treatment of patients with a bortezomib-based regimen followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) has been increasingly used, with improvements in the response rates and allograft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. The objective of this report was to analyze the outcomes of 6 patients who underwent kidney transplantation in our institution after treatment of MIDD between 2010 and 2019. Monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease was initially treated with bortezomib-based therapy followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous SCT with complete hematologic response, although all patients remained on dialysis. During a median follow-up of 20.5 months from kidney transplant (54 months from SCT), 1 patient experienced hematologic relapse and 2 had hematologic progression (one of them with MIDD relapse in the allograft) requiring treatment. The patient with organ relapse received daratumumab monotherapy, achieving complete hematologic response but with graft failure. The other 5 patients had functional grafts with median serum creatinine 1.68 mg/dL. These results support that, in patients with MIDD and sustained complete hematologic response, a kidney transplant can be considered. The optimal approach to treatment of hematologic relapse or recurrence of MIDD after kidney transplant remains to be determined.

Adoption of a novel smart mobile-health application technology to track chronic immunosuppression adherence in solid organ transplantation: Results of a prospective, observational, multicentre, pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Low adherence to chronic immunosuppression is associated with suboptimal transplantation outcomes. Mobile-health technology is a promising tool to monitor medication adherence, but data on patient engagement to these tools are lacking. METHODS: Prospective, observational, multicenter, 2-phase trial in kidney and liver transplant recipients, investigating the degree of engagement to TrackYourMed® (TYM), a novel m-Health technology with a QR code-scan app to track immunosuppression adherence and its association with drug monitoring. RESULTS: Out of 204 consecutive transplant patients, 90 patients were eligible to participate. 61 (68%) used TYM regularly, 21 (23%) never or barely used it, 5 (5.5%) were irregular users, and 3 (3.3%) were lost to follow-up. 6-month total correct intakes (CIN) ranged between 69%-76%, 12%-19% intakes were out-of-time (OUT), and 9%-12% were missed (MIS). Notably, a rate of intakes out of the scheduled time higher than 20% in the 6 days prior to blood immunosuppressant trough levels was associated with a higher intra-patient variability (17 IQR 13-21% vs. 29 IQR 23%-36%, p = .001), and with a higher dose-adjustment (p < .001). At 1 year, 53(59%) patients were still active users of TYM. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing m-Health technologies promoting immunosuppression adherence may be useful for a relevant number of transplant patients and help transplant physicians identifying erratic immunosuppression adherence.

The impact of functional delayed graft function in the modern era of kidney transplantation - A retrospective study.

The dialysis-based definition of Delayed Graft Function (dDGF) is not necessarily objective as it depends on the individual physician's decision. The functional definition of DGF (fDGF, the failure of serum creatinine to decrease by at least 10% daily on 3 consecutive days during the first week post-transplant), may be more sensitive to reflect recovery after the ischemia-reperfusion injury. We retrospectively analyzed both definitions in 253 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients for predicting death-censored graft failure as primary outcome, using eGFR < 25 ml/min/1.73 m2 as a surrogate end-point for graft failure. Secondary outcome was a composite outcome that included graft failure as above and also patient's death. Median follow-up was 3.22 [2.38-4.21] years. Seventy-nine patients developed dDGF (31.2%) and 127 developed fDGF (50.2%). Sixty-three patients fulfilled criteria for both definitions (24.9%). At multivariable analysis, the two definitions were significantly associated with the primary [HR (95%CI) 2.07 (1.09-3.94), P = 0.026 for fDGF and HR (95%CI) 2.41 (1.33-4.37), P = 0.004 for dDGF] and the secondary composite outcome [HR (95%CI) 1.58 (1.01-2.51), P = 0.047 for fDGF and HR (95%CI) 1.67 (1.05-2.66), P = 0.028 for dDGF]. Patients who met criteria for both definitions had the worst prognosis, with a three-year estimates (95%CI) of survival from the primary and secondary outcomes of 2.31 (2.02-2.59) and 2.20 (1.91-2.49) years for fDGF+/dDGF+, in comparison with the other groups (P < 0.01 for trend). fDGF provides supplementary information about graft outcomes on top of the dDGF definition in a modern series of kidney transplantation.

Deciphering transplant outcomes of expanded kidney allografts donated after controlled circulatory death in the current transplant era. A call for caution.

Outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT) after controlled circulatory death (cDCD) with highly expanded criteria donors (ECD) and recipients have not been thoroughly evaluated. We analyzed in a multicenter cohort of 1161 consecutive KT, granular baseline donor and recipient factors predicting transplant outcomes, selected by bootstrapping and Cox proportional hazards, and were validated in a contemporaneous European KT cohort (n = 1585). 74.3% were DBD and 25.7% cDCD-KT. ECD-KT showed the poorest graft survival rates, irrespective of cDCD or DBD (log-rank < 0.001). Besides standard ECD classification, dialysis vintage, older age, and previous cardiovascular recipient events together with low class-II-HLA match, long cold ischemia time and combining a diabetic donor with a cDCD predicted graft loss (C-Index 0.715, 95% CI 0.675-0.755). External validation showed good prediction accuracy (C-Index 0.697, 95%CI 0.643-0.741). Recipient older age, male gender, dialysis vintage, previous cardiovascular events, and receiving a cDCD independently predicted patient death. Benefit/risk assessment of undergoing KT was compared with concurrent waitlisted candidates, and despite the fact that undergoing KT outperformed remaining waitlisted, remarkably high mortality rates were predicted if KT was undertaken under the worst risk-prediction model. Strategies to increase the donor pool, including cDCD transplants with highly expanded donor and recipient candidates, should be performed with caution.

Modeling patients as decision making units: evaluating the efficiency of kidney transplantation through data envelopment analysis.

The main applications of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to medicine focus on evaluating the efficiency of different health structures, hospitals and departments within them. The evolution of patients after undergoing a medical procedure or their response to a given treatment are not generally studied through this programming technique. In addition to the difficulty inherent to the collection of this type of data, the use of a technique that is mainly applied to evaluate the efficiency of decision making units representing industrial and production structures to analyze the evolution of human patients may seem inappropriate. In the current paper, we illustrate how this is not actually the case and implement a decision engineering approach to model kidney transplantation patients as decision making units. As such, patients undergo three different phases, each composed by specific as well as interrelated variables, determining the potential success of the transplantation process. DEA is applied to a set of 12 input and 6 output variables - retrieved over a 10-year period - describing the evolution of 485 patients undergoing kidney transplantation from living donors. The resulting analysis allows us to classify the set of patients in terms of the efficiency of the transplantation process and identify the specific characteristics across which potential improvements could be defined on a per patient basis.

Cellular Immunity to Predict the Risk of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective, Interventional, Multicenter Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Improving cytomegalovirus (CMV) immune-risk stratification in kidney transplantation is highly needed to establish guided preventive strategies. METHODS: This prospective, interventional, multicenter clinical trial assessed the value of monitoring pretransplant CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) using an interferon-γ release assay to predict CMV infection in kidney transplantation. One hundred sixty donor/recipient CMV-seropositive (D+/R+) patients, stratified by their baseline CMV (immediate-early protein 1)-specific CMI risk, were randomized to receive either preemptive or 3-month antiviral prophylaxis. Also, 15-day posttransplant CMI risk stratification and CMI specific to the 65 kDa phosphoprotein (pp65) CMV antigen were investigated. Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in 80% of patients, whereas 20% received thymoglobulin induction therapy. RESULTS: Patients at high risk for CMV based on pretransplant CMI developed significantly higher CMV infection rates than those deemed to be at low risk with both preemptive (73.3% vs 44.4%; odds ratio [OR], 3.44 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.30-9.08]) and prophylaxis (33.3% vs 4.1%; OR, 11.75 [95% CI, 2.31-59.71]) approaches. The predictive capacity for CMV-specific CMI was only found in basiliximab-treated patients for both preemptive and prophylaxis therapy. Fifteen-day CMI risk stratification better predicted CMV infection (81.3% vs 9.1%; OR, 43.33 [95% CI, 7.89-237.96]). CONCLUSIONS: Pretransplant CMV-specific CMI identifies D+/R+ kidney recipients at high risk of developing CMV infection if not receiving T-cell-depleting antibodies. Monitoring CMV-specific CMI soon after transplantation further defines the CMV infection prediction risk. Monitoring CMV-specific CMI may guide decision making regarding the type of CMV preventive strategy in kidney transplantation. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02550639.

Case report of COVID-19 in a kidney transplant recipient: Does immunosuppression alter the clinical presentation?

COVID-19 is novel infectious disease with an evolving understanding of its epidemiology and clinical manifestations. Immunocompromised patients often present atypical presentations of viral diseases. Herein we report a case of a COVID-19 infection in a solid organ transplant recipient, in which the first clinical symptoms were of gastrointestinal viral disease and fever, which further progressed to respiratory symptoms in 48 hours. In these high risk populations, protocols for screening for SARS-Cov2 may be needed to be re-evaluated.

Successful use of nonantigen-specific immunoadsorption with antihuman Ig-columns in kidney graft antibody-mediated rejection.

INTRODUCTION: Nonantigen-specific immunoadsorption (IA) has proven to be effective in acute antibody-mediated rejection (aAMR). However, there is a lack of solid studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of IA with antihuman Ig-columns in aAMR. For chronic-active AMR (cAMR), no studies have evaluated the efficacy of nonantingen-specific IA with antihuman Ig-columns. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of nonantigen-specific IA with antihuman Ig-columns in the treatment of both aAMR and cAMR in kidney transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In retrospective and observational study, kidney graft and recipient survival rates were assessed after treatment of aAMR and cAMR with nonantigen-specific IA with Ig-Flex columns (Therasorb) between January 2012 and May 2018. Protocols included nonantigen-specific IA, rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rescue plasma exchange, if necessary. RESULTS: The study included 14 patients with AMR (acute in 9, chronic active in 5). For aAMR, mean follow-up was 13 ± 6 months, and patient and graft survival were, respectively, of 100% and 83%, with a mean increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 7.98 ± 12.96, 10.18 ± 16.71, and 11.43 ± 13.85 mL/min/1.72 m2 (P > .05) at 3, 12 months after treatment, and at the end of follow-up, respectively. For cAMR, mean follow-up was 14 ± 8 months, and patient and graft survival were, respectively, of 100% and 60%, with an average increase in eGFR of 4.30 ± 7.86, 5.64 ± 10.47, and 14.5 ± 7.86 mL/min/m2 (P > .05) at 3, 12 months after IA treatment, and at the end of the follow-up, respectively, although 40% did not respond and required chronic hemodialysis. CONCLUSION: Nonantigen-specific IA with Ig-Flex columns was safe and effective for aAMR treatment in kidney transplantation. In cAMR, IA with Ig-Flex columns was associated with a satisfactory kidney graft survival, suggesting that IA could potentially offer some benefits supporting its indication in cAMR.

Pancreas outcomes between living and deceased kidney donor in pancreas after kidney transplantation patients.

Background: Pancreas outcomes in pancreas after kidney transplantation (PAK) patients have been reported as being inferior to those of patients who receive simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK). The influence of the kidney donor (i.e. living versus deceased) has never been previously addressed. Methods: We retrospectively analysed all pancreas transplants performed in a single centre since 2007 and compared the outcomes between those patients who had previously received a living-donor kidney transplant (pancreas transplantation after living-donor kidney transplantation, PAldK; n = 18) or a deceased-donor kidney transplant (pancreas transplantation after deceased-donor kidney transplantation, PAddK; n = 28), using SPK (n = 139) recipients as a reference. Results: Pancreas survival was similar between all groups, but inferior for PAldK when including only those with a functioning graft at day 90 post-transplantation (P = 0.004). Pancreas acute rejection was significantly increased in PAldK (67%; 1.8 ± 1.4 episodes/graft) when compared with PAddK (25%) and SPK (32%) (P < 0.05) patients. In a multivariate Cox regression model including known risk factors for pancreas rejection, PAldK was the only predictor of acute rejection (hazard ratio 6.82, 95% confidence interval 1.51-30.70, P < 0.05). No association was found between donor-recipient HLA mismatches and graft rejection. Repeated HLA mismatches between kidney and pancreas donors (0 versus 1-6) did not correlate with pancreas graft rejection or survival in either PAK transplantation group (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Pancreas graft outcomes are worse for PAldK when compared with PAddK and SPK patients.

Assessment of donor satisfaction as an essential part of living donor kidney transplantation: an eleven-year retrospective study.

Living kidney donors seem highly satisfied with donation. However, previous studies measure satisfaction by a single-item or by simply questioning donors' willingness to donate again or to recommend living donation. With the aim of analyzing whether satisfaction with donation is a multidimensional construct, thus allowing a more specific characterization of dissatisfied donors, 332 living kidney donors (2005-2015) answered a renewed version of the European Living Donation and Public Health Project satisfaction survey. Exploratory factor-analyses suggested that satisfaction was composed of three-factors: violation of donors' expectancies about donation; interference of donation on daily activities, and pain and discomfort. Donors reported high levels of satisfaction. However, cluster-analysis identified a subgroup characterized by a higher discrepancy between the expected and the actually experienced during donation, higher interference on daily activities, and higher pain and discomfort. Most of them considered that hospital discharge was premature, suffered economic losses and perceived worse health outcomes of their recipients. Single questions assessing donors' willingness to donate again or to recommend living donation were unable to differentiate between clusters. In summary, donor's satisfaction seems better characterized by three dimensions than by single questions.

Rituximab, plasma exchange and immunoglobulins: an ineffective treatment for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection.

BACKGROUND: Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (c-aABMR) is an important cause of allograft failure and graft loss in long-term kidney transplants. METHODS: To determine the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with rituximab, plasma exchange (PE) and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), a cohort of patients with transplant glomerulopathy (TG) that met criteria of active cABMR, according to BANFF'17 classification, was identified. RESULTS: We identified 62 patients with active c-aABMR and TG (cg ≥ 1). Twenty-three patients were treated with the combination therapy and, 39 patients did not receive treatment and were considered the control group. There were no significant differences in the graft survival between the two groups. The number of graft losses at 12 and 24 months and the decline of eGFR were not different and independent of the treatment. A decrease of eGFR≥13 ml/min between 6 months before and c-aABMR diagnosis, was an independent risk factor for graft loss at 24 months (OR = 5; P = 0.01). Infections that required hospitalization during the first year after c-aABMR diagnosis were significantly more frequent in treated patients (OR = 4.22; P = 0.013), with a ratio infection/patient-year of 0.65 and 0.20 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with rituximab, PE, and IVIG in kidney transplants with c-aABMR did not improve graft survival and was associated with a significant increase in severe infectious complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Agencia Española de Medicametos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS): 14566/RG 24161. Study code: UTR-INM-2017-01.