Physicians' challenges under El Salvador's criminal abortion prohibition.

El Salvador's criminal abortion law-one of the few in the world that prohibits all abortions and that is actively enforced against women-harms women's health and undermines the ethical duties of Salvadoran physicians and the standing of the medical profession. Under the criminal abortion regime, physicians are incentivized to disclose their patients' confidential medical information, in violation of their ethical duties, and public healthcare facilities have become sites of criminal investigation. These investigations target women not only for illegal abortions, but also for miscarriages and obstetric emergencies. The ban further prevents physicians from providing medical care that is often necessary to preserve a woman's life or health. Finally, by criminalizing women's pregnancy outcomes, the regime undermines the country's recent public health improvement efforts and compounds the marginalization of women and girls from its most vulnerable communities, in violation of the state's international human rights obligations.

Estudio transoperatorio de tumores limítrofes de ovario. Características que pueden repercutir en el diagnóstico / The intraoperative study in borderline ovarian tumors. Characteristics that can impact the diagnosis

Resumen OBJETIVO: Determinar el porcentaje de concordancia del estudio transoperatorio con el diagnóstico definitivo de tumores limítrofes de ovario. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional, transversal, retrospectivo y descriptivo efectuado en el Hospital de Ginecoobstetricia 4 Luis Castelazo Ayala, Ciudad de México, en pacientes operadas entre el 1 de enero de 2018 y el 31 diciembre de 2020 de un tumor abdominopélvico, con examen transoperatorio de tumor limítrofe de ovario. El estudio transoperatorio se evaluó como prueba diagnóstica y el diagnóstico definitivo como patrón de referencia para establecer la concordancia del primero con el diagnóstico definitivo de tumores limítrofes de ovario. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 68 tumores limítrofes de ovario, entre los diagnosticados en el estudio transoperatorio y el definitivo. Se encontraron 59 casos con diagnóstico definitivo de tumor limítrofe de ovario. La concordancia con el estudio transoperatorio fue de 63.2%. Se sobrediagnosticaron 2 de 68 pacientes (2.9%) y se subdiagnosticaron 23 de 68 (33.8%). CONCLUSIONES: La concordancia obtenida es semejante a lo reportado en la bibliografía internacional. Los tumores mucinosos mayores de 10 cm son subdiagnosticados con mayor frecuencia debido a su extensión.

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To determine the percentage of concordance of the transoperative study with the definitive diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional, retrospective and des-criptive study performed at the Hospital de Gineco Obstetricia 4 Luis Castelazo Ayala, Mexico City, in patients operated between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 for an abdominopelvic tumor, with transoperative examination of borderline ovarian tumor. The transoperative study was evaluated as a diagnostic test and the definitive diagnosis as a reference standard to establish the concordance of the former with the definitive diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors. RESULTS: Sixty-eight borderline ovarian tumors were analyzed, between those diagnosed in the transoperative study and the definitive one. We found 59 cases with definitive diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumor. The concordance with the transoperative study was 63.2%. Two of 68 patients (2.9%) were overdiagnosed and 23 of 68 (33.8%) were underdiagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: The concordance obtained is like that reported in the international literature. Mucinous tumors larger than 10 cm are most frequently underdiagnosed due to their extension.