Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 99(1): 58-62, 2019 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30206639

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge and influence of predatory journals in the field of dermatology in Austria. A total of 286 physicians (50.5% men) completed a questionnaire. The vast majority of subjects read scientific articles (n = 281, 98.3%) and took them into consideration in their clinical decision-making (n = 271, 98.5% of participants that regularly read scientific literature). Open access was known by 161 (56.3%), predatory journals by 84 (29.4%), and the Beall's list by 19 physicians (6.7%). A total of 117 participants (40.9%) had been challenged by patients with results from the scientific literature, including 9 predatory papers. Participants who knew of predatory journals had a higher level of education as well as scientific experience, and were more familiar with the open-access system (p < 0.001). These results indicate that the majority of dermatologists are not familiar with predatory journals. This is particularly the case for physicians in training and in the early stages of their career.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Dermatólogos/psicología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Publicación de Acceso Abierto , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Adulto , Austria , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Publicación de Acceso Abierto/economía , Publicación de Acceso Abierto/ética , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/economía , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/ética , Estudios Prospectivos , Mala Conducta Científica
5.
PLoS One ; 18(7): e0287547, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37418379

RESUMEN

Beall's list is widely used to identify potentially predatory journals. With this study, we aim to investigate the impact of Beall's list on the perception of listed journals as well as on the publication and citation behavior of the scientific community. We performed comprehensive bibliometric analyses of data extracted from the ISSN database, PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Crossref, Scopus and Web of Science. Citation analysis was performed by data extracted from the Crossref Cited-by database. At the time of analysis, Beall's list consisted of 1,289 standalone journals and 1,162 publishers, which corresponds to 21,735 individual journals. Of these, 3,206 (38.8%) were located in the United States, 2,484 in India (30.0%), and 585 in United Kingdom (7.1%). The majority of journals were listed in the ISSN database (n = 8,266), Crossref (n = 5,155), PubMed (n = 1,139), Scopus (n = 570), DOAJ (n = 224), PMC (n = 135) or Web of Science (n = 50). The number of articles published by journals on Beall's list as well as on the DOAJ continuously increased from 2011 to 2017. In 2018, the number of articles published by journals on Beall's list decreased. Journals on Beall's list were more often cited when listed in Web of Science (CI 95% 5.5 to 21.5; OR = 10.7) and PMC (CI 95% 6.3 to 14.1; OR = 9.4). It seems that the importance of Beall's list for the scientific community is overestimated. In contrast, journals are more likely to be selected for publication or citation when indexed by commonly used and renowned databases. Thus, the providers of these databases must be aware of their impact and verify that good publication practice standards are being applied by the journals listed.


Asunto(s)
Macrodatos , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Bibliometría , Bases de Datos Factuales , Percepción
6.
PLoS One ; 13(10): e0204729, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30273398

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy is a well-established treatment option in patients with metastatic melanoma. However, biomarkers that can be used to predict a response in these patients have not yet been found, putting patients at risk of severe side effects. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we investigated the association between the body mass index and ipilimumab treatment response in patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients with metastatic melanoma who received a monotherapy of up to 4 doses of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) every 3 weeks from 2011 to 2014 in three major hospitals in Austria were included. Patients were classified into two groups: normal group (BMI<25) and overweight group (BMI≥25). RESULTS: 40 patients had a normal BMI, and 36 had a BMI above normal. Patients with a BMI that was above normal showed significantly higher response rates (p = 0.024, χ2), and lower likelihood of brain metastases (p = 0.012, χ2). No differences were found between both groups with respect to gender (p = 0.324, χ2), T-stage (p = 0.197, χ2), or the occurrence of side effects (p = 0.646, χ2). Patients with a BMI above normal showed a trend towards longer overall survival (p = 0.056, Log-Rank), but no difference was found regarding progression-free survival (p = 0.924, Log-Rank). CONCLUSIONS: The BMI correlated with the response to ipilimumab treatment in a cohort of metastatic melanoma patients.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Ipilimumab/administración & dosificación , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/patología , Austria , Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 58(6): BIO174-BIO179, 2017 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28715582

RESUMEN

Purpose: To investigate the role of sunlight exposure in iris freckles formation. Methods: We prospectively examined volunteers attending a skin cancer screening program conducted by ophthalmologists and dermatologists. Frequency and topographical variability of iris freckles were noted and associated with behavioral and dermatologic characteristics indicating high sun exposure. Results: Six hundred thirty-two participants (n = 360; 57% female) were examined. Mean age of all participants was 38.4 ± 18.4 years (range, 4-84 years). Of all individuals, 76.1% (n = 481) exhibited at least one iris freckle. Most freckles were observed in the inferior temporal quadrant. The presence of iris freckles was associated with higher age (participants with iris freckles: 41.8 ± 16.8 years versus participants without iris freckles: 27.6 ± 19.2 years), a high number of sunburns during lifetime (>10: 31% vs. 19%), sunlight-damaged skin (26% vs. 11%), presence of actinic lentigines (72% vs. 45%), and a high total nevus body count (>10; 78% vs. 67%). Conclusions: The association of iris freckles, behavioral factors, and dermatologic findings, as well as the topographical distribution, indicate that sunlight exposure may trigger the formation of iris freckles. The evaluation of iris freckles offers an easily accessible potential biomarker, which might be helpful in indicating sun damage on the skin associated with cutaneous malignancies. Furthermore, the evaluation of iris freckles could also be helpful in understanding the role of sunlight in several ophthalmologic diseases.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Enfermedades del Iris/etiología , Iris/efectos de la radiación , Melanosis/etiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Luz Solar/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Envejecimiento/fisiología , Niño , Preescolar , Enfermedad Crónica , Color del Ojo , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades del Iris/diagnóstico , Masculino , Melanosis/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nevo Pigmentado/diagnóstico , Nevo Pigmentado/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico , Piel/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Quemadura Solar/complicaciones , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA