RESUMEN
Tumor-specific CD8+ T cells (TST) in patients with cancer are dysfunctional and unable to halt cancer progression. TST dysfunction, also known as exhaustion, is thought to be driven by chronic T cell antigen receptor (TCR) stimulation over days to weeks. However, we know little about the interplay between CD8+ T cell function, cell division and epigenetic remodeling within hours of activation. Here, we assessed early CD8+ T cell differentiation, cell division, chromatin accessibility and transcription in tumor-bearing mice and acutely infected mice. Surprisingly, despite robust activation and proliferation, TST had near complete effector function impairment even before undergoing cell division and had acquired hallmark chromatin accessibility features previously associated with later dysfunction/exhaustion. Moreover, continued tumor/antigen exposure drove progressive epigenetic remodeling, 'imprinting' the dysfunctional state. Our study reveals the rapid divergence of T cell fate choice before cell division in the context of tumors versus infection.
Asunto(s)
Linfocitos T CD8-positivos , Neoplasias , Ratones , Animales , División Celular , Antígenos de Neoplasias , Cromatina , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos TRESUMEN
Platelets play a central role in primary hemostasis affecting tumor survival and metastases. Tumors induce platelets to aggregate and bind to the cancer cells, resulting in protection from immune surveillance and often leading to thrombocytosis. In ovarian cancer (OvCa), one-third of patients present with thrombocytosis, a diagnosis that correlates with shorter survival. SUSD2 (SUShi Domain containing 2), a type I transmembrane protein, shown to inhibit metastatic processes in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), is expressed on endothelial cells and thus may influence platelet reactivity. As such, we hypothesized that SUSD2 levels in ovarian cancer-derived cell lines influence platelet activation. We incubated OvCa non-targeting (NT) and SUSD2 knockdown (KD) cell lines with labeled platelets and quantified platelet binding, as well as GPIIb/IIIa integrin activation. The role of GPIIb/IIIa in tumor cell/platelet interaction was also examined by measuring cell-cell adhesion in the presence of eptifibatide. We found that platelets exposed to OvCa cells with low SUSD2 expression display increased tumor cell-platelet binding along with an increase in GPIIb/IIIa receptor activation. As such, platelet activation and binding to HGSOC cells was inversely correlated with the presence of SUSD2. This represents one of the first tumor proteins known to provide differential platelet interaction based on protein status.
Asunto(s)
Plaquetas/metabolismo , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/metabolismo , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias Ováricas/metabolismo , Activación Plaquetaria , Plaquetas/patología , Adhesión Celular , Línea Celular Tumoral , Técnicas de Cocultivo , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/patologíaRESUMEN
Background: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies are an important treatment for patients with advanced cancers; however only a subset of patients with certain types of cancer achieves durable remissions. Cancer vaccines are an attractive strategy to boost patient immune responses, but less is known about whether and how immunization can induce long-term tumor immune reprogramming and arrest cancer progression. We developed a clinically-relevant genetic cancer mouse model in which hepatocytes sporadically undergo oncogenic transformation. We compared how tumor-specific CD8 T cells (TST) differentiate in mice with early sporadic lesions as compared to late lesions and tested how immunotherapeutic strategies, including vaccination and ICB, reprogram TST and impact liver cancer progression. Methods: Mice with a germline floxed allele of the SV40 large T antigen (TAG) undergo spontaneous recombination and activation of the TAG oncogene, leading to rare early pre-cancerous lesions that inevitably progress to established liver cancer. We assessed the immunophenotype and function of TAG-specific CD8 T cells in mice with early and late liver lesions. We vaccinated mice, either alone or in combination with ICB, to test whether these immunotherapeutic interventions could stop liver cancer progression. Results: In mice with early lesions, a subset of TST were PD1 + TCF1 + TOX - and could produce IFNγ, while TST present in mice with late liver cancers were PD1 + TCF1 lo/- TOX + and unable to make effector cytokines. Strikingly, vaccination with attenuated TAG epitope-expressing Listeria monocytogenes (LM TAG ) blocked liver cancer development and led to a population of TST that were TCF1 + TOX - TST and polyfunctional cytokine producers. In contrast, ICB administration did not slow cancer progression or improve LM TAG vaccine efficacy. Conclusion: Vaccination, but not ICB, generated a population of progenitor TST and halted cancer progression in a clinically relevant model of sporadic liver cancer. In patients with early cancers or at high-risk of cancer recurrence, immunization may be the most effective strategy. What is already known on this topic: Immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint blockade and cancer vaccines, fails to induce long-term remissions in most patients with cancer. What this study adds: Hosts with early lesions but not hosts with advanced cancer retain a progenitor TCF1+ TST population. This population can be reprogrammed and therapeutically exploited by vaccination, but not ICB, to block tumor progression. How this study might affect research practice or policy: For people at high-risk of cancer progression, vaccination administered when a responsive progenitor TST population is present may be the optimal immunotherapy to induce long-lasting progression-free survival.
RESUMEN
T cells recognize several types of antigens in tumors, including aberrantly expressed, nonmutated proteins, which are therefore shared with normal tissue and referred to as self/shared-antigens (SSA), and mutated proteins or oncogenic viral proteins, which are referred to as tumor-specific antigens (TSA). Immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) can activate T-cell responses against TSA, leading to tumor control, and also against SSA, causing immune-related adverse events (irAE). To improve anti-TSA immunity while limiting anti-SSA autoreactivity, we need to understand how tumor-specific CD8+ T cells (TST) and SSA-specific CD8+ T (SST) cells differentiate in response to cognate antigens during tumorigenesis. Therefore, we developed a genetic cancer mouse model in which we can track TST and SST differentiation longitudinally as liver cancers develop. We found that both TST and SST lost effector function over time, but while TST persisted long term and had a dysfunctional/exhausted phenotype (including expression of PD1, CD39, and TOX), SST exited cell cycle prematurely and disappeared from liver lesions. However, SST persisted in spleens in a dysfunctional TCF1+PD-1- state: unable to produce effector cytokines or proliferate in response to ICB targeting PD-1 or PD-L1. Thus, our studies identify a dysfunctional T-cell state occupied by T cells reactive to SSA: a TCF1+PD-1- state lacking in effector function, demonstrating that the type/specificity of tumor antigen may determine tumor-reactive T-cell differentiation.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hepáticas , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1 , Animales , Ratones , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos , Citocinas/metabolismo , Activación de Linfocitos , AntígenosRESUMEN
Thirteen percent of cancers worldwide are associated with viral infections. While many human oncogenic viruses are widely endemic, very few infected individuals develop cancer. This raises the question why oncogenic viruses encode viral oncogenes if they can replicate and spread between human hosts without causing cancer. Interestingly, viral infection triggers innate immune signaling pathways that in turn activate tumor suppressors such as p53, suggesting that tumor suppressors may have evolved not primarily to prevent cancer, but to thwart viral infection. Here, we summarize and compare several major immune evasion strategies used by viral and non-viral cancers, with a focus on oncogenes that play dual roles in promoting tumorigenicity and immune evasion. By highlighting important and illustrative examples of how oncogenic viruses evade the immune system, we aim to shed light on how non-viral cancers avoid immune detection. Further study and understanding of how viral and non-viral oncogenes impact immune function could lead to improved strategies to combine molecular therapies targeting oncoproteins in combination with immunomodulators.