Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 98
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 205(1): 135-145, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285110

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To ensure high-quality screening programmes and effective utilization of resources, it is important to monitor how cancer detection is affected by different strategies performed at recall assessment. This study aimed to describe procedures performed at recall assessment and compare and evaluate the performance of the assessment in Denmark, Norway, and Spain in terms of screen-detected cancer (SDC) and interval cancer (IC) rates. METHODS: We included women aged 50-69 years from Denmark, Norway, and Spain, who were recalled for assessment after screening mammography, and recorded all procedures performed during six months after diagnosis, and the timing of the procedures. Women were followed for two years and screen-detected and interval cancer, and sensitivity of recall was calculated and compared. RESULTS: In total, data from 24,645 Danish, 30,050 Norwegian, and 41,809 Spanish women were included in the study. Most of the women had some assessment within 2 months in all three countries. SDC rates were higher in Denmark (0.57) and Norway (0.60) compared to Spain (0.38), as were the IC rates, i.e. 0.25 and 0.18 vs. 0.12, respectively. The sensitivity of the diagnostic follow-up was somewhat higher in Denmark (98.3%) and Norway (98.2%), compared to Spain (95.4%), but when excluding non-invasive assessment pathways, the sensitivities were comparable. CONCLUSION: This comparison study showed variation in the assessment procedures used in the three countries as well as the SDC and IC rates and the sensitivity of recall.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Mamografía , Humanos , Femenino , Mamografía/métodos , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , España/epidemiología , Anciano , Noruega/epidemiología , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos
2.
Scand J Med Sci Sports ; 34(3): e14572, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38424471

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The study examined whether increased physical activity (PA) in nonmetropolitan cancer survivors was maintained 12 weeks following the PPARCS intervention. METHODS: PA outcomes were assessed using an accelerometer at baseline, end of the intervention, and at 24 weeks. Linear mixed models were used to examine between-group changes in PA outcomes. RESULTS: The increased moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) following intervention was maintained with significantly higher MVPA in the intervention group at 24 weeks (vs. controls) compared to baseline nett change of 52.5 min/week (95% CI 11.0-94.0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Distance-based interventions using wearables and health coaching may produce MVPA maintenance amongst nonmetropolitan cancer survivors.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias , Humanos , Ejercicio Físico , Promoción de la Salud
3.
Cancer ; 128(7): 1373-1380, 2022 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34931707

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: False-positive screening results are an inevitable and commonly recognized disadvantage of mammographic screening. This study estimated the cumulative probability of experiencing a first false-positive screening result in women attending 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway, which targets women aged 50 to 69 years. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed screening outcomes from 421,545 women who underwent 1,894,523 screening examinations during 1995-2019. Empirical data were used to calculate the cumulative risk of experiencing a first false-positive screening result and a first false-positive screening result that involved an invasive procedure over 10 screening rounds. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of adjusting for irregular attendance, age at screening, and number of screens attended. RESULTS: The cumulative risk of experiencing a first false-positive screening result was 18.04% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.00%-18.07%). It was 5.01% (95% CI, 5.01%-5.02%) for experiencing a false-positive screening result that involved an invasive procedure. Adjusting for irregular attendance or age at screening did not appreciably affect these estimates. After adjustments for the number of screens attended, the cumulative risk of a first false-positive screening result was 18.28% (95% CI, 18.24%-18.32%), and the risk of a false-positive screening result including an invasive procedure was 5.11% (95% CI, 5.11%-5.22%). This suggested that there was minimal bias from dependent censoring. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 1 in 5 women will experience a false-positive screening result if they attend 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway. One in 20 will experience a false-positive screening result with an invasive procedure. LAY SUMMARY: A false-positive screening result occurs when a woman attending mammographic screening is called back for further assessment because of suspicious findings, but the assessment does not detect breast cancer. Further assessment includes additional imaging. Usually, it involves ultrasound, and sometimes, it involves a biopsy. This study has evaluated the chance of experiencing a false-positive screening result among women attending 10 screening examinations over 20 years in BreastScreen Norway. Nearly 1 in 5 women will experience a false-positive screening result over 10 screening rounds. One in 20 women will experience a false-positive screening result involving a biopsy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamografía , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Eur Radiol ; 32(11): 7480-7487, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35536390

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We compared the compression force, breast thickness, and glandular dose, as well as the severity of discomfort and women's experience between the patient-assisted compression (PAC) and standard compression (SC) modes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled study at Hospital del Mar in Barcelona, Spain. We included 448 asymptomatic women aged 50 to 69 years old, attending their screening round from December 2017 to December 2019. Mammograms included the two bilateral views. In each woman, one breast was studied with SC and the other with PAC. The mode used in each breast was selected following a randomized list. Compression force, breast thickness, and average glandular dose were obtained for each of the 1792 images. We also recorded the degree of discomfort and women's experience, after mammogram acquisitions, using a predefined survey. RESULTS: Higher compression forces were obtained with PAC than with SC (99.27 N vs 83.25 N, p < 0.001). Breast thickness mode (56.11 mm vs 57.52 mm, p = 0.015) and glandular dose (1.34 mGy vs 1.37 mGy, p = 0.018) were lower in PAC. The discomfort score was slightly higher with PAC (mean 3.94 vs 3.69, p = 0.042), but in the satisfaction survey, more women reported that PAC caused less discomfort. Additionally, 63.2% of women (289/448) preferred PAC. CONCLUSION: PAC achieved higher compression forces without impairing the other technical imaging parameters and enhanced women's experience of screening mammography. We believe there were no clinically significant differences in the severity of discomfort between the two modes. KEY POINTS: • Self-compression allows higher compression forces than the standard compression mode. • Self-compression does not affect technical imaging parameters. • Self-compression improved women's experience of screening mammography when standard compression was used on one breast and self-compression on the other.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamografía , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Mamografía/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Método Simple Ciego , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen
5.
Eur Radiol ; 32(11): 7470-7479, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35536391

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the image quality of a mammography screening device using the patient-assisted compression (PAC) compared with the standard compression (SC) mode. METHODS: This prospective within-woman, randomized controlled trial was conducted between September 2017 and December 2019. Participants were asymptomatic women aged 50 to 69 years attending their second or subsequent screening mammography round. By random assignment, one breast underwent the SC and the other breast, the PAC. Image quality was evaluated as perfect, good, moderate, or inadequate (PGMI) on 10 criteria for the craniocaudal (CC) view and 8 criteria for the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view. Pearson's chi-square test, with Yates' correction if pertinent, was performed to compare image quality between compression modes. RESULTS: A total of 444 participants were included (mean [± standard deviation] age, 60 [± 4.9] years). There were no differences in the percentages of PGMI between the PAC and SC modes for the CC view (perfect, 37% [162/444] vs 37% [163/444]; good, 1% [5/444] vs 2% [9/444]; moderate, 62% [277/444] vs 61% [271/444]; inadequate, 0% vs 0.2% [1/444]; p = .88) or for the MLO view (perfect, 53% [237/444] vs 56% [247/444]; good, 22% [99/444] vs 22% [97/444]; moderate, 23% [102/444] vs 22% [98/444]; inadequate, 1% [6/444] vs 0.5% [2/444]; p = .72). No differences were found when we stratified by laterality or when analyzed by PGMI criteria. CONCLUSION: PAC does not seem to impair mammographic image quality. Future research should focus in a daily practice setting. KEY POINTS: No differences were found in the distribution of the PGMI classification, a tool for quality assessment, between patient-assisted compression and standard compression. Similar results were found on stratification of image quality by mammographic view and breast laterality for both types of compression. None of the PGMI criteria had significantly more errors in patient-assisted compression than in standard compression.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamografía , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mamografía/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Hiperplasia
6.
Eur Radiol ; 32(1): 621-629, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34156554

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the mammographic features in women with benign breast disease (BBD) and the risk of subsequent breast cancer according to their mammographic findings. METHODS: We analyzed data from a Spanish cohort of women screened from 1995 to 2015 and followed up until December 2017 (median follow-up, 5.9 years). We included 10,650 women who had both histologically confirmed BBD and mammographic findings. We evaluated proliferative and nonproliferative BBD subtypes, and their mammographic features: architectural distortion, asymmetries, calcifications, masses, and multiple findings. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for breast cancer were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. We plotted the adjusted cumulative incidence curves. RESULTS: Calcifications were more frequent in proliferative disease with atypia (43.9%) than without atypia (36.8%) or nonproliferative disease (22.2%; p value < 0.05). Masses were more frequent in nonproliferative lesions (59.1%) than in proliferative lesions without atypia (35.1%) or with atypia (30.0%; p value < 0.05). Multiple findings and architectural distortion were more likely in proliferative disease (16.1% and 4.7%) than in nonproliferative disease (12.8% and 1.9%). Subsequent breast cancer occurred in 268 (2.5%) women. Compared with women who had masses, the highest risk of subsequent breast cancer was found in those with architectural distortions (aHR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.16-4.22), followed by those with multiple findings (aHR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.34-2.66), asymmetries (aHR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.84-3.28), and calcifications (aHR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.21-2.12). CONCLUSION: BBD subtypes showed distinct mammographic findings. The risk of subsequent breast cancer was high in those who have shown architectural distortion, multiple findings, asymmetries, and calcifications than in women with masses. KEY POINTS: • The presence of mammographic findings in women attending breast cancer screening helps clinicians to assess women with benign breast disease (BBD). • Calcifications were frequent in BBDs with atypia, which are the ones with a high breast cancer risk, while masses were common in low-risk BBDs. • The excess risk of subsequent breast cancer in women with BBD was higher in those who showed architectural distortion compared to those with masses.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Enfermedad Fibroquística de la Mama , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 28(7): 3714-3721, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33247362

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis or treatment of breast cancer is sometimes delayed. A lengthy delay may have a negative psychological impact on patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the sociodemographic, clinical and pathological factors associated with delay in the provision of surgical treatment for localised breast cancer, in a prospective cohort of patients. METHODS: This observational, prospective, multicentre study was conducted in ten hospitals belonging to the Spanish national public health system, located in four Autonomous Communities (regions). The study included 1236 patients, diagnosed through a screening programme or found to be symptomatic, between April 2013 and May 2015. The study variables analysed included each patient's personal history, care situation, tumour history and data on the surgical intervention, pathological anatomy, hospital admission and follow-up. Treatment delay was defined as more than 30 days elapsed between biopsy and surgery. RESULTS: Over half of the study population experienced surgical treatment delay. This delay was greater for patients with no formal education and among widows, persons not requiring assistance for usual activities, those experiencing anxiety or depression, those who had a high BMI or an above-average number of comorbidities, those who were symptomatic, who did not receive NMR spectroscopy, who presented a histology other than infiltrating ductal carcinoma or who had poorly differentiated carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: Certain sociodemographic and clinical variables are associated with surgical treatment delay. This study identifies factors that influence surgical delays, highlighting the importance of preventing these factors and of raising awareness among the population at risk and among health personnel.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Tiempo de Tratamiento
8.
Eur Radiol ; 31(7): 4839-4847, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33409776

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Assessing the combined effect of mammographic density and benign breast disease is of utmost importance to design personalized screening strategies. METHODS: We analyzed individual-level data from 294,943 women aged 50-69 years with at least one mammographic screening participation in any of four areas of the Spanish Breast Cancer Screening Program from 1995 to 2015, and followed up until 2017. We used partly conditional Cox models to assess the association between benign breast disease, breast density, and the risk of breast cancer. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 8.0 years, 3697 (1.25%) women had a breast cancer diagnosis and 5941 (2.01%) had a benign breast disease. More than half of screened women had scattered fibroglandular density (55.0%). The risk of breast cancer independently increased with the presence of benign breast disease and with the increase in breast density (p for interaction = 0.84). Women with benign breast disease and extremely dense breasts had a threefold elevated risk of breast cancer compared with those with scattered fibroglandular density and without benign breast disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.07; 95%CI = 2.01-4.68). Heterogeneous density and benign breast disease was associated with nearly a 2.5 elevated risk (HR = 2.48; 95%CI = 1.66-3.70). Those with extremely dense breast without a benign breast disease had a 2.27 increased risk (95%CI = 2.07-2.49). CONCLUSIONS: Women with benign breast disease had an elevated risk for over 15 years independently of their breast density category. Women with benign breast disease and dense breasts are at high risk for future breast cancer. KEY POINTS: • Benign breast disease and breast density were independently associated with breast cancer. • Women with benign breast disease had an elevated risk for up to 15 years independently of their mammographic density category.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Enfermedad Fibroquística de la Mama , Densidad de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Factores de Riesgo
9.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 1301, 2021 07 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34217258

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of an information leaflet about the risk-benefit balance of breast cancer screening on women's participation. METHODS: This cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted within a population-based breast cancer screening program and included women from the catchment areas of two hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. We evaluated women aged 50-69 years invited to screening between September 2019 and January 2020. The intervention group received an information leaflet on the benefits and harms of mammography screening. The control group received the usual invitation letter. The clusters consisted of the processing days of the invitation letter, assigned to the intervention with a simple random allocation scheme. We compared the participation rate at the individual level between groups, stratified by hospital and by per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses. RESULTS: We included 11,119 women (137 clusters): 5416 in the intervention group (66 clusters) and 5703 in the control group (71 clusters). A total of 36% (1964/5393) of the women in the intervention group and 37% (2135/5694) of those in the control group attended screening, respectively. Overall, we found no differences in participation among groups (difference in participation - 1.1%; 95%CI; - 2.9 to 0.7%). In a hospital attending a population with a low socioeconomic status, attendance was lower in the intervention group (- 1.4, 95%CI: - 5.7% to - 0.03%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall participation in our program was unaffected by a new information leaflet on the risk-benefit balance of breast cancer screening. However, participation was lower in certain populations with lower socioeconomic status TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number ISRCTN13848929 .


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Tamizaje Masivo , España/epidemiología
10.
Circulation ; 140(14): 1188-1204, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567019

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy/arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited cardiac disease characterized by fibrofatty replacement of the myocardium, resulting in heart failure and sudden cardiac death. The most aggressive arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy/ARVC subtype is ARVC type 5 (ARVC5), caused by a p.S358L mutation in TMEM43 (transmembrane protein 43). The function and localization of TMEM43 are unknown, as is the mechanism by which the p.S358L mutation causes the disease. Here, we report the characterization of the first transgenic mouse model of ARVC5. METHODS: We generated transgenic mice overexpressing TMEM43 in either its wild-type or p.S358L mutant (TMEM43-S358L) form in postnatal cardiomyocytes under the control of the α-myosin heavy chain promoter. RESULTS: We found that mice expressing TMEM43-S358L recapitulate the human disease and die at a young age. Mutant TMEM43 causes cardiomyocyte death and severe fibrofatty replacement. We also demonstrate that TMEM43 localizes at the nuclear membrane and interacts with emerin and ß-actin. TMEM43-S358L shows partial delocalization to the cytoplasm, reduced interaction with emerin and ß-actin, and activation of glycogen synthase kinase-3ß (GSK3ß). Furthermore, we show that targeting cardiac fibrosis has no beneficial effect, whereas overexpression of the calcineurin splice variant calcineurin Aß1 results in GSK3ß inhibition and improved cardiac function and survival. Similarly, treatment of TMEM43 mutant mice with a GSK3ß inhibitor improves cardiac function. Finally, human induced pluripotent stem cells bearing the p.S358L mutation also showed contractile dysfunction that was partially restored after GSK3ß inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide evidence that TMEM43-S358L leads to sustained cardiomyocyte death and fibrofatty replacement. Overexpression of calcineurin Aß1 in TMEM43 mutant mice or chemical GSK3ß inhibition improves cardiac function and increases mice life span. Our results pave the way toward new therapeutic approaches for ARVC5.


Asunto(s)
Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica/patología , Glucógeno Sintasa Quinasa 3 beta/metabolismo , Disfunción Ventricular/patología , Animales , Calcineurina/genética , Calcineurina/metabolismo , Diferenciación Celular , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Glucógeno Sintasa Quinasa 3 beta/antagonistas & inhibidores , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Humanos , Células Madre Pluripotentes Inducidas/citología , Proteínas de la Membrana/química , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Transgénicos , Mutagénesis Sitio-Dirigida , Miocardio/metabolismo , Miocardio/patología , Miocitos Cardíacos/citología , Miocitos Cardíacos/metabolismo , Isoformas de Proteínas/genética , Isoformas de Proteínas/metabolismo , Piridinas/farmacología , Pirimidinas/farmacología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Disfunción Ventricular/mortalidad
11.
Phys Rev Lett ; 125(17): 176601, 2020 Oct 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33156671

RESUMEN

We have studied the magnetic, magnetotransport, and galvanomagnetic properties of TmNiC_{2}. We find that the antiferromagnetic and field induced metamagnetic and ferromagnetic orderings do not suppress the charge density wave. The persistence of Fermi surface pockets, open as a result of imperfect nesting accompanying the Peierls transition, results in an electronic carriers mobility of the order of 4×10^{3} cm^{2} V^{-1} s^{-1} in ferromagnetic state, without any signatures for a significant deterioration of nesting properties. This is independently evidenced by high, nonsaturating linear magnetoresistance reaching 440% at T=2 K and an analysis of the Hall conductivity. We thus demonstrate that, the coexistence of charge density wave and magnetism provides an alternative route to maintain high electronic mobility in the magnetically ordered state.

12.
Dig Endosc ; 32(4): 608-615, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31608503

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is an emerging option for acute cholecystitis in non-surgical candidates. Combining endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for common bile duct stones with EUS-GBD in a single session might become a non-surgical management strategy to comprehensively treat gallstone disease in selected patients. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes between EUS-GBD alone (group A) and single-session ERCP combined with EUS-GBD (group B). Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-GBD with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) between June 2011 and August 2018 were analyzed. Exclusion criteria were subjects included in randomized clinical trials, patients who had had ERCP within 5 days of EUS-GBD, patients in whom ERCP or EUS-GBD was carried out for salvage of one or the other procedure, and patients who underwent concurrent EUS-guided biliary drainage. RESULTS: One hundred and nine consecutive patients underwent EUS-GBD with LAMS during the study period. Seventy-one patients satisfied the inclusion criteria and 34 patients were in group A and 37 in group B. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in technical (97.1% vs 97.3%; P = 0.19) and clinical success rates (88.2% vs 94.6%; P = 0.42) of EUS-GBD in group A versus group B. Rate of adverse events was similar in both groups, five (14.7%) in group A versus five (13.5%) in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Single-session EUS-GBD combined with ERCP has comparable rates of technical and clinical success to EUS-GBD alone. A combined EUS-GBD and ERCP procedure does not appear to increase adverse events and makes possible comprehensive treatment of gallstone disease by purely endoscopic means.


Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Drenaje , Endosonografía , Cálculos Biliares/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colecistitis Aguda/complicaciones , Colecistitis Aguda/diagnóstico , Femenino , Cálculos Biliares/complicaciones , Cálculos Biliares/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Br J Cancer ; 120(2): 269-275, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30563993

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We assessed the long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer in women with a first or second false-positive screening result. METHODS: Joint analysis had been performed using individual-level data from three population-based screening programs in Europe (Copenhagen in Denmark, Norway, and Spain). Overall, 75,513 screened women aged 50-69 years from Denmark (1991-2010), 556,640 from Norway (1996-2008), and 517,314 from Spain (1994-2010) were included. We used partly conditional Cox hazards models to assess the association between false-positive results and the risk of subsequent screen-detected and interval cancer. RESULTS: During follow-up, 1,149,467 women underwent 3,510,450 screening exams, and 10,623 screen-detected and 5700 interval cancers were diagnosed. Compared to women with negative tests, those with false-positive results had a two-fold risk of screen-detected (HR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.93-2.16) and interval cancer (HR = 2.18, 95% CI: 2.02-2.34). Women with a second false-positive result had over a four-fold risk of screen-detected and interval cancer (HR = 4.71, 95% CI: 3.81-5.83 and HR = 4.22, 95% CI: 3.27-5.46, respectively). Women remained at an elevated risk for 12 years after the false-positive result. CONCLUSIONS: Women with prior false-positive results had an increased risk of screen-detected and interval cancer for over a decade. This information should be considered to design personalised screening strategies based on individual risk.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Mamografía , Anciano , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Dinamarca , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , España
14.
Br J Cancer ; 121(1): 76-85, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31114019

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Individualised breast cancer risk prediction models may be key for planning risk-based screening approaches. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and quality assessment of these models addressed to women in the general population. METHODS: We followed the Cochrane Collaboration methods searching in Medline, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library databases up to February 2018. We included studies reporting a model to estimate the individualised risk of breast cancer in women in the general population. Study quality was assessed by two independent reviewers. Results are narratively summarised. RESULTS: We included 24 studies out of the 2976 citations initially retrieved. Twenty studies were based on four models, the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT), the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC), the Rosner & Colditz model, and the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS), whereas four studies addressed other original models. Four of the studies included genetic information. The quality of the studies was moderate with some limitations in the discriminative power and data inputs. A maximum AUROC value of 0.71 was reported in the study conducted in a screening context. CONCLUSION: Individualised risk prediction models are promising tools for implementing risk-based screening policies. However, it is a challenge to recommend any of them since they need further improvement in their quality and discriminatory capacity.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Curva ROC , Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo
15.
Eur J Public Health ; 29(5): 981-986, 2019 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30590519

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To determine the risk of hospital readmission and associated factors in patients with a positive sample for multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MRM) and to analyze whether there is a higher risk of hospital readmission with some of the more common MRM. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study (2012-16) performed in a tertiary-care teaching hospital in Barcelona. Patients were divided into two groups, depending on the presence or absence of an MRM-positive sample during hospital admission. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the risk of hospital readmission in the first 30 and 90 days, and the first year for patients with an MRM-positive sample compared with those without. The models were stratified by the presence or absence of an MRM-positive sample and by grouped Charlson comorbidity index. RESULTS: We included 983 patients with an MRM-positive sample and 39 323 patients without. The risk of hospital readmission in the first 30 days was 41% higher in admitted patients with an MRM-positive sample (95%CI=1.17 to 1.69) than in those without. Stratified models showed similar results to the overall results for all Charlson comorbidity index groups. When the models were stratified by the presence of an MRM-positive sample, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus showed the highest risk of readmissions within the more common MRM [103% (95%CI=1.10 to 3.75)]. CONCLUSION: MRMs seem to be an important risk factor for hospital readmissions both among patients with and without comorbidities. Specific types of MRM may represent a higher risk for hospital readmissions than other MRMs, depending on the particular environment or hospital.


Asunto(s)
Resistencia a Múltiples Medicamentos , Infecciones/tratamiento farmacológico , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
16.
Mol Cancer ; 17(1): 33, 2018 02 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29455666

RESUMEN

Lung neoplasms are the leading cause of death by cancer worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes more than 80% of all lung malignancies and the majority of patients present advanced disease at onset. However, in the last decade, multiple oncogenic driver alterations have been discovered and each of them represents a potential therapeutic target. Although KRAS mutations are the most frequently oncogene aberrations in lung adenocarcinoma patients, effective therapies targeting KRAS have yet to be developed. Moreover, the role of KRAS oncogene in NSCLC remains unclear and its predictive and prognostic impact remains controversial. The study of the underlying biology of KRAS in NSCLC patients could help to determine potential candidates to evaluate novel targeted agents and combinations that may allow a tailored treatment for these patients. The aim of this review is to update the current knowledge about KRAS-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, including a historical overview, the biology of the molecular pathways involved, the clinical relevance of KRAS mutations as a prognostic and predictive marker and the potential therapeutic approaches for a personalized treatment of KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Genes ras/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Animales , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Genes ras/fisiología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Mutación/genética
17.
Radiology ; 287(1): 58-67, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29239711

RESUMEN

Purpose To compare rates and tumor characteristics of interval breast cancers (IBCs) detected after a negative versus false-positive screening among women participating in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Materials and Methods The Cancer Registry Regulation approved this retrospective study. Information about 423 445 women aged 49-71 years who underwent 789 481 full-field digital mammographic screening examinations during 2004-2012 was extracted from the Cancer Registry of Norway. Rates and odds ratios of IBC among women with a negative (the reference group) versus a false-positive screening were estimated by using logistic regression models adjusted for age at diagnosis and county of residence. Results A total of 1302 IBCs were diagnosed after 789 481 screening examinations, of which 7.0% (91 of 1302) were detected among women with a false-positive screening as the most recent breast imaging examination before detection. By using negative screening as the reference, adjusted odds ratios of IBCs were 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.6, 4.2) and 2.8 (95% CI: 1.8, 4.4) for women with a false-positive screening without and with needle biopsy, respectively. Women with a previous negative screening had a significantly lower proportion of tumors that were 10 mm or less (14.3% [150 of 1049] vs 50.0% [seven of 14], respectively; P < .01) and grade I tumors (13.2% [147 of 1114] vs 42.9% [six of 14]; P < .01), but a higher proportion of cases with lymph nodes positive for cancer (40.9% [442 of 1080] vs 13.3% [two of 15], respectively; P = .03) compared with women with a previous false-positive screening with benign biopsy. A retrospective review of the screening mammographic examinations identified 42.9% (39 of 91) of the false-positive cases to be the same lesion as the IBC. Conclusion By using a negative screening as the reference, a false-positive screening examination increased the risk of an IBC three-fold. The tumor characteristics of IBC after a negative screening were less favorable compared with those detected after a previous false-positive screening. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Mama/patología , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
Eur Radiol ; 28(4): 1662-1672, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29098437

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate possible associations between breast compression parameters, including compression force, pressure and compressed breast thickness, and mammographic density assessed by an automated software. METHODS: We obtained data on breast compression parameters, breast volume, absolute and percentage dense volume, and body mass index for 14,698 women screened with two-view (craniocaudal, CC, and mediolateral oblique, MLO) digital mammography, in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme, 2014-2015. The Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) was used to measure correlation between breast compression parameters, breast volume and absolute and percentage dense volume. Linear regression was used to examine associations between breast compression parameters and absolute and percentage dense volume, adjusting for breast volume, age and BMI. RESULTS: A fair negative correlation was observed between compression pressure and absolute dense volume (ρ = - 0.37 for CC and ρ = - 0.34 for MLO). A moderate negative correlation was identified for compressed breast thickness and percentage dense volume (ρ = - 0.56 for CC and ρ = - 0.62 for MLO). These correlations were corroborated by the corresponding associations obtained in the adjusted regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study indicate that breast compression parameters may influence absolute and percentage dense volume measured by the automated software. KEY POINTS: • A fair correlation was identified between compression pressure and absolute dense volume • A moderate correlation was identified between compressed breast thickness and percentage dense volume • Breast compression may influence automated density estimates.


Asunto(s)
Densidad de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Mamografía/métodos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Mama/anatomía & histología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Tamaño de los Órganos , Presión , Programas Informáticos
19.
Breast J ; 24(4): 509-518, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29517151

RESUMEN

Women with a benign breast disease (BBD) have an increased risk of subsequent breast carcinoma. Information is scarce regarding the characteristics of breast carcinomas diagnosed after a BBD. Our aim was to point out the differences in clinical and histologic characteristics of breast carcinomas diagnosed in women with and without a previous pathologic diagnosis of BBD in the context of population-based mammography screening. Retrospective cohort study of all women aged 50-69 years who were screened at least once in a population-based screening program in Spain, between 1994 and 2011 and followed up until December 2012. The mean follow-up was 6.1 years. We analyzed 6645 breast carcinomas, of whom 238 had a previous pathologic diagnosis of BBD. Information on clinical and histologic characteristics was collected from pathology reports. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of occurrence of selected histologic characteristics of breast carcinomas in women with and without a previous BBD. Women with a previous BBD had a higher proportion of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) compared with women without a BBD (22.1% and 13.6%, respectively). Among those diagnosed with an invasive breast carcinoma, women with previous BBD were more likely to be diagnosed with carcinomas sized >2 cm (OR = 1.46; 95%CI = 1.03-2.08), metastatic positive (OR = 2.66; 95%CI = 1.21-5.86), and with a high Ki-67 proliferation rate (OR = 1.93; 95%CI = 1.24-2.99). No differences were found across histologic subtypes of BBD. Screening participants with a previous pathologic diagnosis of BBD had a higher proportion of DCIS. However, invasive carcinomas detected in women with a BBD were associated with clinical and histologic characteristics conferring a worst prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Anciano , Enfermedades de la Mama/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/epidemiología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Metástasis Linfática , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiología
20.
Acta Radiol ; 59(2): 154-160, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28565960

RESUMEN

Background Breast radiologists of the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program subjectively classified mammographic density using a three-point scale between 1996 and 2012 and changed into the fourth edition of the BI-RADS classification since 2013. In 2015, an automated volumetric breast density assessment software was installed at two screening units. Purpose To compare volumetric breast density measurements from the automated method with two subjective methods: the three-point scale and the BI-RADS density classification. Material and Methods Information on subjective and automated density assessment was obtained from screening examinations of 3635 women recalled for further assessment due to positive screening mammography between 2007 and 2015. The score of the three-point scale (I = fatty; II = medium dense; III = dense) was available for 2310 women. The BI-RADS density score was provided for 1325 women. Mean volumetric breast density was estimated for each category of the subjective classifications. The automated software assigned volumetric breast density to four categories. The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was assessed using weighted kappa (kw). Results Mean volumetric breast density was 4.5%, 7.5%, and 13.4% for categories I, II, and III of the three-point scale, respectively, and 4.4%, 7.5%, 9.9%, and 13.9% for the BI-RADS density categories, respectively ( P for trend < 0.001 for both subjective classifications). The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was kw = 0.5 (95% CI = 0.47-0.53; P < 0.001). Conclusion Mean values of volumetric breast density increased with increasing density category of the subjective classifications. The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was moderate.


Asunto(s)
Densidad de la Mama , Automatización , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA