Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Transplant ; 27(3): e14487, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36869621

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Literature is limited comparing adverse effects (AEs) of the proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs) sirolimus (SRL) and everolimus (EVL) in pediatric heart transplant (HTx) recipients. METHODS: Single-center, observational cohort analysis assessing first use of SRL or EVL in pediatric HTx recipients <21 years of age with up to 2 years follow-up between 2009 and 2020. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included, with 52 (59.8%) receiving EVL and 35 (40.2%) receiving SRL. Tacrolimus with PSI was the most common regimen. Intergroup comparison revealed lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and greater increase in eGFR from baseline to 6 months and latest follow-up in SRL cohort compared to EVL cohort. There was greater increase in HDL cholesterol in SRL cohort compared to EVL cohort. Intragroup analysis revealed eGFR and HDL cholesterol increased significantly within SRL cohort, triglycerides and glycosylated hemoglobin increased in EVL cohort, and LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol increased in both cohorts (all p < .05). There were no differences in hematological indices or rates of aphthous ulcers, effusions, or infections between cohorts. Incidence of proteinuria was not significantly different among those screened within cohorts. Of those included in our analysis, one patient in SRL cohort (2.9%) and two in EVL cohort (3.8%) had PSI withdrawn due to AE. CONCLUSION: Low-dose PSIs in calcineurin inhibitor minimization regimens appear well-tolerated with low withdrawal rate secondary to AE in pediatric HTx recipients. While incidence of most AE was similar between PSI, our results suggest EVL may be associated with less favorable metabolic impact than SRL in this population.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Sirolimus , Humanos , Niño , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Everolimus/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , HDL-Colesterol , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/efectos adversos
2.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 46(7): 1578-1584, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35616288

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Iron supplementation is required for pediatric patients with intestinal failure (IF). There is a paucity of literature on optimal iron formulation and outcomes in this patient population that requires ongoing supplementation. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes in pediatric patients with IF receiving iron sucrose (IS) vs ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) iron infusions. METHODS: This was a single-center observational cohort study of pediatric patients with IF requiring ongoing intravenous iron supplementation. Patients were transitioned from IS to FCM as iron therapy. Longitudinal linear mixed-effects models and generalized estimating equations were used to compare outcomes, including hematologic, iron, and growth parameters for 12-month treatment duration on each iron formulation. Adverse effects were descriptively summarized. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included. Sixteen received IS and later switched to FCM, five received IS only, and two received FCM only. Most patients' etiology of IF was short bowel syndrome (FCM: 81%, IS: 83%). No differences were seen over time for iron, hematologic, and growth metrics between IS and FCM. The median number of infusions over 12 months for those taking IS was 15 (interquartile range [IQR] = 13-26) and 2 for FCM (IQR = 1-2). Asymptomatic hypophosphatemia was noted in both groups. Similar central line-associated bloodstream infection rates were noted. CONCLUSION: IS and FCM infusions both maintained hematologic and iron parameters with no significant difference noted between the two types of iron, though the number of FCM infusions was significantly less. No significant adverse effects were noted.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica , Insuficiencia Intestinal , Anemia Ferropénica/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Compuestos Férricos/efectos adversos , Sacarato de Óxido Férrico/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Hierro , Maltosa/efectos adversos , Maltosa/análogos & derivados
3.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 15(7): 727-733, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33798402

RESUMEN

Introduction: The goal for pediatric short bowel syndrome (SBS) patients is intestinal adaptation. Until recently, the medical management of pediatric SBS has centered on the prevention and treatment of complications in order to allow time for adaptation. Teduglutide, glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) analog, has recently been approved for use in pediatric SBS patients greater than 1 year of age as a novel agent to augment intestinal adaptation. Areas covered: This article reviews the pharmacology, safety, efficacy, and tolerability of GLP-2 analog teduglutide in pediatric patients greater than 1 year of age. We review all current studies and discuss teduglutide's place in pediatric SBS therapy. Expert opinion: Teduglutide marks the first successful pharmacological intervention that augments the natural process of adaptation safely and effectively in SBS pediatric patients. More studies and further development are needed to optimize its potential in other pediatric patients.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Péptidos/uso terapéutico , Síndrome del Intestino Corto/tratamiento farmacológico , Adaptación Fisiológica/efectos de los fármacos , Adaptación Fisiológica/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/farmacología , Péptido 2 Similar al Glucagón , Humanos , Lactante , Intestinos/efectos de los fármacos , Intestinos/fisiopatología , Péptidos/farmacología , Síndrome del Intestino Corto/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA