Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD) and Diabetes UK joint position statement and recommendations on the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors with insulin for treatment of type 1 diabetes (Updated October 2020).

Dapagliflozin (SGLT-2 inhibitor) and sotagliflozin (SGLT1/2 inhibitor) are two of the drugs of SGLT inhibitor class which have been recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in people with type 1 diabetes with BMI ≥27 kg/m2 . Dapagliflozin is licensed in the UK for use in the NHS while sotagliflozin may be available in future. These and possibly other SGLT inhibitors may be increasingly used in people with type 1 diabetes as new licences are obtained. These drugs have the potential to improve glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes with the added benefit of weight loss, better control of blood pressure and more time in optimal glucose range. However, SGLT inhibitors are associated with a higher incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis without significant hyperglycaemia. The present ABCD/Diabetes UK joint updated position statement is to guide people with type 1 diabetes and clinicians using these drugs help mitigate this risk and other potential complications. Particularly, caution needs to be exercised in people who are at risk of diabetic ketoacidosis due to low calorie diets, illnesses, injuries, starvation, excessive exercise, excessive alcohol consumption and reduced insulin administration among other precipitating factors for diabetic ketoacidosis.

Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD) and Diabetes UK joint position statement and recommendations for non-diabetes specialists on the use of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in people with type 2 diabetes (January 2021).

Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are now an established class of medications for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D), no longer reserved for use by specialists in diabetes. They are being used increasingly for their cardiac and renal benefits by primary care, cardiology and renal teams for indications in parallel with diabetes care as part of holistic management. This guidance provides essential information on SGLT therapy, including the main advantages and the important risks of which healthcare professionals should be aware.

Quality of life (QOL) in patients with acromegaly is severely impaired: use of a novel measure of QOL: acromegaly quality of life questionnaire.

Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL) is a new disease-generated quality of life (QOL) questionnaire comprising 22 questions covering physical and psychological aspects of acromegaly and subdivided into "appearance" and "personal relations" categories. We have performed a cross-sectional study of QOL in 80 patients [43 male (mean age, 54.2 yr; range, 20-84); median GH, 0.93ng/ml (range, <0.3 to 23.7); IGF-I, 333.1 ng/ml (range, 47.7-899)] with acromegaly. In addition to AcroQoL, patients completed three generic QOL questionnaires: Psychological General Well-Being Schedule (PGWBS), EuroQol, and a signs and symptoms score (SSS). All three generic questionnaires confirmed impairment in QOL [mean scores: PGWBS, 69.6; EuroQol, visual analog scale, 66.4 (range, 20-100) and utility index, 0.7 (range, -0.07 to 0.92); and SSS, 12 (range, 0-27)]. There was no correlation between biochemical control and any measure of QOL. AcroQoL (57.3%; range, 18.2-93.2) correlated with PGWBS (r = 0.73; P < 0.0001); and in patients with active disease, AcroQoL-physical dimension correlated with SSS (r = -0.67; P < 0.0003). In all questionnaires, prior radiotherapy was associated with impaired QOL. In conclusion, these data underline the marked impact that acromegaly has on patients' QOL and provide the first evidence validating AcroQoL against well-authenticated measures of QOL. This indicates the potential of AcroQoL as a patient-friendly measure of disease activity.

Treatment of acromegaly improves quality of life, measured by AcroQol.

BACKGROUND: AcroQol is a disease-generated questionnaire, developed to assess quality of life (QOL) in patients with acromegaly. We have previously demonstrated severely impaired QOL in patients with acromegaly and the value of AcroQol in measuring QOL in a cross-sectional study compared with the non-disease-specific generic tools 'Psychological general wellbeing schedule' (PGWBS) and EuroQol (EQ-5D), and the disease-specific signs and symptoms score (SSS). AIM, SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We re-evaluated these tools in a longitudinal study of 56 of the previously reported patients (33 male, mean age 55 +/- 15 years), in order to determine change in QOL over time and the effect of different treatment modalities. Data were analysed using Spearman's correlation tests. RESULTS: Baseline median IGF-I was 354 ng/ml (range 48-899) and at re-evaluation 217 ng/ml (60-594) (P < 0.001) [median time interval 608 days (113-1136)]. Analysis of change in IGF-I levels and AcroQol scores demonstrated a significant negative correlation (i.e. a reduction in IGF-I being associated with improved overall QOL (r = -0.36, P = 0.006). Significant negative correlations were also seen in the physical (r = -0.33, P = 0.01), psychological (r = -0.37, P = 0.005) and appearance (r = -0.42, P = 0.001) AcroQol subdomains. No correlations were seen between change in IGF-I and change in overall PGWBS score or subdomains, SSS or EQ-5D. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, of the tools studied we have demonstrated AcroQol to be uniquely capable of detecting changes in QOL associated with treatment-induced improvement in the main biochemical marker of disease activity in patients with acromegaly. Further studies are required to evaluate the long-term biological significance of the changes seen in AcroQol.