Accidental intoxications in toddlers: lack of cross-reactivity of vilazodone and its urinary metabolite M17 with drug of abuse screening immunoassays.

BACKGROUND: Vilazodone is an FDA approved medication used to treat major depressive disorder. The authors describe two cases of accidental vilazodone exposure in toddlers who presented with symptoms similar to amphetamine exposure and also with unexplained positive amphetamine urine immunoassay drug screens. Given a lack of published data on cross-reactivity of vilazodone and its metabolites with drug of abuse screening tests, the authors investigated drug of abuse immunoassay cross-reactivity of vilazodone and metabolites using computational and empirical approaches. METHODS: To ascertain the likelihood that vilazodone would cross-react with drug of abuse screening immunoassays, the authors assessed the two-dimensional (2D) similarity of the vilazodone parent molecule and known metabolites to an array of antigenic targets for urine immunoassay drug screens. To facilitate studies of the commercially unavailable M17 metabolite, it was prepared synthetically through a novel scheme. Urine and serum were spiked with vilazodone and M17 into urine (200-100,000 ng/mL) and serum (20-2000 ng/mL) samples and tested for cross-reactivity. RESULTS: Computational analysis using 2D similarity showed that vilazodone and metabolites have generally low similarity to antigenic targets of common drug of abuse screening immunoassays, predicting weak or no cross-reactivity. The M17 metabolite had 2D similarity to amphetamines and tricyclic antidepressants in a range similar to some other compounds exhibiting weak cross-reactivity on these immunoassays. Cross-reactivity testing was therefore performed on two different urine amphetamines immunoassays and a serum tricyclic antidepressant immunoassay. However, actual testing of cross reactivity for vilazodone and the M17 metabolite did not detect cross-reactivity for any urine amphetamines screen at concentrations up to 100,000 ng/mL and for a serum tricyclic antidepressants assays at concentrations up to 2000 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: While the vilazodone metabolite M17 has weak 2D structural similarity to amphetamines and tricyclic antidepressants, the current study did not demonstrate any experimental cross-reactivity with two different urine amphetamines immunoassays and a serum tricyclic antidepressant immunoassay. Vilazodone ingestions in young children present a diagnostic challenge in their similarity to amphetamine ingestions and the lack of routine laboratory tests for vilazodone. Further work is needed to understand the metabolic profile for vilazodone in children versus adults.

Newly Emerging Drugs of Abuse and Their Detection Methods: An ACLPS Critical Review.

OBJECTIVES: Illicit drug abuse has reached an epidemic level in the United States. Drug overdose has become the leading cause of injury-related deaths since 2008 due to the recent surge of opioid overdose by heroin, controlled prescription drugs, and nonmethadone synthetic opioids. Synthetic designer drugs such as synthetic cathinones ("bath salts") and synthetic cannabinoids ("Spice" and "K2") continue to emerge and attract recreational users. METHODS: The emergence of new drugs of abuse poses a steep challenge for clinical toxicology laboratories. Limited information about the emerging drugs and their metabolism, "rebranding" of the illicit drugs, and a lack of Food and Drug Administration-approved screening methods for these drugs contribute to this difficulty. Here we review detection methods that can aid in identifying emerging drugs of abuse. RESULTS: One promising approach is the utilization of untargeted drug screening by mass spectrometry. Historically, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry has been the gold standard. CONCLUSIONS: Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry offer improved detection capability of new drugs with simplified sample preparation, making it the new standard.

Ranitidine interference with standard amphetamine immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: We recently encountered several cases of possible false positive results of amphetamine on the Beckman Coulter AMPH assay, but not on the Siemens EMIT II Plus assay. Our clinical chart review suggested that ranitidine interference may be responsible for the false positive results of the AMPH assays. METHODS: Blank urine specimens spiked with ranitidine concentrations ranging from 5µg/ml to 5mg/ml were analyzed on both the AMPH and EMIT II Plus assays. To examine if the false positive results were due to assay specific reagent/sample ratios, we prepared 3 different sample to reagent ratios and analyzed them for amphetamine reaction rates on both assays. RESULTS: Ranitidine at 160µg/ml caused a positive interference on the AMPH assay. No interference was observed by ranitidine on the EMIT II Plus assay. Specifically, the sample to reagent ratios tested neither eliminated the positive inference on the AMP assay nor introduced an interference on the EMIT II Plus assay. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike the EMIT II Plus assay, the AMPH assay has cross-activity with ranitidine, which is independent of sample to reagent ratio.