Adult primary high-grade spinal glioma: a nationwide analysis of current trends in treatment and outcomes.

PURPOSE: High-grade spinal glioma (HGSG) is an extremely rare, malignant neoplasm insufficiently described in the literature. We sought to investigate the effect of epidemiological risk factors and treatment strategies on the prognosis of HGSGs using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS: Patients with diagnosis codes specific for HGSG were queried from the NCDB during the years 2004-2016. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated with log-rank testing performed to assess factors affecting survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was also performed to investigate overall survival. RESULTS: 396 patients were identified with a histologically-confirmed diagnosis of HGSG between 2004-2016. The mean survival time for all patients was 24.5 months (SD: 20.3). Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis revealed that tumor size of 26-50 mm (HR 4.96, 95% CI 1.76-13.98, p < 0.01) and greater than 50 mm (HR 4.67, 95% CI 1.43-15.23, p = 0.01) were associated with worsened overall survival in comparison to lesions less than 26 mm. While quality of life was not investigated, both Kaplan-Meier log-rank testing and regression analysis failed to demonstrate an association of survival outcomes with extent of resection, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The current study represents the largest retrospective analysis of adult primary high-grade spinal glioma to date. Our analysis found no relationship between the extent of surgical resection and survival outcomes. In addition, we failed to show any statistically significant survival benefit with radiotherapy or chemotherapy. This disease process has a poor prognosis without a current modality of treatment that improves survival.

Determining the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in the management of meningioma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis.

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to illustrate the demographic characteristics of meningioma patients and observe the effect of adjuvant radiation therapy on survival by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. More specifically, the authors aimed to answer the question of whether adjuvant radiotherapy following resection of atypical meningioma confers a cause-specific survival benefit. Additionally, they attempted to add to previous characterizations of the epidemiology of primary meningiomas and assess the effectiveness of the standard of care for benign and anaplastic meningiomas. They also sought to characterize the efficacy of various treatment options in atypical and anaplastic meningiomas separately since nearly all other analyses have grouped these two together despite varying treatment regimens for these behavior categories.METHODSSEER data from 1973 to 2015 were queried using appropriate ICD-O-3 codes for benign, atypical, and anaplastic meningiomas. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment choices were analyzed. The effects of treatment were examined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.RESULTSA total of 57,998 patients were included in the analysis of demographic, meningioma, and treatment characteristics. Among this population, cases of unspecified WHO tumor grade were excluded in the multivariate analysis, leaving a total of 12,931 patients to examine outcomes among treatment paradigms. In benign meningiomas, gross-total resection (HR 0.289, p = 0.013) imparted a significant cause-specific survival benefit over no treatment. In anaplastic meningioma cases, adjuvant radiotherapy imparted a significant survival benefit following both subtotal (HR 0.089, p = 0.018) and gross-total (HR 0.162, p = 0.002) resection as compared to gross-total resection alone. In atypical tumors, gross-total resection plus radiotherapy did not significantly change the hazard risk (HR 1.353, p = 0.628) compared to gross-total resection alone. Similarly, it was found that adjuvant radiation did not significantly benefit survival after a subtotal resection (HR 1.440, p = 0.644).CONCLUSIONSThe results of this study demonstrate that the role of adjuvant radiotherapy, especially after the resection of atypical meningioma, remains somewhat unclear. Thus, given these results, prospective randomized clinical studies are warranted to provide clear information on the effects of adjuvant radiation in meningioma treatment.

Selective endovascular treatment of cervical arterial dissection using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography.

INTRODUCTION: The role of endovascular treatment in cervical artery dissection (CAD) is equivocal. This study compared cerebral blood flow in CAD between medically and endovascularly treated patients using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography (QMRA). METHODS: Retrospective chart review was completed for patients with CAD. Inclusion criteria were adults (>18 years) with diagnosis of dissection of the internal carotid artery or vertebral artery who received QMRA. The cases were reviewed for clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and imaging, and in particular, patients who underwent endovascular treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included, 46.3% female and mean age 46.0+/- 11.9 years. 21 patients (51.2%) had contralateral (ICA) dissections while 19 (46.3%) had vertebral artery (VA) dissections, and 1 had both involved. Five patients underwent stenting, angioplasty, or both. Baseline characteristics between patients who underwent medical versus endovascular treatment were similar, although patients undergoing stenting/angioplasty were more likely to have diabetes (p = 0.015) and prior anticoagulation use (p = 0.007). All endovascular patients demonstrated ischemia on MRI versus 53.1% of those undergoing medical management (p = 0.047). Comparing ipsilateral vessel flow over time in these two patient groups showed those who underwent stenting or angioplasty had lower baseline flows, albeit non-significant (p = 0.629). Patients who underwent endovascular treatment had lower distal flow compared to the medical management group. CONCLUSION: This study represents the first to assess vessel flow using QMRA in patients who underwent endovascular treatment of CAD. In combination with progressive symptoms, QMRA may serve as a useful adjunct in the selection of patients for endovascular intervention in arterial dissections.

Disparities in Rates of Fusions in Lumbar Disc Pathologies.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To identify disparities in surgical decision making for lumbar disc pathologies based on patient demographics, hospital characteristics, and temporal characteristics of admission. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients admitted for surgical intervention of disc herniation or degeneration was performed to observe the effect of demographic, hospital, and admission-related factors on the decision to perform an isolated decompression or decompression with single level fusion using the National Inpatient Sample. RESULTS: Of 84 953 patients with lumbar disc pathologies, 69 975 patients were treated electively, and 14 978 patients were treated nonelectively. Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander patients were less likely to receive a fusion for elective cases compared with White patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.88, P = .004; OR 0.70, P < .001, respectively). In elective cases, privately insured and self-paying patients were less likely to receive a fusion compared with Medicare patients (OR 0.83, P < .001; OR 0.66, P < .001, respectively), while this effect was limited to self-pay patients in nonelective cases (OR 0.44, P < .001). Urban teaching and nonteaching hospitals were less likely to perform fusions compared with rural hospitals in nonelective cases (OR 0.47, P < .001; OR 0.58, P < .001, respectively). Private for-profit hospitals were associated with higher rates of fusion in both elective and nonelective cases (OR 1.16, P = .003; OR 1.94, P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study illustrates disparities in the modality of surgical intervention for lumbar disc pathologies in terms of demographics, hospital characteristics, and temporal characteristics of admission. The development of more evidence-based guidelines is warranted to reduce variability seen in treatment regimens for these conditions.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Comparison of National Trends and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been considered the standard treatment for degenerative cervical disc disease; however, recent trials have shown comparable outcomes with cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). This study aimed to observe disparities in treatment paradigms of single-level cervical disc diseases and compare inpatient outcomes between procedures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients treated for single-level cervical disc herniation or degeneration without myelopathy was queried from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample spanning 2012-2015. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the effects of demographics, temporality of admission, and hospital characteristics on odds of receiving CDA versus ACDF. Propensity-score matching was performed to compare cost, length of stay (LOS), non-home discharge, and inpatient complications. RESULTS: In total, 1028 CDAs and 44,374 ACDFs were performed for single-level cervical disc disease during 2012-2015. Matched comparison showed that while non-home discharges were not different between CDA and ACDF (P = 0.248), patients who received CDA had a 0.19-day shorter LOS (P < 0.001) and $4694 greater total cost (P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in inpatient complication rates. Multivariate analysis showed that patients in the 26th-50th percentile, 51st-75th percentile, and 76th-100th percentile of median household income had greater odds of CDA compared with patients in the 0-25th percentile (odds ratio [OR] 1.35, P = 0.003; OR 1.31, P = 0.013; OR 1.34, P = 0.011, respectively). Patients with private insurance had greater odds of receiving CDA compared with patients on Medicare (OR 1.91, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CDA was associated with shorter LOS but greater costs compared with ACDF. Patients with greater median income and private insurance were more likely to receive CDA.

Outcomes and Patterns of Care in Adult Skull Base Chondrosarcoma Patients in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Chondrosarcomas of the skull base are rare intracranial tumors of chondroid origin. The rarity of these lesions has made it difficult to form a consensus on optimal treatment regimens. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes in patients with chondrosarcoma of the skull base. METHODS: Patients with diagnosis codes for chondrosarcoma of the skull base were queried from the National Cancer Database for the years 2004-2016. Outcomes were investigated using Cox univariate and multivariate regression analyses, and survival curves were generated for comparative visualization. RESULTS: A total of 718 patients with chondrosarcoma of the skull base were identified. Mean overall survival (OS) in these patients was 10.7 years. Older age and presence of metastases were associated with worsened OS. Of patients, 83.3% received surgical intervention, and both partial resection and radical resection were associated with significantly improved OS (P < 0.001). Neither radiotherapy nor chemotherapy improved OS; however, patients who received proton-based radiation and patients who received high-dose radiation (≥6000 cGy) had significantly improved OS compared with patients who received traditional radiation. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study to our knowledge of skull base chondrosarcoma to date, both partial resection and radical resection significantly improved OS, thus supporting the goal of maximal safe resection to preserve vital neurovascular structures without sacrificing outcome. In patients who received radiotherapy, proton-based modalities and high-dose radiation were associated with increased OS.

Trends in survival and treatment of SEGA: National Cancer Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: SEGA is a rare, slow-growing CNS neoplasm that has historically been treated by surgical resection. However, the advent of a mammalian target of rapamycin complex-1 inhibitor, everolimus, has shown promising results in recent clinical trials. We sought to provide an analysis of epidemiological and survival risk factors in this rare tumor entity, while comparing trends in surgical management before and after introduction of everolimus in SEGAs. METHODS: Patients with SEGA were queried from the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015. Standard statistical analysis was conducted to assess variables associated with the odds of performing surgery and survival, while controlling for confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients were diagnosed with SEGA. Multivariable analysis of survival demonstrated that increased age was associated with decreased survival (HR, 1.05; P < .0001). Multivariable analysis of surgery showed increased age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02, P = .04) and tumor size 20 mm or larger (OR, 9.52-16.75, P < .0001 for all) to be associated with higher odds of performing surgery. The use of radiotherapy (OR, 0.12, P = .008) or chemotherapy (OR, 0.21, P = .008) was associated with lower odds of surgery. A comparison of surgical rates between 2004 and 2010 and 2011 and 2015 was found to be significantly different, with a lower rate of surgery seen after 2011 (60.63% vs 48.06%, P = .007). CONCLUSION: Our analysis of SEGAs demonstrated that age was the only variable affecting overall survival. Surgical resection was performed in older patients with larger tumors (> 20 mm) as a primary mode of treatment, without chemoradiotherapy. Expectedly, rates of surgical resection were found to have decreased since 2011, after FDA approval of everolimus for SEGA treatment.

Differentiation of Outcomes by Treatment Regimen and Histology in Central Nervous System Primary Embryonal Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) embryonal tumors are malignant neoplasms of undifferentiated embryonic cells that typically occur in the pediatric population. They are further divided into many subgroups by distinct histologic and genetic profiles. We present the largest study to date to identify differential survival outcomes within each subgroup by treatment regimen. METHODS: The SEER (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results) database was queried from 1973 to 2015 for embryonal tumors of primary CNS origin (n = 3900). The effects of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment regimen were analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model in CNS embryonal tumor subtypes divided into medulloblastoma, atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor, and primitive neuroectodermal tumor. RESULTS: No significant patient demographic factors were found to be associated with increased mortality. In all 3 CNS embryonal tumor subtypes, most monotherapy and combinatorial treatment paradigms showed a higher hazard ratio compared with gross total resection with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.72-22.94; P < 0.05 for all). In a subgroup analysis of patients with medulloblastoma ≤3 years of age, patients who did not receive radiation showed lower survival probabilities at 1, 5, and 10 years (odds ratio [OR], 0.37, P < 0.0001; OR, 0.39, P < 0.0001; OR, 0.34, P < 0.0001, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis of medulloblastoma histologic subtypes showed that use of radiation imparted a higher survival probability in the desmoplastic/nodular medulloblastoma and medulloblastoma not otherwise specified groups (P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: CNS embryonal tumors are highly malignant in all populations and the best survival is seen with aggressive combination therapies. Radiation therapy may have a role in prolonging survival in patients with medulloblastoma ≤3 years of age.