Prognostic Performance of Preoperative Staging: Assessed by Using Multidetector Computed Tomography-Between the New Clinical Classification and the Pathological Classification in the Eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification for Gastric Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Since the eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification recently introduced the clinical classification for preoperative staging of gastric cancer, the new clinical classification has not been extensively validated yet. Therefore, in this study, we compared the prognostic performance of the new clinical classification and the pathologic classification for preoperative staging of gastric cancer. METHODS: We reviewed 3027 patients with gastric cancer who were surgically treated between 2009 and 2013. Patient survival was analyzed according to the preoperative stage by the clinical classification and the pathologic classification in the eighth AJCC classification. The prognostic performance was examined using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) value and Harrell c-index. RESULTS: Patient survival was significantly different across the different stages when both classifications were used. However, individual pairwise comparisons showed that survival differences between each stage were more distinctive and homogeneous in the pathologic classification. In the multivariate model adjusted for the final pathologic stage, preoperative staging by the pathologic classification was an independent prognostic factor, whereas the clinical classification was not. The pathologic classification showed a lower AIC value compared with the clinical classification (5100.64 vs. 5114.14). The Harrell c-index was higher in the pathologic classification than in the clinical classification (0.741 vs. 0.739). CONCLUSIONS: The new clinical classification in the eighth AJCC classification discriminates patient survival well. However, it does not appear to have a better prognostic performance compared with the pathologic classification for preoperative staging of gastric cancer.

Reduced anastomotic complications with intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy using endoscopic linear staplers (overlap method) in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: With advances in surgical technique and instrumentation, intracorporeal anastomosis is increasingly being performed for laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). However, the benefits of intracorporeal anastomosis in reducing postoperative complications have not been demonstrated, although its technical feasibility has been proven in many studies. In this study, we investigated the impact of intracorporeal anastomosis in reducing postoperative complications after LTG. METHODS: We analyzed 410 consecutive gastric cancer patients who underwent LTG between 2008 and 2018. Of these, 118 underwent intracorporeal anastomosis using linear staplers (overlap method), while 292 underwent extracorporeal anastomosis using a circular stapler. Short-term surgical outcomes including postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The two groups showed no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidity, and abdominal surgery history. D2 lymph node dissection was more frequently performed in the intracorporeal group because of the presence of more advanced cancer stages. The overall morbidity in the intracorporeal and extracorporeal group was 23.7% and 27.7%, respectively (p = 0.405). However, the intracorporeal group showed a significantly lower incidence of late complications (0.8% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.008). Concerning complications, the incidence of anastomotic bleeding (0% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.008) and anastomotic stenosis (0% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.024) was significantly lower in the intracorporeal group. In univariate and multivariate analyses, American Society of Anesthesiologists score and operative bleeding were independent predictive factors for postoperative complications in patients who underwent intracorporeal anastomosis. CONCLUSIONS: Intracorporeal anastomosis using linear staplers reduced anastomotic bleeding and stenosis compared to extracorporeal anastomosis after LTG. Future research will be required to determine the ideal method for intracorporeal anastomosis in LTG.

Compliance with an Enhanced Recovery After a Surgery Program for Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Study.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have gained widespread acceptance in different fields of major surgery. However, most elements of perioperative care in ERAS are based on practices that originated from colorectal surgery. This study investigated compliance with the main elements of ERAS for patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. METHODS: This phase 2 study enrolled 168 patients undergoing elective gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. An ERAS program consisting of 18 main elements was implemented, and compliance with each element was evaluated (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01653496). RESULTS: Distal gastrectomy was performed for 142 patients (84.5%) and total gastrectomy for 26 patients (10.1%). Laparoscopic surgery was performed for 141 patients (86%). The postoperative morbidity rate was 9.5%, and the mortality rate was 0%. The rates of compliance with the 18 main elements of ERAS ranged from 88.1 to 100%. The lowest compliance rate was observed in the restriction of intravenous fluid element (88.1%). Overall, all ERAS elements were successfully applied for 122 patients (72.6%). In the multivariate analysis, the significant factors that adversely affected compliance with ERAS were surgery during the early study period [odds ratio (OR) 0.39; p = 0.038], open surgery (OR 0.15; p <0.001), and postoperative morbidity (OR 0.16; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Most elements of ERAS can be successfully applied for patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Multimodal collaboration between providers is essential to achieve proper application of ERAS.

Compliance with Guidelines of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Elderly Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) aims at expediting postoperative recovery by implementing specific strategies in perioperative management. However, the tolerance to such fast-tracking protocols is under debate, especially in elderly patients. We aimed to investigate rate of compliance with the main ERAS guidelines in elderly gastrectomy patients. METHODS: Using data for 168 gastric cancer patients who underwent ERAS after gastrectomy as part of Clinical Trial NCT01653496, we calculated the rates of compliance with nine main ERAS guidelines and compared the compliance rates of elderly (≥70 years) and non-elderly (<70 years) patients. Surgical outcomes and fulfillment of criteria for postoperative discharge were also compared. RESULTS: The study included 55 elderly and 113 non-elderly patients. There were no significant differences between these groups of patients with respect to operative techniques and tumor stage. Except for restricted intravenous fluid administration, the patients in both groups showed very high compliance rates (>90%) for every ERAS guideline. Notably, the overall compliance rates did not differ significantly between the groups. Postoperatively, the mean time to fulfillment of discharge criteria was slightly longer for elderly patients (4.7 vs. 4.2 days, p = 0.005), but there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the incidence of postoperative complications, length of hospitalization, and readmission rate. CONCLUSION: Compliance of the medically and physically fit elderly patients with the main ERAS guidelines is comparable to that of non-elderly patients, and such protocols can be safely applied to elderly patients without significant modification.

Early experience of duet laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (duet-LDG) using three abdominal ports for gastric carcinoma: surgical technique and comparison with conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Reduced port laparoscopic surgery may lead to less pain and better cosmetic outcome than conventional surgery. Also, it requires fewer assistants and abdominal ports. Recently, some experts have reported operative techniques and outcomes of reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy. In this study, we sought to introduce our techniques of duet laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (duet-LDG) using three abdominal ports and surgical outcomes of early experience of this procedure. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, 431 patients undergoing LDG for gastric carcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 49 patients underwent duet-LDG. During duet-LDG, an operator performed all the procedures using two abdominal ports with an additional umbilical laparoscopy port. Short-term surgical outcomes of duet-LDG were compared with conventional LDG groups. RESULTS: The mean age of the duet-LDG group was 61.1 years with 38 males and 11 females. Forty patients underwent Billroth II, and 9 patients underwent Roux-en-Y reconstruction. The mean operating time was 147 min, and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 49 ml. Duet-LDG was successfully completed without intraoperative complications or open conversion in all patients. After an operation, six patients (12.2 %) developed postoperative complications, and no mortality occurred. The mean hospital stay was 8.6 days. When compared with the conventional LDG groups, patients who underwent duet-LDG showed no significant differences in short-term surgical outcomes including morbidity, mortality, and the duration of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Duet-LDG is a viable alternative to conventional LDG for treating early gastric carcinoma providing comparable surgical outcomes. Less operative pain and scar, reduced medical cost, and requiring fewer assistants may benefit patients as well as surgeons. Finally, the efficacy of duet-LDG needs to be evaluated in diverse clinical aspects.

Single port intra-gastric full thickness resection: Using "Rotation and Revolution Single Instrument Tie (RRSIT)".

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recently, minimize incisions has led to a reduction in the number of ports, and has led to transumbilical single-port surgery. We evaluated the treatment result of single-port, intragastric, full thickness resections for gastric SMTs. In addition, we introduce a novel intracorporeal knot tying method. METHODOLOGY: From August 2010 to March 2011, five patients underwent single-port intragastric, full thickness gastric wedge resections. After performing a gastrostomy, a single port was inserted into the stomach. After full thickness resection, the defect in the gastric wall was sutured by full thickness interrupted suture and a new knot tying technique. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 129 ± 21.0 min and the mean mass size was 3.0±0.6 cm. There were two very low-risk GISTs, 2 leiomyomas, and 1 carcinoid. The post-operative course was uneventful in all patients. The mean hospital stay was 7.2±1.2 days. CONCLUSIONS: Single-port intra-gastric full thickness resection with novel intracorporeal knot tying method is feasible and safe. novel intracorporeal knot tying method is a very useful knot tying method. We expect the application of novel intracorporeal knot tying method to be diverse and broad.

Novel technique for intraoperative tumor localization during totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: endoscopic autologous blood tattooing.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the intraoperative location of lesions is a prerequisite for deciding the proper extent of gastric resection or the choice of anastomosis technique during totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) for early gastric cancer (EGC). In this study we introduce a novel tumor localization method for TLDG: endoscopic blood tattooing. METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive patients scheduled for TLDG for EGC were enrolled in this prospective study. The day before surgery, 2-3 ml of autologous blood was injected into the gastric muscle layer at 3-4 cm proximal to the lesion during endoscopy. RESULTS: The study subjects consisted of 15 males and 8 females with a mean age of 61 ± 10.4 years. During surgery, the endoscopic blood tattooed sites were successfully identified in all 23 patients. No complications associated with the procedure occurred, and no patient had microscopic residual tumor cells at the proximal resection margin, with a mean proximal margin length of 3.3 ± 2.7 cm. Eighteen patients underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis, four patients with Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy, and one patient with laparoscopic total gastrectomy. At final pathologic examinations, 20 patients were of stage IA and 3 were of stage IB according to the UICC TNM classification (6th ed.). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic blood tattooing provides a simple and useful means of localizing lesions during TLDG for EGC. Although the superiority of this technique over other localization methods needs to be evaluated further, the authors recommend endoscopic blood tattooing as an alternative to other intraoperative localization methods for laparoscopic surgery for EGC.

Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the number of laparoscopic procedures for gastric cancer has increased rapidly. Laparoscopic surgery is reported to have many advantages over open gastrectomy with oncologic safety in early gastric cancer. However, there were few reports on long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aim of this study was to investigate long-term survival outcomes after LAG for AGC. METHODS: The data of 1,485 patients who underwent LAG between April 1998 and December 2005 by ten surgeons at ten hospitals were collected retrospectively. Among them, 239 patients who were diagnosed with AGC on final pathologic examination were enrolled in the present study to investigate long-term clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The ratio of male to female patients was 151:88 and the mean age was 57.1 years. One hundred ninety-three subtotal gastrectomies, 41 total gastrectomies, and 5 proximal gastrectomies were performed. D1 + α, D1 + ß, and D2 lymph node dissections were performed for 14, 62, and 163 cases, respectively. The median follow-up period was 55.4 months. The overall 5-year survival rate of the 239 AGC patients was 78.8% and the disease-specific 5-year survival rate was 85.6%. The 5-year survival rates of the TNM staging system's (7th ed.) stages were 90.5% (stage Ib, n = 86), 86.4% (stage IIa, n = 53), 78.3% (stage IIb, n = 44), 52.8% (stage IIIa, n = 24), 52.9% (stage IIIb, n = 24), and 37.5% (stage IIIc, n = 8) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The long-term survival outcome rates of LAG for AGC in the present study were comparable to those previously reported for open gastrectomy. Based on the present results, a well-designed phase III trial comparing LAG and open gastrectomy for AGC will be needed to affirm the validity of LAG for AGC.

Definition and classification of complications of gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on the accordion severity grading system.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications still comprise the marker used most frequently to assess the quality of gastrectomy. However, the definition and grading of morbidity is not standardized, hampering meaningful comparisons over time and among centers. This study proposes specific definitions and a reproducible classification of complications following gastrectomy using standardized grading tools. METHODS: We defined each complication based on the literature, and adopted the Accordion Severity Grading System to stratify morbidity. The classification was applied to 890 patients with gastric cancer seen between January 2010 and April 2011. The correlation between the complication grades and the length of hospital stay (LOS) was analyzed, and risk factors for complications were examined with special reference to severity grade. RESULTS: The overall morbidity rate was 18.1 %. Mild complications occurred in 31 patients (3.5 %), moderate in 77 patients (8.7 %), severe--invasive procedure/no general anesthesia (GA) in 27 patients (3.0 %), severe--invasive procedures/GA in 18 patients (2.0 %), and severe--organ failure in 3 patients (0.3 %). Five patients (0.6 %) died postoperatively. The grade of complications had a significant effect on the LOS (p < 0.001). Operating time and cardiovascular and pulmonary co-morbidities were independent risk factors for severe complications [odds ratio (OR) 1.001, p = 0.016; OR 2.226, p = 0.006; OR = 2.896, p = 0.003, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: The complications after gastrectomy could be classified into different severity grades that had distinct clinical outcomes. The use of this classification provides more reliable, practical outcome data. Consequently, complications should be reported using a standardized classification tool such as the Accordion Severity Grading System, which requires consensus on the definition of specific complications.

Relationship between frailty and mortality after gastrectomy in older patients with gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Frail older adults with gastric cancer are at an increased risk of poor postoperative outcomes. We assessed whether geriatric frailty assessed using the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) index could predict post-gastrectomy mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed older adults (age ≥ 65 years) who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer between April 2012 and September 2015. Frailty status was assessed using the SOF index (range, 0-3) and categorized as robust (0), pre-frail (1), and frail (2-3). The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to compare survival between frailty groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify mortality-associated risk factors. RESULTS: Among 231 patients (the median age 72.04 years and 140 (60.6%) men), 138 (59.7%) were robust, 58 (25.1%) were pre-frail, and 35 (15.2%) were frail. The mortality rate was 14.5% among robust patients, 20.7% among pre-frail patients, and 20.0% among frail patients (log-rank test, P = 0.032). Frail patients had more than a 3-fold increased risk of mortality compared with robust patients (adjusted HR = 3.331; 95% CI, 1.161-9.559). Multivariate analysis revealed that the SOF index and TNM stage were associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: SOF index predicted post-gastrectomy mortality among older patients independently of age, sex, TNM stage, type of approach, gastrectomy type, and extent of lymph node dissection. SOF index may be used with ease to assess frailty status among older patients with gastric cancer in busy clinics and subgroups that may benefit from targeted frailty interventions before cancer treatments.

The Positive Effects of Cancer Survivor Support Service on Distress in South Korea: A Nationwide Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Cancer survivors are gradually increasing, however, they suffer from various difficulties. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of cancer survivors and the effects of the services of the Korean Cancer Survivorship Center Pilot Project launched by the South Korean government on distress. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was performed on cancer survivors who completed primary treatment. Cancer survivors' distress and symptoms such as fatigue, pain, depressive mood, anxiety, and insomnia were evaluated by well-trained nurses. Regarding their needs, medical and psychosocial support services were provided. RESULTS: This study included 1,921 cancer survivors, with a mean age of 57.3 years (68.7% females). Breast cancer was most common, followed by stomach and colorectal cancer. Psychosocial and medical support decreased the percentage of the high-distress group from 50.9 to 30.5% and decreased the percentage of cancer survivors with high scores in fatigue, pain, anxiety, depressive mood, and insomnia. The independent predictors of a low distress level after the use of the services were older age, the relief of fatigue, pain, and insomnia. CONCLUSION: This study showed that psychosocial and medical support is associated with the lower distress and physical and mental symptoms of cancer survivors. Psychosocial and medical support could contribute to distress relief in cancer survivors. Further management strategies for fatigue, pain and insomnia are required.

Elevated preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts poor survival following resection in late stage gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (N/L ratio) has been shown to be a prognostic indicator in various cancers. We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of the preoperative N/L ratio in late stage gastric cancer. METHODS: From April 2004 to August 2007, 293 patients who had undergone gastrectomy with curative intent for the AJCC/UICC TNM Stage III or IV gastric cancer were included. N/L ratio was calculated from lymphocyte and neutrophil counts on routine blood tests taken prior to surgery. RESULTS: The median follow-up time for surviving patients was 38.2 months (4.2-65.5 months) and median preoperative N/L ratio was 2.06 (range 0.47-19.73). Subjects were dichotomized at the N/L value of 2.0. A multivariate analysis established a significant relationship between the N/L ratio and overall survival (HR=1.609; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.144-2.264; P=0.006). The cutoff value up to 3.0, the value of 75 percentiles, showed a significant prognostic effect on disease-free survival (HR=1.654; 95% CI, 1.088-2.515; P=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the elevated preoperative N/L ratio predicts poor disease-free and overall survival following resection for late stage gastric cancer. It may be utilized as a simple, reliable prognostic factor for risk stratification and will provide better treatment allocation.

Comparison of Billroth I and Billroth II reconstructions after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of large-scale multicenter results from Korea.

BACKGROUND: Since reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is performed through a small minilaparotomy window, the clinical course and complication rate are influenced by clinical technical expertise and experience. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative complications and survival rates of Billroth I and Billroth II reconstructions after LADG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 1,259 patients who underwent LADG performed by ten surgeons at ten hospitals between April 1998 and December 2005. Patients were classified into two groups according to reconstruction method used: the Billroth I group (n=875) and the Billroth II group (n=384). Patient and tumor characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Billroth II reconstruction was performed on obese patients (p=0.003) and patients with more advanced tumors (p<0.001). Billroth I reconstruction was performed more frequently in the lower portion of the stomach (p<0.001) and yielded shorter operating times. The postoperative complication rate was 11.4% in the Billroth I group, which was lower than that in the Billroth II group (16.9%) (p=0.011). However, the differences in the major complication rates were not statistically significant (p=0.263). Of the intra-abdominal complications, intraluminal or intraperitoneal bleeding was the most frequent complication in the Billroth I group and duodenal stump leakage was the most frequent in the Billroth II group. The postoperative mortality rate did not show a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Both Billroth I and Billroth II techniques are feasible and safe reconstruction methods after LADG for gastric cancer. To reduce major complication rates, surgeons should pay attention to bleeding in Billroth I reconstruction and stump leakage in Billroth II reconstruction.

Predisposing factors and management of postoperative bleeding after radical gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To promote proper management of postoperative bleeding, we investigated the clinical manifestations, predisposing factors, diagnostic approaches, and treatments of bleeding complications after gastric cancer surgery. METHODS: Using a prospectively constructed database, we reviewed retrospectively 39 patients who suffered bleeding complications from among a total 1027 patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer between 2004 and 2008. RESULTS: Operating time (hazard ratio [HR] 1.842, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.524-2.367) and body mass index (HR 1.454, 95% CI 1.128-1.792) were significant predisposing factors for postoperative bleeding after gastric cancer surgery. Luminal bleeding occurred in 16 patients: as simple anastomosis site bleeding, treated successfully with conservative or endoscopic treatment, in 13; and as pseudoaneurysmal bleeding in 3, treated successfully with surgery in 2, but resulting in the death of 1. Abdominal bleeding occurred in 23 patients, requiring surgery in 9 and arterial embolization in 1. The most common finding at reoperation was bleeding from the mesocolon surface. The mean hospital stay of patients with postoperative bleeding was 21 (± 20) days. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative bleeding can be managed successfully with a tailored approach, considering its origins and clinical manifestations. Arterial pseudoaneurysms are a rare cause of luminal bleeding, but they can be fatal and should be suspected when extensive luminal bleeding presents after gastric cancer surgery.

Transpyloric optic navigation of tumor using a laparoscope during totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the technique of intraoperative transpyloric optic navigation (TPON) and determine its efficacy and feasibility during totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: Seventy-nine patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy with transpyloric optic localization of the tumor from January 2016 through December 2018 were enrolled in this study. After resecting the first portion of the duodenum, the distal part of the stomach was exteriorized through an extended supraumbilical trocar site, and a balloon trocar was introduced from the pylorus to determine the location of tumor and determine its resection margin. The clinicopathologic and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Results: The tumor was located in the lower third of the stomach in 39 cases, the middle third in 34 cases, and the upper-third in six cases. Tumor localization was successful in 67 patients. The mean proximal margin was 41.7 ± 26.8 mm. There was no morbidity related to the technique. By the fifth postoperative day, the average white blood cell count was within the normal range and the average level of C-reactive protein showed a decreasing pattern. Conclusion: TPON of the tumor during TLDG is an effective and feasible method to determine the tumor location and to obtain an adequate resection margin.

The benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery for gastric cancer: A large before-and-after propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing gastrectomy have been reported in several studies; however, there is limited evidence supporting the efficacy of ERAS in clinical settings. We aimed to identify the benefits of ERAS in the clinical setting by investigating short-term surgical outcomes before and after the implementation of ERAS in patients who underwent gastrectomy. METHODS: We searched our gastric cancer database from 2008 to 2018 to identify patients who underwent gastrectomy before ERAS was implemented (2008-2009) and after the final version of ERAS was implemented (2016-2018). We enrolled 424 patients who were treated before ERAS was implemented and 565 patients who received our completed version of ERAS. After propensity score matching, each group included 219 patients, and short-term surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS group (8.8 vs. 11.5 days, p = 0.001), but the readmission rates were similar in the two groups, at 2.3%. There were no significant differences in morbidity, mortality, and complications of ≥ grade III between the groups. Of the complications, intra-abdominal bleeding (0% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.002) and intra-abdominal abscess (0% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.038) were significantly lower, whereas postoperative ileus was significantly higher in the ERAS group (8.6% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.001). In subgroup analyses by age, operative approach, and the extent of gastric resection, the ERAS group experienced a shorter hospital stay without increased readmission in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that ERAS was associated with a 3-day reduction in hospital stay without increased readmission after gastrectomy. This study validated the benefits of ERAS in the clinical setting of gastrectomy.

Long-Term Oncological Outcomes of Reduced Three-Port Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Early-Stage Gastric Carcinoma: a Retrospective Large-Scale Multi-Institutional Study.

PURPOSE: With advances in surgical techniques, reduced-port laparoscopic surgery is increasingly being performed for the treatment of gastric carcinoma. Many studies have reported satisfactory short-term outcomes after reduced 3-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term oncological outcomes of 3-port LG in patients with gastric carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 1,117 patients who underwent LG for gastric carcinoma in three major institutions between 2012 and 2015. The data showed that 460 patients underwent 3-port LG without assistance, and 657 underwent conventional 5-port LG. We compared the overall and disease-free survival rates between the 2 groups. RESULTS: There were 642 male and 475 female patients with a mean age of 56.1 years. Among them, 1,028 (92.0%) underwent distal gastrectomy and 89 (8.0%) underwent total gastrectomy. In the final pathologic examination, 1,027 patients (91.9%) were stage I, 73 (6.5%) were stage II, and 17 (1.5%) were stage III, and there were no significant difference in the pathologic stage between groups. The 3- and 5-port LG groups showed no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival (94.3% vs. 96.7%, P=0.138) or disease-free survival (94.3% vs. 95.9%, P=0.231). Stratified analyses according to pT and pN stages also showed no significant differences in overall or disease-free survival between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival after 3- and 5-port LG was comparable in patients with early-stage gastric carcinoma. The 3-port technique requiring limited surgical assistance may be an appropriate surgical option for this patient population.

Effect of age on surgical outcomes of extended gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma: prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: As a life expectancy increases, the proportion of aged patients diagnosed with gastric cancer has increased over the past decades, but the optimal surgical approach to these patients remains a dilemma because of the presumed risk associated with extended surgery. METHODS: A total of 383 consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection in 2008 and 2009 were enrolled onto this study. Patients were divided into two age groups (<70 vs. > or =70 years) and were prospectively evaluated with respect to postoperative complications and hospital courses. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 101 elderly and 282 nonelderly patients. No statistically significant differences were evident between the two groups with respect to clinicopathological parameters and operations performed, except for preoperative comorbidity rates and mean American Society of Anesthesiologists scores. Surgical complication rates in the elderly and nonelderly groups were 18.8 and 17.4%, respectively (P = 0.746), and medical complication rates were 5.0 and 1.8%, respectively (P = 0.137). The two groups were not statistically significantly different in terms of mean length of hospital stays, times to diet start, or required transfusion. Multivariate analysis showed that body mass index, male sex, and distal pancreatectomy were independent risk factors of a surgical complication, and that comorbidity and operating time were independently associated with a medical complication. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that age neither increased postoperative morbidity nor negatively affected hospital courses after gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. Accordingly, chronologic age alone should not preclude standard gastrectomy with extended lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma.

CpG methylation of transcription factor 4 in gastric carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Epigenetic silencing of tumor-related genes by CpG island methylation is an important mechanism for the development of many tumors, including gastric carcinoma. Deregulation of transcription factor 4 (TCF4) by promoter methylation was recently shown to play a key role in gastric carcinogenesis. METHODS: The extent of methylation in the TCF4 promoter was assessed using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PS) in 120 gastric carcinoma (GC) samples collected during gastrectomy, and in 40 normal gastric mucosa samples. RESULTS: The PS analysis of GCs revealed a higher frequency of TCF4 methylation (75.8%; 91/120). The methylation frequency for TCF4 by both MSP and PS techniques was significantly higher in advanced (75.0 and 91.7%, respectively) compared with early (60.0 and 60.0%, respectively, p < 0.05) GCs. There was a significant difference in TCF4 methylation between GCs and normal gastric mucosa (67.5 vs. 40.0%, respectively, by MSP and 75.8 vs. 30.0%, respectively, by PS; p < 0.05). There was significant correlation between TCF4 methylation status by PS and tumor size (p = 0.004), Lauren classification (p = 0.043), depth of invasion (p < 0.001), nodal metastasis (p = 0.021), and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that inactivation of TCF4 by promoter methylation may play a role in the early stage of gastric carcinoma progression. Furthermore, standard polymerase chain reaction followed by PS may provide a more specific and quantitative diagnostic alternative to MSP, which may be of benefit in oncology research.