Clinical and endocrine correlates of circulating sclerostin levels in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

AIM: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) increases fragility fractures due to low bone mass, micro-architectural alterations and decreased bone formation. Sclerostin is expressed by osteocytes and inhibits osteoblastic bone formation. We evaluated serum sclerostin levels in T1DM and their association with bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover, glycaemic control and physical activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 128 men and premenopausal women with long-standing T1DM (mean age 43·4 ± 8·8 years, diabetes duration 22·4 ± 9·5 years) and 77 age-, BMI (Body Mass Index) and gender-matched healthy individuals were evaluated. RESULTS: Serum sclerostin levels were higher in T1DM compared with controls, irrespective of gender (male 0·55 ± 0·17 vs 0·49 ± 0·12 ng/ml, P = 0·046; female 0·52 ± 0·19 ng/ml vs 0·43 ± 0·12 ng/ml, P = 0·012). Partial correlation analysis adjusted for age and gender revealed a positive correlation between serum sclerostin levels and BMD at lumbar spine and femoral neck in T1DM and between BMD at lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip in controls. Bone turnover markers, parathyroid hormone, calcium and vitamin D did not correlate with serum sclerostin levels in T1DM or controls. Physical activity was not associated with serum sclerostin levels. A multivariate analysis revealed that only the interaction of T1DM and age affects serum sclerostin levels but not T1DM alone. The influence of age on serum sclerostin levels was more pronounced in T1DM compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Sclerostin serum levels were increased in patients with T1DM, and the positive correlation of age with serum sclerostin levels was stronger in T1DM. There was no effect of serum sclerostin levels on markers of bone metabolism and they do not explain the detrimental effects of T1DM on BMD.

Coping strategies and depressiveness in primary systemic vasculitis--what is their impact on health-related quality of life?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of disease-related coping strategies and depressiveness on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in primary systemic vasculitis (PSV) patients. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-two patients with definite diagnosis of PSV were examined in a cross-sectional study. HRQOL (SF-36), depressiveness (BDI), illness perception (B-IPQ) and coping strategies (FKV-LIS) were measured using validated instruments. Additional disease-related and demographic data were retrieved from the patients' records. RESULTS: HRQOL in PSV patients was reduced compared with the SF-36 norm sample. Specific organ manifestation, size of vessel involvement and disease activity were not related to HRQOL. Linear regression modelling revealed a questionable relationship of emotional to physical HRQOL (P = 0.003, potential suppression effect of BDI), whereas both domains were influenced by depressiveness (P ≤ 0.001). Physical HRQOL was additionally related to fatigue and widowed marital status, while emotional HRQOL was associated with a depressive coping style. CONCLUSION: HRQOL is impaired in PSV as compared with the general population. Current depressiveness strongly affects physical as well as mental HRQOL. Cognitive intervention strategies should be established in order to improve quality of life in PSV patients.

A retrospective study on the incidence and risk factors of severe hypoglycemia in primary care.

AIMS: To investigate the incidence and risk factors of severe hypoglycemia (SH) in primary care. SH was defined as hypoglycemia with coma, or the need of glucose or glucagon injection. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective study in patients with diabetes treated in primary care in Germany. We analyzed an unselected sample of participants with type 1 (n = 373) and type 2 diabetes (n = 4481) who participated in an insurance plan from the health care insurer Deutsche BKK. Data of participants with type 1 diabetes are as follows: women, n = 155 (42%); age, 49±16 years; diabetes duration, 20+13 years; BMI, 28±6 kg/m2; GHb, 7.1+1.5%; GHb≤7%, n = 263 (71%); GHb≥8.5%, n = 48 (13%). Data of participants with type 2 diabetes: women, n = 1979 (44%); age, 66±10 years; diabetes duration, 8±7 years; BMI, 30±5 kg/m2; GHb, 6.6±1.3%; GHb≤7%, n = 3747 (84%); GHb≥8.5%, n = 360 (8%); insulin therapy, n = 1175 (26%). RESULTS: The incidence of SH in type 1 diabetes: 1.3% (CI: 0.4%, 3.1%) per year; type 2 diabetes with insulin therapy: 0.9% (CI: 0.5%, 1.7%); without insulin therapy: 0.3% (CI: 0.1%, 0.6%). The event rate was 0.02 SH per patient/year in type 1 diabetes and 0.01 in type 2 diabetes, respectively. Low BMI, GHb, insulin therapy and female gender were associated with an increased risk of SH. CONCLUSIONS: In primary care, patients with diabetes can achieve good glycemic control with very rare events of SH. Due to low incidence, SH would have been an inappropriate parameter to evaluate the outcome quality of diabetes therapy in primary care.

Effects of metabolic control, patient education and initiation of insulin therapy on the quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of initiation of insulin therapy, metabolic control and structured patient education on the diabetes-related quality of life (QoL) in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted with 71 consecutively recruited patients with insulin-treated diabetes at the University hospital. All patients participated an inpatient diabetes treatment and teaching program (DTTP) for conventional insulin therapy (mean age 68.9 years, HbA1c 10.1+/-1.4%, diabetes duration 11.2 years (range: 0-25.5 years), body-mass-index 28.7+/-5.7 kg/m(2). Diabetes-related quality of life was assessed before and 6 months after participation in the DTTP using the standardized questionnaire of Lohr analysing the subscales: social relations, physical complaints, worries about the future, dietary restrictions, fear of hypoglycaemia, and daily struggles. RESULTS: Only patients switched on insulin therapy showed significant improvement in diabetes-related quality of life 6 months after participation in the DTTP (p=0.03), fewer physical complaints (p=0.03), fewer worries about the future (p=0.02), fewer daily struggles (p=0.01) and less fear of hypoglycaemia (p<0.001), while patients, who were already on insulin therapy showed no improvements in diabetes-related quality of life. Though, residual analysis reveals that effects on patients' QoL are mainly caused by improvements in metabolic control. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in metabolic control have a significant effect on different diabetes-related quality of life domains in patients with diabetes mellitus. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Appropriate interventions resulting in better metabolic control, such as starting on insulin therapy within a structured patient education program seem to be an effective approach to improve patients' diabetes-related quality of life.

Flexible intensive insulin therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes and high risk for severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes treatment and teaching programs (DTTPs) for type 1 diabetes, which teach flexible intensive insulin therapy to enable dietary freedom, have proven to be safe and effective in routine care. This study evaluates DTTP outcomes in patients at high risk for severe hypoglycemia and severe ketoacidosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: There were 96 diabetes centers that participated between 1992 and 2004. A total of 9,583 routine-care patients with type 1 diabetes were examined before and 1 year after a DTTP. History of repeated severe hypoglycemia/severe ketoacidosis was an indication for DTTP participation. Before-after analyses were performed for subgroups of patients with three or more episodes of severe hypoglycemia or two or more episodes of severe ketoacidosis during the year before a DTTP. Main outcome measures were GHb, severe hypoglycemia, severe ketoacidosis, and hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 341 participants had three or more episodes of severe hypoglycemia the year before a DTTP. Mean baseline GHb was 7.4 vs. 7.2% after the DTTP, incidence of severe hypoglycemia was 6.1 vs. 1.4 events x patient(-1) x year(-1), and hospitalization was 8.6 vs. 3.9 days x patient(-1) x year(-1). In mixed-effects models taking effects of centers and diabetes duration into account, mean difference was -0.3% (95% CI -0.5 to -0.1%; P = 0.0006) for GHb and -4.7 events x patient(-1) x year(-1) (-5.4 to -4; P < 0.0001) for severe hypoglycemia. A total of 95 patients had two or more episodes of severe ketoacidosis. GHb was 9.4% at baseline versus 8.7% after DTTP; incidence of severe ketoacidosis was 3.3 vs. 0.6 events x patient(-1) x year(-1), and hospitalization was 19.4 vs. 10.2 days x patient(-1) x year(-1). In linear models with diabetes duration as the fixed effect, the adjusted mean difference was -2.7 events x patient(-1) x year(-1) (95% CI -3.3 to -2.1; P < 0.0001) for severe ketoacidosis and -8.1 days (-12.9 to -3.2; P = 0.0014) for hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Patients at high risk for severe hypoglycemia or severe ketoacidosis may benefit from participation in a standard DTTP for intensive insulin therapy and dietary freedom.

[Mapping of HbA1c as a quality measure in the primary care of diabetic patients in Thuringia, Germany]. / HbA1c-Mapping zur Messung der Qualität der primären Versorgung von Patienten mit Diabetes mellitus in Thüringen.

BACKGROUND: In order to improve quality and outcome in the primary care for patients with diabetes mellitus it is necessary to recognise districts with poorer supply of structured diabetes care. Hba1c is an evaluated surrogate parameter which indicates the long-term control of diabetes therapy. The aim of the study was to create a map with all Hba1c-values of every district of the Free State of Thuringia, Germany. METHODS: Medical laboratories working for general practitioners were used as a new data source. All hba1c-values which were measured in Thuringia within the 4th quarter of 1997 were collected. A corresponding postal code was registered for each hba1c-value for identification purposes. Thuringia consists of 23 districts, and this geographic structure was used as a basis for the hba1c-map. RESULTS: 6 laboratories sent 23,214 hba1c-values. 16,591 values belonged to the territory of Thuringia: The medium relative hba1c (hba1c/mean normal of healthy people) for Thuringia was 1.44, two-fold increased hba1c was found in 7.9% of all hba1c values. The proportion of two-fold increased hba1c-values varied up to 100%. CONCLUSION: This pilot study disclosed significant differences in the outcome of regional ambulatory care for patients with diabetes mellitus in Thuringia. An intervention in districts with poorer study outcomes might result in direct benefits for patients and providers of health care services. Since hba1c-values could not be collected for all districts the first hba1c-map remains incomplete.

Evaluation of a treatment and teaching refresher programme for the optimization of intensified insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of an ambulatory diabetes teaching and treatment refresher programme (DTTP) for the optimization of intensified insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes (refresher course). METHODS: 85 outpatients took part in this prospective multicentre trial. Metabolic and psychosocial data were analyzed at baseline (V1), 6 weeks (V2) and 12 months after DTTP (V3). RESULTS: In patients with baseline HbA1c>7% (88%), HbA1c decreased by 0.36% (p=0.004). The percentage of patients with HbA1c≤7% increased from 21.3 to 34.9% and with HbA1c above 10% decreased from 6.6 to 1.6% at V3. The incidence of hypoglycaemia decreased significantly: non severe hypoglycaemia from 3.31 to 1.39 episodes/pat/week (p=0.001) and severe hypoglycaemia from 0.16 to 0.03 episodes/pat/year (p=0.02). The treatment satisfaction increased by +10 of maximal ±18 points. The negative influence of diabetes on quality of life decreased from -1.93 to -1.69 points (p=0.031). CONCLUSION: In a group of patients with moderately controlled diabetes type 1 who were already treated with intensified insulin therapy, metabolic control, treatment satisfaction and quality of life were improved after participation in an ambulatory DTTP without increasing insulin dosage, number of injections or insulin species. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This DTTP is effective for the optimization of intensified insulin therapy.