RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) integrate clinical, molecular, and radiological information and facilitate coordination of neuro-oncology care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, our MTB transitioned to a virtual and multi-institutional format. We hypothesized that this expansion would allow expert review of challenging neuro-oncology cases and contribute to the care of patients with limited access to specialized centers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records from virtual MTBs held between 04/2020-03/2021. Data collected included measures of potential clinical impact, including referrals to observational or therapeutic studies, referrals for specialized neuropathology analysis, and whether molecular findings led to a change in diagnosis and/or guided management suggestions. RESULTS: During 25 meetings, 32 presenters discussed 44 cases. Approximately half (n = 20; 48%) involved a rare central nervous system (CNS) tumor. In 21% (n = 9) the diagnosis was changed or refined based on molecular profiling obtained at the NIH and in 36% (n = 15) molecular findings guided management. Clinical trial suggestions were offered to 31% (n = 13), enrollment in the observational NCI Natural History Study to 21% (n = 9), neuropathology review and molecular testing at the NIH to 17% (n = 7), and all received management suggestions. CONCLUSION: Virtual multi-institutional MTBs enable remote expert review of CNS tumors. We propose them as a strategy to facilitate expert opinions from specialized centers, especially for rare CNS tumors, helping mitigate geographic barriers to patient care and serving as a pre-screening tool for studies. Advanced molecular testing is key to obtaining a precise diagnosis, discovering potentially actionable targets, and guiding management.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central , Pandemias , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Derivación y ConsultaRESUMEN
Ifosfamide is an alkylating chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of many malignancies. Ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy is one potential side effect that represents a major drawback to ifosfamide therapy and often necessitates discontinuation of chemotherapy. Previous reports demonstrate moderate effectiveness of prophylactic methylene blue at thwarting ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy. This is a report of a 64-year-old female with relapsed double-hit diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who developed severe altered mental status and neurological symptoms after receiving a second dose of ifosfamide as part of her salvage standard dose R-IE (rituximab, ifosfamide, etoposide), in preparation for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Ifosfamide was stopped and extensive metabolic and infectious workups, in addition to brain images, were all unremarkable. Her symptoms were attributed to ifosfamide. Prior to initiating cycle 2 of R-IE, she was started on prophylactic oral thiamine 100 mg, once a day, one week prior to her admission, methylene blue 50 mg intravenous every 6 h (for a total of four doses) and intravenous hydration with normal saline starting on day one of admission. Ifosfamide was administered in the standard dose 2000 mg/m2, days 1-3 as continuous intravenous infusion over 24 h. She tolerated the first two days of ifosfamide well and only developed mild encephalopathy during her last dose of ifosfamide. Her symptoms resolved completely without any intervention the following day and she completed all scheduled doses. She eventually received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Our report demonstrates the use of hydration, methylene blue, and thiamine as a successful secondary prevention regimen for ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy.
Asunto(s)
Encefalopatías/prevención & control , Ifosfamida/efectos adversos , Azul de Metileno/administración & dosificación , Tiamina/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Encefalopatías/inducido químicamente , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Ifosfamida/administración & dosificación , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rituximab/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
We sought to compare the tumor profiles of brain metastases from common cancers with those of primary tumors and extracranial metastases in order to identify potential targets and prioritize rational treatment strategies. Tumor samples were collected from both the primary and metastatic sites of nonsmall cell lung cancer, breast cancer and melanoma from patients in locations worldwide, and these were submitted to Caris Life Sciences for tumor multiplatform analysis, including gene sequencing (Sanger and next-generation sequencing with a targeted 47-gene panel), protein expression (assayed by immunohistochemistry) and gene amplification (assayed by in situ hybridization). The data analysis considered differential protein expression, gene amplification and mutations among brain metastases, extracranial metastases and primary tumors. The analyzed population included: 16,999 unmatched primary tumor and/or metastasis samples: 8,178 nonsmall cell lung cancers (5,098 primaries; 2,787 systemic metastases; 293 brain metastases), 7,064 breast cancers (3,496 primaries; 3,469 systemic metastases; 99 brain metastases) and 1,757 melanomas (660 primaries; 996 systemic metastases; 101 brain metastases). TOP2A expression was increased in brain metastases from all 3 cancers, and brain metastases overexpressed multiple proteins clustering around functions critical to DNA synthesis and repair and implicated in chemotherapy resistance, including RRM1, TS, ERCC1 and TOPO1. cMET was overexpressed in melanoma brain metastases relative to primary skin specimens. Brain metastasis patients may particularly benefit from therapeutic targeting of enzymes associated with DNA synthesis, replication and/or repair.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/genética , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/patología , Anciano , Femenino , Expresión Génica/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación/genéticaRESUMEN
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the spelling of one of the author names. In this Correction the incorrect and correct author names are indicated and the author name has been updated in the original publication. The authors also reported an error in the Methods section of the original article. In this Correction the incorrect and correct versions of the affected sentence are indicated. The original article has not been updated with regards to the error in the Methods section.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Standard therapy for glioblastoma includes surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide. This Phase 3 trial evaluates the addition of an autologous tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cell vaccine (DCVax®-L) to standard therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS: After surgery and chemoradiotherapy, patients were randomized (2:1) to receive temozolomide plus DCVax-L (n = 232) or temozolomide and placebo (n = 99). Following recurrence, all patients were allowed to receive DCVax-L, without unblinding. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS); the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: For the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 331), median OS (mOS) was 23.1 months from surgery. Because of the cross-over trial design, nearly 90% of the ITT population received DCVax-L. For patients with methylated MGMT (n = 131), mOS was 34.7 months from surgery, with a 3-year survival of 46.4%. As of this analysis, 223 patients are ≥ 30 months past their surgery date; 67 of these (30.0%) have lived ≥ 30 months and have a Kaplan-Meier (KM)-derived mOS of 46.5 months. 182 patients are ≥ 36 months past surgery; 44 of these (24.2%) have lived ≥ 36 months and have a KM-derived mOS of 88.2 months. A population of extended survivors (n = 100) with mOS of 40.5 months, not explained by known prognostic factors, will be analyzed further. Only 2.1% of ITT patients (n = 7) had a grade 3 or 4 adverse event that was deemed at least possibly related to the vaccine. Overall adverse events with DCVax were comparable to standard therapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of DCVax-L to standard therapy is feasible and safe in glioblastoma patients, and may extend survival. Trial registration Funded by Northwest Biotherapeutics; Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT00045968; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00045968?term=NCT00045968&rank=1 ; initially registered 19 September 2002.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/inmunología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Glioblastoma/inmunología , Glioblastoma/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/efectos adversos , Determinación de Punto Final , Femenino , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Aim: The EMulate Therapeutics Voyager™ is a simple, wearable, home-use device that uses an alternating electromagnetic field to alter biologic signaling within cells. Objective: To assess the safety/feasibility of the Voyager in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Methods: In this study, patients with rGBM were treated with Voyager as monotherapy or in combination with standard chemotherapy at the Investigator's discretion. Safety was assessed by incidence of adverse events associated with the Voyager. Patients were followed until death. Results: A total of 75 patients were enrolled and treated for at least one day with the Voyager (safety population). Device-related adverse events were uncommon and generally did not result in interruption or withdrawal from treatment. There were no serious adverse events associated with Voyager. A total of 60 patients were treated for at least one month (clinical utility population). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 weeks (4.3 months) in the Voyager only group (n = 24) and 21 weeks (5.3 months) in the Voyager + concurrent therapy group (n = 36). The median overall survival (OS) was 7 months in the Voyager only group and 9 months in the Voyager + concurrent therapy group. In patients treated with Voyager + concurrent therapy, the median OS for patients enrolled with their 1st or 2nd recurrence (n = 26) was 10 months, while in patients enrolled with their 3rd or 4th recurrence (n = 10) OS was 7 months. Conclusion: The data support the safety and feasibility of the Voyager for the treatment of rGBM. Further prospective study of the device is warranted. Trial Registration Number: NCT02296580 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Humanos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Importance: Glioblastoma is the most lethal primary brain cancer. Clinical outcomes for glioblastoma remain poor, and new treatments are needed. Objective: To investigate whether adding autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccine (DCVax-L) to standard of care (SOC) extends survival among patients with glioblastoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, prospective, externally controlled nonrandomized trial compared overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM) and recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) treated with DCVax-L plus SOC vs contemporaneous matched external control patients treated with SOC. This international, multicenter trial was conducted at 94 sites in 4 countries from August 2007 to November 2015. Data analysis was conducted from October 2020 to September 2021. Interventions: The active treatment was DCVax-L plus SOC temozolomide. The nGBM external control patients received SOC temozolomide and placebo; the rGBM external controls received approved rGBM therapies. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary and secondary end points compared overall survival (OS) in nGBM and rGBM, respectively, with contemporaneous matched external control populations from the control groups of other formal randomized clinical trials. Results: A total of 331 patients were enrolled in the trial, with 232 randomized to the DCVax-L group and 99 to the placebo group. Median OS (mOS) for the 232 patients with nGBM receiving DCVax-L was 19.3 (95% CI, 17.5-21.3) months from randomization (22.4 months from surgery) vs 16.5 (95% CI, 16.0-17.5) months from randomization in control patients (HR = 0.80; 98% CI, 0.00-0.94; P = .002). Survival at 48 months from randomization was 15.7% vs 9.9%, and at 60 months, it was 13.0% vs 5.7%. For 64 patients with rGBM receiving DCVax-L, mOS was 13.2 (95% CI, 9.7-16.8) months from relapse vs 7.8 (95% CI, 7.2-8.2) months among control patients (HR, 0.58; 98% CI, 0.00-0.76; P < .001). Survival at 24 and 30 months after recurrence was 20.7% vs 9.6% and 11.1% vs 5.1%, respectively. Survival was improved in patients with nGBM with methylated MGMT receiving DCVax-L compared with external control patients (HR, 0.74; 98% CI, 0.55-1.00; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, adding DCVax-L to SOC resulted in clinically meaningful and statistically significant extension of survival for patients with both nGBM and rGBM compared with contemporaneous, matched external controls who received SOC alone. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00045968.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Humanos , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/patología , Temozolomida/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Recurrencia , Células Dendríticas/patología , VacunaciónRESUMEN
In part one of this two-part paper, we present eight principles that we believe must be considered for more effective treatment of the currently incurable cancers. These are addressed by multidrug adjunctive cancer treatment (MDACT), which uses multiple repurposed non-oncology drugs, not primarily to kill malignant cells, but rather to reduce the malignant cells' growth drives. Previous multidrug regimens have used MDACT principles, e.g., the CUSP9v3 glioblastoma treatment. MDACT is an amalgam of (1) the principle that to be effective in stopping a chain of events leading to an undesired outcome, one must break more than one link; (2) the principle of Palmer et al. of achieving fractional cancer cell killing via multiple drugs with independent mechanisms of action; (3) the principle of shaping versus decisive operations, both being required for successful cancer treatment; (4) an idea adapted from Chow et al., of using multiple cytotoxic medicines at low doses; (5) the idea behind CUSP9v3, using many non-oncology CNS-penetrant drugs from general medical practice, repurposed to block tumor survival paths; (6) the concept from chess that every move creates weaknesses and strengths; (7) the principle of mass-by adding force to a given effort, the chances of achieving the goal increase; and (8) the principle of blocking parallel signaling pathways. Part two gives an example MDACT regimen, gMDACT, which uses six repurposed drugs-celecoxib, dapsone, disulfiram, itraconazole, pyrimethamine, and telmisartan-to interfere with growth-driving elements common to cholangiocarcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, glioblastoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer. gMDACT is another example of-not a replacement for-previous multidrug regimens already in clinical use, such as CUSP9v3. MDACT regimens are designed as adjuvants to be used with cytotoxic drugs.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) has a 5-year survival rate of 3%-5%. GBM treatment includes maximal resection followed by radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Cytochrome C oxidase (CcO) is a mitochondrial enzyme involved in the mechanism of resistance to TMZ. In a prior retrospective trial, CcO activity in GBMs inversely correlated with clinical outcome. The current Cyto-C study was designed to prospectively evaluate and validate the prognostic value of tumor CcO activity in patients with newly diagnosed primary GBM, and compared to the known prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation status. METHODS: This multi-institutional, blinded, prospective biomarker study enrolled 152 patients with newly diagnosed GBM who were to undergo surgical resection and would be candidates for standard of care. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) time, and the secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) time. Tumor CcO activity and MGMT promoter methylation status were assayed in a centralized laboratory. RESULTS: OS and PFS did not differ by high or low tumor CcO activity, and the prognostic validity of MGMT promoter methylation was confirmed. Notably, a planned exploratory analysis suggested that the combination of low CcO activity and MGMT promoter methylation in tumors may be predictive of long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor CcO activity alone was not confirmed as a prognostic marker in GBM patients. However, the combination of low CcO activity and methylated MGMT promoter may reveal a subgroup of GBM patients with improved long-term survival that warrants further evaluation. Our work also demonstrates the importance of performing large, multi-institutional, prospective studies to validate biomarkers. We also discuss lessons learned in assembling such studies.
RESUMEN
Although uncommon, "brain cancer" is one of the most feared diseases that afflict human beings. While still regarded as one of the most deadly forms of primary brain neoplasm, recent advances in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) have offered new hope for patients, families, and clinicians. In the first part of this two-part review, we will focus on the multidisciplinary advances that have established the current treatment approach in the management of GBM. In the second part of this review, ongoing research will be presented including current clinical trials as well as some of the newer technologies that are forming the promise of the future.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Glioblastoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico , Glioblastoma/mortalidad , Glioblastoma/terapia , Humanos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Although uncommon, "brain cancer" is one of the most feared diseases that afflict human beings. While still regarded as one of the most deadly forms of primary malignant brain neoplasm, recent advances in the treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) have offered new hope for patients, families and clinicians. In the first part of this two-part evidence-based review, we focused on the multidisciplinary advances that have established the current standard of care practice in the management of GBM. The second part discusses ongoing research efforts, both ongoing clinical trial efforts as well as some of the newer technologies that are forming the promise of the future.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Glioblastoma/terapia , Oncología Médica/tendencias , Nivel de Atención/tendencias , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Barrera Hematoencefálica/efectos de los fármacos , Terapia Combinada/tendencias , Glioblastoma/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Inmunoterapia/tendencias , Inyecciones Intraarteriales , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Oncología por Radiación/tendenciasRESUMEN
Importance: New treatments are needed to improve the prognosis of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. Objective: To compare overall survival for patients receiving tumor resection followed by vocimagene amiretrorepvec (Toca 511) with flucytosine (Toca FC) vs standard of care (SOC). Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, open-label phase 2/3 trial (TOCA 5) in 58 centers in the US, Canada, Israel, and South Korea, comparing posttumor resection treatment with Toca 511 followed by Toca FC vs a defined single choice of approved (SOC) therapies was conducted from November 30, 2015, to December 20, 2019. Patients received tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive Toca 511/FC (n = 201) or SOC control (n = 202). For the Toca 511/FC group, patients received Toca 511 injected into the resection cavity wall at the time of surgery, followed by cycles of oral Toca FC 6 weeks after surgery. For the SOC control group, patients received investigators' choice of single therapy: lomustine, temozolomide, or bevacizumab. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) in time from randomization date to death due to any cause. Secondary outcomes reported in this study included safety, durable response rate (DRR), duration of DRR, durable clinical benefit rate, OS and DRR by IDH1 variant status, and 12-month OS. Results: All 403 randomized patients (median [SD] age: 56 [11.46] years; 62.5% [252] men) were included in the efficacy analysis, and 400 patients were included in the safety analysis (3 patients on the SOC group did not receive resection). Final analysis included 271 deaths (141 deaths in the Toca 511/FC group and 130 deaths in the SOC control group). The median follow-up was 22.8 months. The median OS was 11.10 months for the Toca 511/FC group and 12.22 months for the control group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI 0.83, 1.35; P = .62). The secondary end points did not demonstrate statistically significant differences. The rates of adverse events were similar in the Toca 511/FC group and the SOC control group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients who underwent tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma, administration of Toca 511 and Toca FC, compared with SOC, did not improve overall survival or other efficacy end points. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02414165.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Citosina Desaminasa/administración & dosificación , Flucitosina/administración & dosificación , Glioma/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Citosina Desaminasa/efectos adversos , Femenino , Flucitosina/efectos adversos , Glioma/genética , Glioma/cirugía , Humanos , Isocitrato Deshidrogenasa/genética , Lomustina/administración & dosificación , Lomustina/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/efectos adversos , Nivel de Atención , Análisis de Supervivencia , Temozolomida/administración & dosificación , Temozolomida/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The incidence of primary malignant brain tumors has remained stable over the past 10 years, with median survival reported as 12 months. Once the patient has been diagnosed, providing care for him or her is primarily performed by family members. Although previous research has documented the stress, depression, anxiety, and burden associated with caregiving, when these conditions occur is not known. The purpose of this study was to explore the caregiver perspective of providing care while the patient was receiving chemotherapy as initial treatment for the disease. Using phenomenological techniques, data were obtained from semistructured interviews with family caregivers and self-disclosed demographic data. Each interview occurred while the patient was receiving treatment; all patients were within 6 months of initial diagnosis. Interview data were analyzed using Colaizzi's method, which allowed themes universal to the participants to be uncovered. Interview data from 10 participants provided saturation and identified three themes: (a) the diagnosis of a brain tumor is a shock; (b) immediate family role changes occur; and (c) there are psychosocial effects for the caregiver, his or her family, and the person with the brain tumor.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Cuidadores/psicología , Costo de Enfermedad , Familia/psicología , Adulto , Ansiedad/psicología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/psicología , Cuidadores/educación , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Acontecimientos que Cambian la Vida , Masculino , Investigación Metodológica en Enfermería , Investigación Cualitativa , Rol , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The clinical course of many neoplastic and primary bone marrow diseases will result in cytopenias secondary to bone marrow failure or infiltration. Acute and chronic leukemias, the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), aplastic anemia, breast and prostate cancer, as well as other hematologic and solid tumors, all may lead to chronic, severe cytopenias. Management of anemia and neutropenia are well described in the medical literature. Less well detailed are management approaches for patients with chronic thrombocytopenia, with or without active bleeding. Severe thrombocytopenia presents many difficult management choices for caregivers, patients and their families, especially near the end of life. The use of platelet transfusions in this patient population presents complex issues; platelets are logistically more difficult to transfuse than red cells and carry risks including acute febrile episodes, alloimmunization, and infection. In this review, we discuss the association of chronic thrombocytopenia to serious bleeding and the role of various prophylactic and therapeutic interventions available to palliative care and hospice providers. Specifically, this review examines the following issues: What is the morbidity and mortality from chronic thrombocytopenia in the setting of cancer or other bone marrow failure states? Is there a role for prophylactic platelet transfusions in the palliative care setting, and if so, with what frequency of monitoring, and at what transfusion threshold? What is the impact of alloimmunization and how can it be minimized? What treatments are available besides, or in addition to, platelet transfusions for acute bleeding episodes?
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Médula Ósea/complicaciones , Trombocitopenia/terapia , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Transfusión de Plaquetas , Trombocitopenia/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Histologic variants of conventional glioblastoma are rare clinical entities. In recent years, an aggressive variant termed malignant glioma with primitive neuroectodermal tumor components (MG-PNET) has been described in adults. In addition to the rarity of supratentorial primitive neuroectdoermal tumors (sPNET) in adults, MG-PNET can present with unique radiographic features. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report the case of a 42-year-old male who presented with headaches and vision changes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain revealed a large right frontal lesion. He underwent craniotomy with pathology demonstrating glioblastoma WHO grade IV, with primitive neuroectodermal tumor-like components (MG-PNET). Seven weeks later the patient represented with worsening headaches and left-hand weakness. MRI brain revealed a diffusion restricting subdural collection overlying the prior craniotomy site. Biopsy revealed PNET-like recurrence of the previously treated MG-PNET. CONCLUSION: In addition to histologic deviation, MG-PNET can present with variable radiographic findings on MRI and a clinical course distinctive from traditional glioblastoma. The hypercellular nature of this lesion can present as a diffusion-restricting lesion.
RESUMEN
The Ral (Ras-Like) signaling pathway plays an important role in the biology of cells. A plethora of effects is regulated by this signaling pathway and its prooncogenic effectors. Our team has demonstrated the overactivation of the RalA signaling pathway in a number of human malignancies including cancers of the liver, ovary, lung, brain, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Additionally, we have shown that the activation of RalA in cancer stem cells is higher in comparison with differentiated cancer cells. In this article, we review the role of Ral signaling in health and disease with a focus on the role of this multifunctional protein in the generation of therapies for cancer. An improved understanding of this pathway can lead to development of a novel class of anticancer therapies that functions on the basis of intervention with RalA or its downstream effectors.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/metabolismo , Células Madre Neoplásicas/metabolismo , Proteínas de Unión al GTP ral/metabolismo , Animales , Humanos , Mutación , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/terapia , Células Madre Neoplásicas/patología , Viroterapia Oncolítica , Virus Oncolíticos/metabolismo , Conformación Proteica , Transducción de Señal , Relación Estructura-Actividad , Proteínas de Unión al GTP ral/química , Proteínas de Unión al GTP ral/genéticaRESUMEN
The War on Cancer began with President Nixon's National Cancer Act of 1971. Treatment-related 'collateral damage' to healthy cells and tissues that reduces quality of life is an unfortunate but inevitable consequence of the overriding imperative to "win the war." In the face of a quality of life decrement, patients are encouraged with militaristic turns-of-phrases to "soldier on," "fight it," and "never say die." Rather than this dysfunctional imagery, which relegates patients to the status of mere cogs in the ever-grinding wheel of the clinical war machine and encourages the practice of disease-centered medicine, we propose an alternate analogy/organizing principle borrowed from the realm of education: No patient left behind.
Asunto(s)
Legislación Médica , Oncología Médica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Metáfora , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/terapia , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
To improve the prognosis of glioblastoma, we developed an adjuvant treatment directed to a neglected aspect of glioblastoma growth, the contribution of nonmalignant monocyte lineage cells (MLCs) (monocyte, macrophage, microglia, dendritic cells) that infiltrated a main tumor mass. These nonmalignant cells contribute to glioblastoma growth and tumor homeostasis. MLCs comprise of approximately 10%-30% of glioblastoma by volume. After integration into the tumor mass, these become polarized toward an M2 immunosuppressive, pro-angiogenic phenotype that promotes continued tumor growth. Glioblastoma cells initiate and promote this process by synthesizing 13 kDa MCP-1 that attracts circulating monocytes to the tumor. Infiltrating monocytes, after polarizing toward an M2 phenotype, synthesize more MCP-1, forming an amplification loop. Three noncytotoxic drugs, an antibiotic - minocycline, an antihypertensive drug - telmisartan, and a bisphosphonate - zoledronic acid, have ancillary attributes of MCP-1 synthesis inhibition and could be re-purposed, singly or in combination, to inhibit or reverse MLC-mediated immunosuppression, angiogenesis, and other growth-enhancing aspects. Minocycline, telmisartan, and zoledronic acid - the MTZ Regimen - have low-toxicity profiles and could be added to standard radiotherapy and temozolomide. Re-purposing older drugs has advantages of established safety and low drug cost. Four core observations support this approach: 1) malignant glioblastoma cells require a reciprocal trophic relationship with nonmalignant macrophages or microglia to thrive; 2) glioblastoma cells secrete MCP-1 to start the cycle, attracting MLCs, which subsequently also secrete MCP-1 perpetuating the recruitment cycle; 3) increasing cytokine levels in the tumor environment generate further immunosuppression and tumor growth; and 4) MTZ regimen may impede MCP-1-driven processes, thereby interfering with glioblastoma growth.
RESUMEN
First introduced during the late 1800s, radiation therapy is fundamental to the treatment of cancer. In developed countries, approximately 60% of all patients receive radiation therapy (also known as the sixty percenters), which makes radioresistance in cancer an important and, to date, unsolved, clinical problem. Unfortunately, the therapeutic refractoriness of solid tumors is the rule not the exception, and the ubiquity of resistance also extends to standard chemotherapy, molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Based on extrapolation from recent clinical inroads with epigenetic agents to prime refractory tumors for maximum sensitivity to concurrent or subsequent therapies, the radioresistant phenotype is potentially reversible, since aberrant epigenetic mechanisms are critical contributors to the evolution of resistant subpopulations of malignant cells. Within the framework of a syllogism, this review explores the emerging link between epigenetics and the development of radioresistance and makes the case that a strategy of pre- or co-treatment with epigenetic agents has the potential to, not only derepress inappropriately silenced genes, but also increase reactive oxygen species production, resulting in the restoration of radiosensitivity.