Patient perspectives on naloxone receipt in the emergency department: a qualitative exploration.

BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (EDs) are important venues for the distribution of naloxone to patients at high risk of opioid overdose, but less is known about patient perceptions on naloxone or best practices for patient education and communication. Our aim was to conduct an in-depth exploration of knowledge and attitudes toward ED naloxone distribution among patients who received a naloxone prescription. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 25 adult participants seen and discharged from three urban, academic EDs in Philadelphia, PA, with a naloxone prescription between November 2020 and February 2021. Interviews focused on awareness of naloxone as well as attitudes and experiences receiving naloxone in the ED. We used thematic content analysis to identify key themes reflecting patient attitudes and experiences. RESULTS: Of the 25 participants, 72% had previously witnessed an overdose and 48% had personally experienced a non-fatal overdose. Nineteen participants (76%) self-disclosed a history of substance use or overdose, and one reported receiving an opioid prescription during their ED visit and no history of substance use. In interviews, we identified wide variability in participant levels of knowledge about overdose risk, the role of naloxone in reducing risk, and naloxone access. A subset of participants was highly engaged with community harm reduction resources and well versed in naloxone access and use. A second subset was familiar with naloxone, but largely obtained it through healthcare settings such as the ED, while a final group was largely unfamiliar with naloxone. While most participants expressed positive attitudes about receiving naloxone from the ED, the quality of discussions with ED providers was variable, with some participants not even aware they were receiving a naloxone prescription until discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Naloxone prescribing in the ED was acceptable and valued by most participants, but there are missed opportunities for communication and education. These findings underscore the critical role that EDs play in mitigating risks for patients who are not engaged with other healthcare or community health providers and can inform future work about the effective implementation of harm reduction strategies in ED settings.

Motivation to Carry Naloxone: A Qualitative Analysis of Emergency Department Patients.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to explore perspectives of patients who received naloxone in the emergency department (ED) about (1) naloxone carrying and use following an ED visit and (2) motivation for performing these behaviors. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews of patients prescribed naloxone at ED discharge. SETTINGS: Three urban academic EDs in Philadelphia, PA. PARTICIPANTS: 25 participants completed the in-depth, semi-structured interviews and demographic surveys. Participants were majority male, African American, and had previously witnessed or experienced an overdose. METHODS: Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using content analysis. We used a hybrid inductive-deductive approach that included prespecified and emergent themes. RESULTS: We found that naloxone carrying behavior was variable and influenced by four main motivators: (1) naloxone access; (2) personal experience and salience of naloxone, (3) comfort with naloxone administration, and (4) societal influences on naloxone carrying. In particular, those with personal history of overdose or close friends or family at risk were motivated to carry naloxone. CONCLUSIONS: Participants in this study reported several important motivators for naloxone carrying after an ED visit, including ease of naloxone access and comfort, perceived risk of experiencing or encountering an overdose, and social influences on naloxone carrying behaviors. EDs, health systems, and public health officials should consider these factors influencing motivation when designing future interventions to increase access, carrying, and use of naloxone.

Assessment of Patient-Reported Naloxone Acquisition and Carrying With an Automated Text Messaging System After Emergency Department Discharge in Philadelphia.

Importance: A central tenet of harm reduction and prevention of opioid overdose deaths is the distribution and use of naloxone. Patient-centered methods that investigate naloxone acquisition and carrying can guide opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution efforts. Objective: To assess patients' self-reported naloxone acquisition and carrying after an emergency department (ED) encounter using automated text messaging. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study investigated self-reported patient behaviors involving naloxone after ED discharge in a large, urban academic health system in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Adult patients who were prescribed or dispensed naloxone and who had a mobile phone number listed in the electronic health record provided informed consent after ED discharge, and data were collected prospectively using text messaging from October 10, 2020, to March 19, 2021. Patients who did not respond to the survey or who opted out were excluded. Exposure: Automated text message-based survey after ED discharge for patients who were prescribed or dispensed naloxone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was patient-reported naloxone acquisition, carrying, and use. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographic characteristics. Results: Of 205 eligible patients, 41 (20.0%) completed the survey; of those patients, the mean (SD) age was 39.5 (13.7) years, and 21 (51.2%) were women. Fifteen (36.6%) had a personal history of being given naloxone after an overdose. As indicated by the ED record, 27 participants (65.9%) had naloxone dispensed in the ED, and 36 (87.8%) self-reported acquiring naloxone during or after their ED visit. Twenty-four participants (58.5%) were not carrying naloxone in the week before their ED visit. Twenty participants (48.8%) were carrying naloxone after the ED visit, and 27 (65.9%) reported planning to continue carrying naloxone in the future. Of the 24 individuals (58.5%) not carrying naloxone before their ED encounter, 13 (54.2%) reported planning to continue carrying naloxone in the future. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of adult patients dispensed or prescribed naloxone from the ED, most reported acquiring naloxone on or after discharge. The ED remains a key point of access to naloxone for individuals at high risk of opioid use and overdose, and text messaging could be a method to engage and motivate patient-reported behaviors in enhancing naloxone acquisition and carrying.

Association of plasma cell-free DNA with survival in patients with IDH wild-type glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine whether plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration is associated with survival in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS: Pre-operative and post-chemoradiotherapy blood samples were prospectively collected from patients with newly diagnosed IDH wild-type GBM. Patients underwent surgical resection or biopsy and received adjuvant radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was isolated from plasma and quantified using SYBR Green-based q polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were enrolled and categorized into high vs. low cfDNA groups relative to the pre-operative median value (25.2 ng/mL, range 5.7-153.0 ng/mL). High pre-operative cfDNA concentration was associated with inferior PFS (median progression-free survival (PFS), 3.4 vs. 7.7 months; log-rank P = .004; hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.26-3.81) and overall survival (OS) (median OS, 8.0 vs. 13.9 months; log-rank P = .01; HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.19-4.95). After adjusting for risk factors, including O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, pre-operative cfDNA remained independently associated with PFS (HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.50-4.83; P = .001) and OS (HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.25-5.59; P = .01). Post-hoc analysis of change in cfDNA post-chemoradiotherapy compared to pre-surgery (n = 24) showed increasing cfDNA concentration was associated with worse PFS (median, 2.7 vs. 6.0 months; log-rank P = .003; HR, 4.92; 95% CI, 1.53-15.84) and OS (median, 3.9 vs. 19.4 months; log-rank P < .001; HR, 7.77; 95% CI, 2.17-27.76). CONCLUSIONS: cfDNA concentration is a promising prognostic biomarker for patients with IDH wild-type GBM. Plasma cfDNA can be obtained noninvasively and may enable more accurate estimates of survival and effective clinical trial stratification.

Optimization of Sources of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Variability for Downstream Molecular Analysis.

Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) is used increasingly as a cancer biomarker for prognostication, as a correlate for tumor volume, or as input for downstream molecular analysis. Determining optimal blood processing and ccfDNA quantification are crucial for ccfDNA to serve as an accurate biomarker as it moves into the clinical realm. Whole blood was collected from 50 subjects, processed to plasma, and used immediately or frozen at -80°C. Plasma ccfDNA was extracted and concentration was assessed by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), fluorimetry, and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). For the 24 plasma samples from metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, the variant allele fractions (VAF) of KRAS G12/13 pathogenic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were measured by ddPCR. Using a high-speed (16,000 × g) or slower-speed (4100 × g) second centrifugation step showed no difference in ccfDNA yield or ctDNA VAF. A two- versus three-spin centrifugation protocol also showed no difference in ccfDNA yield or ctDNA VAF. A higher yield was observed from fresh versus frozen plasma by qPCR and fluorimetry, whereas a higher yield was observed for frozen versus fresh plasma by ddPCR, however, no difference was observed in ctDNA VAF. Overall, our findings suggest factors to consider when implementing a ccfDNA extraction and quantification workflow in a research or clinical setting.