Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Clin Transplant ; 35(4): e14216, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33406279

RESUMEN

Data describing outcomes of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are variable, and the association between SOT status and mortality remains unclear. In this study, we compare clinical outcomes of SOT recipients hospitalized with COVID-19 between March 10, and September 1, 2020, to a matched cohort of non-SOT recipients at a national healthcare system in the United States (US). From a population of 43 461 hospitalized COVID-19-positive patients, we created a coarsened exact matched cohort of 4035 patients including 128 SOT recipients and 3907 weighted matched non-SOT controls. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate association between SOT status and clinical outcomes. Among the 4035 patients, median age was 60 years, 61.7% were male, 21.9% were Black/African American, and 50.8% identified as Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Patients with a history of SOT were more likely to die within the study period when compared to matched non-SOT recipients (21.9% and 14.9%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-3.15). Moreover, SOT status was associated with increased odds of receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (OR [95% CI]: 2.34 [1.51-3.65]), developing acute kidney injury (OR [95% CI]: 2.41 [1.59-3.65]), and receiving vasopressor support during hospitalization (OR [95% CI]: 2.14 [1.31-3.48]).


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Órganos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Lesión Renal Aguda/virología , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
J Vasc Access ; 18(4): 319-324, 2017 Jul 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28665461

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cephalic arch stenosis is one of the most common reasons for repeated endovascular intervention and eventual abandonment of access in hemodialysis patients. There is no prediction model to identify risk factors for recurrent cephalic arch stenosis. We have developed a mathematical model to predict the need for reintervention in brachiocephalic (BC) fistulas with recurrent cephalic arch stenosis. METHODS: Single-center retrospective analysis of 143 patients with a BC fistula referred to the vascular clinic for access dysfunction who underwent cephalic arch angioplasty were included for the analysis. Twelve-month post-index angioplasty data were analyzed using parametric, non-parametric and multiple regression models using SPSS software. RESULTS: The mean need for re-intervention in 1 year since first index visit was 2.46 ± 1.404. Statistically significant correlation (p≤0.001) for re-intervention was observed with the severity of stenosis at index visit, access flow, vessel wall diameter proximal to the stenosis, average venous pressure >50% of the delivered blood flow rate and prolonged bleeding for >30 minutes as a reason for referral. Three equations have been derived for calculating the need for re-intervention based on the diameter of the vessel wall proximal to the stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Risk stratification of BC fistulas utilizing the above parameters could enable clinicians to identify accesses that are at risk for multiple re-interventions. Early identification of accesses that are at high risk for re-interventions at the cephalic arch might prolong access survival and reduce the cost for intervention by utilizing alternate strategies.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Arteria Braquial/cirugía , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Venas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angioplastia , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Arteria Braquial/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Braquial/fisiopatología , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Recurrencia , Retratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Texas , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas/fisiopatología
5.
Case Rep Nephrol ; 2015: 313610, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26380130

RESUMEN

Renal transplant vein stenosis is a rare cause of allograft dysfunction. Percutaneous stenting appears to be safe and effective treatment for this condition. A 56-year-old Caucasian female with end stage renal disease received a deceased donor renal transplant. After transplant, her serum creatinine improved to a nadir of 1.2 mg/dL. During the third posttransplant month, her serum creatinine increased to 2.2 mg/dL. Renal transplant biopsy showed BK nephropathy. Mycophenolate was discontinued. Over the next 2 months, her serum creatinine crept up to 6.2 mg/dL. BK viremia improved from 36464 copies/mL to 15398 copies/mL. A renal transplant ultrasound showed lower pole arteriovenous fistula and abnormal waveforms in the renal vein. Carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography demonstrated severe stenosis of the transplant renal vein. Successful coil occlusion of fistula was performed along with angioplasty and deployment of stent in the renal transplant vein. Serum creatinine improved to 1.5 mg/dL after.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA