Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo de estudio
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 28(3): 363-369, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36689013

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are more vulnerable to COVID-19 and are thus given high priority in vaccination campaigns. In solid cancer patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors, we evaluated the amount of anti-RBD and neutralizing antibodies and antibody avidity after two or three doses of the vaccine. METHODS: Thirty-eight solid cancer patients, 15 untreated hematological patients and 21 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Blood was collected before the first dose (T0), 21 days after the second (T2) and in 18 solid cancer patients also 15 days after the third dose of vaccine (T3). IgG, IgM and IgA anti-RBD antibodies were detected by ELISA. Neutralizing antibodies were measured testing the inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2. Antibody avidity was evaluated in 18 patients by a urea avidity ELISA. RESULTS: IgG anti-RBD antibodies were produced in 65.8% of the cancer patients at T2, and in 60% of hematological patients at levels lower than healthy controls. IgM and IgA anti-RBD antibodies were also produced in 5.3% and 21% cancer patients, respectively. At T3, a significant increase in anti-RBD IgG levels was observed. Neutralizing antibodies were produced in 68.4% of cancer patients as compared with 93% of untreated hematological patients and 100% of controls, at titers lower than in healthy subjects. At T3, neutralizing antibodies and avidity of IgG anti-RBD increased; 6/18 patients negative at T2 developed neutralizing antibodies at T3. CONCLUSION: The data indicate that in cancer patients mRNA vaccine induces high avidity anti-RBD antibodies and neutralizing antibodies that increase after the third dose. The process of induction and selection of high-affinity antibodies is apparently unaffected by the treatment with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Inmunoglobulina A , Inmunoglobulina G , Inmunoglobulina M , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico
4.
Preprint en Inglés | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-21263627

RESUMEN

Immunization with mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has been highly recommended and prioritized in fragile categories with higher risk of mortality after COVID-19 disease compared to healthy people, including patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Available data on the vaccine immune response developed by MF patients, and the impact of the treatment with the inhibitor of JAK-STAT signaling ruxolitimib, are still fragmented to support an informed decision for a third dose for this category of subjects. Here, we show that 76% of MF patients develop spike-specific IgG after the second vaccine dose, but the response has a slower kinetic compared to healthy subjects, suggesting a reduced capability of their immune system to promptly react to vaccination. A reduced ACE2/RBD inhibition binding activity of spike-specific antibodies was also observed, especially in ruxolitimib treated patients. Our results contribute to answer the open question on the induction of the antibody responses in MF patients following vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, showing a slow kinetic that support the need for a third dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA