Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Crit Care Med ; 40(6): 1820-6, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22488006

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare heparin (3 mL, 10 units/mL) and 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl, 10 mL) flush solutions with respect to central venous catheter lumen patency. DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, open label trial. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit and Surgical/Burn/Trauma intensive care unit at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO. PATIENTS: Three hundred forty-one patients with multilumen central venous catheters. Patients with at least one lumen with a minimum of two flushes were included in the analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned within 12 hrs of central venous catheter insertion to receive either heparin or 0.9% sodium chloride flush. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was lumen nonpatency. Secondary outcomes included the rates of loss of blood return, inability to infuse or flush through the lumen (flush failure), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and catheter-related blood stream infection. Assessment for patency was performed every 8 hrs in lumens without continuous infusions for the duration of catheter placement or discharge from intensive care unit. Three hundred twenty-six central venous catheters were studied yielding 709 lumens for analysis. The nonpatency rate was 3.8% in the heparin group (n = 314) and 6.3% in the 0.9% sodium chloride group (n = 395) (relative risk 1.66, 95% confidence interval 0.86-3.22, p = .136). The Kaplan-Meier analysis for time to first patency loss was not significantly different (log rank = 0.093) between groups. The rates of loss of blood return and flush failure were similar between the heparin and 0.9% sodium chloride groups. Pressure-injectable central venous catheters had significantly greater rates of nonpatency (10.6% vs. 4.3%, p = .001) and loss of blood return (37.0% vs. 18.8%, p <.001) compared to nonpressure-injectable catheters. The frequencies of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and catheter-related blood stream infection were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: 0.9% sodium chloride and heparin flushing solutions have similar rates of lumen nonpatency. Given potential safety concerns with the use of heparin, 0.9% sodium chloride may be the preferred flushing solution for short-term use central venous catheter maintenance.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Heparina/administración & dosificación , Cloruro de Sodio/administración & dosificación , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cloruro de Sodio/química
2.
Crit Care Med ; 37(10): 2775-81, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19581803

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine a) if a checklist covering a diverse group of intensive care unit protocols and objectives would improve clinician consideration of these domains and b) if improved consideration would change practice patterns. DESIGN: Pre- and post observational study. SETTING: A 24-bed surgical/burn/trauma intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 1399 patients admitted between June 2006 and May 2007. INTERVENTIONS: The first component of the study evaluated whether mandating verbal review of a checklist covering 14 intensive care unit best practices altered verbal consideration of these domains. Evaluation was performed using real-time bedside audits on morning rounds. The second component evaluated whether the checklist altered implementation of these domains by changing practice patterns. Evaluation was performed by analyzing data from the Project IMPACT database after patients left the intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Verbal consideration of evaluable domains improved from 90.9% (530/583) to 99.7% (669/671, p < .0001) after verbal review of the checklist was mandated. Bedside consideration improved on the use of deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis (p < .05), stress ulcer prophylaxis (p < .01), oral care for ventilated patients (p < 0.01), electrolyte repletion (p < .01), initiation of physical therapy (p < .05), and documentation of restraint orders (p < .0001). Mandatory verbal review of the checklist resulted in a greater than two-fold increase in transferring patients out of the intensive care unit on telemetry (16% vs. 35%, p < .0001) and initiation of physical therapy (28% vs. 42%, p < .0001) compared with baseline practice. CONCLUSIONS: A mandatory verbal review of a checklist covering a wide range of objectives and goals at each patient's bedside is an effective method to improve both consideration and implementation of intensive care unit best practices. A bedside checklist is a simple, cost-effective method to prevent errors of omission in basic domains of intensive care unit management that might otherwise be forgotten in the setting of more urgent care requirements.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Programas Obligatorios , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/normas , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/economía , Implementación de Plan de Salud/economía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales de Enseñanza/economía , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Programas Obligatorios/economía , Programas Obligatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/economía , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/economía , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Washingtón
3.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 8(4): 445-54, 2007 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17883361

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend using antiseptic- or antibiotic-impregnated central venous catheters (CVCs) if, following a comprehensive strategy to prevent catheter-related blood stream infection (CR-BSI), infection rates remain above institutional goals based on benchmark values. The purpose of this study was to determine if chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated CVCs could decrease the CR-BSI rate in an intensive care unit (ICU) with a low baseline infection rate. METHODS: Pre-intervention and post-intervention observational study in a 24-bed surgical/trauma/burn ICU from October, 2002 to August, 2005. All patients requiring CVC placement after March, 2004 had a chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated catheter inserted (post-intervention period). RESULTS: Twenty-three CR-BSIs occurred in 6,960 catheter days (3.3 per 1,000 catheter days)during the 17-month control period. After introduction of chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated catheters, 16 CR-BSIs occurred in 7,732 catheter days (2.1 per 1,000 catheter days; p = 0.16). The average length of time required for an infection to become established after catheterization was similar in the two groups (8.4 vs. 8.6 days; p = 0.85). Chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated catheters did not result in a statistically significant change in the microbiological profile of CR-BSIs, nor did they increase the incidence of resistant organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Although chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated catheters are useful in specific patient populations, they did not result in a statistically significant decrease in the CR-BSI rate in this study, beyond what was achieved with education alone.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Bacteriemia/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Fungemia/etiología , Fungemia/prevención & control , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sulfadiazina de Plata/administración & dosificación
4.
Int J Surg ; 41: 86-90, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28347869

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is carried out for resection of lesions in the body and tail of the pancreas. DP may lead to both insulin and glucagon deficiency, which may worsen diabetes mellitus and render patients more vulnerable to severe hypoglycemia. Maintaining glycemic control can be challenging after DP, and no guidelines have been established for clinicians. The objective of this study was to investigate postoperative glycemic control and insulin dose among patients after DP. METHODS: The medical records from 82 eligible adult patients after DP between 2013 and 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Twenty-one (25.6%) patients had pre-existing diabetes. The average length of stay was 5.8 ± 2.6 days. The average resected volume was 193 ± 313 cm3. Of 2124 blood glucose (BG) values, only 0.3% were <70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L); 45% were 140-180 mg/dL (7.8-10.0 mmol/L); and 14% were >180 mg/dL. Postoperatively, insulin was the most common agent prescribed for glycemic control. Among those who received insulin, 86.8% used rapid-acting correction insulin, 4.4% prandial insulin, and 8.8% long-acting insulin. On postoperative day 1 through 6 and on the day before hospital discharge, <30% of patients received insulin, and a total daily dose (TDD) of <0.10 units/kg was frequently needed for glycemic control. At discharge, 35.3% of patients with pre-existing diabetes improved; 23.2% required diabetic medications, of whom 50% took insulin. Only 2 patients without pre-existing diabetes required medications. CONCLUSION: Postoperative BG levels were relatively well controlled. The majority of BG levels were in the optimal range, and the incidence of hypoglycemia or clinically significant hypoglycemia was minimal with our current regimen. Postoperative patients required small TDD of insulin for glycemic control. Our data suggested that 0.05-0.20 units/kg was an appropriate dose range for postoperative glycemic control among the vulnerable population. Our findings provide guidance for clinicians to dose insulin safely for postoperative patients with DP in a hospital setting.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/cirugía , Hipoglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus/sangre , Femenino , Glucagón/sangre , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/etiología , Insulina/sangre , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Páncreas/cirugía , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Alta del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
J Am Coll Surg ; 202(1): 1-9, 2006 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16377491

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia is associated with complications in the surgical intensive care unit. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of nurse-driven insulin infusion protocols in lowering blood glucose (BG) in critical illness. STUDY DESIGN: All patients in a 24-bed surgical intensive care unit who required i.v. insulin infusions during 3 noncontiguous 6-month periods from 2002 to 2004 were evaluated. In the preintervention phase, 71 patients received a physician-initiated insulin infusion without a developed protocol. They were compared with 95 patients who received a nurse-driven insulin infusion protocol with a target BG of 120 to 150 mg/dL and to 119 patients who received a more stringent protocol with a target BG of 80 to 110 mg/dL. RESULTS: There was a stepwise decrease in average daily BG levels, from 190 to 163 to 132 mg/dL (p < 0.001). The less stringent protocol decreased the time to achieve a BG level < 150 mg/dL from 14.1 to 7.4 hours compared with physician-driven management (p < 0.05) resulting in similar time on an insulin infusion (53 versus 48 hours). The more intensive protocol brought BG levels < 150 mg/dL in 7.2 hours and < 111 mg/dL in 13.6 hours, but increased the length of time a patient was on an insulin infusion to 77 hours. The incidence of severe hypoglycemia (BG < 40 mg/dL) was statistically similar between the groups, ranging between 1.1% and 3.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a nurse-driven protocol led to more rapid and more effective BG control in critically ill surgical patients compared with physician management. Tighter BG control can be obtained without a significant increase in hypoglycemia, although this is associated with increased time on an insulin infusion.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Hiperglucemia/prevención & control , Sistemas de Infusión de Insulina , Evaluación en Enfermería , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Glucemia/metabolismo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Diabetes Educ ; 41(5): 592-8, 2015 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26246595

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM) and prediabetes (pre-DM) in acute stroke patients, to evaluate recommendations of diabetes treatment and follow-up care in a hospital setting, and to examine 1-year readmission rates based on admission A1C measure. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 200 patients randomly selected from 1095 patients admitted with an acute stroke and an A1C measurement during admission. DM and pre-DM prevalence levels were determined per A1C level. Recommendations for diabetes treatment during and after hospitalization were assessed; charts were reviewed for readmission. RESULTS: Among 200 patients, 43% had known DM, and 0.5% had pre-DM. Among 113 patients without history of DM or pre-DM, 61.9% had A1C 5.7% to 6.4% (39-46 mmol/mol), and 8.8% had A1C ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol). None of the newly diagnosed pre-DM and 60% of newly diagnosed DM were documented. Only 7 of newly diagnosed DM or pre-DM patients received diabetes education. For patients with known DM and A1C ≥7.0% (53 mmol/mol), 40.5% registered no change of diabetic regimen. Few patients were recommended for diabetes follow-up care. Patients with A1C ≥6.5% or <5.7% were more likely to be readmitted for any reason within 1 year (33.3% and 31.6%, respectively) than patients with A1C levels of 5.7% to 6.4% (16.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of acutely admitted stroke patients without known DM or pre-DM had A1C ≥5.7%. Newly diagnosed DM or pre-DM patients received inadequate diabetes education and follow-up care. These findings provide significant opportunities for improving acute stroke management.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Tardío/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado Prediabético/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estado Prediabético/sangre , Estado Prediabético/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/sangre
7.
Arch Surg ; 139(2): 131-6, 2004 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14769568

RESUMEN

HYPOTHESIS: The success of an educational program in July 1999 that lowered the catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) rate in our intensive care unit (ICU) 3-fold is correlated with compliance with "best-practice" behaviors. DESIGN: Before-after trial. SETTING: Surgical ICU in a referral hospital. PATIENTS: A random sample underwent bedside audits of central venous catheter care (n = 187). All ICU admissions during a 39-month period (N = 4489) were prospectively followed for bacteremia. INTERVENTIONS: On the basis of audit results in December 2000, a behavioral intervention was designed to improve compliance with evidenced-based guidelines of central venous catheter management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Compliance with practices known to decrease CRBSI. Secondary outcome was CRBSI rate on all ICU patients. RESULTS: Multiple deficiencies were identified on bedside audits 18 months after the previous educational program. After the implementation of a separate behavioral intervention in July 2001, a second set of bedside audits in December 2001 demonstrated improvements in documenting the dressing date (11% to 21%; P<.001) and stopcock use (70% to 24%; P<.001), whereas nonsignificant trends were observed in hand hygiene (17% to 30%; P>.99) and maximal sterile barrier precautions (50% to 80%; P =.29). Appropriate practice was observed before and after the behavioral intervention in catheter site placement, dressing type, absence of antibiotic ointment, and proper securing of central venous catheters. Thirty-two CRBSIs occurred in 9353 catheter-days 24 months before the behavioral intervention compared with 17 CRBSIs in 6152 catheter-days during the 15 months after the intervention (3.4/1000 to 2.8/1000 catheter-days; P =.40). CONCLUSIONS: Although a previous educational program decreased the CRBSI rate, this was associated with only modest compliance with best practice principles when bedside audits were performed 18 months later. A behavioral intervention improved all identified deficiencies, leading to a nonsignificant decrease in CRBSIs.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Patógenos Transmitidos por la Sangre/aislamiento & purificación , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/etiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Controlados Antes y Después , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Educación Médica Continua/organización & administración , Educación Continua en Enfermería/organización & administración , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Probabilidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Valores de Referencia , Medición de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
8.
Heart Lung ; 33(3): 131-45, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15136773

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this literature review is to examine the effect of the interaction between gastrointestinal motility and feeding site on the aspiration risk in critically ill, tube-fed patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A single answer to the question of the preferred feeding site is not likely to be found because the degree of aspiration risk varies significantly according to individual variations in gastrointestinal motility and multiple pre-existing and treatment-related risk factors. However, regardless of the feeding site, it is ultimately regurgitated gastric contents that are aspirated into the lungs. For this reason, the clinical assessment of greatest interest is the evaluation of gastric emptying, usually monitored clinically by measuring gastric residual volumes. CONCLUSION: Current recommendations for monitoring residual volumes and preventing aspiration are provided.


Asunto(s)
Nutrición Enteral/efectos adversos , Motilidad Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Neumonía por Aspiración/prevención & control , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Humanos , Neumonía por Aspiración/etiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
9.
J Intensive Care Med ; 24(1): 54-62, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19017665

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a simple low-cost oral care protocol on ventilator-associated pneumonia rates in a surgical intensive care unit. DESIGN: Preintervention and postintervention observational study. SETTING: Twenty-four bed surgical/trauma/burn intensive care units in an urban university hospital. PATIENTS: All mechanically ventilated patients that were admitted to the intensive care unit between June 1, 2004 and May 31, 2005. INTERVENTIONS: An oral care protocol to assist in prevention of bacterial growth of plaque by cleaning the patients' teeth with sodium monoflurophosphate 0.7% paste and brush, rinsing with tap water, and subsequent application of a 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate chemical solution done twice daily at 12-hour intervals. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the preintervention period from June 1, 2003 to May 31, 2004, there were 24 infections in 4606 ventilator days (rate = 5.2 infections per 1000 ventilator days). After the institution of the oral care protocol, there were 10 infections in 4158 ventilator days, resulting in a lower rate of 2.4 infections per 1000 ventilator days. This 46% reduction in ventilator-associated pneumonia was statistically significant (P = .04). Staff compliance with the oral care protocol during the 12-month period was also monitored biweekly and averaged 81%. The total cost of the oral care protocol was US$2187.49. There were 14 fewer cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia, which led to a decrease in cost of US$140 000 to US$560 000 based on the estimated cost per ventilator-associated pneumonia infection of US$10 000 to US$40 000. There was an overall reduction in ventilator-associated pneumonia without a change to the gram-negative or gram-positive microorganism profile. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a simple, low-cost oral care protocol in the surgical intensive care unit led to a significantly decreased risk of acquiring ventilator-associated pneumonia.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Control de Infecciones , Higiene Bucal/economía , Higiene Bucal/métodos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cariostáticos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos Clínicos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Fluoruros/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Higiene Bucal/enfermería , Fosfatos/uso terapéutico , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Adulto Joven
10.
Crit Care Med ; 30(1): 59-64, 2002 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11902288

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine whether an education initiative aimed at improving central venous catheter insertion and care could decrease the rate of primary bloodstream infections. DESIGN: Pre- and postintervention observational study. SETTING: Eighteen-bed surgical/burn/trauma intensive care unit (ICU) in an urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 4,283 patients were admitted to the ICU between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2000. INTERVENTIONS: A program primarily directed toward registered nurses was developed by a multidisciplinary task force to highlight correct practice for central venous catheter insertion and maintenance. The program consisted of a 10-page self-study module on risk factors and practice modifications involved in catheter-related infections as well as a verbal in-service at staff meetings. Each participant was required to take a pretest before taking the study module and an identical test after its completion. Fact sheets and posters reinforcing the information in the study module were also posted throughout the ICU. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventy-four primary bloodstream infections occurred in 6874 catheter days (10.8 per 1000 catheter days) in the 18 months before the intervention. After the implementation of the education module, the number of primary bloodstream infections fell to 26 in 7044 catheter days (3.7 per 1000 catheter days), a decrease of 66% (p < .0001). The estimated cost savings secondary to the decreased infection rate for the 18 months after the intervention was between $185,000 and $2.808 million. CONCLUSIONS: A focused intervention primarily directed at the ICU nursing staff can lead to a dramatic decrease in the incidence of primary bloodstream infections. Educational programs may lead to a substantial decrease in cost, morbidity, and mortality attributable to central venous catheterization.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Educación Continua en Enfermería/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Sepsis/prevención & control , Educación Médica Continua/métodos , Humanos , Sepsis/etiología , Recursos Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA