Hypercalcemia is a frequent side effect of 13-cis-retinoic acid treatment in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma.

PURPOSE: 13-cis-Retinoic acid (13-cisRA) is used as a postconsolidation treatment in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Hypercalcemia is a known side effect of retinoids. Frequency, symptoms, treatment, and risk factors for hypercalcemia were analyzed. PATIENTS: Data were retrospectively analyzed for 350 patients registered in the German Neuroblastoma trials NB97 and NB04 who were treated with high-risk protocols-including myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) or maintenance therapy-and had received 13-cisRA between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010. RESULTS: Hypercalcemia was reported in 78 patients (22.3%), and 37 patients (10.6%) developed Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 or 4 hypercalcemia. The calcium levels were 2.5-4.6 mmol/L (median 3.1 mmol/L). Patients with a single kidney were at a higher risk of developing hypercalcemia (p = .001). Regarding postinduction treatment, 69 of 280 patients with SCT (24.6%) and nine of 70 patients without SCT (12.9%) developed hypercalcemia during 13-cisRA treatment (p = .037). Most patients developed hypercalcemia in the first cycle of 13-cisRA, and only in a single cycle. Hypercalcemia symptoms were frequent but moderate. In most patients, treatment with 13-cisRA was continued without dose reduction in subsequent cycles. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, grades 3 and 4 hypercalcemia were observed more often than previously reported. A single kidney and pretreatment with myeloablative chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation were identified as potential risk factors for the development of hypercalcemia.

Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Treatment of Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients: An Analysis of 15,099 Patients of the AltersTraumaRegister DGU®.

Background and Objectives: The increased use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) results in an increased prevalence of DOAC treatment in hip fractures patients. However, the impact of DOAC treatment on perioperative management of hip fracture patients is limited. In this study, we describe the prevalence of DOAC treatment in a population of hip fracture patients and compare these patients with patients taking vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and patients not taking anticoagulants. Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU). The data were collected prospectively from patients with proximal femur fractures treated between January 2016 and December 2018. Among other factors, anticoagulation was surveyed. The primary outcome parameter was time-to-surgery. Further parameters were: type of anesthesia, surgical complications, soft tissue complications, length of stay and mortality. Results: In total, 11% (n = 1595) of patients took DOACs at the time of fracture, whereas 9.2% (n = 1325) were on VKA therapy. During the study period, there was a shift from VKA to DOACs. The time-to-surgery of patients on DOACs and of patients on VKA was longer compared to patients who did not take any anticoagulation. No significant differences with regard to complications, type of anesthesia and mortality were found between patients on DOACs compared to VKA treatment. Conclusion: An increased time-to-surgery in patients taking DOACs and taking VKA compared to non-anticoagulated patients was found. This underlines the need for standardized multi-disciplinary orthopedic, hematologic and ortho-geriatric algorithms for the management of hip fracture patients under DOAC treatment. In addition, no significant differences regarding complications and mortality were found between DOAC and VKA users. This demonstrates that even in the absence of widely available antidotes, the safe management of geriatric patients under DOACs with proximal femur fractures is possible.

The Predictive Value of the "Identification of Seniors at Risk" Score on Mortality, Length of Stay, Mobility and the Destination of Discharge of Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients.

Purpose: The German Society for Geriatrics recommends the "ISAR" questionnaire as a screening tool for patients ≥70 for geriatric screening in emergency rooms. Although the ISAR-score is collected routinely in the "AltersTraumaRegister DGU®" (ATR-DGU), to date less is known about the predictive value of the "ISAR"-score in geriatric trauma patients. Patients and Methods: Currently, 84 clinics participate in the ATR-DGU. This evaluation is limited to the subgroup of proximal femur fractures from 2016-2018. Patients ≥70 years, who underwent surgery for a hip fracture are included in the ATR-DGU. In this evaluation, the influence of the "ISAR"-score on mortality, length of stay, mobility and the destination of discharge was examined. Results: Overall 10,098 patients were included in the present study. The median age was 85 years (interquartile range (IQ) 80-89 years). According to the ISAR-score 80.6% (n=8142) of the patients were classified as geriatric patients (cut off "ISAR"-score ≥2 points). These group of patients had a length of stay of 16 days (IQ10.1-22.1) compared to the non-geriatric patient cohort showing a length of stay of 15 days (IQ10.1-20.1). Patients showing an ISAR-score ≥2 had an increased risk of being discharged to a nursing home (OR 8.25), not being able to walk (OR 12.52) and higher risk of mortality (OR 3.45). Conclusion: The "ISAR"-score shows predictive power for the length of stay, mobility, hospital mortality and discharge after hospital in the collective of geriatric trauma patients. It therefore seems suitable as a screening tool for geriatric trauma patients in the emergency department and should be considered in this context.