Dysbalanced sex hormone status is an independent predictor of decompensation and mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis.

AIMS: Endocrinological abnormalities, including low testosterone levels, are prevalent in cirrhosis. We assessed sexual hormone status in regard to hemodynamic abnormalities and its impact on hepatic decompensation and survival. METHODS: Males with cirrhosis were prospectively included in this study since 2010. Sexual hormones including bioavailable testosterone, total testosterone, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, prolactin, and sex hormone-binding globulin as well as Child-Pugh score, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, and hepatic venous pressure gradient were recorded. Sarcopenia was also assessed in patients with available computed tomography scans. Clinical follow-up for hepatic decompensation, liver transplantation, and death was recorded until May 2017. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen male cirrhotic patients were included: age 55 ± 9.4 years, MELD 13.5 (range, 7-20.7). Etiologies were alcoholic liver disease in 61(53.5%) patients, viral in 30 (26.3%) patients, and other in 23 (20.2%). Child-Pugh scores were A in 32 (28.1%) patients, B in 48 (42.1%), and C in 34 (29.8%). Levels of bioavailable testosterone and total testosterone decreased with advanced Child-Pugh score (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001) whereas prolactin increased (P = 0.002). Median bioavailable testosterone (0.8 ng/mL [0.1-2] vs. 1.68 ng/mL [0.07-2.65]; P = 0.004) and total testosterone (2.7 ng/mL [0.23-12.34] vs. 7 ng/mL [0.25-10]; P = 0.041) levels were lower in patients with severe portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient >12 mmHg). Median bioavailable testosterone (0.25 ng/mL [0.07-1.7] vs. 0.97 ng/mL [0.15-2.74)]; P = 0.017) and total testosterone levels (1.28 ng/mL [0.25-7.32] vs. 4.32 ng/mL [0.43-13.47]; P = 0.031) were significantly lower in sarcopenic patients. Median follow-up was 13 months (0.2-75 months) and liver-related events were recorded in 46 patients (40.4%; death, 31 [27.2%]). Low total testosterone was associated with an increased risk for hepatic decompensation and/or death, even after adjusting for Child-Pugh score, MELD, and other relevant factors (Child-Pugh score model: hazard ratio 2.503, 95% confidence interval, 1.214-5.157, P = 0.013; MELD model: hazard ratio 3.065, 95% confidence interval, 1.523-6.169, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In parallel to increasing severity of cirrhosis, levels of testosterone decline whereas prolactin levels increase. However, low testosterone levels are independently associated with a higher risk for hepatic decompensation and mortality.

Erectile dysfunction in cirrhosis is impacted by liver dysfunction, portal hypertension, diabetes and arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Although several risk factors for erectile dysfunction may be present in patients with cirrhosis, data on the actual prevalence and cause of erectile dysfunction is limited. The International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) is a well-validated survey to determine the presence and severity of erectile dysfunction in men. We assessed (i) the prevalence and severity of erectile dysfunction, and (ii) risk factors for erectile dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: In this prospective study, erectile dysfunction was defined as: absent (>21 IIEF-5-points), mild (12-21) and severe (5-11). Patients with overt hepatic encephalopathy, active alcohol abuse, extrahepatic malignancy, previous urologic surgery, previous liver transplantation and severe cardiac conditions were excluded. RESULTS: Among n = 151 screened patients, n = 41 met exclusion criteria and n = 30 were sexually inactive. Thus, a final number of n = 80 male patients with cirrhosis were included. Patient characteristics: age: 53 ± 9 years; model for end-stage liver disease score (MELD): 12.7 ± 3.9; Child-Pugh score (CPS) A: 30 (37.5%), B: 35 (43.8%), C: 15 (18.7%); alcohol: 38 (47.5%), viral: 25 (31.3%), alcohol/viral: 7 (8.8%) and others: 10 (12.5%). The presence of erectile dysfunction was found in 51 (63.8%) patients with 44 (55%) and 7 (8.8%) suffering from mild-to-moderate and moderate-to-severe erectile dysfunction. Mean MELD and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) were significantly higher in patients with erectile dysfunction (P = .021; P = .028). Child-Pugh score C, MELD, creatinine, age, arterial hypertension, diabetes, low libido, low testosterone and high HVPG were associated with the presence of erectile dysfunction. Interestingly, beta-blocker therapy was not associated with an increased risk. In multivariate models, arterial hypertension (OR: 6.36 [1.16-34.85]; P = .033), diabetes (OR: 7.40 [1.31-41.75]; P = .023), MELD (OR: 1.19 [1.03-1.36]; P = .015) and increasing HVPG (n = 48; OR: 1.11 [1.002-1.23]; P = .045) were independent risk factors for the presence of erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSION: About two-thirds of male patients with cirrhosis show erectile dysfunction. Severity of liver dysfunction, portal hypertension, arterial hypertension and diabetes were identified as risk factors for erectile dysfunction.

The FXR agonist PX20606 ameliorates portal hypertension by targeting vascular remodelling and sinusoidal dysfunction.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Steroidal farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists demonstrated potent anti-fibrotic activities and lowered portal hypertension in experimental models. The impact of the novel non-steroidal and selective FXR agonist PX20606 on portal hypertension and fibrosis was explored in this study. METHODS: In experimental models of non-cirrhotic (partial portal vein ligation, PPVL, 7days) and cirrhotic (carbon tetrachloride, CCl4, 14weeks) portal hypertension, PX20606 (PX,10mg/kg) or the steroidal FXR agonist obeticholic acid (OCA,10mg/kg) were gavaged. We then measured portal pressure, intrahepatic vascular resistance, liver fibrosis and bacterial translocation. RESULTS: PX decreased portal pressure in non-cirrhotic PPVL (12.6±1.7 vs. 10.4±1.1mmHg; p=0.020) and cirrhotic CCl4 (15.2±0.5 vs. 11.8±0.4mmHg; p=0.001) rats. In PPVL animals, we observed less bacterial translocation (-36%; p=0.041), a decrease in lipopolysaccharide binding protein (-30%; p=0.024) and splanchnic tumour necrosis factor α levels (-39%; p=0.044) after PX treatment. In CCl4 rats, PX decreased fibrotic Sirius Red area (-43%; p=0.005), hepatic hydroxyproline (-66%; p<0.001), and expression of profibrogenic proteins (Col1a1, α smooth muscle actin, transforming growth factor ß). CCl4-PX rats had significantly lower transaminase levels and reduced hepatic macrophage infiltration. Moreover, PX induced sinusoidal vasodilation (upregulation of cystathionase, dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH)1, endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), GTP-cyclohydrolase1) and reduced intrahepatic vasoconstriction (downregulation of endothelin-1, p-Moesin). In cirrhosis, PX improved endothelial dysfunction (decreased von-Willebrand factor) and normalized overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor and angiopoietins. While short-term 3-day PX treatment reduced portal pressure (-14%; p=0.041) by restoring endothelial function, 14week PX therapy additionally inhibited sinusoidal remodelling and decreased portal pressure to a greater extent (-22%; p=0.001). In human liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, PX increased eNOS and DDAH expression. CONCLUSIONS: The non-steroidal FXR agonist PX20606 ameliorates portal hypertension by reducing liver fibrosis, vascular remodelling and sinusoidal dysfunction. LAY SUMMARY: The novel drug PX20606 activates the bile acid receptor FXR and shows beneficial effects in experimental liver cirrhosis: In the liver, it reduces scarring and inflammation, and also widens blood vessels. Thus, PX20606 leads to an improved blood flow through the liver and decreases hypertension of the portal vein. Additionally, PX20606 improves the altered intestinal barrier and decreases bacterial migration from the gut.

Splenectomy ameliorates portal pressure and anemia in animal models of cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic portal hypertension.

PURPOSE: Portal hypertension (PH)-associated splenomegaly is caused by portal venous congestion and splanchnic hyperemia. This can trigger hypersplenism, which favors the development of cytopenia. We investigated the time-dependent impact of splenectomy on portal pressure and blood cell counts in animal models of non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic PH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-six rats underwent either partial portal vein ligation (PPVL), bile duct ligation (BDL), or sham operation (SO), with subgroups undergoing additional splenectomy. Portal pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, blood cell counts and hemoglobin concentrations were evaluated throughout 5 weeks following surgery. RESULTS: Following PPVL or BDL surgery, the animals presented a progressive rise in portal pressure, paralleled by decreased mean arterial pressure and accelerated heart rate. Splenectomy curbed the development of PH in both models (PPVL: 16.25 vs. 17.93 â€‹mmHg, p â€‹= â€‹0.083; BDL: 13.55 vs. 15.23 â€‹mmHg, p â€‹= â€‹0.028), increased mean arterial pressure (PPVL: +7%; BDL: +9%), and reduced heart rate (PPVL: -10%; BDL: -13%). Accordingly, splenectomized rats had lower von Willebrand factor plasma levels (PPVL: -22%; BDL: -25%). Splenectomy resulted in higher hemoglobin levels in PPVL (14.15 vs. 13.08 â€‹g/dL, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and BDL (13.20 vs. 12.39 â€‹g/dL, p â€‹= â€‹0.097) animals, and significantly increased mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentrations (PPVL: +9%; BDL: +15%). Thrombocytopenia only developed in the PPVL model and was alleviated in the splenectomized subgroup. Conversely, BDL rats presented with thrombocytosis, which was not affected by splenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Splenectomy improves both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic PH, and ameliorates the hyperdynamic circulation. Hypersplenism related anemia and thrombocytopenia were only significantly improved in the non-cirrhotic PH model.

Correction: Different enteral nutrition formulas have no effect on glucose homeostasis but on diet-induced thermogenesis in critically ill medical patients: a randomized controlled trial.

After publication, the author noticed that Table 2 was incorrectly formatted for the final PDF despite being correct in earlier proofs. The table was correct in the HTML version of the article. The EJCN apologizes for the inadvertent error in the formatting of Table 2. The corrected version is uploaded and should be read in conjunction with the original paper. Any inconvenience to the author and readership is regretted.

Different enteral nutrition formulas have no effect on glucose homeostasis but on diet-induced thermogenesis in critically ill medical patients: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Hyperglycemia is common in critically ill patients and associated with increased mortality. It has been suggested that different nutrition formulas may beneficially influence glucose levels in surgical intensive care patients. In this prospective randomized clinical cohort study we investigated glucose homeostasis in response to different enteral nutrition formulas in medical critically ill patients. SUBJECTS/METHODS: 60 medical critically ill patients were randomized to receive continuous fat-based (group A, n = 30) or glucose-based enteral nutrition (group B, n = 30) for seven days. Indirect calorimetry was performed to determine energy demand at baseline and on days 3 and 7. Glucose levels and area under the curve (AUC), insulin demand, glucose variability, and calorie and substrate intake per 24 h were assessed for 7 days. RESULTS: Over the course of 7 days patients had similar average daily glucose (p = 0.655), glucose AUC (A: 758 (641-829) mg/dl/day vs B: 780 (733-845) mg/dl/day, p = 0.283), similar overall insulin demand (A: 153.5 (45.3-281.5) IE vs B: 167.9 (82.3-283.8) IE, p = 0.525), and received similar amounts of enteral nutrition per 24 h. Resting energy expenditure was similar at baseline (A: 1556 (1227-1808) kcal/day vs B: 1563 (1306-1789) kcal/day, p = 0.882) but energy expenditure increased substantially over time in group A (p < 0.0001), but not in group B (p = 0.097). CONCLUSION: Fat-based and glucose-based EN influence glucose homeostasis and insulin demand similarly, yet diet-induced thermogenesis was substantially higher in critically ill patients receiving fat-based enteral nutrition.