Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 46
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Med Care ; 59(9): 768-777, 2021 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34310457

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) major coverage expansions mitigated the impact of unemployment on health insurance coverage status. DATA SOURCE: A 2011-2019 versions of the American Community Survey developed by the University of Minnesota Integrated Public Use Microdata Series program. RESEARCH DESIGN: We use difference-in-difference-in-differences (ie, triple difference) regressions to compare changes in the short-run impacts of local unemployment rates before and after the ACA. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Before the ACA, rises in local unemployment were associated with uninsurance due to losses in private coverage (ie, both nongroup and employer sponsored).Following the ACA's full implementation, the link between employment and coverage was attenuated by access to publicly subsidized qualified health plans on the ACA's nongroup market, and enhanced access to Medicaid in states that expanded. Our findings suggest protections from unemployment-linked uninsured spells are largest in states that expanded Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: Expanded access to coverage under the ACA could mitigate the adverse effects on insurance status and access to care historically linked to job loss. However, should the ACA be repealed, many households stand to lose their ability to turn to Medicaid or subsidized nongroup coverage as safety-net resources to offset the burdens of job loss.


Asunto(s)
Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Desempleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
2.
BMC Oral Health ; 21(1): 540, 2021 10 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34670549

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Unmet oral health needs routinely affect low-income communities. Lower-income adults suffer a disproportionate share of dental disease and often cannot access necessary oral surgery services. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion created new financial opportunities for community health centers (CHCs) to provide mission-relevant services in low-income areas. However, little is understood in the literature about how the ACA Medicaid expansion impacted oral surgery delivery at CHCs. Using a large sample of CHCs, we examined whether the ACA Medicaid expansion increased the likelihood of oral surgery delivery at expansion-state CHCs compared to non-expansion-state CHCs. METHODS: Exploiting a natural experiment, we estimated Poisson regression models examining the effects of the Medicaid expansion on the likelihood of oral surgery delivery at expansion-state CHCs relative to non-expansion-state CHCs. We merged data from multiple sources spanning 2012-2017. The analytic sample included 2054 CHC-year observations. RESULTS: Compared to the year prior to expansion, expansion-state CHCs were 13.5% less likely than non-expansion-state CHCs to provide additional oral surgery services in 2016 (IRR = 0.865; P = 0.06) and 14.7% less likely in 2017 (IRR = 0.853; P = 0.02). All else equal, and relative to non-expansion-state CHCs, expansion-state CHCs included in the analytic sample were 8.7% less likely to provide oral surgery services in all post-expansion years pooled together (IRR = 0.913; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansions can provide CHCs with opportunities to expand their patient revenue and services. However, whether because of known dental treatment capacity limitations, new competition, or coordination with other providers, expansion-state CHCs in our study sample were less likely to provide oral surgery services on the margin relative to non-expansion-state CHCs following Medicaid expansion.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Orales , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Adulto , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Medicaid , Salud Pública , Estados Unidos
3.
Prev Med ; 126: 105734, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31152830

RESUMEN

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend annual influenza vaccination of persons ≥6 months old. However, in 2016-17, only 43.3% of U.S. adults reported receiving an influenza vaccination. Limited awareness about the cost-effectiveness (CE) or the economic value of influenza vaccination may contribute to low vaccination coverage. In 2017, we conducted a literature review to survey estimates of the CE of influenza vaccination of adults compared to no vaccination. We also summarized CE estimates of other common preventive interventions that are recommended for adults by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Results are presented as costs in US$2015 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved. Among adults aged 18-64, the CE of influenza vaccination ranged from $8000 to $39,000 per QALY. Assessments for adults aged ≥65 yielded lower CE ratios, ranging from being cost-saving to $15,300 per QALY. Influenza vaccination was cost-saving to $85,000 per QALY for pregnant women in moderate or severe influenza seasons and $260,000 per QALY in low-incidence seasons. For other preventive interventions, CE estimates ranged from cost-saving to $170,000 per QALY saved for breast cancer screening among women aged 50-74, from cost-saving to $16,000 per QALY for colorectal cancer screening, and from $27,000 to $600,000 per QALY for hypertension screening and treatment. Influenza vaccination in adults appears to have a similar CE profile as other commonly utilized preventive services for adults. Efforts to improve adult vaccination should be considered by adult-patient providers, healthcare systems and payers given the health and economic benefits of influenza vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
Am J Public Health ; 107(6): 889-892, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28426315

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine the health insurance coverage options for Medicaid expansion enrollees if the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is repealed, using evidence from Ohio, where more than half a million adults have enrolled in the state's Medicaid program through the ACA expansion. METHODS: The Ohio Medicaid Assessment Survey interviewed 42 000 households in 2015. We report data from a unique battery of questions designed to identify insurance coverage immediately prior to Medicaid enrollment. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of new Medicaid enrollees in Ohio did not have a private health insurance option immediately before enrollment. These new enrollees are predominantly older, low-income Whites with a high school education or less. Only 5% of new Medicaid enrollees were eligible for an employer-sponsored insurance plan to which they could potentially return in the case of repeal of the ACA. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of Medicaid expansion enrollees would have no plausible pathway to obtaining private-sector insurance if the ACA were repealed. Demographic similarities between the expansion population and 2016 exit polls suggest that coverage losses would fall disproportionately on members of the winning Republican coalition.


Asunto(s)
Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Pobreza , Composición Familiar , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Medicaid/organización & administración , Ohio , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/organización & administración , Estados Unidos
5.
Adm Policy Ment Health ; 43(4): 524-34, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25966651

RESUMEN

This study provides insight to policy makers and stakeholders on how three types of benefits limits on Medicaid-covered mental health services might affect access for consumers diagnosed with severe mental illness. The study used a retrospective cohort design with data for Medicaid-covered, community-based mental health services provided in Ohio during fiscal year 2010. Log-binomial regression was used for the analysis. Results indicate that limits compared have significant, varying consequences based on Medicaid coverage and diagnoses. When constraining Medicaid costs, policy makers should consider how limits will disrupt care and include clinicians in discussions prior to implementation.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Gastos en Salud , Beneficios del Seguro , Medicaid , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Ohio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
6.
Cancer ; 120(4): 570-8, 2014 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24166217

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Navigators can facilitate timely access to cancer services, but to the authors' knowledge there are little data available regarding their economic impact. METHODS: The authors conducted a cost-consequence analysis of navigation versus usual care among 10,521 individuals with abnormal breast, cervical, colorectal, or prostate cancer screening results who enrolled in the Patient Navigation Research Program study from January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2010. Navigation costs included diagnostic evaluation, patient and staff time, materials, and overhead. Consequences or outcomes were time to diagnostic resolution and probability of resolution. Differences in costs and outcomes were evaluated using multilevel, mixed-effects regression modeling adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, language, marital status, insurance status, cancer, and site clustering. RESULTS: The majority of individuals were members of a minority (70.7%) and uninsured or publically insured (72.7%). Diagnostic resolution was higher for navigation versus usual care at 180 days (56.2% vs 53.8%; P = .008) and 270 days (70.0% vs 68.2%; P < .001). Although there were no differences in the average number of days to resolution between the 2 groups (110 days vs 109 days; P = .63), the probability of ever having diagnostic resolution was higher for the navigation group versus the usual-care group (84.5% vs 79.6%; P < .001). The added cost of navigation versus usual care was $275 per patient (95% confidence interval, $260-$290; P < .001). There was no significant difference in stage distribution among the 12.4% of patients in the navigation group vs 11% of the usual-care patients diagnosed with cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Navigation adds costs and modestly increases the probability of diagnostic resolution among patients with abnormal screening test results. Navigation is only likely to be cost-effective if improved resolution translates into an earlier cancer stage at the time of diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Grupos Minoritarios , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/patología , Factores de Tiempo
7.
Med Care ; 52(3): 202-7, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24309671

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Previous authors have answered "how many children in immigrant families are uninsured"; we do not know the inverse: "how many uninsured children live in immigrant families." This paper will show the total contribution of having an immigrant parent to the uninsured rate for children in the United States. DATA SOURCE: Secondary data from the 2008-2010 American Community Survey. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive analyses and a multinomial probit model illustrate the relationship between immigration history and insurance status. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In 2010, almost half (42%) of uninsured children lived in an immigrant family. State-level estimates range from a low of 4% in Maine to a high of 69% in California. Two thirds (69%) of these uninsured children are citizens; furthermore, 39% are Medicaid eligible, 39% are not eligible for Medicaid, and eligibility is unknown for the 21% that are low-income, noncitizens. CONCLUSIONS: In 2000, a third of all uninsured children lived in immigrant families. In 2010, 42% of all uninsured children lived in immigrant families. Initiatives to expand coverage or increase Medicaid and CHIP uptake will require decision makers to develop new policy and outreach approaches to enroll these children so they do not fall further behind.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Determinación de la Elegibilidad , Humanos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos
8.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 16(6): 786-93, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24474305

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Smoking prevalence is 49% among Medicaid enrollees in Ohio. The objective of this pilot project was to test a comprehensive tobacco dependence treatment program targeting rural Medicaid-enrolled smokers for both physician-level and smoker-level outcomes. METHODS: Using a group-randomized trial design, intervention group physicians (n = 4) were exposed to systems-level changes in their clinics, and smokers in these clinics were offered 12 weeks of telephone cessation counseling. Control group physicians (n = 4) were given the clinician's version of the U.S. Public Health Serivce (USPHS) Clinical Practice Guideline, and smokers in these clinics were given information about the Ohio Tobacco Quitline. Physician-level and smoker-level outcomes were assessed at 1 week and 3 months, respectively. Costs per quit were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 214 Medicaid smokers were enrolled. At 1 week, there were no reported differences in rates of being asked about tobacco use (68% intervention, 58% control) or advised to quit (69% intervention, 63% control). However, 30% of intervention and 56% of control smokers reported receiving a prescription for pharmacotherapy (p < .01). At 3 months, there were no differences in quit attempts (58% intervention, 64% control), use of pharmacotherapy (34% intervention, 46% control), or abstinence (24% intervention, 16% control for self-reported abstinence; 11% intervention, 3.5% control for cotinine-confirmed abstinence). The intervention group proved more cost-effective at achieving confirmed quits ($6,800 vs. $9,700). CONCLUSIONS: We found few differences in outcomes between physicians exposed to a brief intervention and physicians who were intensively trained. Future studies should examine how tobacco dependence treatment can be further expanded in Medicaid programs.


Asunto(s)
Medicaid , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Tabaquismo/terapia , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Consejo/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ohio , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Proyectos Piloto , Población Rural , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/economía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Teléfono , Tabaquismo/economía , Estados Unidos
9.
J Behav Health Serv Res ; 51(1): 132-145, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38017296

RESUMEN

Over the past decade, significant investments have been made in coordinated specialty care (CSC) models for first episode psychosis (FEP), with the goal of promoting recovery and preventing disability. CSC programs have proliferated as a result, but financing challenges imperil their growth and sustainability. In this commentary, the authors discuss (1) entrenched and emergent challenges in behavioral health policy of consequence for CSC financing; (2) implementation realities in the home rule context of Ohio, where significant variability exists across counties; and (3) recommendations to improve both care quality and access for individuals with FEP. The authors aim to provoke careful thought about policy interventions to bridge science-to-service gaps, and in this way, advance behavioral health equity.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Políticas , Ohio
10.
Psychiatr Serv ; 75(3): 295-298, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37731346

RESUMEN

In this study, the authors measured and described the costs of coordinated specialty care (CSC) for first-episode psychosis in Ohio. A microcosting tool was used to estimate personnel and nonpersonnel costs of service delivery at seven CSC programs. Average annual cost per participant (N=511 participants) was estimated as $17,810 (95% CI=$9,141-$26,479). On average, 61% (95% CI=53%-69%) of annual program costs were nonbillable. Key cost drivers included facility costs, administrative tasks, and social services. Novel financing models may redress reimbursement gaps incurred by CSC programs.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Ohio , Servicio Social
11.
Addict Sci Clin Pract ; 19(1): 23, 2024 04 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566249

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Communities That HEAL (CTH) is a novel, data-driven community-engaged intervention designed to reduce opioid overdose deaths by increasing community engagement, adoption of an integrated set of evidence-based practices, and delivering a communications campaign across healthcare, behavioral-health, criminal-legal, and other community-based settings. The implementation of such a complex initiative requires up-front investments of time and other expenditures (i.e., start-up costs). Despite the importance of these start-up costs in investment decisions to stakeholders, they are typically excluded from cost-effectiveness analyses. The objective of this study is to report a detailed analysis of CTH start-up costs pre-intervention implementation and to describe the relevance of these data for stakeholders to determine implementation feasibility. METHODS: This study is guided by the community perspective, reflecting the investments that a real-world community would need to incur to implement the CTH intervention. We adopted an activity-based costing approach, in which resources related to hiring, training, purchasing, and community dashboard creation were identified through macro- and micro-costing techniques from 34 communities with high rates of fatal opioid overdoses, across four states-Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio. Resources were identified and assigned a unit cost using administrative and semi-structured-interview data. All cost estimates were reported in 2019 dollars. RESULTS: State-level average and median start-up cost (representing 8-10 communities per state) were $268,657 and $175,683, respectively. Hiring and training represented 40%, equipment and infrastructure costs represented 24%, and dashboard creation represented 36% of the total average start-up cost. Comparatively, hiring and training represented 49%, purchasing costs represented 18%, and dashboard creation represented 34% of the total median start-up cost. CONCLUSION: We identified three distinct CTH hiring models that affected start-up costs: hospital-academic (Massachusetts), university-academic (Kentucky and Ohio), and community-leveraged (New York). Hiring, training, and purchasing start-up costs were lowest in New York due to existing local infrastructure. Community-based implementation similar to the New York model may have lower start-up costs due to leveraging of existing infrastructure, relationships, and support from local health departments.


Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Opiáceos , Humanos , Atención a la Salud , Massachusetts , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia
12.
Prev Med ; 57(2): 125-8, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23701846

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the associations between asthma, secondhand smoke exposure and healthcare utilization in a nationally representative sample of children. METHODS: Data from 5686 children aged 0-11 years were analyzed. Healthcare utilization, asthma diagnosis and demographic information came from the 2001 and 2006 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys. Secondhand smoke exposure was measured during the 2000 and 2005 National Health Interview Surveys. Multivariable regression models were used to determine the association between secondhand smoke exposure, asthma diagnosis and healthcare utilization (hospitalizations, emergency department visits, outpatient visits and prescription medication use). RESULTS: Asthma modified the relationship between secondhand smoke exposure and hospitalizations, as exposure more than doubled the odds of hospitalization among children with asthma but had no effect on children without asthma. Secondhand smoke exposure increased the odds by 37% of emergency room visits (P<0.001), but was not associated with outpatient visits or medication use. Children with asthma had a higher odds of utilizing all healthcare services (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Secondhand smoke exposure was associated with a greater utilization of hospitals and emergency departments, and the effect on hospitalizations was most pronounced among children with asthma. Reducing secondhand smoke exposure would help to reduce the burden on the healthcare system, especially among children with asthma.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/efectos adversos , Asma/etiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Gastos en Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
J Healthc Manag ; 58(2): 126-41; discussion 141-2, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23650697

RESUMEN

Not-for-profit (NFP) hospitals have come under increased public scrutiny for management practices that are inconsistent with their charitable focus. Of particular concern is the amount of community benefit provided by NFP hospitals compared to for-profit (FP) hospitals given the substantial tax benefits afforded to NFP hospitals. This study examines hospital ownership and community benefit provision beyond the traditional uncompensated care comparison by using broader measures of community benefit that capture charitable services, community assessment and partnership, and community-oriented health services. The study sample includes 3,317 nongovernment, general, acute care, community hospitals that were in operation in 2006. Data for this study came from the 2006 American Hospital Association Hospital Survey and the 2006 Area Resource File. We used multivariate regression analyses to examine the relationship between hospital ownership and five indicators of community benefit, controlling for hospital characteristics, market demand, hospital competition, and state regulations for community benefit. We found that NFP hospitals report more community benefit activities than do FP hospitals that extend beyond uncompensated care. Our findings underscore the importance of defining and including activities beyond uncompensated care when evaluating community benefit provided by NFP hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Hospitales Filantrópicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención no Remunerada/legislación & jurisprudencia , American Hospital Association , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/economía , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Regulación Gubernamental , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hospitales Filantrópicos/economía , Hospitales Filantrópicos/organización & administración , Humanos , Análisis Multivariante , Propiedad , Exención de Impuesto/legislación & jurisprudencia , Exención de Impuesto/normas , Atención no Remunerada/economía , Estados Unidos
14.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(12): e2349305, 2023 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38150255

RESUMEN

Importance: Although substantial research has reported grave population-level psychiatric sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence pertaining to temporal changes in schizophrenia spectrum disorders in the US following the pandemic remains limited. Objective: To examine the monthly patterns of emergency department (ED) visits for schizophrenia spectrum disorders after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational cohort study used time-series analyses to examine whether monthly counts of ED visits for schizophrenia spectrum disorders across 5 University of California (UC) campus health systems increased beyond expected levels during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data included ED visits reported by the 5 UC campuses from 2016 to 2021. Participants included persons who accessed UC Health System EDs had a diagnosis of a psychiatric condition. Data analysis was performed from March to June 2023. Exposures: The exposures were binary indicators of initial (March to May 2020) and extended (March to December 2020) phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was monthly counts of ED visits for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnosis codes, categorized within Clinical Classification Software groups, were used to identify ED visits for schizophrenia spectrum disorders and all other psychiatric ED visits, from the University of California Health Data Warehouse database, from January 2016 to December 2021. Time-series analyses controlled for autocorrelation, seasonality, and concurrent trends in ED visits for all other psychiatric conditions. Results: The study data comprised a total of 377 872 psychiatric ED visits, with 37 815 visits for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The prepandemic monthly mean (SD) number of ED visits for schizophrenia spectrum disorders was 519.9 (38.1), which increased to 558.4 (47.6) following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results from time series analyses, controlling for monthly counts of ED visits for all other psychiatric conditions, indicated 70.5 additional ED visits (95% CI, 11.7-129.3 additional visits; P = .02) for schizophrenia spectrum disorders at 1 month and 74.9 additional visits (95% CI, 24.0-126.0 visits; P = .005) at 3 months following the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in California. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found a 15% increase in ED visits for schizophrenia spectrum disorders within 3 months after the initial phase of the pandemic in California across 5 UC campus health systems, underscoring the importance of social policies related to future emergency preparedness and the need to strengthen mental health care systems.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Visitas a la Sala de Emergencias , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Análisis de Datos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Pandemias , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Universidades , California , Servicios de Salud Mental , Visitas a la Sala de Emergencias/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Sex Reprod Healthc ; 38: 100919, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37839215

RESUMEN

This study evaluates trends in long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) services among obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) and non-OB/GYNs in the U.S. during 2012-2018. Using public and private insurance claims from the Symphony Health database, we calculated the percentage of LARC insertions, removals, and reinsertions performed by OB/GYNs and non-OB/GYNs. We then assessed time trends with linear regression. The proportion of LARC services that were performed by non-OBGYNs increased modestly between 2012 and 2018. Increases were similar for insertions, removals, and reinsertions. Further research is needed to understand trends in LARC service provision within primary care to better tailor medical training and policy interventions.


Asunto(s)
Ginecología , Anticoncepción Reversible de Larga Duración , Humanos , Ginecología/educación , Personal de Salud , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Anticoncepción
16.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(4): e2311004, 2023 04 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37115541

RESUMEN

Importance: Women living in rural areas have lower rates of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening compared with women living in urban settings. Objective: To assess the comparative effectiveness of (1) a mailed, tailored digital video disc (DVD) intervention; (2) a DVD intervention plus telephonic patient navigation (DVD/PN); and (3) usual care with simultaneously increased adherence to any breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening that was not up to date at baseline and to assess cost-effectiveness. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial recruited and followed up women from rural Indiana and Ohio (community based) who were not up to date on any or all recommended cancer screenings. Participants were randomly assigned between November 28, 2016, and July 1, 2019, to 1 of 3 study groups (DVD, DVD/PN, or usual care). Statistical analyses were completed between August and December 2021 and between March and September 2022. Intervention: The DVD interactively assessed and provided messages for health beliefs, including risk of developing the targeted cancers and barriers, benefits, and self-efficacy for obtaining the needed screenings. Patient navigators counseled women on barriers to obtaining screenings. The intervention simultaneously supported obtaining screening for all or any tests outside of guidelines at baseline. Main Outcomes and Measures: Receipt of any or all needed cancer screenings from baseline through 12 months, including breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Binary logistic regression was used to compare the randomized groups on being up to date for all and any screenings at 12 months. Results: The sample included 963 women aged 50 to 74 years (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [6.3] years). The DVD group had nearly twice the odds of those in the usual care group of obtaining all needed screenings (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; 95% CI, 1.02-3.43; P = .048), and the odds were nearly 6 times greater for DVD/PN vs usual care (OR, 5.69; 95% CI, 3.24-10.5; P < .001). The DVD/PN intervention (but not DVD alone) was significantly more effective than usual care (OR, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.60-6.28; P < .001) for promoting at least 1 (ie, any) of the needed screenings at 12 months. Cost-effectiveness per woman who was up to date was $14 462 in the DVD group and $10 638 in the DVD/PN group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of rural women who were not up to date with at least 1 of the recommended cancer screenings (breast, cervical, or colorectal), an intervention designed to simultaneously increase adherence to any or all of the 3 cancer screening tests was more effective than usual care, available at relatively modest costs, and able to be remotely delivered, demonstrating great potential for implementing an evidence-based intervention in remote areas of the midwestern US. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02795104.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Navegación de Pacientes , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Ohio , Indiana
17.
J Gen Intern Med ; 27(9): 1159-64, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22528619

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities exist in many aspects of HIV/AIDS. Comorbid depression adds to the complexity of disease management. However, prior research does not clearly show an association between race and antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence, or depression and adherence. It is also not known whether the co-existence of depression modifies any racial differences that may exist. OBJECTIVE: To examine racial differences in ART adherence and whether the presence of comorbid depression moderates these differences among Medicaid-enrolled HIV-infected patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Multi-state Medicaid database (Thomson Reuters MarketScan®). PARTICIPANTS: Data for 7,034 HIV-infected patients with at least two months of antiretroviral drug claims between 2003 and 2007 were assessed. MAIN MEASURES: Antiretroviral therapy adherence (90 % days covered) were measured for a 12-month period. The main independent variables of interest were race and depression. Other covariates included patient variables, clinical variables (comorbidity and disease severity), and therapy-related variables. KEY RESULTS: In this study sample, over 66 % of patients were of black race, and almost 50 % experienced depression during the study period. A significantly higher portion of non-black patients were able to achieve optimal adherence (≥90 %) compared to black patients (38.6 % vs. 28.7 %, p < 0.001). In fact, black patients had nearly 30 % decreased odds of being optimally adherent to antiretroviral drugs compared to non-black patients (OR = 0.70, 95 % CI: 0.63-0.78), and was unchanged regard less of whether the patient had depression. Antidepressant treatment nearly doubled the odds of optimal ART adherence among patients with depression (OR = 1.92, 95 % CI: 1.12-3.29). CONCLUSIONS: Black race was significantly associated with worse ART adherence, which was not modified by the presence of depression. Under-diagnosis and under-treatment of depression may hinder ART adherence among HIV-infected patients of all races.


Asunto(s)
Antirretrovirales/uso terapéutico , Depresión/etnología , Infecciones por VIH/etnología , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/etnología , Pobreza/etnología , Grupos Raciales/etnología , Adulto , Antirretrovirales/economía , Antidepresivos/economía , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/economía , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pobreza/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
Community Ment Health J ; 48(5): 604-10, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21710209

RESUMEN

Over the past 20 years, states have increasingly moved away from centrally financed, state-operated facilities to financing models built around community-based service delivery mechanisms. This paper identifies four important broad factors to consider when developing a funding formula to allocate state funding for community mental health services to local boards in an equitable manner, based on local community need: (1) funding factors used by other states; (2) state specific legislative requirements; (3) data availability; and (4) local variation of factors in the funding formula. These considerations are illustrated with the recent experience of Ohio using available evidence and data sources to develop a new community-based allocation formula. We discuss opportunities for implementing changes in formula based mental health funding related to Medicaid expansions for low income adults scheduled to go into effect under the new Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/organización & administración , Programas de Gobierno/economía , Desarrollo de Programa/economía , Asignación de Recursos , Planes Estatales de Salud/economía , Adulto , Humanos , Medicaid/economía , Ohio , Características de la Residencia , Asignación de Recursos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
19.
Am J Hematol ; 86(3): 273-7, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21328441

RESUMEN

While laboratory and clinical benefits of hydroxyurea for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are well-established, few data describe the extent and implications of non-adherence. We sought to assess adherence to hydroxyurea among patients with SCD and investigate associations between adherence and clinical and economic outcomes. Insurance claims of North Carolina Medicaid enrollees (6/2000-8/2008) with SCD were analyzed. Inclusion criteria included age < 65 years, continuous Medicaid enrollment ≥ 12 months before and following hydroxyurea initiation, and ≥ 2 hydroxyurea prescriptions. Three hundred twelve patients, mean age 21 (± 12.2) years, met inclusion criteria and 35% were adherent, defined as a medication possession ration (MPR) ≥ 0.80; mean MPR was 0.60. In the 12 months following hydroxyurea initiation, adherence was associated with reduced risk of SCD-related hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65, p = .0351), all-cause and SCD-related emergency department visit (HR = 0.72, p = .0388; HR = 0.58, p =.0079, respectively), and vaso-occlusive event (HR = 0.66, p = .0130). Adherence was associated with reductions in health care costs such as all-cause and SCD-related inpatient (-$5,286, p < .0001; -$4,403, p < .0001, respectively), ancillary care (-$1,336, p < .0001; -$836, p < .0001, respectively), vaso-occlusive event-related (-$5,793, p < .0001), and total costs (-$6,529, p < .0001; -$5,329, p <.0001, respectively). Adherence to hydroxyurea among SCD patients appears suboptimal and better adherence is associated with improved clinical and economic outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Anemia de Células Falciformes/tratamiento farmacológico , Anemia de Células Falciformes/economía , Hidroxiurea/uso terapéutico , Medicaid , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anemia de Células Falciformes/complicaciones , Niño , Recolección de Datos , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Hidroxiurea/economía , Masculino , North Carolina , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Enfermedades Vasculares , Adulto Joven
20.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 12: 21501319211069473, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34939505

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Federally-funded community health centers (CHCs) serve on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic, providing essential COVID-19 testing and care for vulnerable patient populations. Overlooked in the scholarly literature is a description of how different characteristics and vulnerabilities shaped COVID-19 care delivery at CHCs in the first year of the pandemic. Our research objective was to identify organization- and state-level factors associated with more or fewer COVID-19 care and testing visits at CHCs in 2020. METHODS: Multilevel random intercept regression models examined associations among organization and state-level predictor variables and the frequency of COVID-19 care and testing visits at CHCs in 2020. The study sample included 1267 CHCs across the 50 states and the District of Columbia. RESULTS: The average CHC provided 932 patient visits for COVID-19-related care in 2020. Yet, the CHC's role in delivering COVID-19 services proved as diverse as the populations and localities CHCs serve. For example, after adjusting for other factors, each percentage-point increase in a CHC's Hispanic patient population size was associated with a 1.3% increase in the frequency of patient visits for COVID-19 care in 2020 (P < .001). Serving a predominantly rural patient population was associated with providing significantly fewer COVID-19-related care visits (P = .002). Operating in a state that enacted a mask-wearing policy in 2020 was associated with a 26.2% lower frequency of COVID-19 testing visits at CHCs in 2020, compared to CHCs operating in states without mask-wearing policies (P = .055). CONCLUSIONS: In response to the pandemic, the federal government legislated funding to help CHCs address challenges associated with COVID-19 and provide services to medically-underserved patient populations. Policymakers will likely need to provide additional support to help CHCs address population-specific vulnerabilities affecting COVID-19 care and testing delivery, especially as highly contagious COVID-19 variants proliferate (eg, Delta and Omicron).


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Comunitarios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Política de Salud , Humanos , Máscaras , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA