RESUMEN
A man in his 80s was referred to our hospital for further examination of partial pancreatic atrophy that was detected incidentally. Various imaging examinations including CT, MRI, and EUS did not reveal any obvious abnormal findings other than the partial pancreatic atrophy. However, cytological examination of serial pancreatic juice aspiration showed atypical cells. The presence of pancreatic intraepithelial carcinoma in the atrophy site was considered, and the patient underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Pathological examination of the excised specimen confirmed the presence of high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia consistent with the atrophy site, and the patient was diagnosed with pTisN0M0, Stage 0 pancreatic cancer. For the detection of early pancreatic cancer, it is important to be aware of partial pancreatic atrophy on imaging studies.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma in Situ , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Masculino , Atrofia/patología , Carcinoma in Situ/cirugía , Páncreas/patología , Pancreatectomía , Jugo Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the choice of either unilateral or bilateral drainage in stent placement for patients with unresectable hilar biliary obstruction. The aim of the present study was to clarify which drainage method is superior. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 82 patients with hilar biliary obstruction who underwent metallic stenting. These patients were divided into a unilateral drainage group (Uni group) and a bilateral drainage group (Bi group). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in median survival time, median stent patency period, and median complication-free survival time. The most frequent complication was stent obstruction, followed by cholangitis. Liver abscess was found at a higher frequency in the Bi group (17.6%) than in the Uni group (1.5%) (P=0.0266). There was no significant difference between the groups in the occurrence of two or more complications (P=0.247), life-threatening severe complications (P=0.0577), and stent obstruction by sludge (P=0.0912). CONCLUSION: When compared with bilateral biliary drainage, unilateral biliary drainage is associated with a lower incidence of liver abscess as well as a comparable outcome of stent patency time and complication-free survival. We therefore propose that hilar biliary obstruction can be treated first by unilateral drainage with a metallic stent and by bilateral drainage only in patients who develop cholangitis in the contralateral biliary tree.
Asunto(s)
Colestasis/terapia , Drenaje/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
We report the successful retrieval of an impacted mechanical lithotripsy basket. In a patient with two large common bile duct stones, the basket with the entrapped stone was impacted within the mid-common bile duct. We then attempted to use another mechanical lithotripter; however the central wire of the basket fractured at the handle portion. Grasping a few wires of the impacted basket with rat-tooth forceps allowed the wires of the basket to slip away from the stone. The present report describes the safe and effective use of rat-tooth forceps in the management of an impacted lithotripter basket.