Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 74
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 65(11): e27312, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30070020

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Thalassemia major (TM) is an inherited disorder caused by ineffective erythropoiesis. At the present time, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a curative option. Conventional busulfan and cyclophosphamide based myeloablative conditioning regimens are limited by increased toxicity, especially in high-risk patients. Replacement of cyclophosphamide with fludarabine has reduced toxicity and nonrelapse mortality (NRM), thus improving outcomes. We analyzed long-term data of our fludarabine-based myeloablative, reduced toxicity protocol, specifically in high-risk patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 47 consecutive patients with TM undergoing allo-SCT from matched donors, using the fludarabine-based regimen (reduced toxicity regimen). The median age of the cohort was 10 years. Thirty-eight patients (80%) were in the high-risk and nine patients (20%) were in the low-risk category. The primary aim of this analysis was thalassemia-free survival (TFS). RESULTS: The rejection rate was 11% within high-risk patients with NRM of 2%. With a median follow-up period of 7 years (1-15 years), the 10-year TFS in the entire cohort was 87%, and the overall survival (OS) was 97%. The 10-year TFS and OS among the low-risk and high-risk groups were 90% versus 84%, respectively (P = 0.45) and 100% versus 96%, respectively (P = 0.5), and both subsets of patients did equally well. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, replacement of high-dose cyclophosphamide with fludarabine is well tolerated with minimal regimen-related toxicity and acceptable rejection rates, especially in high-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Agonistas Mieloablativos/uso terapéutico , Talasemia/cirugía , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Busulfano/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Homólogo/métodos , Vidarabina/uso terapéutico
2.
Hematol Oncol ; 35(4): 797-803, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27338621

RESUMEN

The probability of achieving long term remission for patients with refractory acute leukaemia is very low. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is offered to these patients in order to improve their dismal outcome. We retrospectively analyzed 361 acute leukaemia patients, who underwent allogeneic SCT in the Hadassah's bone marrow transplantation department between the years 2005 and 2012 and identified 84 patients with active leukaemia at transplantation. Median age was 34 years. Sixty four patients were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), 18 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and two with biphenotypic leukaemia. The majority of patients were diagnosed with de-novo AML and transplanted at relapse. In the surviving patients, median follow up was 15 months. One year OS was 20%. At time of last follow up, 13 patients were alive (15.5%): ten patients with AML and two patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. In the univariate analysis, factors associated with significantly better overall survival were as follows: matched unrelated donor (p = 0.006), matched donor (p = 0.014) and occurrence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (p = 0.019). Karnofsky performance score at SCT and occurrence of cGVHD were found to be borderline significant. Only matched unrelated donor and aGVHD were found to affect overall survival significantly in the multivariate analysis. Other than performance score at SCT, none of the pretransplant patients' characteristics were found to influence survival. In conclusion, as none of the pretransplant characteristics were found to influence the ability to select the patients that will benefit from HSC transplantation, this work supports offering HSCT to all active leukaemia eligible patients with reasonable performance status. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
3.
Br J Haematol ; 169(1): 44-56, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25496030

RESUMEN

ImMucin, a 21-mer cancer vaccine encoding the signal peptide domain of the MUC1 tumour-associated antigen, possesses a high density of T- and B-cell epitopes but preserves MUC1 specificity. This phase I/II study assessed the safety, immunity and clinical response to 6 or 12 bi-weekly intradermal ImMucin vaccines, co-administered with human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to 15 MUC1-positive multiple myeloma (MM) patients, with residual or biochemically progressive disease following autologous stem cell transplantation. Vaccination was well tolerated; all adverse events were temporal grade 1 2 and spontaneously resolved. ImMucin vaccination induced a robust increase in γ-interferon (IFN-γ-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells (≤80-fold), a pronounced population of ImMucin multimer CD8+ T-cells (>2%), a 9·4-fold increase in peripheral blood mononuclear cells proliferation and 6·8-fold increase in anti-ImMucin antibodies, accompanied with T-cell and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. A significant decrease in soluble MUC1 levels was observed in 9/10 patients. Stable disease or improvement, persisting for 17·5-41·3 months (ongoing) was achieved in 11/15 patients and appeared to be associated with low-intermediate PDL1 (CD274) bone marrow levels pre- and post-vaccination. In summary, ImMucin, a highly tolerable cancerous vaccine, induces robust, diversified T- and B-cell ImMucin-specific immunity in MM patients, across major histocompatibility complex-barrier, resulting in at least disease stabilization in most patients.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/administración & dosificación , Epítopos de Linfocito B/administración & dosificación , Epítopos de Linfocito T/administración & dosificación , Mucina-1/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Señales de Clasificación de Proteína , Vacunación , Anciano , Antígeno B7-H1/sangre , Antígeno B7-H1/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/metabolismo , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/patología , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/metabolismo , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/patología , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/farmacología , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Epítopos de Linfocito B/inmunología , Epítopos de Linfocito T/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Interferón gamma/sangre , Interferón gamma/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucina-1/inmunología , Mieloma Múltiple/sangre , Mieloma Múltiple/inmunología
4.
Support Care Cancer ; 23(1): 223-36, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25189149

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Hematology-oncology patients undergoing chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients are at risk for oral complications which may cause significant morbidity and a potential risk of mortality. This emphasizes the importance of basic oral care prior to, during and following chemotherapy/HSCT. While scientific evidence is available to support some of the clinical practices used to manage the oral complications, expert opinion is needed to shape the current optimal protocols. METHODS: This position paper was developed by members of the Oral Care Study Group, Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) in attempt to provide guidance to the health care providers managing these patient populations. RESULTS: The protocol on basic oral care outlined in this position paper is presented based on the following principles: prevention of infections, pain control, maintaining oral function, the interplay with managing oral complications of cancer treatment and improving quality of life. CONCLUSION: Using these fundamental elements, we developed a protocol to assist the health care provider and present a practical approach for basic oral care. Research is warranted to provide robust scientific evidence and to enhance this clinical protocol.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea/efectos adversos , Atención Odontológica , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Salud Bucal , Higiene Bucal , Médula Ósea , Células de la Médula Ósea/citología , Protocolos Clínicos , Femenino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Manejo del Dolor , Calidad de Vida
5.
Mycoses ; 58(12): 694-8, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26429354

RESUMEN

Invasive fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We evaluated, in our allogeneic stem cell transplant patients, the effect on the incidence of invasive fungal infection during neutropenia of a strategy combining a diagnostic-driven approach with chemoprophylaxis during higher risk periods of graft vs. host disease and prolonged neutropenia, using itraconazole oral solution with parenteral voriconazole bridging. One hundred and thirty patients admitted for allogeneic stem cell transplantation within two predefined 20 month periods were included in the study. Data for all patients were collected prospectively. Implementation of the protocol resulted in the administration of more prophylactic antifungals to more patients. Following implementation, there was a non-significant decrease in the overall number of invasive fungal infections (IFI) [11 of 65 patients (17.2%) vs. 4 of 65 patients (6.2%, P = 0.051)], as well as in the occurrence of invasive mould infections [8 of 65 patients (12.5%) vs. 2 of 65 patients (3.1%, P = 0.054)]. Survival rates at three and 6 months were not significantly affected. A combined diagnostic-driven approach and antifungal prophylaxis with oral itraconazole and an intravenous voriconazole bridging protocol, was associated with a reduced, albeit non-statistically significant, number of IFI in our medical centre.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Itraconazol/administración & dosificación , Micosis/epidemiología , Infecciones Oportunistas/epidemiología , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Quimioprevención/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Protocolos Clínicos , Femenino , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & control , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Micosis/diagnóstico , Micosis/prevención & control , Neutropenia/complicaciones , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Oportunistas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Oportunistas/prevención & control , Soluciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos , Voriconazol/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven
6.
J Infect Dis ; 209(4): 557-61, 2014 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23983215

RESUMEN

We examined the rate, clinical impact, and risk factors of cytomegalovirus (CMV) drug resistance in 561 patients who underwent 616 hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCTs) over 5 years. Drug resistance was exclusively identified in haploidentical (haplo)-HSCT recipients receiving preemptive therapy, among whom the rate was 14.5%. Resistance appeared after prolonged treatment (median, 70 days), was associated with higher preceding viral load (P < .001), and was the strongest predictor for disease by multivariate analysis. The high rate of drug resistance as interlinked with severe disease in haplo-HSCT recipients suggests the potential advantage of prophylactic over preemptive treatment in high-risk patients and highlights the need for better-tolerable anti-CMV drugs.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/prevención & control , Citomegalovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Niño , Citomegalovirus/genética , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/virología , Farmacorresistencia Viral , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Fosfotransferasas (Aceptor de Grupo Alcohol)/genética , Estudios Prospectivos
7.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal ; 19(3): e212-9, 2014 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24121920

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) often suffer from dry mouth and oral mucosal lesions. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the safety of an intra-oral electrostimulator (GenNarino) in symptomatic cGVHD patients. The secondary objective was to study the impact on the salivary gland involvement of cGVHD patients. STUDY DESIGN: This paper presents a case series. The study included patients treated for 4 weeks, randomly assigned to the active device and then crossed-over to a sham-device or vice versa. The patients and clinicians were blind to the treatment delivered. Data regarding oral mucosal and salivary gland involvement were collected. RESULTS: Six patients were included in this series. Most of the intraoral areas with manifestations of cGVHD were not in contact with the GenNarino device. Two patients developed mild mucosal lesions in areas in contact with the GenNarino during the study. However, only one of them had a change in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) score for oral cGVHD. The unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rate increased in 4 out of the 5 patients included in this analysis. Symptoms of dry mouth and general oral comfort improved. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that GenNarino is safe in cGVHD patients with respect to oral tissues. Furthermore the use of GenNarino resulted in subjective and objective improvements in dry mouth symptoms. A large scale study is needed to confirm the impact and safety of GenNarino on systemic cGVHD.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/complicaciones , Xerostomía/etiología , Xerostomía/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Glándulas Salivales , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 18(1): 134-40, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21703973

RESUMEN

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) frequently involves oral tissues. Although the mucosal changes may be painful and impair oral function, there is currently no topical therapy available for oral cGVHD that has been proven to work in an evidence-based manner. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the response of patients with oral cGVHD to various doses of a new topical budesonide formulation; (2) evaluate the efficacy and safety of the new topical budesonide formulation in these patients. An open, randomized, multicenter phase II pilot study with 4 treatment arms differing in application frequency and duration was performed. Response to treatment was scored by the clinician and patient using several scales. Oral cGVHD improved in all patients, with a median reduction of 70%. Pain reduction was similar in all study arms. The rate of objective improvement (defined as ≥50%) was not significantly different among the 4 study arms. The safety profile was satisfactory. Topical budesonide mouthwash (3 mg/10 mL) improved oral cGVHD in all patients when applied for 5 or 10 minutes, 2 or 3 times daily. The response was similar in all treatment arms. Safety analysis supported a dosing schedule of 3 mg of budesonide 3 times a day for 10 minutes.


Asunto(s)
Budesonida/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Tópica , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antisépticos Bucales/administración & dosificación , Proyectos Piloto , Comprimidos/administración & dosificación
11.
Transpl Int ; 25(12): 1241-7, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22974004

RESUMEN

Cyclosporine (CSA) is the most commonly used medication for GVHD prophylaxis. The initiation time varies from day -4 to day 0. Initially, we gave CSA starting on day -1. However, since 2003 we have changed CSA initiation timing policy in most of our protocols to day -4, to achieve stable and controlled pretransplant CSA levels. Here, we assessed if initiation time impact the outcome of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Data of 261 patients who underwent allo-SCT for hematological malignancies from a fully matched donor, treated with CSA as a single agent for GVHD prophylaxis were prospectively collected. Patients were divided according to CSA initiation time and analyzed for outcome. The acute GVHD severity, cGVHD extent, GVHD-associated mortality were significantly lower in the CSA -4 group. There was no difference in the rate and timing of acute or chronic GVHD. Overall survival did not differ between the groups. We conclude that the initiation of CSA at day -4 reduced the severity of aGVHD, extent of cGVHD, and GVHD-associated mortality without impact on overall survival.


Asunto(s)
Ciclosporina/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & control , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/cirugía , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante Homólogo , Vidarabina/uso terapéutico
12.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 17(9): 1282-8, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21220033

RESUMEN

In the mid-1990s, we introduced a fludarabine (Flu)-based conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with Fanconi anemia (FA).The aim of this study is to compare Flu-based conditioning to alternative regimens in patients with FA. Forty-one patients with FA (aged 0.5-31, median, 10.3 years) who underwent allogeneic HSCT were included in this retrospective study. Hospital records were reviewed for conditioning regimens, engraftment data, and toxicity. The median (range) follow-up was 32 (0.5-149) months. Flu-based conditioning regimens were used in 24 patients: 17 patients were treated with alternative conditioning regimens including a radiation-based regimen/cyclophosphamide and busulfan regimen. The disease-free survival (DFS) after Flu-based regimens is 83% (20/24) versus 35% (6/17) for the alternative regimens (P = .002). Toxicity was significantly lower in patients who received Flu-based conditioning (modified Bearman toxicity score [P = .001]). Seven patients received transplants from matched unrelated donors without irradiation (5 of whom are currently alive and well). All patients who survived are disease free and in good clinical condition. We conclude that a combination of fludarabine with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and low-dose cyclophosphamide (Cy) and/or busulfan (Bu) is safe, demonstrates low rejection rates, and is well tolerated by FA patients.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/métodos , Anemia de Fanconi/terapia , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Suero Antilinfocítico/uso terapéutico , Busulfano/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Lactante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vidarabina/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
13.
Radiology ; 258(3): 660-71, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21339345

RESUMEN

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an increasingly available treatment option for patients with various oncologic, hematologic, and immunologic diseases. Although HSCT can be curative for some diseases, complications associated with this treatment limit its success and applicability. Gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and hepatic veno-occlusive disease are unique and deadly complications of HSCT. These diseases can mimic other HSCT complications, such as infection, hemorrhage, and hepatotoxicity with cholestasis, but GVHD and veno-occlusive disease require specific treatment. Early treatment improves the probability of treatment success. For these reasons, timely and accurate diagnosis is essential. Abdominal imaging and intervention play an important role in the early, minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment of GVHD and veno-occlusive disease. Imaging findings tend to be nonspecific, but common findings that may guide further management or establish a diagnosis in the clinical setting have been defined. In cases where the diagnosis is unclear and liver biopsy is required, image-guided transvenous liver biopsy may be a safer and more practical option than the transcutaneous approach. Image-guided interventions, including intraarterial steroid-injection therapy in severe, systemic steroid-refractory GVHD and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement in veno-occlusive disease with portal hypertension, have shown some promise in small, uncontrolled series. Larger, controlled studies are needed to define the role of these invasive procedures in this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/etiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/terapia , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/terapia , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/terapia , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional , Radiografía Abdominal , Radiografía Intervencional , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
14.
Lancet Oncol ; 11(4): 331-8, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20117965

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplants now use peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) instead of bone-marrow transplantation (BMT). Long-term data on outcome and late effects of PBPCT compared with BMT are scarce. Here we present long-term data from a randomised study comparing PBPCT with BMT. METHODS: Between February, 1995, and September, 1999, 329 patients with leukaemia received either PBPCT (n=163) or BMT (n=166) from HLA-identical sibling donors after central randomisation accounting for stratification criteria. Follow-up data were collected via questionnaires from 87% (176 of 202; 84 PBPCT, 92 BMT) patients who survived for more than 3 years (median of 9.3 years) after transplantation. Efficacy analyses included all patients who received treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01020175. FINDINGS: 10-year overall survival was 49.1% for patients who underwent PBPCT and 56.5% for patients who underwent BMT (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.60-1.15; p=0.27). Leukaemia-free survival was 28.3% with BMT versus 13.0% with PBPCT (0.61, CI 0.32-1.16; p=0.12) for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; 62.3% with BMT versus 47.1% with PBPCT for acute myeloid leukaemia (0.67, 0.39-1.16; p=0.16); and 40.2% with BMT versus 48.5% with PBPCT for chronic myeloid leukaemia (1.12, 0.73-1.74; p=0.60). More patients developed chronic graft-versus-host disease after PBPCT (n=56, 73%) than after BMT (n=46, 56%; p=0.021), with more frequent involvement of skin, liver, and oral mucosa, and more patients who underwent PBPCT needed immunosuppressive treatment 5 years after transplantation (n=20, 26%) than patients who had BMT (n=10, 12%; p=0.024). Nonetheless, there was no difference in performance status, return to work, incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans, and haematopoietic function between the two groups. 14 cases of secondary malignancies occurred (five after BMT, nine after PBPCT), resulting in a cumulative incidence of 3% and 7% after BMT and PBPCT (p=0.17), respectively. INTERPRETATION: More than 9 years after transplantation, overall and leukaemia-free survival remain similar in patients who underwent BMT and PBPCT. Differences in the incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease and the duration of immunosuppression exist, but do not affect survival, general health status, or late events. FUNDING: No external funding was received.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Leucemia/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica , Adolescente , Adulto , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica/efectos adversos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(16)2021 Aug 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34439244

RESUMEN

Current standard frontline therapy for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (NDMM) involves induction therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and maintenance therapy. Major efforts are underway to understand the biological and the clinical impacts of each stage of the treatment protocols on overall survival statistics. The most routinely used drugs in the pre-ASCT "induction" regime have different mechanisms of action and are employed either as monotherapies or in various combinations. Aside from their direct effects on cancer cell mortality, these drugs are also known to have varying effects on immune cell functionality. The question remains as to how induction therapy impacts post-ASCT immune reconstitution and anti-tumor immune responses. This review provides an update on the known immune effects of melphalan, dexamethasone, lenalidomide, and bortezomib commonly used in the induction phase of MM therapy. By analyzing the actions of each individual drug on the immune system, we suggest it might be possible to leverage their effects to rationally devise more effective induction regimes. Given the genetic heterogeneity between myeloma patients, it may also be possible to identify subgroups of patients for whom particular induction drug combinations would be more appropriate.

16.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 62(11): 2747-2754, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34013829

RESUMEN

Platelet recovery after allogeneic umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation is delayed compared to other graft sources. We conducted a multicenter phase 2a study to explore whether eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin-receptor agonist, would enhance platelet recovery after UCB transplantation. Between 02/2013 and 07/2016, 12 (10 adults, 2 children) individuals (median age 50; range 6-74 years) with hematological malignancies in complete remission were enrolled. Eltrombopag was given for a median of 76 (range 15-175) days and was safe even at doses of 300 mg/day. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 23 (range 16-40) days. Median time to platelets >20,000/µl and >50,000/µl was 55 (range 25-199) and 66 (range 31-230) days, respectively. A historical cohort comparison did not reveal an advantage for eltrombopag. In conclusion, in the present study eltrombopag seems safe. Based on our limited data, it seems unlikely that eltrombopag could enhance platelet engraftment after UCB transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre del Cordón Umbilical , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Benzoatos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Humanos , Hidrazinas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirazoles , Adulto Joven
17.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 16(1): 62-9, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19733252

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to validate the 2005-2006 National Institutes of Health (NIH) scale for patient's self-reporting and clinical manifestations of oral chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Numerical parameters of the NIH scale were analyzed for their construct validity (correlation of the NIH scale with numerical rating scale [NRS] for pain) and internal consistency reliability (correlation between different parameters of the same scale). Categoric parameters were analyzed by comparison between severity subgroups defined by the oral manifestation (lichenoid/erythema/ulceration). Analysis included data of 75 evaluations. The total NIH score and the NRS for pain were found to be moderately correlated (r=0.449). Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was .718. Strong correlations were found between the total NIH score and both erythema and ulceration scores (r=0.746 and r=0.926, respectively). The difference between the 2 "severe" subgroups (ie, lichenoid and erythema/ulceration) was significant (P=.025). The difference between the moderate-erythema/ulceration subgroup and the severe-lichenoid subgroup was nonsignificant (total NIH score and NRS for pain: P=.276 and .291, respectively). The correlation between the total NIH score and the NRS for pain is only moderate. The internal consistency reliability analysis yielded good reliability, especially for erythema and ulceration. Analysis of categoric parameters suggests that the NIH scale disproportionately differentiates between moderate-erythema/ulceration and severe-lichenoid cGVHD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/clasificación , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de la Boca/diagnóstico , Mucosa Bucal , Medicina Oral/instrumentación , Dolor/clasificación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/complicaciones , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/fisiopatología , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de la Boca/etiología , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Úlceras Bucales/etiología , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Estadística como Asunto , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
18.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 59(10): 1511-9, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20563804

RESUMEN

The feasibility and safety of immunotherapy mediated by intentionally mismatched rIL-2 activated killer lymphocytes (IMAK) with no prior stem cell engraftment was investigated in patients with advanced chemotherapy-resistant hematological malignancies and metastatic solid tumors. Our goals were to maximize anti-cancer activity by using intentionally mismatched donor lymphocytes; amplify killing of target cancer cells by rIL-2 activation of killer cells in vitro and in vivo, and avoid the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by anticipated rejection of alloreactive donor lymphocytes. Conditioning consisted of 5 days of fludarabine 25 mg/m(2) or a single dose of cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2), 2 subcutaneous injections of alpha interferon (IFN) 3 x 10(6) and COX2 inhibitors, followed by administration of IMAK (65 +/- 5 CD3(+)CD56(-); 17 +/- 5 CD3(-)CD56(+)) in conjunction with low dose subcutaneous rIL-2 (6 x 10(6) IU/m(2)/day) for 5 days for continuous activation of alloreactive donor lymphocytes prior to their anticipated rejection. Here, we present our phase 1 clinical study data in a cohort of 40 high-risk patients with metastatic solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Treatment was accompanied by some malaise and occasional self-limited fever but otherwise well tolerated on an outpatient basis. Transient engraftment of donor cells was documented in two patients and only one developed self-limited grade 1 GVHD. Among patients with chemotherapy-resistant disease, long-term progression-free survival was recorded in 5 of 21 evaluable patients with metastatic solid tumors and in four of five patients with hematological malignancies. We conclude that the proposed procedure is feasible, safe, and potentially effective, with some otherwise resistant cancer patients long-term disease-free, thus justifying larger Phase II studies in patients with hematological malignancies and metastatic solid tumors, preferably at a stage of minimal residual disease with the goal in mind to eradicate all malignant cells at an early stage of the disease.


Asunto(s)
Células Asesinas Inducidas por Citocinas/trasplante , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Inmunoterapia , Interleucina-2/farmacología , Activación de Linfocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Interleucina-2/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacología , Factores de Riesgo , Linfocitos T/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T/trasplante , Adulto Joven
19.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 15(4): 483-9, 2009 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19285636

RESUMEN

The failure of allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) is cumbersome. We analyzed our experience in a second allo-SCT. Between the years 1981 and 2007, 144 patients underwent 2 or more allo-SCT. The first to second transplant interval ranged from 18 days to 13.25 years (median 98 days). The most frequent indications for the second SCT were activity of the basic disease (78), rejection (37), and engraftment failure (25). Twenty-nine of the 144 (20%) patients transplanted survived more then a year with treatment-related mortality of 45.5% as the leading cause of death. Interestingly, despite the low rate of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis used, only 51 and 16 of the patients developed acute and chronic GVHD (aGVHD, cGVHD), respectively. Factors indicating higher likelihood for survival were nonmalignant disease, a nonrelapse indication for the second SCT, full HLA-matching, and the use of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). Age at transplantation, time interval between transplants, the development of GVHD, conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis, or graft source were not shown to influence the prognosis. With a median follow-up of 4.5 years, 25 patients (17.2%) are alive, and 18 are disease-free. We conclude that although toxic, a second allo-SCT can lead to long-term survival.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/mortalidad , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & control , Trasplante de Células Madre , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Enfermedad Crónica , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trasplante Homólogo
20.
Cytotherapy ; 11(1): 61-7, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19191054

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AIMS: We have shown previously that alefacept is effective in acute steroid resistant/dependent and chronic extensive graft versus host disease (GvHD) with a protocol using timings similar to those used for psoriasis treatment. In this study, we describe the use of an alefacept induction (e.g. for 7 consecutive days) followed by a bi-weekly maintenance treatment in combination with tacrolimus for acute steroid resistant/dependent GvHD 1, 3. METHODS: Sixteen patients were treated in this cohort, most with refractory GvHD. The pre-treatment GvHD grade ranged from 2 to 4 (median 3), involving the skin 16, gut 11 and liver 5. RESULTS: Twelve out of the 16 patients showed a response. As with the first protocol, the response of GvHD in the skin was fastest. In contrast to our previous protocol, however, the gastro-intestinal (GI) GvHD response was faster (P=0.05 compared with the first cohort). A hepatic response was seen in 4/6 patients and was complete in three. All responses were durable, including mucocutaneous, gut and liver GvHD. In all responding patients we were able to decrease the steroid dose significantly and in seven it was completely withdrawn. CONCLUSION: Alefacept induction is safe in acute steroid resistant/dependent GvHD and may be more effective therapeutically than our previous alefacept protocol. We speculate that alefacept initiates an allo-versus-allo cellular effect through its Fc receptor.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Alefacept , Niño , Preescolar , Protocolos Clínicos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/mortalidad , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/patología , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/efectos adversos , Tacrolimus/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA