RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The positive aspects of social interaction on health have been described often, with considerably less attention to their negative aspect. This study aimed to assess the impact of social associations on cardiovascular mortality in the United States. METHODS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) data sets from 2016 to 2020 were used to identify death records due to cardiovascular disease in the United States population aged 15 years and older. The social association rate defined as membership associations per 10,000 population, accessed from the 2020 County Health Rankings data was used as a surrogate for social participation. All United States counties were grouped into quartiles based on their social association rate; Q1 being the lowest quartile of social association, and Q4 the highest quartile. Age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) was calculated for each quartile. County health factor rankings for the state of Texas were used to adjust the AAMR for baseline comorbidities of county population, using Gaussian distribution linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, the AAMR was highest in the 4th social association rate quartile (306.73 [95% CI, 305.72-307.74]) and lowest in the 1st social association rate quartile (266.80 [95% CI, 266.41-267.20]). The mortality rates increased in a linear pattern from lowest to highest social association rate quartiles. After adjustment for the county health factor ranks of Texas, higher social association rate remained associated with a significantly higher AAMR (coefficient 15.84 [95% CI, 12.78-18.89]). CONCLUSIONS: Our study reported higher cardiovascular AAMR with higher social associations in the United States, with similar results after adjustment for County Health Rankings in the state of Texas.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Estudios TransversalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is frequently employed in patients with end-stage heart failure. The outcomes of addressing the repair of all substantial aortic valvular disease at the time of LVAD implantation remain unclear. We sought to assess the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation concomitant with aortic valve procedures (AVPs) compared with isolated LVAD implantation. METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception till June 2022. Primary outcomes included short-term mortality and long-term survival. Random effects models were used to compute mean differences and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 14 observational studies (N = 52 693) met our inclusion criteria. Concomitant LVAD implantation and AVPs were associated with higher short-term mortality (OR = 1.61 [95% CI, 1.06-2.42]; p = 0.02) and mean CPBt (MD = 43.25 [95% CI, 22.95-63.56]; p < 0.0001), and reduced long-term survival (OR = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55-0.88]; p = 0.003) compared with isolated LVAD implantation. No difference in the odds of cerebrovascular accident (OR = 1.05 [95% CI, 0.79-1.39]; p = 0.74) and mean length of hospital stay (MD = 2.89 [95% CI, -4.04 to 9.82]; p = 0.41) was observed between the two groups. On adjusted analysis, short-term mortality was significantly higher in the LVAD group with concurrent AVPs when compared with the isolated LVAD group (aHR = 1.50 [95% CI, 1.20-1.87]; p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent AVPs were associated with higher short-term mortality and reduced long-term survival in patients undergoing LVAD implantation compared with isolated LVAD implantation.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos , Humanos , Válvula Aórtica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyze trends of 30-day readmission and find high-risk patients associated with increased risk of mortality, resource use, and readmission after primary left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Limited data exist on the contemporary trends of readmission rates and patients at a higher risk of worse outcomes after LVAD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective study of adults from the Nationwide Readmission Database who underwent primary durable LVAD implantation from 2010 to 2018. The main outcomes were 30-day readmission rates and their trends in patients with primary durable LVAD implantation from 2010 to 2018. This study also sought to identify patients at the highest risk for readmission, in-hospital mortality, and resource use. A total of 31,002 adults with primary durable LVAD implantation were included in the present analysis. Overall, 3808 patients (12.3%) died and 27,168 (87.6%) were discharged alive. Of those discharged alive, 8303 patients (30.6%) were readmitted within 30 days. The trend of 30-day all-cause readmission among LVAD implantation patients remained similar from 2010 to 2018 (Pâ¯=â¯.809). The in-hospital mortality rate during the index hospitalization decreased significantly (Pâ¯=â¯.014), and the mean cost of an index hospitalization increased (Pâ¯=â¯.031) during the study period. The patients with post-LVAD in-hospital cardiac, vascular, and thromboembolic complications (ie, high-risk patients) had the highest mortality, resource use, and readmission rates compared with patients without major complications. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the readmission rates associated with LVAD implantation did not change from 2010 to 2018 and identified high-risk patients who may benefit from closer monitoring after primary LVAD implantation.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Adulto , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Humanos , Readmisión del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Studies on outcomes related to endovascular treatment (EVT) in advanced stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among hospitalizations with acute limb ischemia (ALI) are limited. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was quarried from October 2015 to December 2017 to identify the hospitalizations with ALI and undergoing EVT. The study population was subdivided into 3 groups based on their CKD stages: group 1 (No CKD, stage I, stage II), group 2 (CKD stage III, stage IV), and group 3 (CKD stage V and ESRD). The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 51 995 hospitalizations with ALI undergoing EVT were identified. The in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in group 2 (OR = 1.17; 95% CI 1.04 - 1.32, p=0.009) and group 3 (OR = 3.18; 95% CI 2.74-3.69, p<0.0001) compared with group 1. Odds of minor amputation, vascular complication, atherectomy, and blood transfusion were higher among groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1. Group 2 had higher odds of access site hemorrhage compared with groups 1 and 3, whereas group 3 had higher odds of major amputation, postprocedural infection, and postoperative hemorrhage compared with groups 1 and 2. Besides, groups 2 and 3 had lower odds of discharge to home compared with group 1. Finally, the length of hospital stay and cost of care was significantly higher with the advancing CKD stages. CONCLUSION: Advanced CKD stages and ESRD are associated with higher mortality, worse in-hospital outcomes and higher resource utilization among ALI hospitalizations undergoing EVT. CLINICAL IMPACT: Current guidelines are not clear for the optimum first line treatment of acute limb ischemia, especially in patients with advanced kidney disease as compared to normal/mild kidney disease patients. We found that advanced kidney disease is a significant risk factor for worse in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, patients with acute limb ischemia and advanced kidney disease is associated with significantly higher resource utilization as compared to patients with normal/mild kidney disease. This study suggests shared decision making between treating physician and patients when considering endovascular therapy for the treatment of acute limb ischemia in patients with advanced kidney disease.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Outcomes of patients with implanted left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation experiencing a cardiac arrest (CA) are not well reported. We aimed at defining the in-hospital outcomes of patients with implanted LVAD experiencing a CA. METHODS: The national inpatient sample (NIS) was queried using ICD9/ICD10 codes for patients older than 18 years with implanted LVAD and CA between 2010-2018. We excluded patients with orthotropic heart transplantation, biventricular assist device (BiVAD) implantation and do not resuscitate (DNR) status. RESULTS: A total of 93,153 hospitalisations between 2010 and 2018 with implanted LVAD were identified. Only 578 of these hospitalisations had experienced CA and of those, 173 (33%) hospitalisations underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The mean age of hospitalisations that experienced a CA was 60.61±14.85 for non-survivors and 56.23±17.33 for survivors (p=0.14). The in-hospital mortality was 60.8% in hospitalisations with CA and 74.33% in hospitalisations in whom CPR was performed. In an analysis comparing survivors with non-survivors, non-survivors had more diabetes mellitus (DM) (p=0.01), and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) (p=0.04). Age, female sex, peripheral vascular disease and history of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) were independently associated with increased mortality in our cohort. Also, ventricular tachycardia (VT) and CPR were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. During the study period, there was a significantly decreasing trend in performing CPR in LVAD hospitalisations with CA. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, age, female sex, peripheral vascular disease, history of CABG, VT and CPR were independently associated with in-hospital mortality in LVAD hospitalisations who experienced CA.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Paro Cardíaco , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The manifestations of COVID-19 as outlined by imaging modalities such as echocardiography, lung ultrasound (LUS), and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging are not fully described. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the current literature and included studies that described cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 using echocardiography, CMR, and pulmonary manifestations using LUS. We queried PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for relevant articles. Original studies and case series were included. RESULTS: This review describes the most common abnormalities encountered on echocardiography, LUS, and CMR in patients infected with COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Ecocardiografía , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Microvascular obstruction following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is highly prevalent and independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Microvascular obstruction is determined by index of the microvascular resistance. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of all published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) studying the effect of intra-coronary thrombolysis with PCI as compared to standard treatment among patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction. We included 6 RCTs summing up to 947 patients in the final analysis. Intra-coronary thrombolysis resulted in significantly lower index of microvascular resistance [standardized mean difference: - 13.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): - 16.74 to - 10.73, P value < 0.001, I2 = 0%]. There was no difference noted in the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events with intra-coronary thrombolysis as compared to standard treatment [Odds ratio: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.46-1.08, P value = 0.11, I2 = 0%]. The absence of heterogeneity deferred us from using dose-response analysis to account for altering dose used across studies. The results of the present meta-analysis highlights the role of intra-coronary thrombolysis in reducing microvascular obstruction. No effect of intra-coronary thrombolysis was noted on the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events.
Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Terapia Trombolítica , Resistencia Vascular , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Microvasos/fisiopatología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapiaRESUMEN
The pooled estimate of a recent meta-analysis concluded that rate of reoperation at 1 year was significantly higher in Aortic valve repair (8.82% vs 3.70%) as compared with aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic regurgitation (odds ratio = 2.67, 95% confidence interval [1.08, 3.62], P = .03). We performed a trial sequential analysis using the published data of the meta-analysis and found the evidence is not strong enough for the conclusion.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Cardíaca , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Factores de TiempoAsunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury (TTAI) is associated with high mortality rates and is the second leading cause of death in traumatic patients. There has been a considerable advancement in the management of TTAI with novel and improved surgical procedures and imaging modalities. The aim of this study was to determine the national demographic and regional trends in mortality associated with TTAI in the United States across twenty years, 1999 to 2019. METHODS: The multiple cause of death data on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC-WONDER) database was utilized to query death certificates for TTAI from 1999 to 2019, in the United States. The International Classification of the Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code S25.0 was used to identify and abstract data for TTAI related deaths. The data was further abstracted based on age, race, gender and Census-Bureau defined regions. The age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) per 100,000 population-year and Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC) with 95 % Confidence Interval were computed. The JoinPoint software was utilized to compute the temporal trends in mortality based on a segmented change and AAPC calculation. RESULTS: A total of 20,842 TTAI associated deaths occurred from 1999 to 2019 corresponding to an AAMR of 0.407(0.401-0.412) per 100,000 population-year. The overall AAMR reduced from 0.759 to 0.223 per 100,000 population-year from 1999 to 2019[average APC -6.5(-7.5; -5.5)]. The reduction was reported in both <45 age group [average APC -6.5(-7.9; -5.1)] and >45 age group [-6.2(-7.3; -5.0)]; among females [average APC -6.1(-7.8; -4.3)] and males [-6.1(-7.2; -5.0)]; among Whites [average APC -6.9(-7.8; -5.9)] and Blacks [-5.0(-7.4; -2.5)]. The reduction in mortality as per the census region was highest in the west followed by Mid-West, North-East and South [average APC -6.8(-8.6; -5.0); -6.2(-8.8; -3.6); -5.7(-7.0; -4.4); -5.5(-7.4; -3.6), respectively]. CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in the TTAI associated mortality trends in the United States across 1999-2019 with a consistent decline in all demographic and regional subgroups.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Torácicos , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Demografía , Mortalidad , BlancoRESUMEN
There is limited evidence for the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in patients who underwent peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). We conducted retrospective cohort study utilizing the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality National Readmission database to delineate outcomes in IVUS-guided PVI versus non-IVUS-guided PVI. The present study utilized National Readmission database between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. We identified patients who underwent endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease using relevant International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Procedural Coding System. The cohort was divided based on the use of IVUS during the procedure. The primary outcome was major amputation at 6 months after index hospitalization. Measured confounders were matched using propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighing method. We further performed a subgroup analysis based on disease severity, location of intervention, device, and procedure. A total of 434,901 hospitalizations were included in the present analysis. PVI with IVUS compared with no IVUS had similar risk of amputation at 6 months (195 of 8,939 [2.17%] vs 10,404 of 384,003 [2.71%]), hazard ratio 0.98, CI 0.77 to 1.25. Further, there was no difference in the rates of secondary outcomes. On subgroup analysis, amputation rates were significantly lower in patients with rest pain, in iliac intervention, or patients who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation with the use of IVUS compared with no IVUS. This nationwide observational study showed that there was no difference in major amputation rates with the use of IVUS in patients who underwent PVI. However, in subgroup of patients with rest pain, iliac intervention or drug-eluting stent implantation IVUS use was associated with significantly lower major amputation rates.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Humanos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Femenino , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Puntaje de Propensión , Stents Liberadores de FármacosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To estimate gender disparities among first and last authorships in cardiothoracic randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and association of gender with publications in high-impact journals. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 using R statistical software via the 'easyPubMed' package to retrieve pertinent data. The 'gender' package was utilized to determine gender using the United States Social Security Administration Baby Name Data. The percentage of female first and last authors were computed along with determining the uniqueness of the names. The association of gender and publication in high-impact peer-reviewed journals was delineated. Jonckheere's trend was computed. RESULTS: The database search retrieved a total of 4820 RCTs, of which gender was encoded for the first author in 3247 (67%) RCTs, among which 911 (28%) studies had women as first authors, with a similar trend across 7 years (P = 0.23). Gender was encoded for the last author of 3204 (66%) RCTs, of which 622 (19%) studies had women as last authors, with a similar trend across 7 years (P = 0.45). A total of 627 studies were published in high-impact-factor journals, among which 79 (16%) studies had female first authors and 67 (13%) studies had female last authors. CONCLUSIONS: There is an obvious gender disparity of first and last authors in cardiothoracic surgery-related RCTs, with a similar trend across 7 years. However, the post-hoc analysis did demonstrate a positive trend with an increase in the number of female first authors, demonstrating progress.
Asunto(s)
Autoria , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Cirugía Torácica/estadística & datos numéricos , Sexismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Sexismo/tendencias , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/tendenciasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Despite the development of dedicated, two-stent strategies, including the double kissing (DK) crush technique, the ideal technique for coronary artery bifurcation stenting has not been identified. We aimed to compare and determine the absolute risk difference (ARD) of the DK crush technique alone versus provisional stenting approaches for coronary bifurcation lesions, using the Bayesian technique. METHOD: We queried PubMed/MEDLINE to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared DK crush technique with provisional stenting for bifurcation lesions, published till January 2023. We used Bayesian methods to calculate the ARD and 95% credible interval (CrI). RESULTS: We included three RCTs, with 916 patients, in the final analysis. The ARD of cardiac death was centered at -0.01 (95% CrI: -0.04 to 0.02; Tau: 0.02, 85% probability of ARD of DK crush vs. provisional stenting <0). ARD for myocardial infarction was centered at -0.03 (95%CrI: -0.9 to 0.03; Tau: 0.05, 87% probability of ARD of DK crush vs. provisional stenting <0). ARD for stent thrombosis was centered at 0.00 (95% CrI: -0.04 to 0.03, Tau: 0.03, 51% probability of ARD for DK crush vs. provisional stenting <0). Finally, ARD for target lesion revascularization was centered at -0.05 (95% CrI: -0.08 to -0.03, Tau: 0.02, 99.97% probability of ARD for DK crush vs. provisional stenting <0). CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian analysis demonstrated a lower probability of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization, with DK crush compared with provisional stenting techniques, and a minimal probability of difference in stent thrombosis.
Asunto(s)
Teorema de Bayes , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Angiografía Coronaria , StentsRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The association between sleep duration and atrial fibrillation risk is poorly understood, with inconsistent findings reported by several studies. We sought to assess the association between long sleep duration and mortality due to atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL). METHODS: The 2016-2020 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research dataset was used to identify death records secondary to AF/AFL in the United States population. We used the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) dataset of sleep duration at the county level. All counties were grouped into quartiles based on the percentage of their population with long sleep duration (i.e., ≥ 7 h), Q1 being the lowest and Q4 the highest quartile. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) were calculated for each quartile. County Health Rankings for Texas were used to adjust the AAMR for comorbidities using linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, the AAMR for AF/AFL were highest in Q4 (65.9 [95% CI, 65.5-66.2] per 100,000 person-years) and lowest in Q1 (52.3 [95% CI, 52.1-52.5] per 100,000 person-years). The AAMR for AF/AFL increased stepwise from the lowest to highest quartiles of the percentage population with long sleep duration. After adjustment for the county health ranks of Texas, long sleep duration remained associated with a significantly higher AAMR (coefficient 220.6 (95% CI, 21.53-419.72, p-value = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Long sleep duration was associated with higher AF/AFL mortality. Increased focus on risk reduction for AF, public awareness about the importance of optimal sleep duration, and further research to elucidate a potential causal relationship between sleep duration and AF are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Aleteo Atrial , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Aleteo Atrial/epidemiología , Duración del Sueño , Comorbilidad , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Antioxidant micronutrients (AxMs) have been administered to critically ill adults attempting to counteract the oxidative stress imposed during critical illness. However, results are conflicting and relative effectiveness of AxMs regimens is unknown. We conducted a Bayesian multi-treatment comparison (MTC) meta-analysis to identify the best AxM treatment regimen that will improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched from the inception of databases through August 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing AxMs supplementations with placebo among critically ill adults were included. Two authors assessed trial quality using Cochrane risk of bias tool and assessed certainty of evidence (CoE). A random effect model, non-informative priors Bayesian MTC meta-analysis using gemtc package in R version 3.6.2 was performed. AxMs treatment effect on clinical outcomes (mortality, infection rates, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays and ventilator days) were represented by absolute risk differences (ARD) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. Prior to final analysis, we repeated the search through January 2021. RESULTS: 37 RCT (4905 patients) were included with 16 direct comparisons. With respect to mortality, the ARD for "vitamin E" compared with placebo was centred at -0.19 [95%CrI: -0.54,0.16; very low CoE] and was ranked the best treatment for mortality reduction as per surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA 0.71, 95%CrI: 0.07,1.00). A combination of "selenium, zinc and copper" was ranked the best for lowest ICU stay [-9.40, 95% CrI: -20.0,1.50; low CoE]. A combination of "selenium, zinc, copper and vitamin E" was ranked the best treatment for infection risk reduction [-0.22, 95% CrI: -0.61,0.17; very low CoE]. Ventilator days were least with a combination of "selenium, zinc and manganese" [2.80, 95% CrI: -6.30,0.89; low CoE]. Hospital stay was the lowest using a combination of "selenium, zinc and copper" [-13.00, 95% CrI: -38.00,13.00; very low CoE]. There is substantial uncertainty present in the rankings due to wide and overlapping 95% CrIs of SUCRA scores for the treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Studies on critically ill adult patients have suggested a possible beneficial effects of certain AxM supplementations over and above the recommended dietary allowance. However, evidence does not support their use in clinical practice due to the low confidence in the estimates. Current studies evaluating specific AxMs or their combinations are limited with small sample sizes. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42020210199. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Evidence suggesting a potential benefit of AxMs use more than recommended doses in critically ill adults is weak, indicating that there is no justification for this practice.
Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes , Enfermedad Crítica , Adulto , Antioxidantes/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Micronutrientes/uso terapéutico , Metaanálisis en Red , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Mitral valve repair (MVr) secondary to degenerative anterior/bi-leaflet mitral valve disease is more challenging than posterior leaflet repair. However, conclusive evidence is needed to make decisions based on the outcomes rather than technical difficulties. This meta-analysis compares anterior/bi-leaflet MVr with isolated posterior leaflet repair in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) due to degenerative mitral valve disease. The outcomes of interest were long-term (≥ 5 years) survival and freedom from re-operation and moderate-to-severe MR. Meta-analysis of 10 studies showed that there was no significant difference in long-term survival (risk ratio, RR: 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 0.96-1.04), freedom from moderate-to-severe MR (RR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.87-1.03), and freedom from re-operation (RR: 0.96; 95% CI 0.90-1.02) between anterior/bi-leaflet MVr and posterior leaflet repair. As outcomes of anterior/bilateral repair were comparable with those of isolated posterior leaflet repair, our findings do not support the inclination towards replacement over repair for MR caused by anterior/bilateral degenerative mitral disease.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Humanos , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Reoperación , Oportunidad Relativa , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
A 54-year-old man with a history of type 2 diabetes presented in 2020 for a Bentall procedure after undergoing cardiac surgery complicated by sternal osteomyelitis in 2011. Sternal closure after aortic root replacement included a laparoscopically harvested omental flap to cover the heart. In 2021, multidisciplinary complex sternal reconstruction using a customized 3-dimensional-printed implant based on the patient's computed tomography imaging was performed with compassionate use permission from the Food and Drug Administration. We report the successful entire sternal replacement using a synthetic polyethylene implant.