Not as Clear Online? Active Visualization of How PrEP Works in the Body Improves Knowledge But Doesn't Change Behavior.

Active visualization, the use of dynamic representation of internal processes, is associated with increased knowledge and adherence to ART among people living with HIV. The current pilot intervention study tested the effectiveness of an online visualization for HIV prevention among 146 at-risk youth. Youth were randomized to a standard PrEP briefing or an online visualization. PrEP knowledge, attitudes, and uptake were self-reported at baseline and 3-months. Knowledge of PrEP increased, but there were no changes in preferences or uptake. Active visualization delivered online may be a useful educational tool for PrEP but not for shifting youth's uptake.

No evidence synthesis about me without me: Involving young people in the conduct and dissemination of a complex evidence synthesis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and reflect on the methods and influence of involvement of young people with lived experience within a complex evidence synthesis. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Linked syntheses of quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews of evidence about interventions to improve the mental health of children and young people (CYP) with long-term physical conditions (LTCs). METHODS: Involvement was led by an experienced patient and public involvement in research lead. Young people with long-term physical conditions and mental health issues were invited to join a study-specific Children and Young People's Advisory Group (CYPAG). The CYPAG met face to face on four occasions during the project with individuals continuing to contribute to dissemination following report submission. RESULTS: Eight young people joined the CYPAG. Their views and experiences informed (a) a systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of interventions intended to improve the mental health of CYP with LTCs, (b) a systematic review exploring the experiences of interventions intended to improve the mental well-being of CYP with LTCs and (c) an overarching synthesis. The CYPAG greatly contributed to the team's understanding and appreciation of the wider context of the research. The young people found the experience of involvement empowering and felt they would use the knowledge they had gained about the research process in the future. CONCLUSION: Creating an environment that enabled meaningful engagement between the research team and the CYPAG had a beneficial influence on the young people themselves, as well as on the review process and the interpretation, presentation and dissemination of findings.

Prenatal Care Outcomes in Women with Substance Use Disorders: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine and compare the characteristics and prenatal care and pregnancy outcomes of women with and without substance use disorder (SUD). It also examined whether there were differences in prenatal care and pregnancy outcomes within the population of substance-using women based on the stability of their SUD during pregnancy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved pregnant women with and without SUD who accessed care through the Maternity Centre of Hamilton between 2015 and 2017. Cases and controls were matched 1:1 for gravidity, parity, ethnicity, smoking status, and postal code. RESULTS: Fifty-five pregnant women with SUD were identified and matched to 55 pregnant women without SUD. When analyzed by stability of substance use, women with stable SUD had similar outcomes to those of women without SUD. Women with unstable SUD received the poorest prenatal care and were more likely to have their infants removed from their care. There was significant movement towards stability of maternal substance use over the course of pregnancy in our integrated prenatal and addiction care model. CONCLUSION: Women with unstable SUD had poorer prenatal care and higher rates of custody loss than those with stable substance use disorders or those without substance use disorders. The disparate outcomes among women with unstable SUD may indicate a need to identify patients requiring greater support at entry into prenatal care and to target services accordingly. This integrated prenatal and addiction care model was effective in reducing maternal substance use in pregnancy.

A qualitative study of organisational response to national quality standards for 7-day services in English hospitals.

BACKGROUND: National standards are commonly used as an improvement strategy in healthcare, but organisations may respond in diverse and sometimes negative ways to external quality demands. This paper describes how a sample of NHS hospital trusts in England responded to the introduction of national standards for 7-day services (7DS), from an organisational behaviour perspective. METHODS: We conducted 43 semi-structured interviews with executive/director level and clinical staff, in eight NHS trusts that varied in size, location, and levels of specialist staffing at weekends. We explored approaches to implementing standards locally, and the impact of organisational culture and local context on organisational response. RESULTS: Senior staff in the majority of trusts described a focus on hitting targets and achieving compliance with the standards. Compliance-based responses were associated with a hierarchical organisational culture and focus on external performance. In a minority of trusts senior staff described mobilising commitment-based strategies. In these trusts senior staff reframed the external standards in terms of organisational values, and used co-operative strategies for achieving change. Trusts that took a commitment-based approach tended to be described as having a developmental organisational culture and a history of higher performance across the board. Audit data on 7DS showed improvement against standards for most trusts, but commitment-focused trusts were less likely to demonstrate improvements on the 7DS audit. The ability of trusts to respond to external standards was limited when they were under pressure due to a history of overall poor performance or resource limitations. CONCLUSIONS: National standards and audit for service-level improvement generate different types of response in different local settings. Approaches to driving improvement nationally need to be accompanied by resources and tailored support for improvement, taking into account local context and organisational culture.

Endorsement of clinical practice guidelines: Criteria from the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To refine the process for endorsement of guidelines and establish the expectations of the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) regarding the quality and relevance of clinical practice guidelines targeting family physicians and their patients. COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE: Initially, a group of 6 CFPC staff and selected College members reviewed the previous process for endorsement with the aim of providing a new direction, if needed. The work was then assumed by the Guideline and Knowledge Translation Expert Working Group, a purposefully selected group of 9 family physicians from across Canada with expertise in research, evidence, guidelines, knowledge translation, and continuing professional development and education. METHODS: The initial task force reviewed the endorsement process and identified areas for improvement. A draft new process and core criteria for high-quality guidelines were developed. This was approved by the CFPC board. A Guideline and Knowledge Translation Expert Working Group was then formed to further refine the process and the criteria. Multiple resources were used to inform the criteria. The Guideline and Knowledge Translation Expert Working Group will manage the endorsement process of external submitted guidelines, as well as provide high-level guidance to the CFPC regarding in-house guidelines and continuing professional development content. REPORT: This article provides the expectations of the CFPC regarding clinical practice guidelines and describes in detail the process and criteria for endorsement. Key principles include family physician involvement and guideline funding unlikely to introduce bias, with most criteria falling under 4 themed areas: relation to family medicine, CFPC values, patient engagement and decision making, and scientific rigour. The Guideline and Knowledge Translation Expert Working Group will report to the CFPC board at least once a year. It is hoped that this fully transparent process and these criteria will help advance the quality and standards of clinical practice guideline production in Canada. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive but reasonable list has been provided that reflects the best standards and recommendations and is consistent with the CFPC's values while recognizing the landscape of guideline development for its national partners and colleagues. As with all processes, careful consideration and evaluation will be essential.

Gender equity within medical specialties of Australia and New Zealand: cardiology's outlier status.

BACKGROUND: Gender disparity remains a prominent medical workforce issue, extending beyond surgical specialties with low proportions of female doctors. AIMS: To examine female representation within Australia and New Zealand (NZ) among physician specialties and certain comparator surgical specialties with a focus on cardiology as an outlier of workforce gender equality. METHODS: Data of practising medical specialists, new consultants and trainees were sought from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency, the Medical Council of NZ and the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (2015-2017). The stratified data pertaining to interventional cardiologists were obtained through direct contact with individual hospitals (from 2017 to 2018) and derived from state-based cardiac registries. RESULTS: In Australia and NZ, there were fewer female practising adult medicine physician consultants (n = 8956, 32%, P < 0.001), with gender disparities seen across most physician specialties. Cardiology (15%) was the only physician specialty with <20% representation; gastroenterology (23%), neurology (27%) and respiratory medicine (29%) had <30% female representation at the consultant level. The rates of cardiology (15%) and interventional cardiology (5%) were similar to general surgery (15%) and orthopaedics (4%). Although more than half of physician trainees are female, and most physician specialties are approaching or have equal gender ratios at the trainee level, cardiology (23%) and interventional cardiology (9%) remain significantly underrepresented. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiology is the only physician specialty with <20% female consultants, and this disparity is reflected throughout every stage of the cardiology training programme. Increased awareness and proactive strategies are needed to improve gender disparity within this underrepresented medical specialty.

Triggering of Acute Coronary Occlusion by Episodes of Vigorous Physical Exertion.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition that heavy exertion can occasionally trigger an acute myocardial infarction (MI), although some uncertainties exist regarding the link. The primary aim of this study was to compare the relative risk (RR) of MI following vigorous exertion between those with confirmed coronary occlusion and those with a non-occluded culprit artery on acute angiography. Secondary aims were to determine if the risk of coronary occlusion is modified by the type of exercise (dynamic or isometric resistance), the frequency of regular exertion or whether the exertion was emotionally charged. METHODS: Seven hundred sixty-two (762) participants with MI (410 with coronary occlusion TIMI 0,1), and 352 (46%) with a non-occluded culprit artery (TIMI 2,3) completed a questionnaire within 4days of admission, detailing episodes of physical exertion in the 28hours prior to symptom onset and the usual frequency of such exertion. Exertion exposures within 1hour prior to symptom onset were compared to subjects' usual yearly exposure, with case-crossover methodology. RESULTS: The RR of symptom onset following heavy physical exertion level ≥6 (exertion scale 1-8), was higher in those with TIMI 0,1 compared to those with TIMI 2,3 flow (RR 6.30, 95% CI 4.70-8.50 vs 3.93, 2.89-5.30). The increased risk of coronary occlusion following vigorous exertion was observed following both dynamic exertion and isometric resistance, and did not differ between exertion types. The highest risk of coronary occlusion following exertion was observed in those who were sedentary (regular vigorous exertion <1day weekly) (RR=77, 95% CI 46-132), whereas in those who frequently perform regular vigorous physical exertion (>4days weekly), the RR of symptom onset during exertion was significantly lower, RR 2.3 (95% CI 1.5-3.6). There was no significant difference in relative risk based on whether the exertion was reported as emotionally charged. CONCLUSIONS: The relative risk that heavy exertion will trigger a non-fatal MI with an occluded artery is greater than for a non-occluded culprit artery. Both dynamic and isometric exertion increase the relative risk of event, while exposure to regular vigorous exertion reduces the relative risk.

Legacy Drug-Prescribing Patterns in Primary Care.

PURPOSE: Polypharmacy is a key clinical challenge for primary care. Drugs that should be prescribed for an intermediate term (longer than 3 months, but not indefinitely) that are not appropriately discontinued could contribute to polypharmacy. We named this type of prescribing legacy prescribing. Commonly prescribed drugs with legacy prescribing potential include antidepressants, bisphosphonates, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We evaluated the proportion of legacy prescribing within these drug classes. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data from the McMaster University Sentinel and Information Collaboration (MUSIC) Primary Care Practice Based Research Network, located in Hamilton, Ontario. All adult patients (aged 18 or older) in the MUSIC data set during 2010-2016 were included (N = 50,813). We calculated rates of legacy prescribing of antidepressants (prescription longer than 15 months), bisphosphonates (longer than 5.5 years), and PPIs (longer than 15 months). RESULTS: The proportion of patients having a legacy prescription at some time during the study period was 46% (3,766 of 8,119) for antidepressants, 14% (228 of 1,592) for bisphosphonates, and 45% (2,885 of 6,414) for PPIs. Many of these patients held current prescriptions. The mean duration of prescribing for all legacy prescriptions was significantly longer than that for non-legacy prescriptions (P <.001). Concurrent legacy prescriptions for both antidepressants and PPIs was common, signaling a potential prescribing cascade. CONCLUSIONS: The phenomenon of legacy prescribing appears prevalent. These data demonstrate the potential of legacy prescribing to contribute to unnecessary polypharmacy, providing an opportunity for system-level intervention in primary care with enormous potential benefit for patients.

What influences success in family medicine maternity care education programs? Qualitative exploration.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain how program leaders in family medicine characterize success in family medicine maternity care education and determine which factors influence the success of training programs. DESIGN: Qualitative research using semistructured telephone interviews. SETTING: Purposive sample of 6 family medicine programs from 5 Canadian provinces. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen departmental leaders and program directors. METHODS: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with program leaders in family medicine maternity care. Departmental leaders identified maternity care programs deemed to be "successful." Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Team members conducted thematic analysis. MAIN FINDINGS: Participants considered their education programs to be successful in family medicine maternity care if residents achieved competency in intrapartum care, if graduates planned to include intrapartum care in their practices, and if their education programs were able to recruit and retain family medicine maternity care faculty. Five key factors were deemed to be critical to a program's success in family medicine maternity care: adequate clinical exposure, the presence of strong family medicine role models, a family medicine-friendly hospital environment, support for the education program from multiple sources, and a dedicated and supportive community of family medicine maternity care providers. CONCLUSION: Training programs wishing to achieve greater success in family medicine maternity care education should employ a multifaceted strategy that considers all 5 of the interdependent factors uncovered in our research. By paying particular attention to the informal processes that connect these factors, program leaders can preserve the possibility that family medicine residents will graduate with the competence and confidence to practise full-scope maternity care.

Triggering of acute myocardial infarction by respiratory infection.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory infection has been associated with an increased short-term risk of myocardial infarction (MI). However, previous studies have predominantly been conducted without angiographic confirmation of MI. The possibility can therefore not be excluded that raised troponin levels or electrocardiogram abnormalities that may be seen with respiratory infections are due to non-ischaemic causes. AIMS: To investigate the association between respiratory infection and angiographically confirmed MI. METHODS: Interviews were conducted within 4 days of hospitalisation in 578 patients with angiographically confirmed MI, to assess for recent exposure to respiratory infection symptoms and the usual annual frequency of these symptoms. Using case-crossover methodology, exposure to respiratory infection prior to the onset of MI was compared against the usual frequency of exposure in the past year. RESULTS: Symptoms of respiratory infection were reported by 100 (17%) and 123 (21%) within 7 and 35 days, respectively, prior to MI. The relative risk (RR) for MI occurring within 1-7 days after respiratory infection symptoms was 17.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 13.2-21.8), and declined with subsequent time periods. In a subgroup analysis, the RR tended to be lower in groups taking regular cardiac medications. For those who reported milder, upper respiratory tract infection symptoms, the RR for the 1-7-day time period was 13.5 (95% CI 10.2-17.7). CONCLUSION: These findings confirm that respiratory infection can trigger MI. Further study is indicated to identify treatment strategies to decrease this risk, particularly in individuals who may have increased susceptibility.

Routine aspiration thrombectomy improves the diagnosis and management of embolic myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: Assess the effect of aspiration thrombectomy on diagnosis and management of embolic acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Discrimination of embolic acute myocardial infarction from atherosclerotic plaque rupture/erosion prompts oral anticoagulation treatment of source of embolus, as well as avoiding unnecessary stenting and dual antiplatelet therapy. However, detection is difficult without aspiration. METHODS: We compared rates of diagnosis of embolic infarction for 2.5 years prior to (pre-RAT) and 2.5 years post routine aspiration thrombectomy (post-RAT). Baseline demographics, outcomes, and treatment strategies were also compared between the embolic infarction and atherosclerotic infarction. RESULTS: Diagnosed embolic infarction rose from 1.2% in the pre-RAT era to 2.8% in the post-RAT period (P < 0.05). In addition, more successful removal of thrombus by aspiration led to less stenting (20% vs. 55% P < 0.05) in the post-RAT period thus avoiding the hazards of "triple therapy." Embolic infarction was more frequently associated with atrial fibrillation (55% vs. 8%), had higher mortality (17% vs. 4%), and had higher rates of embolic stroke (13% vs. 0.3%) when compared with atherosclerotic MI (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Routine aspiration thrombectomy more readily identifies embolic infarction allowing more specific therapy and avoidance of stenting and triple anticoagulant therapy.

Trial participation as avoidance strategy: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Trial participation decisions are often influenced by expectations of potential benefit. Attention has focused on trial participation as a means of securing something seen as desirable, such as experimental treatment. In contrast, we consider a case in which one trial arm involved receiving less than usual care. We explore how this influenced participants' decisions to participate. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 29 women participating in a pilot trial comparing invasive urodynamic testing (typically normal care) to basic clinical assessment with non-invasive tests, prior to surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence. Analysis was based on the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Invasive tests were something many were aware of and worried about. Participants understood that trial participation meant they might avoid having these tests, and for about one-third, this was the primary factor motivating participation. A further third mentioned they were not looking forward to tests (if allocated to them) or were lucky to have missed them (if allocated to basic clinical assessment). None of the women appeared to have discussed their desire to avoid having invasive tests with their clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to cases in which trial participation is motivated by the wish to secure an intervention not otherwise available, this study reports the opposite - trial participation as an opportunity to avoid having something regarded as undesirable. The option to decline a particular intervention should always be available, and care must be taken to ensure that potential participants are aware that trial participation is not the only possible means of avoidance.

Validation des lignes directrices de pratique clinique: Critères du Collège des médecins de famille du Canada.

OBJECTIF: Parfaire le processus de validation des lignes directrices et établir les attentes du Collège des médecins de famille du Canada (CMFC) quant à la qualité et à la pertinence des lignes directrices de pratique clinique à l'intention des médecins de famille et de leurs patients. COMPOSITION DU COMITÉ: Au départ, un groupe de 6 personnes, employés et membres choisis du CMFC, ont révisé le précédent processus de validation dans le but de lui donner une nouvelle orientation, au besoin. Le Groupe de travail d'experts sur les lignes directrices et le transfert des connaissances a ensuite pris le relais; ce groupe est composé de 9 médecins de famille sélectionnés avec soin partout au Canada qui sont expérimentés dans les domaines de la recherche, des données probantes, des lignes directrices, du transfert des connaissances, ainsi que du perfectionnement professionnel continu et de l'éducation. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Le groupe de travail initial s'est penché sur le processus de validation et a relevé les domaines pouvant être améliorés. L'ébauche d'un nouveau processus et de critères fondamentaux pour des lignes directrices de bonne qualité a été rédigée et approuvée par le Conseil d'administration du CMFC. Un Groupe de travail d'experts sur les lignes directrices et le transfert des connaissances a ensuite été formé pour peaufiner davantage le processus et les critères. Les critères s'appuient sur plusieurs ressources. Le Groupe de travail d'experts sur les lignes directrices et le transfert des connaissances aura la responsabilité de gérer le processus de validation des lignes directrices externes soumises, ainsi que de fournir au CMFC des conseils de haut niveau sur les lignes directrices internes et le contenu du perfectionnement professionnel continu. RAPPORT: Cet article présente les attentes du CMFC en matière de lignes directrices de pratique clinique, et décrit en détail le processus et les critères de validation. Les principes fondamentaux sont la participation des médecins de famille et le financement des lignes directrices qui est peu susceptible d'introduire un biais, et la plupart des critères s'inscrivent sous 4 thèmes : la relation avec la médecine familiale; les valeurs du CMFC; l'engagement et la prise de décision des patients; et la rigueur scientifique. Le Groupe de travail d'experts sur les lignes directrices et le transfert des connaissances présentera ses résultats au Conseil d'administration du CMFC au moins une fois l'an. L'on souhaite que ce processus complètement transparent et ces critères fassent progresser la qualité et les normes qui régissent la production des lignes directrices de pratique clinique au Canada. CONCLUSION: Une liste exhaustive, mais raisonnable, reflète les meilleures normes et recommandations, et respecte les valeurs du CMFC tout en reconnaissant le contexte de rédaction des lignes directrices pour ses partenaires et ses collègues à l'échelle nationale. Comme c'est le cas pour tous les processus, l'examen et l'évaluation approfondis seront essentiels.

Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.

BACKGROUND: Tailored intervention strategies are frequently recommended among approaches to the implementation of improvement in health professional performance. Attempts to change the behaviour of health professionals may be impeded by a variety of different barriers, obstacles, or factors (which we collectively refer to as determinants of practice). Change may be more likely if implementation strategies are specifically chosen to address these determinants. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether tailored intervention strategies are effective in improving professional practice and healthcare outcomes. We compared interventions tailored to address the identified determinants of practice with either no intervention or interventions not tailored to the determinants. SEARCH METHODS: We conducted searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, and the British Nursing Index to May 2014. We conducted a final search in December 2014 (in MEDLINE only) for more recently published trials. We conducted searches of the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) in March 2013. We also handsearched two journals. SELECTION CRITERIA: Cluster-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions tailored to address prospectively identified determinants of practice, which reported objectively measured professional practice or healthcare outcomes, and where at least one group received an intervention designed to address prospectively identified determinants of practice. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed quality and extracted data. We undertook qualitative and quantitative analyses, the quantitative analysis including two elements: we carried out 1) meta-regression analyses to compare interventions tailored to address identified determinants with either no interventions or an intervention(s) not tailored to the determinants, and 2) heterogeneity analyses to investigate sources of differences in the effectiveness of interventions. These included the effects of: risk of bias, use of a theory when developing the intervention, whether adjustment was made for local factors, and number of domains addressed with the determinants identified. MAIN RESULTS: We added nine studies to this review to bring the total number of included studies to 32 comparing an intervention tailored to address identified determinants of practice to no intervention or an intervention(s) not tailored to the determinants. The outcome was implementation of recommended practice, e.g. clinical practice guideline recommendations. Fifteen studies provided enough data to be included in the quantitative analysis. The pooled odds ratio was 1.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27 to 1.93, P value < 0.001). The 17 studies not included in the meta-analysis had findings showing variable effectiveness consistent with the findings of the meta-regression. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increase in the number of new studies identified, our overall finding is similar to that of the previous review. Tailored implementation can be effective, but the effect is variable and tends to be small to moderate. The number of studies remains small and more research is needed, including trials comparing tailored interventions to no or other interventions, but also studies to develop and investigate the components of tailoring (identification of the most important determinants, selecting interventions to address the determinants). Currently available studies have used different methods to identify determinants of practice and different approaches to selecting interventions to address the determinants. It is not yet clear how best to tailor interventions and therefore not clear what the effect of an optimally tailored intervention would be.

Prophylactic balloon occlusion of the common iliac arteries for the management of suspected placenta accreta/percreta: conclusions from a short case series.

PURPOSE: The management of women with abnormally invasive placenta remains one of the most challenging aspects of obstetric care. Various surgical and interventional radiological techniques have been developed to limit the risk of massive haemorrhage at caesarean section. Here we describe our experience with three such cases that required caesarean hysterectomy and were managed with prophylactic balloon catheterisation of the common iliac arteries. METHODS: The details of three cases that received prophylactic balloon catheterisation of the common iliac arteries for the surgical management of placenta accreta/percreta are presented. Observational conclusions from these cases as well as a review of the relevant literature are discussed. RESULTS: Our three cases required caesarean hysterectomy for suspected placenta accreta/percreta. The mean estimated blood loss was 3,333 ml. In one of the cases, we observed notable reduction in blood loss during occlusion of the common iliac arteries, as the balloons were deflated every 5 min to avoid lower limb ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: The cases presented here, and also our literature review, suggest that occlusion of the common iliac arteries appears to be more effective than, and as safe as the occlusion of the internal iliac arteries. Clinicians need to be aware of the potential risks and employ measures to prevent them. Further research is required to investigate the optimum length of occlusion and balance between reducing blood loss and risking ischemia of the limbs when occluding the common iliac arteries.

What is the volume, quality and characteristics of evidence relating to the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multi-disciplinary occupational health interventions aiming to improve work-related outcomes for employed adults? An evidence and gap map of systematic reviews.

Background: In the UK, tens of millions of working days are lost due to work-related ill health every year, costing billions of pounds. The role of Occupational Health (OH) services is vital in helping workers to maintain employment when they encounter injury or illness. OH providers traditionally rely on a clinical workforce to deliver these services, particularly doctors and nurses with OH qualifications. However, the increasing demand for OH services is unlikely to be met in the future using this traditional model, due to the declining number of OH-trained doctors and nurses in the UK. Multi-disciplinary models of OH delivery, including a more varied range of healthcare and non-healthcare professionals, could provide a way to meet this new demand for OH services. There is a need to identify collaborative models of OH service delivery and review their effectiveness on return-to work outcomes. There is an existing pool of systematic review evidence evaluating workplace based, multi-disciplinary OH interventions, but it is difficult to identify which aspects of the content and/or delivery of these interventions may be associated with improved work-related outcomes. Objectives: The aim of this evidence and gap map (EGM) was to provide an overview of the systematic review evidence that evaluates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multi-disciplinary OH interventions intending to improve work-related outcomes. Search Methods: In June 2021 we searched a selection of bibliographic databases and other academic literature resources covering a range of relevant disciplines, including health care and business studies, to identify systematic review evidence from a variety of sectors of employment. We also searched Google Search and a selection of topically relevant websites and consulted with stakeholders to identify reports already known to them. Searches were updated in February 2023. Selection Criteria: Systematic reviews needed to be about adults (16 years or over) in employment, who have had absence from work for any medical reason. Interventions needed to be multi-disciplinary (including professionals from different backgrounds in clinical and non-clinical professions) and designed to support employees and employers to manage health conditions in the workplace and/or to help employees with health conditions retain and/or return to work following medical absence. Effectiveness needed to be measured in terms of return to work, work retention or measures of absence, or economic evaluation outcomes. These criteria were applied to the title and abstract and full text of each systematic review independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved through discussion. We awarded each systematic review a rating of 'High', 'Medium' or 'Low' relevance to indicate the extent to which the populations, interventions and their contexts synthesised within the review were consistent with our research question. We also recorded the number of primary studies included within each of the 'High' and 'Medium' reviews that were relevant to research question using the same screening process applied at review level. Data Collection and Analysis: Summary data for each eligible review was extracted. The quality of the systematic reviews, rated as 'High' or 'Medium' relevance following full text screening, was appraised using the AMSTAR-2 quality appraisal tool. All data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second, with disagreements being settled through discussion. Summary data for all eligible systematic reviews were tabulated and described narratively. The data extracted from reviews of 'High' and 'Medium' relevance was imported into EPPI-Mapper software to create an EGM. Stakeholder Involvement: We worked alongside commissioners and policy makers from the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and Department of Work and Pensions (DWP), OH personnel, and people with lived experience of accessing OH services themselves and/or supporting employees to access OH services. Individuals contributed to decision making at all stages of the project. This ensured our EGM reflects the needs of individuals who will use it. Main Results: We identified 98 systematic reviews that contained relevant interventions, which involved a variety of professionals and workplaces, and which measured effectiveness in terms of return to work (RTW). Of these, we focused on the 30 reviews where the population and intervention characteristics within the systematic reviews were considered to be of high or medium relevance to our research questions. The 30 reviews were of varying quality, split evenly between High/Moderate quality and Low/Critically-Low quality ratings. We did not identify any relevant systematic review evidence on any other work-related outcome of interest. Interventions were heterogenous, both within and across included systematic reviews. The EGM is structured according to the health condition experienced by participants, and the effectiveness of the interventions being evaluated, as reported within the included systematic reviews. It is possible to view (i) the quality and quantity of systematic review evidence for a given health condition, (ii) how review authors assessed the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of the interventions evaluated. The EGM also details the primary studies relevant to our research aim included within each review. Authors' Conclusions: This EGM map highlights the array of systematic review evidence that exists in relation to the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of multi-disciplinary, workplace-based OH interventions in supporting RTW. This evidence will allow policy makers and commissioners of services to determine which OH interventions may be most useful for supporting different population groups in different contexts. OH professionals may find the content of the EGM useful in identifying systematic review evidence to support their practice. The EGM also identifies where systematic review evidence in this area is lacking, or where existing evidence is of poor quality. These may represent areas where it may be particularly useful to conduct further systematic reviews.

Further Validation of Comfortable Print Size as a Parameter for Clinical Low-Vision Assessment.

Purpose: Comfortable print size (CfPS) has been proposed as a clinical alternative to deriving critical print size (CPS) in the assessment of reading function of vision-impaired patients. This study aimed to assess the repeatability of CfPS and to compare assessment duration and values to CPS measures and acuity reserves. Methods: Thirty-four adults with vision impairment had their reading function assessed. Two assessments of CfPS were made by asking, "What is the smallest print size that you would find comfortable using?" Reading parameters including CPS were determined using the MNREAD card chart and MNREAD app. Results: CfPS was quicker to assess (mean ± SD, 144 ± 77 seconds) than the MNREAD card (231 ± 177 seconds) or app (285 ± 43 seconds). Within-session repeatability of CfPS showed no significant bias or variation across the functional range and limits of agreement (LoA) of ±0.09 logMAR. CfPS values were 0.10 logMAR larger than card CPS values, but no different from app CPS values, with LoA of ±0.43 to 0.45 logMAR. Acuity reserve (comparing CfPS to card reading acuity) was 1.9:1 on average, with a maximum of 5.0:1. Conclusions: CfPS offers a quick, repeatable, and individualized clinical measure of the print size required for sustained reading that reflects CPS values obtained by more traditional measures. Translational Relevance: CfPS is an appropriate clinical measure of reading function to use in determining the magnification requirements of vision impaired patients for sustained reading tasks.