RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an intrapartum electromechanical pelvic floor dilator designed to reduce the risk of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion during vaginal delivery. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled nulliparous participants planning vaginal delivery. During the first stage of labor, participants were randomized to receive the intravaginal device or standard-of-care labor management. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the presence of full LAM avulsion on transperineal pelvic-floor ultrasound at 3 months. Three urogynecologists performed blinded interpretation of ultrasound images. The primary safety endpoint was adverse events (AEs) through 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 214 women were randomized to Device (n = 113) or Control (n = 101) arms. Of 113 Device assignees, 82 had a device placed, of whom 68 delivered vaginally. Of 101 Control participants, 85 delivered vaginally. At 3 months, 110 participants, 46 Device subjects who received full device treatment, and 64 Controls underwent ultrasound for the per-protocol analysis. No full LAM avulsions (0.0%) occurred in the Device group versus 7 out of 64 (10.9%) in the Control group (p = 0.040; two-tailed Fisher's test). A single maternal serious AE (laceration) was device related; no neonate serious AEs were device related. CONCLUSIONS: The pelvic floor dilator device significantly reduced the incidence of complete LAM avulsion in nulliparous individuals undergoing first vaginal childbirth. The dilator demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and was well received by recipients. Use of the intrapartum electromechanical pelvic floor dilator in laboring nulliparous individuals may reduce the rate of LAM avulsion, an injury associated with serious sequelae including pelvic organ prolapse.
Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Diafragma Pélvico , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Embarazo , Proyectos Piloto , Diafragma Pélvico/lesiones , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/instrumentación , Dilatación/instrumentación , Dilatación/efectos adversos , Dilatación/métodos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/prevención & control , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Ultrasonografía , Paridad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate trends, risk factors, and outcomes associated with infections and sepsis during delivery hospitalizations in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: The 2000-2020 National Inpatient Sample was used for this repeated cross-sectional analysis. Delivery hospitalizations of patients aged 15 to 54 with and without infection and sepsis were identified. Common infection diagnoses during delivery hospitalizations analyzed included (i) pyelonephritis, (ii) pneumonia/influenza, (iii) endometritis, (iv) cholecystitis, (v) chorioamnionitis, and (vi) wound infection. Temporal trends in sepsis and infection during delivery hospitalizations were analyzed. The associations between sepsis and infection and common chronic health conditions including asthma, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, and obesity were analyzed. The associations between clinical, demographic, and hospital characteristics, and infection and sepsis were determined with unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models with unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals as measures of association. RESULTS: An estimated 80,158,622 delivery hospitalizations were identified and included in the analysis, of which 2,766,947 (3.5%) had an infection diagnosis and 32,614 had a sepsis diagnosis (4.1 per 10,000). The most common infection diagnosis was chorioamnionitis (2.7% of deliveries) followed by endometritis (0.4%), and wound infections (0.3%). Infection and sepsis were more common in the setting of chronic health conditions. Evaluating trends in individual infection diagnoses, endometritis and wound infection decreased over the study period both for patients with and without chronic conditions, while risk for pyelonephritis and pneumonia/influenza increased. Sepsis increased over the study period for deliveries with and without chronic condition diagnoses. Risks for adverse outcomes including mortality, severe maternal morbidity, the critical care composite, and acute renal failure were all significantly increased in the presence of sepsis and infection. CONCLUSION: Endometritis and wound infections decreased over the study period while risk for sepsis increased. Infection and sepsis were associated with chronic health conditions and accounted for a significant proportion of adverse obstetric outcomes including severe maternal morbidity. KEY POINTS: · Sepsis increased over the study period for deliveries with and without chronic condition diagnoses.. · Endometritis and wound infection decreased over the study period.. · Infection and sepsis accounted for a significant proportion of adverse obstetric outcomes..
Asunto(s)
Endometritis , Hospitalización , Sepsis , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Embarazo , Sepsis/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Factores de Riesgo , Endometritis/epidemiología , Corioamnionitis/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Parto Obstétrico , Modelos Logísticos , Pielonefritis/epidemiología , Neumonía/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To review obstetric personnel absences at a hospital during the initial peak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection risk in New York City from March 25 to April 21, 2020. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study evaluated absences at Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital. Clinical absences for (1) Columbia University ultrasonographers, (2) inpatient nurses, (3) labor and delivery operating room (OR) technicians, (4) inpatient obstetric nurse assistants, and (5) attending physicians providing inpatient obstetric services were analyzed. Causes of absences were analyzed and classified as illness, vacation and holidays, leave, and other causes. Categorical variables were compared with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: For nurses, absences accounted for 1,052 nursing workdays in 2020 (17.2% of all workdays) compared with 670 (11.1%) workdays in 2019 (p < 0.01). Significant differentials in days absent in 2020 compared with 2019 were present for (1) postpartum nurses (21.9% compared with 12.9%, p < 0.01), (2) labor and delivery nurses (14.8% compared with 10.6%, p < 0.01), and (3) antepartum nurses (10.2% compared with 7.4%, p = 0.03). Evaluating nursing assistants, 24.3% of workdays were missed in 2020 compared with 17.4% in 2019 (p < 0.01). For ultrasonographers, there were 146 absences (25.2% of workdays) in 2020 compared with 96 absences (16.0% of workdays) in 2019 (p < 0.01). The proportion of workdays missed by OR technicians was 22.6% in 2020 and 18.3% in 2019 (p = 0.25). Evaluating attending physician absences, a total of 78 workdays were missed due to documented COVID-19 infection. Evaluating the causes of absences, illness increased significantly between 2019 and 2020 for nursing assistants (42.6 vs. 57.4%, p = 0.02), OR technicians (17.1 vs. 55.9%, p < 0.01), and nurses (15.5 vs. 33.7%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 outbreak surge planning represents a major operational issue for medical specialties such as critical care due to increased clinical volume. Findings from this analysis suggest it is prudent to devise backup staffing plans. KEY POINTS: · 1) COVID-19 outbreak surge planning represents a major operational issue for obstetrics.. · 2) Inpatient obstetric volume cannot be reduced.. · 3) Staffing contingencies plans for nurses, sonographers, and physicians may be required..
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Embarazo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether race and ethnicity contribute to risks associated with peripartum hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cross-sectional study utilized the 2000-2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample to analyze risk of peripartum hysterectomy and associated severe maternal morbidity, mortality, surgical injury, reoperation, surgical-site complications, and mortality by maternal race and ethnicity. Race and ethnicity were categorized as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, other, and unknown. Multivariable log-linear regression models including patient, clinical, and hospital risk factors were performed with adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of 59,854,731 delivery hospitalizations, there were 45,369 peripartum hysterectomies (7.6 per thousand). Of these, 37.8% occurred among non-Hispanic white, 13.9% among non-Hispanic black, and 22.8% among Hispanic women. In adjusted analyses, non-Hispanic black (aRR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.17-1.29) and Hispanic women (aRR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.22-1.29) were at increased risk of hysterectomy compared with non-Hispanic white women. Risk for severe morbidity was increased for non-Hispanic black (aRR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.19-1.33), but not for Hispanic (aRR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.97-1.07) women. Between these three groups, risk for intraoperative complications was highest among non-Hispanic white women, risk for reoperation was highest among Hispanic women, and risk for surgical-site complications was highest among non-Hispanic black women. Evaluating maternal mortality, non-Hispanic black women (RR: 3.83, 95% CI: 2.65-5.53) and Hispanic women (RR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.74-3.59) were at higher risk than non-Hispanic white women. CONCLUSION: Peripartum hysterectomy and related complications other than death differed modestly by race. In comparison, mortality differentials were large supporting that differential risk for death in the setting of this high-risk scenario may be an important cause of disparities. KEY POINTS: · Peripartum hysterectomy and related complications differed modestly by race.. · Mortality differentials in the setting of peripartum hysterectomy were large.. · Failure to rescue may be an important cause of peripartum hysterectomy disparities..
Asunto(s)
Histerectomía , Mortalidad Materna , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Adulto Joven , Estudios Transversales , Etnicidad , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Materna/etnología , Periodo Periparto , Resultado del Embarazo , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Grupos RacialesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze whether hospital safety-net burden status is associated with increased risk for severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and postpartum readmissions. STUDY DESIGN: The 2010 to 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database was utilized for this retrospective cohort study. Hospitals were categorized as high-burden hospitals (25% of hospitals with the highest safety-net burden), medium-burden hospitals (50% of hospitals with intermediate safety-net burden), and low-burden hospitals (25% of hospitals with the lowest safety-net burden) based on the proportions of Medicaid or uninsured patients. Risk for (1) SMM, (2) 60-day postpartum readmissions, and (3) SMM during postpartum readmissions was analyzed. Unadjusted and adjusted log-linear regression models were performed, respectively, for these outcomes with unadjusted risk ratio (RR) and adjusted RR (aRR) as measures of effect. Adjusted models included demographic, hospital, and clinical factors. RESULTS: High-burden safety-net status was associated with increased risk for SMM compared with low-burden safety-net status in both unadjusted (RR: 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.50-1.53) and adjusted analyses (aRR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.25-1.30). High-burden status was also associated with increased risk for readmissions in unadjusted analyses (RR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.40-1.44), although this risk was attenuated in adjusted analyses (aRR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.06-1.08). High-burden status was associated with significantly increased risk for readmission for uterine infections, hypertensive diseases of pregnancy, and psychiatric diagnoses. High-burden status was not associated with severe morbidity during readmissions in adjusted or unadjusted analyses (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.98-1.05; aRR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99). CONCLUSION: This study found that high safety-net burden hospitals may be a higher risk setting for obstetric care. Improvement of outcomes in high-burden settings may be important in overall efforts to reduce maternal risk.
Asunto(s)
Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Posparto , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad , Adolescente , Adulto , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Medicaid , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to review 4 weeks of universal novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) screening among delivery hospitalizations, at two hospitals in March and April 2020 in New York City, to compare outcomes between patients based on COVID-19 status and to determine whether demographic risk factors and symptoms predicted screening positive for COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study evaluated all patients admitted for delivery from March 22 to April 18, 2020, at two New York City hospitals. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were collected. The relationship between COVID-19 and demographic, clinical, and maternal and neonatal outcome data was evaluated. Demographic data included the number of COVID-19 cases ascertained by ZIP code of residence. Adjusted logistic regression models were performed to determine predictability of demographic risk factors for COVID-19. RESULTS: Of 454 women delivered, 79 (17%) had COVID-19. Of those, 27.9% (n = 22) had symptoms such as cough (13.9%), fever (10.1%), chest pain (5.1%), and myalgia (5.1%). While women with COVID-19 were more likely to live in the ZIP codes quartile with the most cases (47 vs. 41%) and less likely to live in the ZIP code quartile with the fewest cases (6 vs. 14%), these comparisons were not statistically significant (p = 0.18). Women with COVID-19 were less likely to have a vaginal delivery (55.2 vs. 51.9%, p = 0.04) and had a significantly longer postpartum length of stay with cesarean (2.00 vs. 2.67days, p < 0.01). COVID-19 was associated with higher risk for diagnoses of chorioamnionitis and pneumonia and fevers without a focal diagnosis. In adjusted analyses, including demographic factors, logistic regression demonstrated a c-statistic of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69, 0.80). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 symptoms were present in a minority of COVID-19-positive women admitted for delivery. Significant differences in obstetrical outcomes were found. While demographic risk factors demonstrated acceptable discrimination, risk prediction does not capture a significant portion of COVID-19-positive patients. KEY POINTS: · COVID-19 symptoms were present in a minority of COVID-19-positive women admitted.. · COVID-19 symptomatology did not appear to differ before or after the apex of infection in New York.. · Demographic risk factors are unlikely to capture a significant portion of COVID-19-positive patients..
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Corioamnionitis/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Fiebre/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Edad Materna , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Obesidad Materna/epidemiología , Neumonía/epidemiología , Embarazo , Características de la Residencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To characterize risk and temporal trends for preeclampsia and related outcomes by maternal age. STUDY DESIGN: Deliveries to women aged 15 to 54 years in the 1998 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample who had a diagnosis of preeclampsia, eclampsia, or both were included in the analysis. Age was categorized as 15 to 17, 18 to 24, 25 to 29, 30 to 34, 35 to 39, 40 to 44, and 45 to 54 years. The primary outcome was temporal trends in preeclampsia based on maternal age. Secondary outcomes analyzed included risk for severe maternal morbidity. RESULTS: The proportion of women with preeclampsia aged 15 to 24 years decreased from 42.3% in 1998 to 30.1% in 2014, while preeclampsia among those 30 to 54 years increased from 32.9 to 43.7%. Preeclampsia risk increased for all groups over the study period. Risk for severe morbidity by age group with and without transfusion was "U-shaped," with risk highest for women 18 to 24 and 40 to 54 years. The risk for abruption, acute renal failure, acute heart failure or pulmonary edema, and stroke was lowest for women aged 15 to 24 years and increased in a "dose-dependent" manner with increasing maternal age. In contrast, eclampsia risk was highest for women aged 15 to 17 years. CONCLUSION: With a changing demographic profile of preeclampsia, older women accounted for an increasing proportion of preeclampsia and related adverse outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Edad Materna , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Transfusión Sanguínea , Comorbilidad/tendencias , Estudios Transversales , Parto Obstétrico , Eclampsia/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hospitalización , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
As New York City became an international epicenter of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, telehealth was rapidly integrated into prenatal care at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, an academic hospital system in Manhattan. Goals of implementation were to consolidate in-person prenatal screening, surveillance, and examinations into fewer in-person visits while maintaining patient access to ongoing antenatal care and subspecialty consultations via telehealth virtual visits. The rationale for this change was to minimize patient travel and thus risk for COVID-19 exposure. Because a large portion of obstetric patients had underlying medical or fetal conditions placing them at increased risk for adverse outcomes, prenatal care telehealth regimens were tailored for increased surveillance and/or counseling. Based on the incorporation of telehealth into prenatal care for high-risk patients, specific recommendations are made for the following conditions, clinical scenarios, and services: (1) hypertensive disorders of pregnancy including preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and chronic hypertension; (2) pregestational and gestational diabetes mellitus; (3) maternal cardiovascular disease; (4) maternal neurologic conditions; (5) history of preterm birth and poor obstetrical history including prior stillbirth; (6) fetal conditions such as intrauterine growth restriction, congenital anomalies, and multiple gestations including monochorionic placentation; (7) genetic counseling; (8) mental health services; (9) obstetric anesthesia consultations; and (10) postpartum care. While telehealth virtual visits do not fully replace in-person encounters during prenatal care, they do offer a means of reducing potential patient and provider exposure to COVID-19 while providing consolidated in-person testing and services. KEY POINTS: · Telehealth for prenatal care is feasible.. · Telehealth may reduce coronavirus exposure during prenatal care.. · Telehealth should be tailored for high risk prenatal patients..
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Embarazo de Alto Riesgo , Atención Prenatal , Telemedicina , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Femenino , Asesoramiento Genético/métodos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Atención Prenatal/organización & administración , Atención Prenatal/tendencias , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Consulta Remota/métodos , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina/instrumentación , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Maternal race may be an important risk factor for postpartum readmissions and associated adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of race with serious complications during postpartum readmissions. STUDY DESIGN: This repeated cross-sectional analysis used the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project from 2012 to 2014. Women ages 15-54 readmitted postpartum after a delivery hospitalization were identified by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Race and ethnicity were characterized as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific islander, Native American, other, and unknown. Overall risk for readmission by race was determined. Risk for severe maternal morbidity during readmissions by race was analyzed. Individual outcomes including pulmonary edema/acute heart failure and stroke also were analyzed by race. Log-linear regression models including demographics, hospital factors, and comorbid risk were used to analyze risk for severe maternal morbidity during postpartum readmissions. RESULTS: Of 11.3 million births, 207,730 (1.8%) women admitted postpartum from 2012 to 2014 were analyzed, including 96,670 white, 47,015 black, and 33,410 Hispanic women. Compared with non-Hispanic white women, non-Hispanic black women were at 80% greater risk of postpartum readmission (95% confidence interval, 79%-82%) whereas Hispanic women were at 11% lower risk of readmission (95% confidence interval, 10%-12%). In unadjusted analysis, compared with non-Hispanic white women, non-Hispanic black women admitted postpartum were at 27% greater risk of severe maternal morbidity (95% confidence interval, 24%-30%) whereas Hispanic women were at 10% lower risk (95% confidence interval, 7%-13%). In the adjusted model, non-Hispanic black women were at 16% greater risk for severe maternal morbidity during readmission than non-Hispanic white women (95% confidence interval, 10%-22%), whereas Hispanic women were at 7% lower risk (95% confidence interval, 1%-12%). Differences in severe maternal morbidity risk between other racial groups and non-Hispanic white women were not significant. In addition to overall morbidity, non-Hispanic black women were at significantly greater risk for eclampsia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and renal failure than other racial groups (P<.05 all). Black women were at 126% greater risk for pulmonary edema/acute heart failure than white women (95% confidence interval, 117%-136%). CONCLUSION: Black women were more likely (1) to be readmitted postpartum, (2) to suffer severe maternal morbidity during readmission, and (3) to suffer life threatening complications such as pulmonary edema/acute heart failure. At-risk women including black women with cardiovascular risk factors may benefit from short-term postpartum follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Puerperales/epidemiología , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Eclampsia/epidemiología , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Edema Pulmonar/epidemiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Sepsis/epidemiología , Choque/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Objectives To identify risk factors associated with urban postpartum emergency department utilization. Methods This case-control study included 100 matched pairs of postpartum women who had delivered at a large, integrated urban medical system in Bronx, New York, in 2012-2013, with the cases having had an emergency department visit within 42 days of delivery. The cases, identified utilizing administrative and billing data, were matched 1:1 with controls by labor unit, delivery mode and date, excluding nonviable pregnancies. The controls did not have a known postpartum emergency department visit. Variables were abstracted from administrative data and chart review, and included demographics, antenatal/intrapartum/postpartum complications and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Factors associated with puerperal emergency department use were identified via univariate and multivariable analyses. Results Following conditional logistic regression, primiparity [54% vs. 32%, aOR 5.91, 95% CI 2.34-14.91], public insurance [70% vs. 56%, aOR 4.22, 95% CI 1.60-11.12], weekend delivery [30% vs. 26%, aOR 7.61, 95% CI 1.15-52.43] and delivery-related complications [47% vs. 28%, aOR 2.95, 95% CI 1.16-7.51] were associated with an increased risk of postpartum emergency department use, while women of younger ages (17-24 years old) were less likely to have postpartum emergency department use [aOR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.74]. Univariate analysis of individual events within the composite variables showed an association between gestational hypertension/pre-eclampsia and postpartum emergency department use [28% vs. 13% OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.26-5.39]. Psychiatric history, social instability, preterm delivery/neonatal intensive care unit admission, pre-existing medical/antepartum conditions and prolonged postpartum stay were not associated. Conclusions for Practice Delivery-related complications, delivery timing, and certain sociodemographic factors are identifiable risk factors for increased postpartum emergency department utilization. These may be targeted for development of interventions improving puerperal care and potentially preventing emergency department visits, which are costly to the health system and disruptive to the lives of women and their families.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Posnatal/métodos , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Ciudad de Nueva York , Oportunidad Relativa , Atención Posnatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize the risk for severe maternal morbidity and other pregnancy complications by maternal age during delivery hospitalizations. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort analysis used the Perspective database to characterize the risk for adverse maternal outcomes from 2006 to 2015 based on maternal age. Women were divided into 7 categories based on maternal age: 15-17, 18-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, 40-44, and 45-54 years of age. The primary outcome of this study was severe maternal morbidity as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Secondary outcomes included (1) overall comorbid risk; (2) risk for pregnancy complications such as postpartum hemorrhage, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and cesarean delivery; and (3) risk for individual severe morbidity diagnoses such as stroke, embolism, eclampsia, and hysterectomy. Adjusted models were fitted to assess factors associated with severe morbidity with adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) as measures of effect. Population weights were applied to create national estimates. RESULTS: Of 36,944,292 deliveries included, 2.5% occurred among women aged 15-17 years (n = 921,236), 29.1% to women aged 18-24 years (n = 10,732,715), 28.6% to women aged 25-29 years (n = 10,564,850), 24.9% to women aged 30-34 years (n = 9,213,227), 12.1% to women aged 35-39 years (n = 4,479,236), 2.6% to women aged 40-44 years (n = 974,289), and 0.2% to women aged 45-54 years (n = 58,739). In unadjusted analyses, severe morbidity was more than 3 times higher (risk ratio [RR], 3.33, 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.03-3.66) for women 45-54 years compared with women 25-29 years. Women aged 40-44, 35-39, and 15-17 years were also at increased risk (RR, 1.83, 95% CI, 1.77-1.89; RR, 1.36, 95% CI, 1.33-1.39; RR, 1.39, 95% CI, 1.34-1.45, respectively). In the adjusted model, the 45-54 year old group was associated with the highest relative risk (aRR, 3.46, 95% CI, 3.15-3.80) followed by the 40-44 year old group (aRR 1.90, 95% CI, 1.84-1.97), the 35-39 year old group (aRR, 1.43, 95% CI, 1.40-1.47), and the 15-17 year old group (aRR, 1.20, 95% CI, 1.15-1.24). Cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, postpartum hemorrhage, and gestational diabetes were most common among women aged 45-54 years, as were thrombosis and hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: While differential risk was noted across maternal age categories, women aged 45 years old and older were at highest risk for a broad range of adverse outcomes during delivery hospitalizations.
Asunto(s)
Edad Materna , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Mortalidad Materna , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/mortalidad , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia en Hospital/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Evaluación de Necesidades/organización & administración , Embarazo , Gestión de Riesgos , Flujo de TrabajoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence, timing, clinical risk factors, and adverse outcomes associated with postpartum readmissions for maternal sepsis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of delivery hospitalizations and 60-day postpartum readmissions for females aged 15-54 years with and without sepsis using the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Temporal trends in sepsis diagnoses during delivery hospitalizations and 60-day postpartum readmissions were analyzed with the National Cancer Institute's Joinpoint Regression Program to estimate the average annual percent change with 95% CIs. Logistic regression models were fit to determine whether delivery hospitalization characteristics were associated with postpartum sepsis readmissions, and unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with 95% CIs were reported. Adverse outcomes associated with sepsis during delivery hospitalization and readmission were described, including death, severe morbidity, a critical care composite, and renal failure. RESULTS: Overall, 15,268,190 delivery hospitalizations and 256,216 associated 60-day readmissions were included after population weighting, of which 16,399 (1.1/1,000 delivery hospitalizations) had an associated diagnosis of sepsis at delivery, and 20,130 (1.3/1,000 delivery hospitalizations) had an associated diagnosis of sepsis with postpartum readmission. A sepsis diagnosis was present in 7.9% of all postpartum readmissions. Characteristics associated with postpartum sepsis readmission included younger age at delivery, Medicaid insurance, lowest median ZIP code income quartile, and chronic medical conditions such as obesity, pregestational diabetes, and chronic hypertension. Postpartum sepsis readmissions were associated with infection during the delivery hospitalization, including intra-amniotic infection or endometritis, wound infection, and delivery sepsis. Sepsis diagnoses were associated with 24.4% of maternal deaths at delivery and 38.4% postpartum, 2.2% cases of nontransfusion severe morbidity excluding sepsis at delivery and 13.6% postpartum, 15.6% of critical care composite diagnoses at delivery and 30.1% postpartum, and 11.1% of acute renal failure diagnoses at delivery and 36.4% postpartum. CONCLUSION: Sepsis accounts for a significant proportion of postpartum readmissions and is a major contributor to adverse outcomes during delivery hospitalizations and postpartum readmissions.
Asunto(s)
Infección Puerperal , Sepsis , Embarazo , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Infección Puerperal/epidemiología , Readmisión del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Hospitalización , Periodo Posparto , Sepsis/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Disparities in maternal health outcomes are striking. Historical and biased clinical support tools have potential to exacerbate inequities. In 2022, NewYork-Presbyterian, with â¼25,000 annual births, and our academic partners, Columbia and Weill Cornell, launched a program to better understand practice patterns and clinician attitudes toward a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) calculator, which predicts VBAC success. This article summarizes the program, focusing on the VBAC calculator utilization survey, which measured provider awareness of the revised calculator and key factors considered in patient counseling. Our preliminary findings warrant future research and education on the calculator's implications for counseling and outcomes.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether fetal growth restriction (FGR) with or without abnormal Dopplers is associated with intracranial abnormalities and death in premature infants. STUDY DESIGN: Premature infants with and without FGR born between 2016 and 2019 were included. Primary outcome was death, severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) or periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). Groups were compared using standard bivariate testing and multivariable regression. RESULTS: Among 168 FGR and 560 non-FGR infants, FGR infants with abnormal Dopplers had an increased incidence of death, severe IVH or PVL compared to non-FGR infants (13% (16/123) vs. 7% (41/560); p = 0.03) while FGR infants with normal Dopplers had a nonsignificant decrease. In a logistic regression model, FGR with abnormal Dopplers was associated with more than three times higher odds of death, severe IVH or PVL (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.54,6.49; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Growth-restricted infants with abnormal Dopplers had an increased risk of death, intracranial abnormalities, and prematurity-related morbidities.
Asunto(s)
Recien Nacido Prematuro , Leucomalacia Periventricular , Lactante , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Leucomalacia Periventricular/diagnóstico por imagen , Leucomalacia Periventricular/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Refractory postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) affects 10-20% of patients with PPH when they do not respond adequately to first-line treatments. These patients require second-line interventions, including three or more uterotonics, additional medications, transfusions, non-surgical treatments, and/or surgical intervention. Multiple studies have suggested that patients with refractory PPH have different clinical characteristics and causes of PPH when compared to patients who respond to first-line agents. This review highlights current insights into therapeutic approaches for the management of refractory PPH. Early management of refractory PPH relies on both hypovolemic resuscitation and achievement of hemostasis, with an emphasis on early blood product replacement and massive transfusion protocols. Transfusion needs can be more rapidly and accurately identified through point-of-care tests such as thromboelastography. Medical therapies for the treatment of refractory PPH involve treatment of both uterine atony as well as the underlying coagulopathy, with the use of tranexamic acid and adjunct therapies such as factor replacement. The principles guiding the management of refractory PPH include restoring normal uterine and pelvic anatomy, through the evaluation and management of retained products of conception, uterine inversion, and obstetric lacerations. Intrauterine vacuum-induced hemorrhage control devices are novel methods for the treatment of refractory PPH secondary to uterine atony, in addition to other uterine-sparing surgical procedures that are under investigation. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta can be considered for cases of critical refractory PPH, to prevent or decrease ongoing blood loss while definitive surgical interventions are performed. Finally, for patients with critical hemorrhage resulting in hemorrhagic shock, damage control resuscitation (a staged surgical approach focused on restoring normal physiologic recovery and maximizing tissue oxygenation prior to proceeding with definitive surgical management) has been shown to successfully control refractory PPH, with an overall mortality decrease for obstetric patients.
RESUMEN
Obstetric patients are at increased risk for psychological distress and the development or exacerbation of mental illness, particularly in the setting of pregnancy or delivery complications. Inpatient antepartum, labor and delivery, and postpartum hospitalization is an important opportunity for psychiatric support and intervention. The aims of this paper are to review the unmet mental health needs in obstetric inpatient care, examine the current state of obstetric consultation-liaison (OB CL) psychiatry services, present one existing model of such a service at the authors' institution, provide broad recommendations for the structure and implementation of this service, and detail areas of future research within the area of OB CL psychiatry. We argue that the inpatient obstetric setting is a critical space for mental health evaluation, education and intervention, and that dedicated OB CL psychiatry services are a potentially valuable tool in addressing the perinatal mental health crisis.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Psiquiatría , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Pacientes Internos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Salud Mental , Derivación y ConsultaRESUMEN
Importance: Reducing rates of unnecessary cesarean deliveries is both a national and a global health objective. However, there are limited national US data on trends in indications for low-risk cesarean delivery. Objective: To determine temporal trends in and indications for cesarean delivery among patients at low risk for the procedure over a 20-year period. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed 2000 to 2019 delivery hospitalizations using the National Inpatient Sample. Births at low risk for cesarean delivery were identified using a definition from the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and additional criteria. Temporal trends in cesarean birth were analyzed using joinpoint regression to estimate the average annual percentage change (AAPC) with 95% CIs. Data analysis was performed from August 2022 to January 2023. Exposure: This analysis evaluated cesarean birth trends in a population at low risk for this procedure over a 20-year period. Main Outcomes and Measures: In addition to overall cesarean birth risk, cesarean deliveries for nonreassuring fetal status and labor arrest were individually analyzed. Results: Of an estimated 76.7 million delivery hospitalizations, 21.5 million were excluded according to the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine definition, and 14.7 million were excluded according to additional criteria. Of the estimated 40â¯517â¯867 deliveries included, 12.1% (4â¯885â¯716 deliveries) were by cesarean delivery. Cesarean deliveries among patients at low risk for the procedure increased from 9.7% to 13.9% between 2000 and 2009, plateaued, and then decreased from 13.0% to 11.1% between 2012 and 2019. The AAPC for cesarean delivery was 6.4% (95% CI, 5.2% to 7.6%) from 2000 to 2005, 1.2% from 2005 to 2009 (95% CI, -1.2% to 3.7%), and -2.2% from 2009 to 2019 (95% CI, -2.7% to -1.8%). Cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status increased from 3.4% of all deliveries in 2000 to 5.1% in 2019 (AAPC, 2.1%; 95% CI, 1.7% to 2.5%). Cesarean delivery for labor arrest increased from 3.6% in 2000 to a peak of 4.8% in 2009 before decreasing to 2.7% in 2019. Cesarean deliveries for labor arrest increased during the first half of the study (2000-2009) for the active phase (from 1.5% to 2.1%), latent phase (from 1.1% to 1.5%), and second stage (from 0.9% to 1.3%) and then decreased from 2010 to 2019, from 2.1% to 1.7% for the active phase, from 1.5% to 1.2% for the latent phase, and from 1.2% to 0.9% for the second stage. Conclusions and Relevance: Cesarean deliveries among patients at low risk for cesarean birth appeared to decrease over the latter years of the study period, with cesarean deliveries for labor arrest becoming less common.