Is the combinational administration of doxorubicin and glutathione a reasonable proposal?

The combinational administration of antioxidants and chemotherapeutic agents during conventional cancer treatment is among one of the most controversial areas in oncology. Although the data on the combinational usage of doxorubicin (DOX) and glutathione (GSH) agents have been explored for over 20 years, the duration, administration route, and authentic rationality have not yet been fully understood yet. In the current study, we systematically investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) with both in vivo and in vitro models to elucidate the influence of GSH on the toxicity and efficacy of DOX. We first studied the cardioprotective and hepatoprotective effects of GSH in Balb/c mice, H9c2, and HL7702 cells. We showed that coadministration of exogenous GSH (5, 50, and 500 mg/kg per day, intragastric) significantly attenuated DOX-induced cardiotoxicity and hepatotoxicity by increasing intracellular GSH levels, whereas the elevated GSH concentrations did not affect the exposure of DOX in mouse heart and liver. From PK and PD perspectives, then the influences of GSH on the chemotherapeutic efficacy of DOX were investigated in xenografted nude mice and cancer cell models, including MCF-7, HepG2, and Caco-2 cells, which revealed that administration of exogenous GSH dose-dependently attenuated the anticancer efficacy of DOX in vivo and in vitro, although the elevated GSH levels neither influenced the concentration of DOX in tumors in vivo, nor the uptake of DOX in MCF-7 tumor cells in vitro. Based on the results we suggest that the combined administration of GSH and DOX should be contraindicated during chemotherapy unless DOX has caused serious hepatotoxicity and cardiotoxicity.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evidence for developing an oral formulation of octreotide against gastric mucosal injury.

Among the somatostatin analogues, octreotide (OCT) is the most commonly used in clinic via intravenous or subcutaneous injection to treat various diseases caused by increased secretion of growth hormone, gastrin or insulin. In order to assesse the feasibility of developing oral formulations of OCT, we conducted systematical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of OCT in several animal models. The pharmacokinetic studies in rats showed that intragastric administration of OCT had extremely low bioavailability (<0.5%), but it could specifically distribute to the gastric mucosa due to the high expression of somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) in the rat stomach. The pharmacodynamic studies revealed that intragastric administration of OCT dose-dependently protected against gastric mucosal injury (GMI) in mice with WIRS-induced mouse gastric ulcers, which were comparable to those achieved by intravenous injection of OCT, and this effect was markedly attenuated by co-administration of CYN-154806, an antagonist of SSTR2. In pyloric ligation-induced ulcer mice, we further demonstrated that OCT significantly reduced the secretion of gastric acid via down-regulating the level of gastrin, which was responsible for the protective effect of OCT against GMI. Overall, we have provided pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evidence for the feasibility of developing an oral formulation of OCT. Most importantly, the influence of SSTR2 on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of OCT suggested that an oral formulation of OCT might be applicable for other clinical indications, including neuroendocrine neoplasms and pituitary adenoma due to the overexpression of SSTR2 on these tumor cells.