RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Alcohol-induced facial flushing phenotype (flushing) is common among East Asians. Despite a small intake of alcohol, they experience heightened levels of acetaldehyde, a group-1 carcinogen, which in turn causes unpleasant symptoms such as redness, acting as a robust protective mechanism against consuming alcohol. However, some individuals with this genetic trait exhibit weakened alcohol restraint, which increases the risk of developing alcohol-related cancers, such as esophageal and head/neck cancer, by more than ten times. Although this flushing phenomenon is crucial for public health, there is a paucity of studies that have comprehensively investigated the effect of flushing or its genotype on alcohol consumption in a large group of East Asians while controlling for various sociodemographic and health-related variables at a country level. OBJECTIVE: This two-year cross-sectional study aimed to explore the effect of flushing on drinking behavior in Koreans and to examine whether the effect varies across sociodemographic and health-related factors. METHODS: We used data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2019-2020 conducted by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Our sample comprised 10,660 Korean adults. The study investigated the association of 26 variables, including flushing, with drinking frequency and amount. The effect of flushing was examined with and without adjusting for the other 25 variables using multinomial logistic regression analysis. Additionally, we tested the interaction effect with flushing and conducted a simple effect analysis. To ensure unbiased results, we employed complex sample design elements, including strata, clusters, and weights, to obtain unbiased results for the Rao-Scott χ2 test, t-test, and multinomial logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The suppressive effect of flushing was significant across all pronounced categories of alcohol consumption at the significance level of .001 in 2019. The ranges of the standardized regression slopes and odds ratios were -6.70 ≥ ï¢ ≥ -11.25 and 0.78 ≥ OR ≥ 0.50 for frequency; -5.37 ≥ ï¢ ≥ -17.64 and 0.73 ≥ OR ≥ 0.36 for amount, respectively. The effect became somewhat stronger when adjusted for confounders. The effect also exhibited an overall stronger trend as the severity of alcohol consumption increased. The betas and odds ratios were consistently smaller in 2020 compared to the previous year. A simple effect analysis revealed a diminished alcohol-suppressive effect of flushing on alcohol consumption for specific groups (e.g., those with low levels of education, limited family support, physical labor, or health-related issues). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that flushing suppresses drinking in Koreans overall but has little or no effect in certain vulnerable populations. Therefore, health authorities should conduct targeted epidemiological studies to assess drinking patterns and disease profiles, particularly regarding alcohol-related cancers, and establish effective preventive measures tailored to this population.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ketamine has been used to control refractory cancer pain as an adjuvant to opioids. We conducted a prospective phase II study to investigate the efficacy and safety of 5-day continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) of Ketamine in terminally ill cancer patients with refractory cancer pain. METHODS: Hospitalized terminally ill cancer patients with refractory cancer pain were enrolled. Refractory cancer pain was indicated by requirements for 4 or more rescue opioids or pain intensity using numerical rating scale > personalized pain goal (PPG) despite of intravenous morphine equivalent daily dose (IV MEDD) ≥ 120 mg/day. The CIVI of ketamine was increased from .05 mg/kg/hour to .5 mg/kg/hour by .05 every 8 hours if pain intensity exceeded PPG or if number of rescue opioids ≥2 during prior 8 hours was required. The primary end-point was overall pain response rate, which indicates complete response (both rescue opioid ≤3/day and pain intensity ≤ PPG) plus partial response (rescue opioid ≤3/day), without unacceptable toxicities. RESULTS: Among 21 eligible patients enrolled between September 2019 and January 2023, 20 were analyzed. Most pain mechanisms were mixed type (n = 15, 75%), with neuropathic component (n = 17, 85%). The baseline background opioids were IV MEDD 186 mg/24hour (range, 124-592), number of rescue opioids was 6 (IQR, 5-9), and median PPG was 4 (IQR, 3-4). The overall pain response rate was 50% (n = 10) including 40% (n = 8) for complete pain response and 10% (n = 2) for partial pain response. CONCLUSION: This study showed efficacy of gradually increasing CIVI of ketamine for terminally ill cancer patients with refractory cancer pain. CIVI of ketamine could be a useful tool in these patients considering the limited treatment options. (NCT03362073, Initial Release: November 15, 2017).
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Studies evaluating weight changes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have yielded inconsistent results, and most of those studies were based on self-reported anthropometric measures. We investigated changes in body mass index (BMI), professionally measured waist circumference (WC), and metabolic syndrome components from before to during the pandemic in a sample of the adult population in Korea. METHODS: This retrospective study included 1,118 male and female (age≥18 years) who underwent health checkups at a university medical center between January 1, 2016 and March 31, 2022. Changes in BMI, lifestyles, and metabolic syndrome components during the pandemic were analyzed using the paired t-test, McNemar test, generalized estimating equations, and repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Changes in body weight, BMI, and body fat percentage during the pandemic were not clinically significant. However, statistically significant results were found for decreased physical activity (p<0.001) and WC (p<0.001), and exacerbation of all metabolic syndrome components (except serum triglyceride levels). Moreover, the metabolic syndrome prevalence increased significantly from 20.2% to 31.2% during the pandemic (p<0.001). The prevalence of abdominal obesity and high fasting blood glucose levels also significantly increased from 2019 to 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic syndrome, its components, and fat distribution worsened significantly after the implementation of social distancing and lockdowns, despite no clinically significant changes in body weight and BMI. Further studies on the post- pandemic period should investigate the long-term impact of social lockdowns on BMI and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome.