Venous thromboembolism incidence associated with pegylated asparaginase (ASP) compared to the native L-ASP: A retrospective analysis with an ASP-based protocol in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) receiving asparaginase (ASP)-based chemotherapy, including the ASP-intensive Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) 91-01 protocol for adults. Since 2019, native L-ASP is no longer available in Canada and was replaced by pegylated (PEG)-ASP. To determine whether the incidence of VTE has changed since switching from L-ASP to PEG-ASP, we conducted a single-centred retrospective cohort study. We included 245 adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome negative ALL between 2011 and 2021, with 175 from the L-ASP group (2011-2019) and 70 from the PEG-ASP group (2018-2021). During Induction, 10.29% (18/175) of patients who received L-ASP developed VTE, whereas 28.57% (20/70) of patients who received PEG-ASP developed VTE (p = 0.0035; odds ratio [OR] 3.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51-7.39), after adjusting for line type, gender, history of VTE, platelets at diagnosis. Similarly, during Intensification, 13.64% (18/132) of patients had VTE on L-ASP while 34.37% (11/32) of patients on PEG-ASP developed VTE (p = 0.0096; OR 3.96, 95% CI 1.57-9.96 with multivariable analysis). We found that PEG-ASP is associated with a higher incidence of VTE compared to L-ASP, both during Induction and Intensification, despite the administration of prophylactic anticoagulation. Further VTE mitigation strategies are needed in particular for adult patients with ALL receiving PEG-ASP.

Measurable residual disease monitoring provides insufficient lead-time to prevent morphologic relapse in the majority of patients with core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia is characterized by t(8;21) or inv(16) and the fusion proteins RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and CBFB-MYH11. International guidelines recommend monitoring for measurable residual disease every 3 months for 2 years after treatment. However, it is unknown if serial molecular monitoring can predict and prevent morphologic relapse. We conducted a retrospective single-center study of 114 patients in complete remission who underwent molecular monitoring with RT-qPCR of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 transcripts every 3 months. Morphologic relapse was defined as re-emergence of >5% blasts and molecular relapse as ≥1 log increase in transcript level between 2 samples. Over a median follow-up time of 3.7 years (range 0.2-14.3), remission persisted in 71 (62.3%) patients but 43 (37.7%) developed molecular or morphologic relapse. Patients who achieved <3 log reduction in RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 transcripts at end of chemotherapy had a significantly higher risk of relapse compared to patients who achieved ≥3 log reduction (61.1% vs. 33.7%, p=0.004). The majority of relapses (74.4%, n=32) were not predicted by molecular monitoring and occurred rapidly with <100 days from molecular to morphologic relapse. Molecular monitoring enabled the detection of impending relapse and permitted pre-emptive intervention prior to morphologic relapse in only 11 (25.6%) patients. The current practice of molecular monitoring every 3 months provided insufficient lead-time to identify molecular relapses and prevent morphologic relapse in the majority of patients with core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia treated at our institution. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal monitoring strategies for these patients.