How much time is enough? Sentinel lymph node mapping time depends on the radiotracer agent.

BACKGROUND: In 2014, technetium-99m tilmanocept (TcTM) replaced technetium-99m sulfur colloid (TcSC) as the standard lymphoscintigraphy (LS) mapping agent in melanoma patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The aim of this study was to examine differences in mapping time, intra-operative identification of sentinel lymph node (SLN), and false negative rate (FNR) between patients who underwent SLNB with TcTM compared to TcSC. METHODS: Patients who underwent SLNB between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Patient demographic, tumor, and imaging data was stratified by receipt of TcSC (n = 258) or TcTM (n = 133). Student's t test and χ2 test were used to compare characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: Both cohorts were similar in demographic, primary tumor characteristics, and total number of SLN identified (TcTM 3.56 vs. TcSC 3.28, p = 0.244). TcTM was associated with significantly shorter LS mapping times (51.8 vs. 195.1 min, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the number of patients with positive SLN (TcTM 11.3 vs. TcSC 17.4%, p = 0.109) and the FNR was similar between both groups (TcTM 25% vs. TcSC 22%). CONCLUSION: TcTM was associated with significantly shorter LS mapping time while identifying similar numbers of SLN. Our results support further study to ensure similar FNR and oncologic outcomes between agents.

Consecutive Case Series of Melanoma Sentinel Node Biopsy for Lymphoseek Compared to Sulfur Colloids.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an important adjunct in the staging of patients with melanoma. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with radiolabeled isotopes is essential to localize sentinel nodes for removal. Our study compared the effectiveness of Lymphoseek to standard sulfur colloids in patients with melanoma undergoing SLNB. METHODS: We queried our IRB-approved melanoma database to identify 370 consecutive patients who underwent SLNB from 2012 to 2016 with at least 1 y of follow-up. There were 185 patients in each group. Data points included characteristics of the primary melanoma lymphoscintigraphy and SLNB. Student's t-test and chi-square were used to analyze the data with a P value of <0.05 being considered significant. RESULTS: Patients were equally matched in regard to age, sex, and primary characteristics of their melanoma. In comparison to sulfur colloid, Lymphoseek required lower radiation dosages (P < 0.001), shorter mapping times (P = 0.008), and decreased number of sentinel nodes removed (P = 0.03). There was no difference in the number of patients with positive nodes (P = 0.5). In addition, there were no statistical differences between the two radioactive tracers in regard to the number of patients with false-negative SLNB. CONCLUSION: Lymphoseek has the potential to decrease radioactivity and mapping time in patients who need SLNB. With a decrease in the number of nodes removed without loss of sensitivity, there is a potential to avoid unnecessary node removal and thus complications such as lymphedema. Longer follow-up will help to determine if there is any increase in false-negative rates despite fewer nodes removed.

How I GPT It: Development of Custom Artificial Intelligence (AI) Chatbots for Surgical Education.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots provide a novel format for individuals to interact with large language models (LLMs). Recently released tools allow nontechnical users to develop chatbots using natural language. Surgical education is an exciting area in which chatbots developed in this manner may be rapidly deployed, though additional work will be required to ensure their accuracy and safety. In this paper, we outline our initial experience with AI chatbot creation in surgical education and offer considerations for future use of this technology.

Reimagining general surgery resident selection: Collaborative innovation through design thinking.

Introduction: The process by which surgery residency programs select applicants is complex, opaque, and susceptible to bias. Despite attempts by program directors and educational researchers to address these issues, residents have limited ability to affect change within the process at present. Here, we present the results of a design thinking brainstorm to improve resident selection and propose this technique as a framework for surgical residents to creatively solve problems and generate actionable changes. Methods: Members of the Collaboration of Surgical Education Fellows (CoSEF) used the design thinking framework to brainstorm ways to improve the resident selection process. Members participated in one virtual focus group focused on identifying pain points and developing divergent solutions to those pain points. Pain points and solutions were subsequently organized into themes. Finally, members participated in a second virtual focus group to design prototypes to test the proposed solutions. Results: Sixteen CoSEF members participated in one or both focus groups. Participants identified twelve pain points and 57 potential solutions. Pain points and solutions were grouped into the three themes of transparency, fairness, and applicant experience. Members subsequently developed five prototype ideas that could be rapidly developed and tested to improve resident selection. Conclusions: The design thinking framework can help surgical residents come up with creative ideas to improve pain points within surgical training. Furthermore, this framework can supplement existing quantitative and qualitative methods within surgical education research. Future work will be needed to implement the prototypes devised during our sessions and turn them into complete interventions. Key message: In this paper, we demonstrate the results of a resident-led design thinking brainstorm on improving resident selection in which our team identified twelve pain points in resident selection, ideated 57 solutions, and developed five prototypes for further testing. In addition to sharing our results, we believe design thinking can be a useful framework for creative problem solving within surgical education.

Use and Outcomes of Dexamethasone in the Management of Malignant Small Bowel Obstruction.

Objective: To describe rates of dexamethasone use in the nonoperative management of malignant small bowel obstruction (mSBO) and their outcomes. Background: mSBO is common in patients with advanced abdominal-pelvic cancers. Management includes prioritizing quality of life and avoiding surgical intervention when possible. The use of dexamethasone to restore bowel function is recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for mSBO. Yet, it is unknown how often dexamethasone is used for mSBO and whether results from nonresearch settings support its use. Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study including unique admissions for mSBO from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. Dexamethasone use and management outcomes were summarized with descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression. Results: Among 571 admissions (68% female, mean age 63 years, 85% history of abdominal surgery) that were eligible and initially nonoperative, 26% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 23%-30%] received dexamethasone treatment (69% female, mean age 62 years, 87% history of abdominal surgery). Dexamethasone use by site ranged from 13% to 52%. Among dexamethasone recipients, 13% (95% CI = 9%-20%) subsequently required nonelective surgery during the same admission and 4 dexamethasone-related safety-events were reported. Amongst 421 eligible admissions where dexamethasone was not used, 17% (95% CI = 14%-21%) required nonelective surgery. Overall, the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for nonelective surgery with dexamethasone use compared to without its use was 0.7 (95% CI = 0.4-1.3). Using multiple logistic regression, OR after adjusting for site, age, sex, history of abdominal surgery, nasogastric tube, and Gastrografin use was 0.6 (95% CI = 0.3-1.1). Conclusion: Dexamethasone was used in about 1 in 4 eligible mSBO admissions with high variability of use between tertiary academic centers. This multicenter retrospective cohort study suggested an association between dexamethasone use and lower rates of nonelective surgery, representing a potential opportunity for quality improvement.

Restorative pouch surgery following proctocolectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: past experience and future direction.

Major advancements in surgery for patients suffering proctocolitis from ulcerative colitis (UC) or selected patients with Crohn's disease (CD) have emerged in a relatively short time. Historically, patients underwent a proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, however, a restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) was introduced in the late 1970s in the United Kingdom and gave patients the opportunity to avoid a permanent stoma. Initially designed as a hand-sewn "S" shaped pouch, with the invention of the linear stapler, a "J" shaped pouch was described in Japan, and subsequent advances in the United States largely contributed to the pelvic pouch's evolution to the standard of care in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The procedure was then divided into different stages depending on the medical condition of the patient and minimally invasive techniques (laparoscopic & robotic surgery) have continued to advance the success of the operation. Unfortunately, pouch complications occur, and seem to be occurring at an increasing frequency with the adoption of minimally invasive surgery. The field of reoperative pouch surgery has emerged to offer patients the opportunity to restore their quality of life (QOL) without the need for a permanent ostomy. Many patients with signs of pouch failure such as pouchitis, fistulae, pain and obstruction are diagnosed with Crohn's of the pouch, but many have mechanical complications that can be corrected with surgery, rather than offering pouch excision with a permanent ostomy (continent or traditional). Patients with Crohn's may be offered an IPAA but they will not have success if they, like patients with UC, have mechanical complications leading to their pouch failure. Patients who undergo reoperative pouch surgery do well with an acceptable QOL.