Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Int J Cancer ; 144(6): 1234-1242, 2019 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30362502

RESUMEN

Wilms tumor demonstrates significant interethnic epidemiological, histological and outcome differences, and is rare and poorly studied among Asians. We compared the clinicopathological, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) profile and survival outcomes of Asian and non-Asian patients with Wilms tumor. Clinical charts and histological slides from patients with malignant renal tumors over a period of 20 years were retrospectively reviewed. We adapted a genotyping assay to determine 1p36 and 16q21-22 LOH in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens, and compared these characteristics between Asian and non-Asian patients. Fifty-three (79.1%) Asian and 14 (20.9%) non-Asian patients had Wilms tumors. Compared to non-Asians, Asians were younger (mean 4.6 and 4.0 years, respectively), had more equal gender distribution (female: male = 1.8 and 1.0, respectively), fewer tumors with unfavorable histology (25.0% and 4.1%, respectively, p = 0.05), and less advanced disease at presentation, yet similar nodal metastases rates (16.7% and 18.4%, respectively). No Asian patients had bilateral tumors. Our adapted genotyping assay accurately determined LOH in FFPE specimens <10 years post-fixation. Among 30 Asian patients, 1p and 16q LOH were each detected in 5 (16.7%) patients, respectively-similar to rates reported in other ethnicities. Yet after similar treatment with National Wilms Tumor Study regimens, 15-year event-free and overall survival for Asian patients was 95.7% and 96.3% respectively. In summary, despite similar nodal metastasis and LOH rates, Asian patients had fewer unfavorable histology tumors, lower-stage disease, and better survival outcomes. The bases for these differences and implications on treatment strategy for these patients warrant further study.


Asunto(s)
Pueblo Asiatico/genética , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Pérdida de Heterocigocidad , Tumor de Wilms/genética , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Cromosomas Humanos Par 1/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 11/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 16/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Singapur/epidemiología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tumor de Wilms/mortalidad , Tumor de Wilms/patología
2.
Br J Anaesth ; 122(5): 662-670, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30916007

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neonates and infants undergoing general anaesthesia for hernia surgery are at risk of perioperative cardiorespiratory adverse events. The use of regional anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine preserves airway tone and may potentially avoid these complications. This study compares the perioperative conditions and adverse events between dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal block and general anaesthesia with caudal block for inguinal hernia surgery in infants. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Singapore involving 104 infants younger than 3 months, who were randomised to receive either dexmedetomidine sedation (DEX) with caudal block or general sevoflurane anaesthesia with tracheal intubation and caudal block (GA) for inguinal hernia surgery. Perioperative conditions, haemodynamics and adverse events were compared between groups. RESULTS: Fifty-one infants received DEX and 48 infants received GA. In the DEX group, 46 infants (90.2%) had their operations completed solely under this technique, two (3.9%) were converted to general anaesthesia with intubation, and three (5.9%) required brief administration of nitrous oxide or low-dose sevoflurane. Overall, 96.1% of infants in the DEX group did not require intubation. Perioperative conditions were similar in both groups. The DEX group had significantly lower heart rates and higher mean arterial pressures intraoperatively. Two infants in the DEX group (3.9%) required postoperative intensive care admission compared with six infants (12.5%) in the GA group. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal block provides a feasible alternative to general anaesthesia in infants undergoing hernia surgery. This technique avoids the need for tracheal intubation, which may be beneficial in neonates. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02559102.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia por Inhalación/métodos , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Dexmedetomidina , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Anestesia Caudal/efectos adversos , Anestesia Caudal/métodos , Anestesia por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Sedación Consciente/efectos adversos , Dexmedetomidina/efectos adversos , Dexmedetomidina/farmacología , Femenino , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Masculino , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(6)2024 Jun 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38871644

RESUMEN

Spontaneous pampiniform plexus thrombosis is an extremely rare condition. Its aetiology and pathophysiology are unknown, and its diagnosis remains challenging. We present the first case of an adolescent patient with bilateral spontaneous pampiniform plexus thrombosis. He presented with a 2-day history of bilateral testicular pain. Biochemical investigations were unremarkable, and the patient did not have any risk factors. Ultrasound of the scrotum demonstrated bilateral pampiniform plexus thrombosis. He was managed conservatively and repeat scrotal ultrasound 3 months later revealed complete resolution. This case adds to the minimal literature on spontaneous pampiniform plexus thrombosis, supporting diagnosis via scrotal ultrasound while recommending conservative management without the use of anticoagulation for patients with no pre-existing coagulopathy.


Asunto(s)
Escroto , Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Escroto/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía , Tratamiento Conservador , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis/diagnóstico , Trombosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico
4.
J Pediatr Surg ; 58(7): 1285-1290, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36931940

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a protocol was adopted by our department on antibiotics treatment for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis (AUA). Our study aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of non-operative treatment (NOT), compared to upfront laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), for AUA in children during the pandemic. METHOD: Our prospective comparative study was conducted from May 1, 2020 to January 31, 2021. Patient selection criteria included: age ≥5 years, abdominal pain duration ≤48 h, ultrasound (US)/Computered Tomography scan confirmation of AUA, US appendiceal diameter 6-11 mm with no features of perforation/abscess collection and no faecolith. For NOT patients, intravenous antibiotics were administered for 24-48 h followed by oral for 10-day course. Comparison was performed between patients whose parents preferred NOT to those who opted for up-front appendectomy. Primary outcomes were NOT success at index admission, early and late NOT failure rates till 27 months. Secondary outcomes were differences in complication rate, hospital length of stay (LOS) and cost between groups. RESULTS: 77 patients were recruited: 43 (55.8%) underwent NOT while 34 (44.2%) patients opted for LA. Success of NOT at index admission was 90.7% (39/43). Overall, NOT failure rate at 27 months' follow-up was 37.2% (16/43). Of the NOT failures, 1 appendix was normal on histology while only 1 was perforated. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between both groups except for LOS of late NOT failure. Cost for upfront LA was nearly thrice that of NOT. CONCLUSION: Our stringent COVID protocol together with shared decision-making with parents is a safe and feasible treatment option during a crisis situation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Treatment study, Level II.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , COVID-19 , Laparoscopía , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Pandemias , Estudios Prospectivos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Apendicectomía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad Aguda
5.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 935082, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36340705

RESUMEN

Purpose: This study aims to compare the outcomes of extravesical (EVUR) and intravesical (IVUR) ureteric reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) via systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Literature review from Medline, Embase, and Cochrane since inception to March 2022 was performed. Meta-analysis was conducted on eligible randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational cohort studies (OCS) comparing outcomes between EVUR and IVUR. Results: Twelve studies were included, comprising 577 patients (778 ureters) operated by EVUR and 395 patients (635 ureters) by IVUR. Pre-operative VUR grade, postoperative VUR persistence and hydronephrosis was not statistically significant. EVUR had shorter operative time [mean differences (MD) -22.91 min; 95% confidence interval (CI), -44.53 to -1.30, P = 0.04] and hospital stay (MD -2.09 days; 95% CI, -2.82 to -1.36, P < 0.00001) compared to IVUR. Bilateral EVUR had higher risk of postoperative acute urinary retention (ARU) (8.1%) compared to bilateral IVUR (1.7%) (OR = 4.40; 95% CI, 1.33-14.58, P = 0.02). No patient undergoing unilateral EVUR or IVUR experienced ARU. Conclusion: Both EVUR and IVUR are equally effective in correcting primary VUR. Operative time and hospital stay are shorter after EVUR compared to IVUR. However, bilateral EVUR is associated with higher risk of postoperative ARU.

6.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20132013 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23964045

RESUMEN

The cooccurrence of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and oesophageal atresia with distal tracheo-oesophageal fistula is very rare and carries high mortality. Very few anecdotal case reports and one case series have been reported in the literature. We report a case of a late preterm, low birth weight infant with this rare association who was successfully managed by staged surgical approach and had good outcome.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Múltiples/cirugía , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Fístula Traqueoesofágica/cirugía , Atresia Esofágica , Hernia Diafragmática/cirugía , Humanos , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA