RESUMEN
Bile acids (BAs) are steroid detergents in bile that contribute to the absorption of fats and fat-soluble vitamins while shaping the gut microbiome because of their antimicrobial properties1-4. Here we identify the enzyme responsible for a mechanism of BA metabolism by the gut microbiota involving amino acid conjugation to the acyl-site of BAs, thus producing a diverse suite of microbially conjugated bile acids (MCBAs). We show that this transformation is mediated by acyltransferase activity of bile salt hydrolase (bile salt hydrolase/transferase, BSH/T). Clostridium perfringens BSH/T rapidly performed acyl transfer when provided various amino acids and taurocholate, glycocholate or cholate, with an optimum at pH 5.3. Amino acid conjugation by C. perfringens BSH/T was diverse, including all proteinaceous amino acids except proline and aspartate. MCBA production was widespread among gut bacteria, with strain-specific amino acid use. Species with similar BSH/T amino acid sequences had similar conjugation profiles and several bsh/t alleles correlated with increased conjugation diversity. Tertiary structure mapping of BSH/T followed by mutagenesis experiments showed that active site structure affects amino acid selectivity. These MCBA products had antimicrobial properties, where greater amino acid hydrophobicity showed greater antimicrobial activity. Inhibitory concentrations of MCBAs reached those measured natively in the mammalian gut. MCBAs fed to mice entered enterohepatic circulation, in which liver and gallbladder concentrations varied depending on the conjugated amino acid. Quantifying MCBAs in human faecal samples showed that they reach concentrations equal to or greater than secondary and primary BAs and were reduced after bariatric surgery, thus supporting MCBAs as a significant component of the BA pool that can be altered by changes in gastrointestinal physiology. In conclusion, the inherent acyltransferase activity of BSH/T greatly diversifies BA chemistry, creating a set of previously underappreciated metabolites with the potential to affect the microbiome and human health.
Asunto(s)
Aciltransferasas , Amidohidrolasas , Ácidos y Sales Biliares , Clostridium perfringens , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Animales , Humanos , Ratones , Aciltransferasas/química , Aciltransferasas/metabolismo , Alelos , Amidohidrolasas/química , Amidohidrolasas/metabolismo , Aminoácidos/metabolismo , Antiinfecciosos/metabolismo , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Cirugía Bariátrica , Ácidos y Sales Biliares/química , Ácidos y Sales Biliares/metabolismo , Dominio Catalítico , Clostridium perfringens/enzimología , Clostridium perfringens/metabolismo , Heces/química , Vesícula Biliar/metabolismo , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Interacciones Hidrofóbicas e Hidrofílicas , Hígado/metabolismo , Ácido Taurocólico/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current therapies for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection do not address the disrupted microbiome, which supports C. difficile spore germination into toxin-producing bacteria. SER-109 is an investigational microbiome therapeutic composed of purified Firmicutes spores for the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in which patients who had had three or more episodes of C. difficile infection (inclusive of the qualifying acute episode) received SER-109 or placebo (four capsules daily for 3 days) after standard-of-care antibiotic treatment. The primary efficacy objective was to show superiority of SER-109 as compared with placebo in reducing the risk of C. difficile infection recurrence up to 8 weeks after treatment. Diagnosis by toxin testing was performed at trial entry, and randomization was stratified according to age and antibiotic agent received. Analyses of safety, microbiome engraftment, and metabolites were also performed. RESULTS: Among the 281 patients screened, 182 were enrolled. The percentage of patients with recurrence of C. difficile infection was 12% in the SER-109 group and 40% in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.58; P<0.001 for a relative risk of <1.0; P<0.001 for a relative risk of <0.833). SER-109 led to less frequent recurrence than placebo in analyses stratified according to age stratum (relative risk, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.78] for patients <65 years of age and 0.36 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.72] for those ≥65 years) and antibiotic received (relative risk, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.79] with vancomycin and 0.09 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.63] with fidaxomicin). Most adverse events were mild to moderate and were gastrointestinal in nature, with similar numbers in the two groups. SER-109 dose species were detected as early as week 1 and were associated with bile-acid profiles that are known to inhibit C. difficile spore germination. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with symptom resolution of C. difficile infection after treatment with standard-of-care antibiotics, oral administration of SER-109 was superior to placebo in reducing the risk of recurrent infection. The observed safety profile of SER-109 was similar to that of placebo. (Funded by Seres Therapeutics; ECOSPOR III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03183128.).
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Firmicutes , Anciano , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Tracto Gastrointestinal/microbiología , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Microbiota/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Prevención Secundaria , Esporas BacterianasRESUMEN
Rare genetic diseases affect millions, and identifying causal DNA variants is essential for patient care. Therefore, it is imperative to estimate the effect of each independent variant and improve their pathogenicity classification. Our study of 140 214 unrelated UK Biobank (UKB) participants found that each of them carries a median of 7 variants previously reported as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. We focused on 967 diagnostic-grade gene (DGG) variants for rare bleeding, thrombotic, and platelet disorders (BTPDs) observed in 12 367 UKB participants. By association analysis, for a subset of these variants, we estimated effect sizes for platelet count and volume, and odds ratios for bleeding and thrombosis. Variants causal of some autosomal recessive platelet disorders revealed phenotypic consequences in carriers. Loss-of-function variants in MPL, which cause chronic amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia if biallelic, were unexpectedly associated with increased platelet counts in carriers. We also demonstrated that common variants identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for platelet count or thrombosis risk may influence the penetrance of rare variants in BTPD DGGs on their associated hemostasis disorders. Network-propagation analysis applied to an interactome of 18 410 nodes and 571 917 edges showed that GWAS variants with large effect sizes are enriched in DGGs and their first-order interactors. Finally, we illustrate the modifying effect of polygenic scores for platelet count and thrombosis risk on disease severity in participants carrying rare variants in TUBB1 or PROC and PROS1, respectively. Our findings demonstrate the power of association analyses using large population datasets in improving pathogenicity classifications of rare variants.
Asunto(s)
Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Trombosis , Humanos , Bancos de Muestras Biológicas , Hemostasis , Hemorragia/genética , Enfermedades RarasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although comorbidities are risk factors for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI), many clinical trials exclude patients with medical conditions such as malignancy or immunosuppression. In a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial (ECOSPOR III), fecal microbiota spores, live (VOWST, Seres Therapeutics; hereafter "VOS," formerly SER-109), an oral microbiota therapeutic, significantly reduced the risk of rCDI at week 8. We evaluated the efficacy of VOS compared with placebo in patients with comorbidities and other risk factors for rCDI. METHODS: Adults with rCDI were randomized to receive VOS or placebo (4 capsules daily for 3 days) following standard-of-care antibiotics. In this post hoc analysis, the rate of rCDI through week 8 was assessed in VOS-treated participants compared with placebo for subgroups including (i) Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score category (0, 1-2, 3-4, ≥5); (ii) baseline creatinine clearance (<30, 30-50, >50 to 80, or >80 mL/minute); (iii) number of CDI episodes, inclusive of the qualifying episode (3 and ≥4); (iv) exposure to non-CDI-targeted antibiotics after dosing; and (v) acid-suppressing medication use at baseline. RESULTS: Of 281 participants screened, 182 were randomized (59.9% female; mean age, 65.5 years). Comorbidities were common with a mean overall baseline age-adjusted CCI score of 4.1 (4.1 in the VOS arm and 4.2 in the placebo arm). Across all subgroups analyzed, VOS-treated participants had a lower relative risk of recurrence compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis, VOS reduced the risk of rCDI compared with placebo, regardless of baseline characteristics, concomitant medications, or comorbidities.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Microbiota , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Prevalencia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To identify and validate novel COVID-19 subphenotypes with potential heterogenous treatment effects (HTEs) using electronic health record (EHR) data and 33 unique biomarkers. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of adults presenting for acute care, with analysis of biomarkers from residual blood collected during routine clinical care. Latent profile analysis (LPA) of biomarker and EHR data identified subphenotypes of COVID-19 inpatients, which were validated using a separate cohort of patients. HTE for glucocorticoid use among subphenotypes was evaluated using both an adjusted logistic regression model and propensity matching analysis for in-hospital mortality. SETTING: Emergency departments from four medical centers. PATIENTS: Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 based on International Classification of Diseases , 10th Revision codes and laboratory test results. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Biomarker levels generally paralleled illness severity, with higher levels among more severely ill patients. LPA of 522 COVID-19 inpatients from three sites identified two profiles: profile 1 ( n = 332), with higher levels of albumin and bicarbonate, and profile 2 ( n = 190), with higher inflammatory markers. Profile 2 patients had higher median length of stay (7.4 vs 4.1 d; p < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality compared with profile 1 patients (25.8% vs 4.8%; p < 0.001). These were validated in a separate, single-site cohort ( n = 192), which demonstrated similar outcome differences. HTE was observed ( p = 0.03), with glucocorticoid treatment associated with increased mortality for profile 1 patients (odds ratio = 4.54). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter study combining EHR data with research biomarker analysis of patients with COVID-19, we identified novel profiles with divergent clinical outcomes and differential treatment responses.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores , Mortalidad HospitalariaRESUMEN
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoaV-2) is responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In randomized clinical trials, patients who were treated with the anti-spike monoclonal antibody bamlanivimab had fewer COVID-19-related hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits than the control group. Methods: A retrospective cohort was assembled across a multisite healthcare system between November 20, 2020 and March 31, 2021. Ambulatory COVID-19 patients treated with bamlanivimab (n = 209) were propensity score matched without replacement (1:1) to a pool of 1024 eligible control patients who received similar care without bamlanivimab. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality or admission at 30 days. Secondary endpoints included hospitalization, critical care admission, oxygenation requirements, and infusion-related reactions. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to assess the effect of bamlanivimab infusion on the composite endpoint and secondary endpoints. Results: A total of n = 209 matched patients were included in each arm of the study. The absolute standardized difference (stddiff) was calculated and indicated a balance between the groups. Almost all variables had a stddiff of less than 0.10, except for respiratory rate (RR) (stddiff = -0.11). For the primary composite endpoint of the matched cohort, 10.1% (n = 21) of patients in the intervention group were hospitalized or deceased within 30-day postbamlanivimab infusion versus 27.8% (n = 58) in the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17 to 0.51, P < .001). Conclusion: Patients with ambulatory COVID-19 who received bamlanivimab in the outpatient setting had a statistically significant reduction on the odds of admission postinfusion. Despite bamlanivimab's lack of efficacy on newer SARS-CoV-2 variants, this study demonstrates that neutralizing monoclonal antibodies can be effective against specific variants. If variant identification becomes a more accessible tool in outpatient centers or EDs, more targeted therapeutic options may be considered.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , COVID-19 , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Gray platelet syndrome (GPS) is a rare recessive disorder caused by biallelic variants in NBEAL2 and characterized by bleeding symptoms, the absence of platelet α-granules, splenomegaly, and bone marrow (BM) fibrosis. Due to the rarity of GPS, it has been difficult to fully understand the pathogenic processes that lead to these clinical sequelae. To discern the spectrum of pathologic features, we performed a detailed clinical genotypic and phenotypic study of 47 patients with GPS and identified 32 new etiologic variants in NBEAL2. The GPS patient cohort exhibited known phenotypes, including macrothrombocytopenia, BM fibrosis, megakaryocyte emperipolesis of neutrophils, splenomegaly, and elevated serum vitamin B12 levels. Novel clinical phenotypes were also observed, including reduced leukocyte counts and increased presence of autoimmune disease and positive autoantibodies. There were widespread differences in the transcriptome and proteome of GPS platelets, neutrophils, monocytes, and CD4 lymphocytes. Proteins less abundant in these cells were enriched for constituents of granules, supporting a role for Nbeal2 in the function of these organelles across a wide range of blood cells. Proteomic analysis of GPS plasma showed increased levels of proteins associated with inflammation and immune response. One-quarter of plasma proteins increased in GPS are known to be synthesized outside of hematopoietic cells, predominantly in the liver. In summary, our data show that, in addition to the well-described platelet defects in GPS, there are immune defects. The abnormal immune cells may be the drivers of systemic abnormalities such as autoimmune disease.
Asunto(s)
Gránulos Citoplasmáticos/patología , Heterogeneidad Genética , Síndrome de Plaquetas Grises , Sistema Inmunológico/patología , Fenotipo , Biopsia , Proteínas Sanguíneas/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Gránulos Citoplasmáticos/metabolismo , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Frecuencia de los Genes , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Síndrome de Plaquetas Grises/clasificación , Síndrome de Plaquetas Grises/genética , Síndrome de Plaquetas Grises/inmunología , Síndrome de Plaquetas Grises/patología , Humanos , Sistema Inmunológico/fisiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Inmune/sangre , Enfermedades del Sistema Inmune/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Inmune/genética , Enfermedades del Sistema Inmune/patología , MutaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although the risk of exposure to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is higher for frontline healthcare workers, not all personnel have similar risks. Determining infection rate is difficult due to the limits on testing and the high rate of asymptomatic individuals. Detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 may be useful for determining prior exposure to the virus and assessing mitigation strategies, such as isolation, masks, and other protective equipment. METHODS: An online assessment that included demographic, clinical, and exposure information and a blood sample was collected from 20 614 participants out of ~43 000 total employees at Beaumont Health, which includes 8 hospitals distributed across the Detroit metropolitan area in southeast Michigan. The presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was determined using the EUROIMMUN assay. RESULTS: A total of 1818 (8.8%) participants were seropositive between April 13 and May 28, 2020. Among the seropositive individuals, 44% reported that they were asymptomatic during the month prior to blood collection. Healthcare roles such as phlebotomy, respiratory therapy, and nursing/nursing support exhibited significantly higher seropositivity. Among participants reporting direct exposure to a Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive individual, those wearing an N95/PAPR mask had a significantly lower seropositivity rate (10.2%) compared to surgical/other masks (13.1%) or no mask (17.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Direct contact with COVID-19 patients increased the likelihood of seropositivity among employees but study participants who wore a mask during COVID-19 exposures were less likely to be seropositive. Additionally, a large proportion of seropositive employees self-reported as asymptomatic. (Funded by Beaumont Health and by major donors through the Beaumont Health Foundation). CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER: NCT04349202.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Michigan , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Remdesivir is efficacious for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults, but data in pregnant women are limited. We describe outcomes in the first 86 pregnant women with severe COVID-19 who were treated with remdesivir. METHODS: The reported data span 21 March to 16 June 2020 for hospitalized pregnant women with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and room air oxygen saturation ≤94% whose clinicians requested remdesivir through the compassionate use program. The intended remdesivir treatment course was 10 days (200 mg on day 1, followed by 100 mg for days 2-10, given intravenously). RESULTS: Nineteen of 86 women delivered before their first dose and were reclassified as immediate "postpartum" (median postpartum dayâ 1 [range, 0-3]). At baseline, 40% of pregnant women (median gestational age, 28 weeks) required invasive ventilation, in contrast to 95% of postpartum women (median gestational age at delivery 30 weeks). By day 28 of follow-up, the level of oxygen requirement decreased in 96% and 89% of pregnant and postpartum women, respectively. Among pregnant women, 93% of those on mechanical ventilation were extubated, 93% recovered, and 90% were discharged. Among postpartum women, 89% were extubated, 89% recovered, and 84% were discharged. Remdesivir was well tolerated, with a low incidence of serious adverse events (AEs) (16%). Most AEs were related to pregnancy and underlying disease; most laboratory abnormalities were grade 1 or 2. There was 1 maternal death attributed to underlying disease and no neonatal deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Among 86 pregnant and postpartum women with severe COVID-19 who received compassionate-use remdesivir, recovery rates were high, with a low rate of serious AEs.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Ensayos de Uso Compasivo , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Saturación de Oxígeno , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Mujeres Embarazadas , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Intravenous (i.v.) minocycline is increasingly used to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii Despite its being approved nearly 50 years ago, published information on its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile is limited. This multicenter study examined the PK and probability of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) target attainment profile of i.v. minocycline in critically ill patients, with suspected or documented infection with Gram-negative bacteria. The PK study population included 55 patients who received a single 200-mg i.v. dose of minocycline. Plasma PK samples were collected predose and 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h after initiation of minocycline. Total and unbound minocycline concentrations were determined at each time point. Probabilities of achieving the PK-PD targets associated with stasis and 1-log killing (free area under the curve above the MIC [fAUC:MIC] of 12 and 18, respectively) in an immunocompetent animal pneumonia infection model of A. baumannii were evaluated. A two-compartment population PK model with zero-order i.v. input and first-order elimination, which estimated a constant fraction unbound (fub) for minocycline, best characterized the total and unbound plasma minocycline concentration-time data. The only two covariates retained in the final PK model were body surface area (associated with central volume of distribution) and albumin (associated with fub). In the PK-PD probability of target attainment analyses, minocycline 200 mg i.v. every 12 h (Q12H) was predicted to result in a suboptimal PK-PD profile for patients with A. baumannii infections with MIC values of >1 mg/liter. Like all PK-PD profiling studies of this nature, these findings need clinical confirmation.
Asunto(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii , Minociclina , Adulto , Animales , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad MicrobianaRESUMEN
Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) culture is a standard, though time-consuming, approach for identifying microorganisms in patients with severe lower respiratory tract (LRT) infections. The sensitivity of BAL culture is relatively low, and prior antimicrobial therapy decreases the sensitivity further, leading to overuse of empirical antibiotics. The Unyvero LRT BAL Application (Curetis GmbH, Germany) is a multiplex molecular panel that detects 19 bacteria, 10 antibiotic resistance markers, and a fungus, Pneumocystis jirovecii, in BAL fluid in â¼4.5 h. Its performance was evaluated using 1,016 prospectively collected and 392 archived specimens from 11 clinical trial sites in the United States. Overall positive and negative percent agreements with culture results for identification of bacteria that grow in routine cultures were 93.4% and 98.3%, respectively, with additional potential pathogens identified by Unyvero in 21.7% of prospectively collected specimens. For detection of P. jirovecii, the positive percent agreement with standard testing was 87.5%. Antibiotic resistance marker results were compared to standard antibiotic susceptibility test results to determine positive predictive values (PPVs). PPVs ranged from 80 to 100%, based on the microorganism and specific resistance marker(s). The Unyvero LRT BAL Application provides accurate detection of common agents of bacterial pneumonia and of P. jirovecii The sensitivity and rapidity of this panel suggest significant clinical value for choosing appropriate antibiotics and for antibiotic stewardship.
Asunto(s)
Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex , Neumonía Bacteriana , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Alemania , Humanos , Neumonía Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
To identify novel causes of hereditary thrombocytopenia, we performed a genetic association analysis of whole-genome sequencing data from 13 037 individuals enrolled in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) BioResource, including 233 cases with isolated thrombocytopenia. We found an association between rare variants in the transcription factor-encoding gene IKZF5 and thrombocytopenia. We report 5 causal missense variants in or near IKZF5 zinc fingers, of which 2 occurred de novo and 3 co-segregated in 3 pedigrees. A canonical DNA-zinc finger binding model predicts that 3 of the variants alter DNA recognition. Expression studies showed that chromatin binding was disrupted in mutant compared with wild-type IKZF5, and electron microscopy revealed a reduced quantity of α granules in normally sized platelets. Proplatelet formation was reduced in megakaryocytes from 7 cases relative to 6 controls. Comparison of RNA-sequencing data from platelets, monocytes, neutrophils, and CD4+ T cells from 3 cases and 14 healthy controls showed 1194 differentially expressed genes in platelets but only 4 differentially expressed genes in each of the other blood cell types. In conclusion, IKZF5 is a novel transcriptional regulator of megakaryopoiesis and the eighth transcription factor associated with dominant thrombocytopenia in humans.
Asunto(s)
Plaquetas , Enfermedades Genéticas Congénitas , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Factor de Transcripción Ikaros , Mutación Missense , Trombocitopenia , Trombopoyesis/genética , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Plaquetas/ultraestructura , Cromatina/genética , Cromatina/metabolismo , Cromatina/ultraestructura , Gránulos Citoplasmáticos/genética , Gránulos Citoplasmáticos/metabolismo , Gránulos Citoplasmáticos/ultraestructura , Femenino , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Enfermedades Genéticas Congénitas/genética , Enfermedades Genéticas Congénitas/metabolismo , Enfermedades Genéticas Congénitas/patología , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Factor de Transcripción Ikaros/genética , Factor de Transcripción Ikaros/metabolismo , Masculino , Trombocitopenia/genética , Trombocitopenia/metabolismo , Trombocitopenia/patologíaRESUMEN
Thrombosis and platelet activation play a central role in stroke pathogenesis, and antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies are central to stroke prevention. However, whether haematological traits contribute equally to all ischaemic stroke subtypes is uncertain. Furthermore, identification of associations with new traits may offer novel treatment opportunities. The aim of this research was to ascertain causal relationships between a wide range of haematological traits and ischaemic stroke and its subtypes. We obtained summary statistics from 27 published genome-wide association studies of haematological traits involving over 375 000 individuals, and genetic associations with stroke from the MEGASTROKE Consortium (n = 67 000 stroke cases). Using two-sample Mendelian randomization we analysed the association of genetically elevated levels of 36 blood cell traits (platelets, mature/immature red cells, and myeloid/lymphoid/compound white cells) and 49 haemostasis traits (including clotting cascade factors and markers of platelet function) with risk of developing ischaemic (AIS), cardioembolic (CES), large artery (LAS), and small vessel stroke (SVS). Several factors on the intrinsic clotting pathway were significantly associated (P < 3.85 × 10-4) with CES and LAS, but not with SVS (e.g. reduced factor VIII activity with AIS/CES/LAS; raised factor VIII antigen with AIS/CES; and increased factor XI activity with AIS/CES). On the common pathway, increased gamma (γ') fibrinogen was significantly associated with AIS/CES. Furthermore, elevated plateletcrit was significantly associated with AIS/CES, eosinophil percentage of white cells with LAS, and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor activation peptide antigen with AIS. We also conducted a follow-up analysis in UK Biobank, which showed that amongst individuals with atrial fibrillation, those with genetically lower levels of factor XI are at reduced risk of AIS compared to those with normal levels of factor XI. These results implicate components of the intrinsic and common pathways of the clotting cascade, as well as several other haematological traits, in the pathogenesis of CES and possibly LAS, but not SVS. The lack of associations with SVS suggests thrombosis may be less important for this stroke subtype. Plateletcrit and factor XI are potentially tractable new targets for secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke, while factor VIII and γ' fibrinogen require further population-based studies to ascertain their possible aetiological roles.
Asunto(s)
Coagulación Sanguínea/genética , Fibrinólisis/genética , Embolia Intracraneal/sangre , Trombosis Intracraneal/sangre , Activación Plaquetaria/genética , Accidente Cerebrovascular/sangre , Recuento de Células Sanguíneas , Isquemia Encefálica/sangre , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Causalidad , Factor VIII/metabolismo , Factor XI/metabolismo , Fibrinógeno/metabolismo , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Humanos , Embolia Intracraneal/epidemiología , Trombosis Intracraneal/epidemiología , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is the most commonly administered antibiotic in hospitalized patients, but optimal exposure targets remain controversial. To clarify the therapeutic exposure range, this study evaluated the association between vancomycin exposure and outcomes in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter (n = 14), observational study of 265 hospitalized adults with MRSA bacteremia treated with vancomycin. The primary outcome was treatment failure (TF), defined as 30-day mortality or persistent bacteremia ≥7 days. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI). The study was powered to compare TF between patients who achieved or did not achieve day 2 area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) thresholds previously found to be associated with lower incidences of TF. The thresholds, analyzed separately as co-primary endpoints, were AUC/MIC by broth microdilution ≥650 and AUC/MIC by Etest ≥320. RESULTS: Treatment failure and AKI occurred in 18% and 26% of patients, respectively. Achievement of the prespecified day 2 AUC/MIC thresholds was not associated with less TF. Alternative day 2 AUC/MIC thresholds associated with lower TF risks were not identified. A relationship between the day 2 AUC and AKI was observed. Patients with day 2 AUC ≤515 experienced the best global outcomes (no TF and no AKI). CONCLUSIONS: Higher vancomycin exposures did not confer a lower TF risk but were associated with more AKI. The findings suggest that vancomycin dosing should be guided by the AUC and day 2 AUCs should be ≤515. As few patients had day 2 AUCs <400, further study is needed to define the lower bound of the therapeutic range.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vancomicina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Blood culture (BC) often fails to detect bloodstream microorganisms in sepsis. However, molecular diagnostics hold great potential. The molecular method PCR/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) can detect DNA from hundreds of different microorganisms in whole blood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of this method in a multicenter study including 16 teaching hospitals in the United States (n = 13) and Europe (n = 3). First, on testing of 2,754 contrived whole blood samples, with or without spiked microorganisms, PCR/ESI-MS produced 99.1% true-positive and 97.2% true-negative results. Second, among 1,460 patients with suspected sepsis (sepsis-2 definition), BC and PCR/ESI-MS on whole blood were positive in 14.6% and 25.6% of cases, respectively, with the following result combinations: BC positive and PCR/ESI-MS negative, 4.3%; BC positive and PCR/ESI-MS positive, 10.3%; BC negative and PCR/ESI-MS positive, 15.3%; and BC negative and PCR/ESI-MS negative, 70.1%. Compared with BC, PCR/ESI-MS showed the following sensitivities (coagulase-negative staphylococci not included): Gram-positive bacteria, 58%; Gram-negative bacteria, 78%; and Candida species, 83%. The specificities were >94% for all individual species. Patients who had received prior antimicrobial medications (n = 603) had significantly higher PCR/ESI-MS positivity rates than patients without prior antimicrobial treatment-31% versus 22% (P < 0.0001)-with pronounced differences for Gram-negative bacteria and Candida species. In conclusion, PCR/ESI-MS showed excellent performance on contrived samples. On clinical samples, it showed high specificities, moderately high sensitivities for Gram-negative bacteria and Candida species, and elevated positivity rates during antimicrobial treatment. These promising results encourage further development of molecular diagnostics to be used with whole blood for detection of bloodstream microorganisms in sepsis.
Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Espectrometría de Masa por Ionización de Electrospray , Cultivo de Sangre , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Sepsis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Importance: The appropriate duration of antibiotics for staphylococcal bacteremia is unknown. Objective: To test whether an algorithm that defines treatment duration for staphylococcal bacteremia vs standard of care provides noninferior efficacy without increasing severe adverse events. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized trial involving adults with staphylococcal bacteremia was conducted at 16 academic medical centers in the United States (n = 15) and Spain (n = 1) from April 2011 to March 2017. Patients were followed up for 42 days beyond end of therapy for those with Staphylococcus aureus and 28 days for those with coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia. Eligible patients were 18 years or older and had 1 or more blood cultures positive for S aureus or coagulase-negative staphylococci. Patients were excluded if they had known or suspected complicated infection at the time of randomization. Interventions: Patients were randomized to algorithm-based therapy (n = 255) or usual practice (n = 254). Diagnostic evaluation, antibiotic selection, and duration of therapy were predefined for the algorithm group, whereas clinicians caring for patients in the usual practice group had unrestricted choice of antibiotics, duration, and other aspects of clinical care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary outcomes were (1) clinical success, as determined by a blinded adjudication committee and tested for noninferiority within a 15% margin; and (2) serious adverse event rates in the intention-to-treat population, tested for superiority. The prespecified secondary outcome measure, tested for superiority, was antibiotic days among per-protocol patients with simple or uncomplicated bacteremia. Results: Among the 509 patients randomized (mean age, 56.6 [SD, 16.8] years; 226 [44.4%] women), 480 (94.3%) completed the trial. Clinical success was documented in 209 of 255 patients assigned to algorithm-based therapy and 207 of 254 randomized to usual practice (82.0% vs 81.5%; difference, 0.5% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -6.2% to ∞]). Serious adverse events were reported in 32.5% of algorithm-based therapy patients and 28.3% of usual practice patients (difference, 4.2% [95% CI, -3.8% to 12.2%]). Among per-protocol patients with simple or uncomplicated bacteremia, mean duration of therapy was 4.4 days for algorithm-based therapy vs 6.2 days for usual practice (difference, -1.8 days [95% CI, -3.1 to -0.6]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with staphylococcal bacteremia, the use of an algorithm to guide testing and treatment compared with usual care resulted in a noninferior rate of clinical success. Rates of serious adverse events were not significantly different, but interpretation is limited by wide confidence intervals. Further research is needed to assess the utility of the algorithm. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01191840.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Coagulasa , Intervalos de Confianza , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método Simple Ciego , Staphylococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificaciónRESUMEN
Objectives: The ß-lactamase inhibitor relebactam can restore imipenem activity against imipenem non-susceptible pathogens. Methods: To explore relebactam's safety, tolerability and efficacy, we conducted a randomized (1:1:1), controlled, Phase 2 trial comparing imipenem/cilastatin+relebactam 250 mg, imipenem/cilastatin+relebactam 125 mg and imipenem/cilastatin alone in adults with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) or acute pyelonephritis, regardless of baseline pathogen susceptibility. Treatment was administered intravenously every 6 h for 4-14 days, with optional step-down to oral ciprofloxacin. The primary endpoint was favourable microbiological response rate (pathogen eradication) at discontinuation of intravenous therapy (DCIV) in the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population. Non-inferiority of imipenem/cilastatin+relebactam over imipenem/cilastatin alone was defined as lower bounds of the 95% CI for treatment differences being above -15%. Results: At DCIV, 71 patients in the imipenem/cilastatinâ¯+â¯250 mg relebactam, 79 in the imipenem/cilastatinâ¯+â¯125 mg relebactam and 80 in the imipenem/cilastatin-only group were ME; 51.7% had cUTI and 48.3% acute pyelonephritis. Microbiological response rates were 95.5%, 98.6% and 98.7%, respectively, confirming non-inferiority of both imipenem/cilastatinâ¯+â¯relebactam doses to imipenem/cilastatin alone. Clinical response rates were 97.1%, 98.7% and 98.8%, respectively. All 23 ME patients with imipenem non-susceptible pathogens had favourable DCIV microbiological responses (100% in each group). Among all 298 patients treated, 28.3%, 29.3% and 30.0% of patients, respectively, had treatment-emergent adverse events. The most common treatment-related adverse events across groups (1.0%-4.0%) were diarrhoea, nausea and headache. Conclusions: Imipenem/cilastatinâ¯+â¯relebactam (250 or 125 mg) was as effective as imipenem/cilastatin alone for treatment of cUTI. Both relebactam-containing regimens were well tolerated. (NCT01505634).
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Cilastatina/uso terapéutico , Imipenem/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intravenosa , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/efectos adversos , Cilastatina/administración & dosificación , Cilastatina/efectos adversos , Combinación Cilastatina e Imipenem , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , Imipenem/administración & dosificación , Imipenem/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Pielonefritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Adulto Joven , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Publication bias within systematic reviews may result in incorrect conclusions leading to inappropriate clinical decisions and a decreased quality of patient care. Searching clinical trial registries for unpublished studies is one possible solution to minimise publication bias. OBJECTIVES: To examine rates of clinical trial registry searches in systematic reviews published in respected anaesthesiology journals and whether these searches found trials (or data) eligible for inclusion; to compare rates of registry searches between published reviews and similar reviews within the Cochrane Anaesthesia, Critical and Emergency Care Group; to conduct trial registry searches for a subset of reviews, determining whether eligible studies were overlooked; to investigate whether reporting of results in completed anaesthesia trials on ClinicalTrials.gov followed guidelines. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in 10 anaesthesiology journals and the Cochrane Library. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for systematic reviews or meta-analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the number of systematic reviews that searched clinical trial registries for unpublished trials. Secondary outcomes included the number of registered trials in the ClinicalTrial.gov registry and the number of trials reporting trial results which were available on the ClinicalTrials.gov database and which should have been considered in a systematic review. RESULTS: The PubMed search yielded 507 records, and 415 remained after exclusions. Of these, 49 (11.8%) included a search of clinical trial registries. In total, 12 systematic reviews reported finding unpublished data but only five incorporated the data into their analyses. Of the Cochrane reviews, 58.9% (43/73) reported registry searches. Among a sample of 30 systematic reviews that omitted registry searches, we found many studies within the registries that were probably eligible to be included in the systematic reviews. For completed trials within the ClinicalTrials.gov database, only 15.4% reported results. CONCLUSION: The majority of systematic reviews in anaesthesiology did not include data from clinical trial registries. Exclusion of statistically nonsignificant data may lead to a biased interpretation of the data and hence inappropriate clinical interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000021932).
Asunto(s)
Anestesiología/estadística & datos numéricos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Literatura de Revisión como Asunto , Estudios Transversales , HumanosRESUMEN
This study examines adverse events and durability of response of SER-109, an investigational microbiome therapeutic comprised of purified Firmicutes spores, compared with placebo for Clostridioides difficile infection.